Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

Additional resources

Chapter 7 
The nature and development of human rights
Domestic documents and guaranteed freedom of speech for those who spoke in parliament
and ensured that no one would be imprisoned without trial. This
treaties represented an important transfer of power from the monarchy to
parliament.

Magna Carta (1215) (UK)


United States Declaration of
The Magna Carta is a document that certain rebellious nobles Independence (1776)
forced King John of England to sign in 1215, limiting the king’s
power in a number of ways. The king promised that there would The US Declaration of Independence was really a declaration
be no interference from the king in the running of the Church, that of war against the repressive British Government. The most
no new taxes would be imposed without agreement, that no free important statement in the declaration, which was primarily
man would be imprisoned without a trial, that all free men could written by political philosopher Thomas Jefferson, was that ‘all
travel anywhere they wished, and that towns would keep all the men are created equal’. The foundation of this declaration is the
privileges that they had built up over the years. concept that rights are seen to exist because we all think and feel
them. In other words, all citizens are entitled to basic rights and
freedoms. Furthermore, they should be entitled to fight in order
Habeas Corpus Act 1679 (UK) to preserve these rights. In short, the Declaration of Independence
stipulated that we do not have to be told that we have the right to
The Habeas Corpus Act declared that the lawfulness of detention
freedom – instead, we believe it instinctively.
must be tested quickly by the courts. This means that people could
not be held indefinitely without being charged or facing trial.
United States Constitution (1787)
English Bill of Rights (1688) (UK) After winning the War of Independence (1776–83) against Britain,
a constitution was written by the newly independent government
The English Bill of Rights was part of the agreement for reinstating
of what would become the United States. The Constitution created
the monarchy in England after the popular overthrow and
a federal union of the existing 13 states. This union came into
expulsion (from England) of King James II in 1688. In his place,
existence in 1789 and was called the United States of America.
William of Orange and his wife, Mary, were invited to take the
What was then a novel idea was contained in the Constitution:
throne of England on the condition that William agree to a bill
the separation of powers of the three branches of governement:
of rights. This was to prevent a return to the anti‐parliament
legislative, executive and judicial. The concept originated from
policies of James II and two earlier kings: Charles I and Charles
the thinking of the French philosopher Montesquieu and was
II. The English Bill of Rights forbade the king from raising an
designed to prevent any branch of government from becoming
army or levying taxes without the consent of parliament. It also
too powerful.

    1
ISBN 978-1-107-69460-6 © Paul Milgate, Daryl Le Cornu, Sarah Hawke, Ann Miller, Tim Kelly, Kevin Steed, Phil Webster 2013 Cambridge University Press
Photocopying is restricted under law and this material must not be transferred to another party
United States Bill of Rights (1789) It represents the most advanced thinking in the area of human
rights up to that time in history. The US Bill of Rights has become

The US Bill of Rights is in fact the original 10 amendments to the the cornerstone of the US legal system, and has heavily influenced

US Constitution. Due to concern that the new Constitution did later human rights documents all round the world.

not provide safeguards against a future government violating


the rights of its citizens, it was amended. These 10 amendments Declaration of the Rights of Man
included such rights as the freedom of assembly, speech, religion
(1789) (France)
and the press.
The Fifth Amendment may be familiar to students. Part of this In 1789, after the French Revolution, the French National Assembly
amendment states that a defendant should not be compelled to proclaimed the Declaration of the Rights of Man. This declaration is
take the stand in a court case and, in so doing, be a witness against similar to the US Bill of Rights. In 1791, some of the rights from this
themselves. This is popularly referred to as ‘taking the Fifth’. declaration were written into the short‐lived French Constitution.
Another part of the US Bill of Rights that may be known to However, many of the freedoms stated in the Declaration of the
students is the Second Amendment, which states: ‘A well regulated Rights of Man were violated in the chaos of the revolutionary
Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right years that followed and were curtailed under the rule of Napoleon
of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed’. The Bonaparte (1799–1812). Nevertheless, the ideas contained in
original intention of this amendment was to prevent any future this French document spread to the European states that were
government from becoming too powerful and taking away the conquered by the French during Bonaparte’s rule and served to
rights of its citizens by allowing the population to arm itself. Today, inspire their own political progress and sense of nationalism.
however, the ‘right of the people to keep and bear arms’ is used
by powerful US pro‐gun lobby groups, such as the National Rifle
Association (NRA), to oppose limitations on the right of citizens to Four Freedoms Speech (1941) (US)
own or use guns.
Since 1791 another 17 amendments have been added to the This speech was given to Congress by US President Franklin
Constitution. Roosevelt on 6 January 1941. World War II had been raging in
One of the most famous amendments is the Thirteenth Europe for nearly one and a half years and it looked as if Hitler’s
Amendment, which brought about the abolition of slavery after dream of conquering all Europe to form a Third Reich would come
the Civil War in 1865. about. At this stage the United States was not at war. Despite the
Another interesting amendment was the Eighteenth fact that President Roosevelt felt that military force was now the
Amendment. Passed in 1919, it forbade the sale of alcohol in the only way to stop Nazi aggression, the US Congress would not
United States. However, it is now generally agreed that this legal allow the United States to join in the war. It was in this context that
attempt to discourage the use of alcohol backfired, and in fact Roosevelt made this speech, in which he laid down the values that
encouraged the growth of organised crime. In 1933, the Twenty‐ the world should hold dear. These values were incorporated in the
first Amendment repealed the Eighteenth Amendment. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) seven years later:
In 1920 the Nineteenth Amendment was passed. It prohibits ££ freedom of speech

denying any person the right to vote on the basis of their gender – ££ freedom of belief

paving the way for women being granted the vote. ££ freedom from want

Many of the rights enshrined in the US Bill of Rights are based ££ freedom from fear.

on the principles of the historic documents discussed above, from


the Magna Carta onwards. Therefore, the US Bill of Rights is viewed
as a significant landmark in the development of human rights.

2
ISBN 978-1-107-69460-6 © Paul Milgate, Daryl Le Cornu, Sarah Hawke, Ann Miller, Tim Kelly, Kevin Steed, Phil Webster 2013 Cambridge University Press
Photocopying is restricted under law and this material must not be transferred to another party
International documents not part of the war. Britain was under threat of being invaded by
Germany, which had conquered most of Europe over the previous
and treaties two years. Roosevelt and Churchill placed issues of human security
at the forefront of plans for a postwar peace, stating that:

Treaty of Versailles (1919) ££ territorial changes should only occur with the ‘freely expressed
wishes of the people’
In 1919, the countries that emerged victorious from World War I ££ the ‘right of all peoples to choose the form of government

held a peace conference at Versailles in France. The result was the under which they live’ should be respected, so that
establishment, for the first time in history, of a world body with the ££ ‘all men in all lands may live out their lives in freedom from

primary aim of preventing war – the League of Nations. fear and want’.
This focus on prevention of war can now be described as a The Atlantic Charter was the first official step in the process of
collective right to peace. When the treaty was signed, the concept the creation of an international organisation to guarantee peace
of individual human rights was still in its infancy. The framers of and security. On 1 January 1942, little more than three weeks after
the League of Nations were more focused on the rights of states Pearl Harbor, the Atlantic Charter was endorsed by the ‘Declaration
and peoples to be able to rule themselves free from the threat of the United Nations’ by the United States, Britain, the Soviet
of oppression by more powerful states. This is now called the Union and 22 other nations that had joined the war against Hitler
collective right to self‐determination. Concern for the right to and his allies. This declaration pledged the signature countries to
self‐determination did not extend beyond the continent of Europe. use their full resources against the Axis Powers and to agree not to
In other words, the countries that signed the Treaty of Versailles make a separate peace.
were not very interested in self-determination for those peoples of Some commentators argue that the Atlantic Charter was a
Africa, Asia and the Pacific who lived in the colonies ruled by the visionary document which laid the foundations of the United
imperial powers of Europe. Nations, the European Union, NATO, the UDHR and all human
rights treaties.

League of Nations (1920) The two treaties examined below were written at about the
same time as the Universal Declararion of Human Rights (UDHR).
The main aim of the League of Nations was the prevention of
They have a different origin from the UDHR, but overlap in their
war. The League upheld the notion that all states have the right
concerns for the welfare of all human beings.
not to be threatened or attacked. All member nations pledged
to stick by the principle of collective security, which meant that
all members would protect any country that was being attacked Genocide Convention (1948)
by an aggressor. However, it was the League’s dramatic failure on
this very point that led to its being discredited and ignored by the The Genocide Convention was adopted by the UN General
international community. In the 1930s, the League was ineffective Assembly in 1948 and came into force in 1951. The main reason for
in preventing the aggression by Germany, Japan and Italy against the drafting of this Convention was the widespread condemnation
weaker nations, which ultimately led to the outbreak of World War of the war crimes perpetrated against the Jews in the
II in 1939. The League of Nations was formally dissolved in 1946. concentration camps of Nazi Germany – particularly information
that became available at the trials of the Nazi leaders in the case
USA, France, UK, and USSR v Hermann Goering et al. (1945–46
Atlantic Charter (1941) IMT, Nuremberg).
This declaration has been described as the ‘high‐water mark’
In August 1941, President Roosevelt of the United States and Prime
for human rights because it was the first time in history that
Minister Winston Churchill of Great Britain signed an agreement,
genocide was officially made a crime. The treaty was developed
known as the Atlantic Charter, designed to act as a blueprint for
at around the same time as the UDHR, though by a separate
the world after World War II. At this time, the United States was still

    3
ISBN 978-1-107-69460-6 © Paul Milgate, Daryl Le Cornu, Sarah Hawke, Ann Miller, Tim Kelly, Kevin Steed, Phil Webster 2013 Cambridge University Press
Photocopying is restricted under law and this material must not be transferred to another party
committee and with no collusion between the two committees. It
differs from the UDHR in that it is the first piece of hard law drawn
Review 7.10
up by the United Nations. This means that, theoretically, it can be 1 How did the Magna Carta, the Habeas Corpus Act and
enforced. English Bill of Rights limit the sovereign’s power?
Although the Genocide Convention was effective in securing
2 What introductory statement in the US Declaration of
nearly universal condemnation of genocide, it failed to motivate
Independence is mirrored in Article 1 of the UDHR?
politicians and diplomats to take concrete measures to ensure that
3 What amendment in the US Bill of Rights is referred to
these crimes could not occur in the future. Also, by the time the
repeatedly by the US pro‐gun lobby today?
Convention was written, the Cold War was just beginning. During
4 What postwar international organisations, treaties or
the Cold War (1947–91) there was very little cooperation between
documents did the Atlantic Charter lay the foundations
the superpowers – including taking steps to give enforceable
for?
powers to the Genocide Convention. It was not until the creation
of the International Criminal Court in 2002 that the Genocide 5 What area of international law do the Geneva
Convention was made legally enforceable. Conventions belong to?
6 How has the Genocide Convention been strengthened
in recent years?
Geneva Conventions (1949)
Another major development in human rights that has its origins
in the 19th century was the establishment of laws of war. Jus in
bello is Latin for ‘law in war’. These laws define the conduct and
responsibilities of warring states in terms of treatment of non‐
combatants and civilians in wartime. Examples of the laws of war
include not firing on someone who is carrying a white flag and
not attacking a building, truck or ship with a red cross on it. Henry
Dunant, who founded the organisation that was to become the
Red Cross, in 1863, played a pioneering role in the establishment of
the rules of war.
The Red Cross was one of the first global NGOs to be formed.
Not only did the Red Cross pioneer humanitarian work to alleviate
the suffering of wounded soldiers and prisoners of war, it also
championed the development of rules of war, which today we
refer to as international humanitarian law.
The Red Cross sponsored an international conference in
St Petersburg in 1868 and the resulting convention outlawed
the use of exploding bullets and poison gas. There was further
development of the rules of war at the Hague Conferences of
1899 and 1907. International humanitarian law was also furthered
by the Geneva Conventions of 1864, 1906, 1929 and 1949. All the
decisions of the earlier conferences were ratified in 1949 and are
now simply called the Geneva Conventions.
Nearly all states of the world today are signatories to the four
treaties that make up the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and to the
three additional protocols to the Geneva Conventions that were
added in 1977.

4
ISBN 978-1-107-69460-6 © Paul Milgate, Daryl Le Cornu, Sarah Hawke, Ann Miller, Tim Kelly, Kevin Steed, Phil Webster 2013 Cambridge University Press
Photocopying is restricted under law and this material must not be transferred to another party

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi