Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ARTHI 5005
James Elkins
jelkins@artic.edu
Syllabus
Revised Friday, September 3, 2004
Original location of this syllabus:
http://www.jameselkins.com/syllabi.html
The textbook, Our Beautiful, Dry, and Distant Texts, argues that it is not sufficient just to
study a series of methodologies (psychoanalysis, feminisms, semiotics, etc.) because
that leaves unsaid how a scholar knows when to choose a given method, or which one
is most important, or which is most apposite to the art historical material at hand.
Much art historical writing moves from one method to another without justifying the
transitions or choices (“now I will present some concepts from Lacan… and here it is
interesting to consider the concept of the liminal…”). Our Beautiful, Dry, and Distant
Texts is an attempt to step back and consider the desire for theories and the ways of
thinking about the relation between theories and art historical material.
Ideally, Our Beautiful, Dry, and Distant Texts would be an “advanced” historiography
course, after the course that introduces psychoanalysis, semiotics, etc. In this course,
the student presentations serve to introduce the methodologies, and the textbooks
serve to question how those theories are usually taught and applied.
CUR R ENT A R T H IS TOR Y - 2 - S Y L L A BU S
Class requirements
(a) Participation, and preparation of critical notes on the texts. These should be 1 or 2
pages long, and should consist of your critiques and questions regarding particular
points in the texts. Use them in class to guide your questions; I will collect them after
each class. (40 % of the grade)
(b) Presentation of a paper on an individual historian. (40% of the grade.) The paper
consists of three parts:
i. A bibliography of the historian, as thorough as you can manage. (Between one
and 10,000 pages.)
ii. An introduction to the historian’s work (5 pp.)
iii. A critical essay on a single chapter or essay (10 pp.)
iv. A critical analysis of the historian’s work. Can you use the historian’s
methods and approach? What are the historian’s strengths and limitations?
(5 pp.)
(c) Revision of the paper, due at the end of the semester. (20% of the grade.)
Papers need to be finished a week in advance; you should copy them for everyone, and
hand them out so everyone can read them before the following week’s class. You
should also include illustrations or URLs for the relevant artwork. Reading other
students’ papers before class is also required. On weeks when students are
presenting, you are responsible for reading their papers exactly as if they were
required readings: you still need to prepare 1-2 pages of notes, to be handed in after
class.
The presentations should be about 20 minutes; we’ll follow them with discussion.
Presenters should not read from their papers, but outline the possibilities for further
research. Be sure to prepare lecture notes in advance, so you have 20 minutes of
material that is not in your paper. Two or three students may collaborate in one
presentation; in that case, the paper should be in separate sections with the authors
identified.
CUR R ENT A R T H IS TOR Y - 3 - S Y L L A BU S
Textbooks:
1. My book, Our Beautiful, Dry, and Distant Texts: Art History as Writing,, which available
online.
Chapters of this book are identified by name in the readings (for instance
“Elkins, ‘On Half-Consciousness’”)
5. Other readings will be “on reserve” in the mail room on the 6th floor, beyond the
Art History office.
That is an honor system: borrow the copy, Xerox it, return the original. (Like
Flaxman reserve, but without the hassle.) Some readings may also be posted on
the website.
Research:
Research should be thorough. I will expect everyone to have gone through the full list
on the MA Research page in the Department’s web pages
:
http://www.artic.edu/webspaces/arthi/Research.html
Research is very important: if I find sources on one of the databases listed on that page,
and you haven’t found them, your paper may be lowered by one grade. Plan on spending
several days searching for bibliographic information. Texts in languages you don’t read
should still be listed.
CUR R ENT A R T H IS TOR Y - 4 - S Y L L A BU S
Schedule of classes:
These are the dates of the classes, and the topics for each class. Be sure to do the
reading before the class (except the first week).
Read this schedule carefully: days I will be out of town are rescheduled for Fridays and
Saturdays.
9: Feminisms
Toril Moi, What is a Woman? (Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1999)
Hélène Cixous, “Coming to Writing” And Other Essays (Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press, 1991)
Judith Butler, Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex” (New
York: Routledge, 1993)
New Feminist Art Criticism: Critical Srategies, edited by Katie Deepwell
(New York: Manchester University Press, 1995), selections to
be announced.
A bibliography of Hélène Cixous is at:
http://sun3.lib.uci.edu/~scctr/Wellek/cixous/index.html
A bibliography of Judith Butler is at:
http://sun3.lib.uci.edu/~scctr/Wellek/butler/
CUR R ENT A R T H IS TOR Y - 7 - S Y L L A BU S
10: Semiotics
“Problems with Peirce,” essay on the website
http://www.jameselkins.com/worksinprogress.html
Alex Potts, “Sign,” in Critical Terms for Art History, edited by Rob
Nelson and Richard Shiff (Chicago, 1996), 17-30
CUR R ENT A R T H IS TOR Y - 8 - S Y L L A BU S
Papers should be chosen from the books on this list. Texts in the first section will be
assigned, or you can pick them on a first-come, first-served basis. The second section
gives more choices.
If you read French, Italian, or German, I may assign books in those languages.
Hans Belting, Art History After Modernism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
2002).
-- or --
Hans Belting, The Invisible Masterpiece, translated by Helen Atkins (Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 2001).
Reviewed unfavorably by Charles Harrison in Bookforum 8 no. 4 (2002): 38.
-- or --
* Hans Belting, The Germans and Their Art: A Troublesome Relationship, translated by
Scott Kleager (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
Michael Ann Holly, Past Looking (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1999[?]).
Svetlana Alpers and Michael Baxandall, Tiepolo and the Pictorial Intelligence (New
Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994).
Hubert Damisch, Traité du trait: Tractatus Tractus (Paris: Reunion des Musées
Nationaux, 1995)
Julia Kristeva, Visions capitales (Paris: Reunion des musées nationaux, 1998)
* Thomas Crow, The Intelligence of Art (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North
Carolina Press, 1999).
Jacques Derrida and Paule Thévenin, The Secret Art of Antonin Artaud
(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998). ISBN 0-262-04165-0
Ján Bakos, Styri trasy metodologie dejin umenia (Bratislava: Veda, 2000).
(This is if you read Slovakian.)
Texts relevant to art historical problems, but not quite in art history:
CUR R ENT A R T H IS TOR Y - 10 - S Y L L A BU S
Claude Lévi-Strauss, Look, Listen, Read, translated by Brian Singer (New York:
Basic Book, 1997).
Whitney Davis, Drawing the Dream of the Wolves (Bloomington, IN: Indiana
University Press, 1995).
-- or --
Whitney Davis, Replications: Archaeology, Art History, Psychoanalysis (University Park
PA: Penn State Press, 1996).
l’Image, textes choisis et presentés par Laurent Lavaud (Paris: Gallimard, 1995).
Sites of Vision: The Discursive Construction of Sight in the History of Philosophy, edited by
David Levin (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997). ISBN 0-262-62129-0
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend, For and Against Method, edited and with an
introduction by Matteo Motterlini (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
1999). $34.00
Carlo Ginzburg, History, Rhetoric, and Proof: The Menahem Stern Jerusalem Lectures
(Brandeis University Press/Historical Society of Israel/Published by the
University Press of New England, 1999). $14.95
CUR R ENT A R T H IS TOR Y - 11 - S Y L L A BU S
These are recent anthologies from which you may pick essays for your paper. I
recommend these as a last resort, because it takes an extra week to find the book and
choose the essay:
The Subjects of Art History, edited by Michael Ann Holly, Keith Moxey, and Mark
Cheetham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)
Critical Terms for Art History, edited by Robert Nelson and Richard Shiff (Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1996)
Kunstgeschichte: Aber Wie? Zehn Themen und Beispiele (Berlin: Dietrich Riemer)
ISBN 3-496-00971-3
The Changing Status of the Artist:, edited by Emma Barker, Nick Webb, and Kim
Woods (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999)
Gender and Art, edited by Gill Perry (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999)