“Argumentation Ethics and Liberty: A Concise Guide”

(2011) and Supplemental Resources

by STEPHAN KINSELLA on JANUARY 1, 2015

My article “Argumentation Ethics and Liberty: A Concise Guide” was published in Mises
Daily (May 27, 2011) (it includes “Discourse Ethics and Liberty: A Skeletal Ebook”
[archived comments on Mises thread]). Below I note some relevant supplemental
material that has been published since or that I have been made aware of that was not
noted in the original article, and a few pieces with missing links from the original. It was
also discussed on the Mises blog when published (archived comments)
 Hans Hermann Hoppe, “On The Ethics of Argumentation” (PFS 2016)
 The A priori of Argumention, video introduction by Hoppe
 Lecture 3 of my 2011 Mises Academy course, “The Social Theory of Hoppe”
(slides here)
 Lecture 2 of my 2011 Mises Academy course, “Libertarian Legal Theory: Property,
Conflict, and Society” (slides here)
 Kinsella, The Genesis of Estoppel: My Libertarian Rights
Theory, StephanKinsella.com (March 22, 2016)
 ————, Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics and Its
Critics, StephanKinsella.com (Aug. 11, 2015)
 Roger Pilon, “A Theory of Rights: Toward Limited Government“
 Alan Gewirth, “The Basis and Content of Human Rights“
 Pilon, “Ordering Rights Consistently: Or, What We Do and Do Not Have Rights To“
 Michaël Bauwens, “Rights, Robinson Crusoe, and Friday,” Independent
Institute (Oct. 13, 2008)
 Cezary Błaszczyk, “The Critique of Copyright in Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s
Argumentation Ethics,” Studia Iuridica (2017)
 Dave Burns, “What is incompatible with argumentation?,”Liberty Roadmap (Dec.
31, 2014)
 ————, “What did Hoppe’s critics miss?” (Dec 28, 2014)
 ————, “Hoppe questions” (Dec. 26, 2014)
 ————, “Frederick versus Hoppe” (Dec. 22, 2014)
 ————, “That which argumentation presupposes” (Dec. 15, 2014)
 ————, “We ought not argue” (Dec. 14, 2014)
 ————, “Who owns my brain?” (Dec. 12, 2014)
 ————, “Argumentation Presupposes Self-ownership” (Dec. 10, 2014)
 ————, “Understanding Hoppe” (Nov. 27, 2014)
 ————, “Reverse-engineering Hoppe” (Nov. 12, 2014)
 ————, “Notes on Long versus Hoppe” (Oct. 29, 2014)
 Christophe Cieters, “Nietzschean Libertarianism: The how and why of the free
market morality” (Thesis Academiejaar 2009-2010, 2010)
 Danny Frederick, “Hoppe’s Derivation of Self-Ownership from Argumentation:
Analysis and Critique,” Reason Papers, Vol. 35, no. 1 (July 2013)
 Spooner Bookman, “Critique of Danny Frederick’s Critique of Hans-Hermann
Hoppe’s Derivation of Self-Ownership from Argumentation“
 ‫אומלל מדע‬, Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics: A User Friendly, Neighborly Introduction,
(Dec. 25, 2011)
 Walter Block, “Rejoinder to Murphy and Callahan on Hoppe’s Argumentation
Ethics,” Journal of Libertarian Studies 22:1 (2011)
 Konrad Graf, “Action-Based Jurisprudence: Praxeological Legal Theory in Relation
to Economic Theory, Ethics, and Legal Practice,” Libertarian Papers 3, 19 (Aug. 13,
2011)
 Terrell, Timothy D. “Property Rights and Externalities: The Ethics of the
Austrian School,” Journal of Markets and Morality 2, no. 2. 1999.
 Janne Wilhelm & Florian Klugler, Hoppe’s Theory of Property Rights, Ethics, and
UPB and How Do Morality, Emotions and Rational Thinking Fit Together? (PDF);
and Bogdan Dabrowski, Mises’ Human Action & Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics
applied to Psychology, Philosophy Europe Convention, Cryptoanarchy Institute,
Prague (Sept. 12, 2015);
 Young, Andrew T.. 2015. “Argumentation Ethics and the Question of Self-
Ownership.”The Journal of Private Enterprise 30(3) Fall: 79–88.
 van Dun, Frank. 2015. “Reply to Andrew Young’s “Argumentation Ethics and the
Question of Self-Ownership”.” The Journal of Private Enterprise 30(3) Fall: 89–
102.
 Argumentation Ethics: A Praxeological failure, by egoutilitarianism (kenshikenji)
(March 7, 2016) (see also the corresonding YouTube video by Ego-Utilitarianism)
 Argumentation ethics (Wikipedia)
 “Argumentation Ethics and Liberty: A Concise Guide” (2011) (Audio)
 KOL218 | Argumentation Ethics – Patterson in Pursuit
 KOL155 | “The Social Theory of Hoppe: Lecture 3: Libertarian Rights and
Argumentation Ethics”
 “Argumentation Ethics, Estoppel, and Libertarian Rights: Adam Smith Forum,
Moscow”
 “Argumentation Ethics, Estoppel, and Libertarian Rights: Transcript”
 “Libertarian Legal Theory: Property, Conflict, and Society: Lecture 1: Libertarian
Basics: Rights and Law”
 “Libertarian Legal Theory: Property, Conflict, and Society: Lecture 2: Libertarian
Basics: Rights and Law-Continued”