Decision Variables Revenue/Ton Prod Cost Ship Cost Profit Margin

a 55608 SM-Chicago $ 750 $ 89.77 $ 390 $ 270.23

b 64976 SM-Dallas $ 750 $ 162.24 $ 390 $ 197.76
c 0 SM-NO $ 750 $ 166.18 $ 390 $ 193.82
d 23832 SM-Denver $ 750 $ 151.77 $ 390 $ 208.23
e 0 SM-SF $ 750 $ 151.11 $ 390 $ 208.89
f 40727 NM-Seattle $ 750 $ 46.68 $ 415 $ 288.32
g 0 NM-Chicago $ 750 $ 128.82 $ 415 $ 206.18
h 27704 NM-Dallas $ 750 $ 204.13 $ 415 $ 130.87 Seattle
i 92680 NM-NO $ 750 $ 195.08 $ 415 $ 139.92 Chicago
j 0 NM-Denver $ 750 $ 162.83 $ 415 $ 172.17 Dallas
k 22401 NM-LA $ 750 $ 147.46 $ 415 $ 187.54 NO
l 52960 NM-SF $ 750 $ 115.49 $ 415 $ 219.51 Denver
m 0 NM-Vancouver $ 700 $ 72.42 $ 415 $ 212.58 LA
n 0 NM-Calgary $ 700 $ 77.50 $ 415 $ 207.50 SF
o 0 DU-Seattle $ 750 $ 52.80 $ 415 $ 282.20 Vancouver
p 0 DU-Chicago $ 750 $ 97.17 $ 415 $ 237.83 Calgary
q 0 DU-Dallas $ 750 $ 210.42 $ 415 $ 124.58
r 0 DU-NO $ 750 $ 200.62 $ 415 $ 134.38
s 0 DU-Denver $ 750 $ 142.82 $ 415 $ 192.18
t 189440 DU-LA $ 750 $ 150.14 $ 415 $ 184.86
u 0 DU-SF $ 750 $ 124.83 $ 415 $ 210.17
v 32581 DU-Vancouver $ 700 $ 42.17 $ 415 $ 242.83
w 8145 DU-Calgary $ 700 $ 87.94 $ 415 $ 197.06
144,416 Total Capacity <= 166,320
236,472 Total Capacity <= 272,340
230,166 Total Capacity <= 265,077

144,416 Total Operating Level >= 133,056

236,472 Total Operating Level >= 217,340
230,166 Total Operating Level >= 212,062
40,727 Total Demand = 40,727
55,608 Total Demand = 55,608
92,680 Total Demand = 92,680
92,680 Total Demand = 92,680
23,832 Total Demand = 23,832
211,841 Total Demand = 211,841
52,960 Total Demand = 52,960
32,581 Total Demand = 32,581
8,145 Total Demand = 8,145

Max Profits $ 121,537,867.15

Microsoft Excel 14.0 Answer Report
Worksheet: [NorthwestNewsprintV2.xlsx]AfterOptimization
Report Created: 1/7/2016 1:11:33 AM
Result: Solver found a solution. All Constraints and optimality conditions are satisfied.
Solver Engine
Engine: Simplex LP
Solution Time: 0.046 Seconds.
Iterations: 19 Subproblems: 0
Solver Options
Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision 0.000001, Use Automatic Scaling
Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance 1%, Assume NonNegative

Objective Cell (Max)

Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$K$19 Max Profits $ 121,537,867.15 $ 125,460,012.75

Variable Cells
Cell Name Original Value Final Value Integer
$B$2 a Decision Variables 55608 0 Contin
$B$3 b Decision Variables 64976 92680 Contin
$B$4 c Decision Variables 0 73640 Contin
$B$5 d Decision Variables 23832 0 Contin
$B$6 e Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$7 f Decision Variables 40727 40727 Contin
$B$8 g Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$9 h Decision Variables 27704 0 Contin
$B$10 i Decision Variables 92680 19040 Contin
$B$11 j Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$12 k Decision Variables 22401 96654 Contin
$B$13 l Decision Variables 52960 52960 Contin
$B$14 m Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$15 n Decision Variables 0 8145 Contin
$B$16 o Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$17 p Decision Variables 0 55608 Contin
$B$18 q Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$19 r Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$20 s Decision Variables 0 23832 Contin
$B$21 t Decision Variables 189440 115187 Contin
$B$22 u Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$23 v Decision Variables 32581 32581 Contin
$B$24 w Decision Variables 8145 0 Contin

Constraints
Cell Name Cell Value Formula Status Slack
$I$2 SM-Chicago 166,320 $I$2<=$K$2 Binding 0
$I$3 SM-Dallas 217,526 $I$3<=$K$3 Not Binding 54814
$I$4 SM-NO 227,208 $I$4<=$K$4 Not Binding 37869
$I$6 SM-SF 166,320 $I$6>=$K$6 Not Binding 33,264
$I$7 NM-Seattle 217,526 $I$7>=$K$7 Not Binding 186
$I$8 NM-Chicago 227,208 $I$8>=$K$8 Binding -
$I$9 Seattle 40,727 $I$9=$K$9 Binding 0
$I$10 Chicago 55,608 $I$10=$K$10 Binding 0
$I$11 Dallas 92,680 $I$11=$K$11 Binding 0
$I$12 NO 92,680 $I$12=$K$12 Binding 0
$I$13 Denver 23,832 $I$13=$K$13 Binding 0
$I$14 LA 211,841 $I$14=$K$14 Binding 0
$I$15 SF 52,960 $I$15=$K$15 Binding 0
$I$16 Vancouver 32,581 $I$16=$K$16 Binding 0
$I$17 Calgary 8,145 $I$17=$K$17 Binding 0
Microsoft Excel 14.0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [NorthwestNewsprintV2.xlsx]AfterOptimization
Report Created: 1/7/2016 1:11:34 AM

Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
$B$2 a Decision Variables 0 -24.18 270.23 24.18 1E+030
$B$3 b Decision Variables 92680 0 197.76 1E+030 12.99
$B$4 c Decision Variables 73640 0 193.82 12.99 24.18
$B$5 d Decision Variables 0 -40.53 208.23 40.53 1E+030
$B$6 e Decision Variables 0 -64.52 208.89 64.52 1E+030
$B$7 f Decision Variables 40727 0 288.32 1E+030 3.44
$B$8 g Decision Variables 0 -34.33 206.18 34.33 1E+030
$B$9 h Decision Variables 0 -12.99 130.87 12.99 1E+030
$B$10 i Decision Variables 19040 0 139.92 24.18 2.86
$B$11 j Decision Variables 0 -22.69 172.17 22.69 1E+030
$B$12 k Decision Variables 96654 0 187.54 2.86 2.68
$B$13 l Decision Variables 52960 0 219.51 1E+030 6.66
$B$14 m Decision Variables 0 -32.93 212.58 32.93 1E+030
$B$15 n Decision Variables 8145 0 207.5 1E+030 7.76
$B$16 o Decision Variables 0 -3.44 282.2 3.44 1E+030
$B$17 p Decision Variables 55608 0 237.83 1E+030 24.18
$B$18 q Decision Variables 0 -16.6 124.58 16.6 1E+030
$B$19 r Decision Variables 0 -2.86 134.38 2.86 1E+030
$B$20 s Decision Variables 23832 0 192.18 1E+030 22.69
$B$21 t Decision Variables 115187 0 184.86 2.68 2.86
$B$22 u Decision Variables 0 -6.66 210.17 6.66 1E+030
$B$23 v Decision Variables 32581 0 242.83 1E+030 32.93
$B$24 w Decision Variables 0 -7.76 197.06 7.76 1E+030

Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
$I$2 SM-Chicago 166320 53.9 166320 186 33264
$I$3 SM-Dallas 217526 0 272340 1E+030 54814
$I$4 SM-NO 227208 0 265077 1E+030 37869
$I$6 SM-SF 166320 0 133056 33264 1E+030
$I$7 NM-Seattle 217526 0 217340 186 1E+030
$I$8 NM-Chicago 227208 -2.68 227208 186 54814
$I$9 Seattle 40727 288.32 40727 54814 186
$I$10 Chicago 55608 240.51 55608 54814 186
$I$11 Dallas 92680 143.86 92680 54814 186
$I$12 NO 92680 139.92 92680 54814 186
$I$13 Denver 23832 194.86 23832 54814 186
$I$14 LA 211841 187.54 211841 54814 186
$I$15 SF 52960 219.51 52960 54814 186
$I$16 Vancouver 32581 245.51 32581 54814 186
$I$17 Calgary 8145 207.5 8145 54814 186
Microsoft Excel 14.0 Limits Report
Worksheet: [NorthwestNewsprintV2.xlsx]AfterOptimization
Report Created: 1/7/2016 1:11:34 AM

Objective
Cell Name Value
$K$19 Max Profits $ 125,460,012.75

Variable Lower Objective Upper Objective

Cell Name Value Limit Result Limit Result
$B$2 a Decision Variables 0 0 125460012.8 0 125460012.8
$B$3 b Decision Variables 92680 92680 125460012.8 92680 125460012.8
$B$4 c Decision Variables 73640 73640 125460012.8 73640 125460012.8
$B$5 d Decision Variables 0 0 125460012.8 0 125460012.8
$B$6 e Decision Variables 0 0 125460012.8 0 125460012.8
$B$7 f Decision Variables 40727 40727 125460012.8 40727 125460012.8
$B$8 g Decision Variables 0 0 125460012.8 0 125460012.8
$B$9 h Decision Variables 0 0 125460012.8 0 125460012.8
$B$10 i Decision Variables 19040 19040 125460012.8 19040 125460012.8
$B$11 j Decision Variables 0 0 125460012.8 0 125460012.8
$B$12 k Decision Variables 96654 96654 125460012.8 96654 125460012.8
$B$13 l Decision Variables 52960 52960 125460012.8 52960 125460012.8
$B$14 m Decision Variables 0 0 125460012.8 0 125460012.8
$B$15 n Decision Variables 8145 8145 125460012.8 8145 125460012.8
$B$16 o Decision Variables 0 0 125460012.8 0 125460012.8
$B$17 p Decision Variables 55608 55608 125460012.8 55608 125460012.8
$B$18 q Decision Variables 0 0 125460012.8 0 125460012.8
$B$19 r Decision Variables 0 0 125460012.8 0 125460012.8
$B$20 s Decision Variables 23832 23832 125460012.8 23832 125460012.8
$B$21 t Decision Variables 115187 115187 125460012.8 115187 125460012.8
$B$22 u Decision Variables 0 0 125460012.8 0 125460012.8
$B$23 v Decision Variables 32581 32581 125460012.8 32581 125460012.8
$B$24 w Decision Variables 0 0 125460012.8 0 125460012.8
 Decision Variables Revenue/Ton Prod Cost Ship Cost Profit Margin
a - SM-Chicago $ 750 $ 89.77 $ 390 $ 270.23
b 92,680 SM-Dallas $ 750 $ 162.24 $ 390 $ 197.76
c 73,640 SM-NO $ 750 $ 166.18 $ 390 $ 193.82
d - SM-Denver $ 750 $ 151.77 $ 390 $ 208.23
e - SM-SF $ 750 $ 151.11 $ 390 $ 208.89
f 40,727 NM-Seattle $ 750 $ 46.68 $ 415 $ 288.32
g - NM-Chicago $ 750 $ 128.82 $ 415 $ 206.18
h - NM-Dallas $ 750 $ 204.13 $ 415 $ 130.87 Seattle
i 19,040 NM-NO $ 750 $ 195.08 $ 415 $ 139.92 Chicago
j - NM-Denver $ 750 $ 162.83 $ 415 $ 172.17 Dallas
k 111,800 NM-LA $ 750 $ 147.46 $ 415 $ 187.54 NO
l 52,960 NM-SF $ 750 $ 115.49 $ 415 $ 219.51 Denver
m - NM-Vancouver $ 700 $ 72.42 $ 415 $ 212.58 LA
n 8,145 NM-Calgary $ 700 $ 77.50 $ 415 $ 207.50 SF
o - DU-Seattle $ 750 $ 52.80 $ 415 $ 282.20 Vancouver
p 55,608 DU-Chicago $ 750 $ 97.17 $ 415 $ 237.83 Calgary
q - DU-Dallas $ 750 $ 210.42 $ 415 $ 124.58
r - DU-NO $ 750 $ 200.62 $ 415 $ 134.38
s 23,832 DU-Denver $ 750 $ 142.82 $ 415 $ 192.18
t 100,041 DU-LA $ 750 $ 150.14 $ 415 $ 184.86
u - DU-SF $ 750 $ 124.83 $ 415 $ 210.17
v 32,581 DU-Vancouver $ 700 $ 42.17 $ 415 $ 242.83
w - DU-Calgary $ 700 $ 87.94 $ 415 $ 197.06
166,320 Total Capacity <= 166,320
232,672 Total Capacity <= 272,340
212,062 Total Capacity <= 265,077

166,320 Total Operating Level >= 133,056

232,672 Total Operating Level >= 217,340
212,062 Total Operating Level >= 212,062
40,727 Total Demand = 40,727
55,608 Total Demand = 55,608
92,680 Total Demand = 92,680
92,680 Total Demand = 92,680
23,832 Total Demand = 23,832
211,841 Total Demand = 211,841
52,960 Total Demand = 52,960
32,581 Total Demand = 32,581
8,145 Total Demand = 8,145

Max Profits $ 125,500,604.03

 Decision Variables Revenue/Ton Prod Cost Ship Cost Profit Margin
a - SM-Chicago $ 750 $ 89.77 $ 390 $ 270.23
b 92,680 SM-Dallas $ 750 $ 162.24 $ 390 $ 197.76
c 73,640 SM-NO $ 750 $ 166.18 $ 390 $ 193.82
d - SM-Denver $ 750 $ 151.77 $ 390 $ 208.23
e - SM-SF $ 750 $ 151.11 $ 390 $ 208.89
f 40,727 NM-Seattle $ 750 $ 46.68 $ 415 $ 288.32
g - NM-Chicago $ 750 $ 128.82 $ 415 $ 206.18
h - NM-Dallas $ 750 $ 204.13 $ 415 $ 130.87 Seattle
i 19,040 NM-NO $ 750 $ 195.08 $ 415 $ 139.92 Chicago
j - NM-Denver $ 750 $ 162.83 $ 415 $ 172.17 Dallas
k 111,800 NM-LA $ 750 $ 147.46 $ 394 $ 208.29 NO
l 52,960 NM-SF $ 750 $ 115.49 $ 415 $ 219.51 Denver
m - NM-Vancouver $ 700 $ 72.42 $ 415 $ 212.58 LA
n 8,145 NM-Calgary $ 700 $ 77.50 $ 415 $ 207.50 SF
o - DU-Seattle $ 750 $ 52.80 $ 415 $ 282.20 Vancouver
p 55,608 DU-Chicago $ 750 $ 97.17 $ 415 $ 237.83 Calgary
q - DU-Dallas $ 750 $ 210.42 $ 415 $ 124.58
r - DU-NO $ 750 $ 200.62 $ 415 $ 134.38
s 23,832 DU-Denver $ 750 $ 142.82 $ 415 $ 192.18
t 100,041 DU-LA $ 750 $ 150.14 $ 394 $ 205.61
u - DU-SF $ 750 $ 124.83 $ 415 $ 210.17
v 32,581 DU-Vancouver $ 700 $ 42.17 $ 415 $ 242.83
w - DU-Calgary $ 700 $ 87.94 $ 415 $ 197.06
166,320 Total Capacity <= 166,320
232,672 Total Capacity <= 272,340
212,062 Total Capacity <= 265,077

166,320 Total Operating Level >= 133,056

232,672 Total Operating Level >= 217,340
212,062 Total Operating Level >= 212,062
40,727 Total Demand = 40,727
55,608 Total Demand = 55,608
92,680 Total Demand = 92,680
92,680 Total Demand = 92,680
23,832 Total Demand = 23,832
211,841 Total Demand = 211,841
52,960 Total Demand = 52,960
32,581 Total Demand = 32,581
8,145 Total Demand = 8,145

Max Profits $ 129,896,304.78

 Decision Variables Revenue/Ton Prod Cost Ship Cost Profit Margin
a 55608 SM-Chicago $ 750 $ 89.77 $ 390 $ 270.23 SM
b 64976 SM-Dallas $ 750 $ 162.24 $ 390 $ 197.76 NM
c 0 SM-NO $ 750 $ 166.18 $ 390 $ 193.82 DU
d 23832 SM-Denver $ 750 $ 151.77 $ 390 $ 208.23
e 0 SM-SF $ 750 $ 151.11 $ 390 $ 208.89 SM
f 40727 NM-Seattle $ 750 $ 46.68 $ 415 $ 288.32 NM
g 0 NM-Chicago $ 750 $ 128.82 $ 415 $ 206.18 DU
h 27704 NM-Dallas $ 750 $ 204.13 $ 415 $ 130.87 Seattle
i 92680 NM-NO $ 750 $ 195.08 $ 415 $ 139.92 Chicago
j 0 NM-Denver $ 750 $ 162.83 $ 415 $ 172.17 Dallas
k 22401 NM-LA $ 750 $ 147.46 $ 415 $ 187.54 NO
l 52960 NM-SF $ 750 $ 115.49 $ 415 $ 219.51 Denver
m 0 NM-Vancouver $ 700 $ 72.42 $ 415 $ 212.58 LA
n 0 NM-Calgary $ 700 $ 77.50 $ 415 $ 207.50 SF
o 0 DU-Seattle $ 750 $ 52.80 $ 415 $ 282.20 Vancouver
p 0 DU-Chicago $ 750 $ 97.17 $ 415 $ 237.83 Calgary
q 0 DU-Dallas $ 750 $ 210.42 $ 415 $ 124.58
r 0 DU-NO $ 750 $ 200.62 $ 415 $ 134.38
s 0 DU-Denver $ 750 $ 142.82 $ 415 $ 192.18
t 189440 DU-LA $ 750 $ 150.14 $ 415 $ 184.86
u 0 DU-SF $ 750 $ 124.83 $ 415 $ 210.17
v 32581 DU-Vancouver $ 700 $ 42.17 $ 415 $ 242.83
w 8145 DU-Calgary $ 700 $ 87.94 $ 415 $ 197.06
144,416 Total Capacity <= 166,320
236,472 Total Capacity <= 272,340
230,166 Total Capacity <= 265,077

144,416 Total Operating Level >= 133,056

236,472 Total Operating Level >= 217,340
230,166 Total Operating Level >= 212,062
40,727 Total Demand = 40,727
55,608 Total Demand = 55,608
92,680 Total Demand = 92,680
92,680 Total Demand = 92,680
23,832 Total Demand = 23,832
211,841 Total Demand = 211,841
52,960 Total Demand = 52,960
32,581 Total Demand = 32,581
8,145 Total Demand = 8,145

Max Profits $ 121,537,867.15

Microsoft Excel 14.0 Answer Report
Worksheet: [NorthwestNewsprintV2.xlsx]AfterOptAlt1
Report Created: 1/7/2016 2:08:10 AM
Result: Solver found a solution. All Constraints and optimality conditions are satisfied.
Solver Engine
Engine: Simplex LP
Solution Time: 0.047 Seconds.
Iterations: 20 Subproblems: 0
Solver Options
Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision 0.000001, Use Automatic Scaling
Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance 1%, Assume NonNegative

Objective Cell (Max)

Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$K$19 Max Profits $ 125,451,474.27 $ 125,451,474.27

Variable Cells
Cell Name Original Value Final Value Integer
$B$2 a Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$3 b Decision Variables 92680 92680 Contin
$B$4 c Decision Variables 73640 73640 Contin
$B$5 d Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$6 e Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$7 f Decision Variables 40727 40727 Contin
$B$8 g Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$9 h Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$10 i Decision Variables 19040 19040 Contin
$B$11 j Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$12 k Decision Variables 93468 93468 Contin
$B$13 l Decision Variables 52960 52960 Contin
$B$14 m Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$15 n Decision Variables 8145 8145 Contin
$B$16 o Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$17 p Decision Variables 55608 55608 Contin
$B$18 q Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$19 r Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$20 s Decision Variables 23832 23832 Contin
$B$21 t Decision Variables 118373 118373 Contin
$B$22 u Decision Variables 0 0 Contin
$B$23 v Decision Variables 32581 32581 Contin
$B$24 w Decision Variables 0 0 Contin

Constraints
Cell Name Cell Value Formula Status Slack
$I$2 SM 166,320 $I$2<=$K$2 Binding 0
$I$3 NM 214,340 $I$3<=$K$3 Binding 0
$I$4 DU 230,394 $I$4<=$K$4 Not Binding 34683
$I$6 SM 166,320 $I$6>=$K$6 Not Binding 33,264
$I$7 NM 214,340 $I$7>=$K$7 Not Binding 30,563
$I$8 DU 230,394 $I$8>=$K$8 Not Binding 18,332
$I$9 Seattle 40,727 $I$9=$K$9 Binding 0
$I$10 Chicago 55,608 $I$10=$K$10 Binding 0
$I$11 Dallas 92,680 $I$11=$K$11 Binding 0
$I$12 NO 92,680 $I$12=$K$12 Binding 0
$I$13 Denver 23,832 $I$13=$K$13 Binding 0
$I$14 LA 211,841 $I$14=$K$14 Binding 0
$I$15 SF 52,960 $I$15=$K$15 Binding 0
$I$16 Vancouver 32,581 $I$16=$K$16 Binding 0
$I$17 Calgary 8,145 $I$17=$K$17 Binding 0
Microsoft Excel 14.0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [NorthwestNewsprintV2.xlsx]AfterOptAlt1
Report Created: 1/7/2016 2:08:11 AM

Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
$B$2 a Decision Variables 0 -24.18 270.23 24.18 1E+030
$B$3 b Decision Variables 92680 0 197.76 1E+030 12.99
$B$4 c Decision Variables 73640 0 193.82 12.99 24.18
$B$5 d Decision Variables 0 -40.53 208.23 40.53 1E+030
$B$6 e Decision Variables 0 -64.52 208.89 64.52 1E+030
$B$7 f Decision Variables 40727 0 288.32 1E+030 3.44
$B$8 g Decision Variables 0 -34.33 206.18 34.33 1E+030
$B$9 h Decision Variables 0 -12.99 130.87 12.99 1E+030
$B$10 i Decision Variables 19040 0 139.92 24.18 2.86
$B$11 j Decision Variables 0 -22.69 172.17 22.69 1E+030
$B$12 k Decision Variables 93468 0 187.54 2.86 2.68
$B$13 l Decision Variables 52960 0 219.51 1E+030 6.66
$B$14 m Decision Variables 0 -32.93 212.58 32.93 1E+030
$B$15 n Decision Variables 8145 0 207.5 1E+030 7.76
$B$16 o Decision Variables 0 -3.44 282.2 3.44 1E+030
$B$17 p Decision Variables 55608 0 237.83 1E+030 24.18
$B$18 q Decision Variables 0 -16.6 124.58 16.6 1E+030
$B$19 r Decision Variables 0 -2.86 134.38 2.86 1E+030
$B$20 s Decision Variables 23832 0 192.18 1E+030 22.69
$B$21 t Decision Variables 118373 0 184.86 2.68 2.86
$B$22 u Decision Variables 0 -6.66 210.17 6.66 1E+030
$B$23 v Decision Variables 32581 0 242.83 1E+030 32.93
$B$24 w Decision Variables 0 -7.76 197.06 7.76 1E+030

Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
$I$2 SM 166320 56.58 166320 18332 33264
$I$3 NM 214340 2.68 214340 18332 30562.7406
$I$4 DU 230394 0 265077 1E+030 34683
$I$6 SM 166320 0 133056 33264 1E+030
$I$7 NM 214340 0 183777.2594 30562.7406 1E+030
$I$8 DU 230394 0 212062 18332 1E+030
$I$9 Seattle 40727 285.64 40727 34683 18332
$I$10 Chicago 55608 237.83 55608 34683 18332
$I$11 Dallas 92680 141.18 92680 34683 18332
$I$12 NO 92680 137.24 92680 34683 18332
$I$13 Denver 23832 192.18 23832 34683 18332
$I$14 LA 211841 184.86 211841 34683 18332
$I$15 SF 52960 216.83 52960 34683 18332
$I$16 Vancouver 32581 242.83 32581 34683 18332
$I$17 Calgary 8145 204.82 8145 34683 8145
Microsoft Excel 14.0 Limits Report
Worksheet: [NorthwestNewsprintV2.xlsx]AfterOptAlt1
Report Created: 1/7/2016 2:08:11 AM

Objective
Cell Name Value
$K$19 Max Profits $ 125,451,474.27

Variable Lower Objective Upper Objective

Cell Name Value Limit Result Limit Result
$B$2 a Decision Variables 0 0 125451474.3 0 125451474.3
$B$3 b Decision Variables 92680 92680 125451474.3 92680 125451474.3
$B$4 c Decision Variables 73640 73640 125451474.3 73640 125451474.3
$B$5 d Decision Variables 0 0 125451474.3 0 125451474.3
$B$6 e Decision Variables 0 0 125451474.3 0 125451474.3
$B$7 f Decision Variables 40727 40727 125451474.3 40727 125451474.3
$B$8 g Decision Variables 0 0 125451474.3 0 125451474.3
$B$9 h Decision Variables 0 0 125451474.3 0 125451474.3
$B$10 i Decision Variables 19040 19040 125451474.3 19040 125451474.3
$B$11 j Decision Variables 0 0 125451474.3 0 125451474.3
$B$12 k Decision Variables 93468 93468 125451474.3 93468 125451474.3
$B$13 l Decision Variables 52960 52960 125451474.3 52960 125451474.3
$B$14 m Decision Variables 0 0 125451474.3 0 125451474.3
$B$15 n Decision Variables 8145 8145 125451474.3 8145 125451474.3
$B$16 o Decision Variables 0 0 125451474.3 0 125451474.3
$B$17 p Decision Variables 55608 55608 125451474.3 55608 125451474.3
$B$18 q Decision Variables 0 0 125451474.3 0 125451474.3
$B$19 r Decision Variables 0 0 125451474.3 0 125451474.3
$B$20 s Decision Variables 23832 23832 125451474.3 23832 125451474.3
$B$21 t Decision Variables 118373 118373 125451474.3 118373 125451474.3
$B$22 u Decision Variables 0 0 125451474.3 0 125451474.3
$B$23 v Decision Variables 32581 32581 125451474.3 32581 125451474.3
$B$24 w Decision Variables 0 0 125451474.3 0 125451474.3
 Decision Variables Revenue/Ton Prod Cost Ship Cost Profit Margin
a 0 SM-Chicago $ 750 $ 89.77 $ 390 $ 270.23 SM
b 92680 SM-Dallas $ 750 $ 162.24 $ 390 $ 197.76 NM
c 73640 SM-NO $ 750 $ 166.18 $ 390 $ 193.82 DU
d 0 SM-Denver $ 750 $ 151.77 $ 390 $ 208.23
e 0 SM-SF $ 750 $ 151.11 $ 390 $ 208.89 SM
f 40727 NM-Seattle $ 750 $ 46.68 $ 415 $ 288.32 NM
g 0 NM-Chicago $ 750 $ 128.82 $ 415 $ 206.18 DU
h 0 NM-Dallas $ 750 $ 204.13 $ 415 $ 130.87 Seattle
i 19040 NM-NO $ 750 $ 195.08 $ 415 $ 139.92 Chicago
j 0 NM-Denver $ 750 $ 162.83 $ 415 $ 172.17 Dallas
k 93468 NM-LA $ 750 $ 147.46 $ 415 $ 187.54 NO
l 52960 NM-SF $ 750 $ 115.49 $ 415 $ 219.51 Denver
m 0 NM-Vancouver $ 700 $ 72.42 $ 415 $ 212.58 LA
n 8145 NM-Calgary $ 700 $ 77.50 $ 415 $ 207.50 SF
o 0 DU-Seattle $ 750 $ 52.80 $ 415 $ 282.20 Vancouver
p 55608 DU-Chicago $ 750 $ 97.17 $ 415 $ 237.83 Calgary
q 0 DU-Dallas $ 750 $ 210.42 $ 415 $ 124.58
r 0 DU-NO $ 750 $ 200.62 $ 415 $ 134.38
s 23832 DU-Denver $ 750 $ 142.82 $ 415 $ 192.18
t 118373 DU-LA $ 750 $ 150.14 $ 415 $ 184.86
u 0 DU-SF $ 750 $ 124.83 $ 415 $ 210.17
v 32581 DU-Vancouver $ 700 $ 42.17 $ 415 $ 242.83
w 0 DU-Calgary $ 700 $ 87.94 $ 415 $ 197.06
166,320 Total Capacity <= 166,320
214,340 Total Capacity <= 214,340 Reduction 58000
230,394 Total Capacity <= 265,077

166,320 Total Operating Level >= 133,056

214,340 Total Operating Level >= 183,777
230,394 Total Operating Level >= 212,062
40,727 Total Demand = 40,727
55,608 Total Demand = 55,608
92,680 Total Demand = 92,680
92,680 Total Demand = 92,680
23,832 Total Demand = 23,832
211,841 Total Demand = 211,841
52,960 Total Demand = 52,960
32,581 Total Demand = 32,581
8,145 Total Demand = 8,145

Max Profits $ 125,451,474.27

 Production Before Optimization Route Optimization Δ Production
Spruce 144416 166320 7%
Naomee 236472 232672 -0.81%
Duchesne 230166 212062 -4.09%
Profit $ 121,537,867 $ 125,500,604 2%
100K Discount (NM/DU-LA) Δ Production Alt1 58K Press Reduction Δ Production
166,320 7% 166,320 7%
232,672 -0.81% 214,340 -4.91%
212,062 -4.09% 230,394 0.05%
$ 129,896,305 3% $ 125,451,474 2%