Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Este ejemplar no tiene costo alguno. El uso indebido de este ejemplar es responsabilidad del alumno.
Reading # 14
Richards, J. C. and Rodgers, T.S. Aparoaches and Methods in lan~uageteachin~.C.U P., pp.
142-153
1O 'Suggestopedia
Background
Suggestopedia
agonized (e g.,
awake aroused crarnming)
Approach
Theory of language
Lozanov does not articulate a theory of language, nor does it seeiit he
is much concerned with any particular assumptions regarding langii~ige
elements and their organization. The emphasis on memorization of vo-
cabulary pairs - a target language item and its native language translation
- suggests a view of language in which lexis is central and in which
lexical translation rather than contextualization is stressed. However,
Lozanov does occasionally refer to the importante of experiencing lan-
guage
. -
material in "whole meaningful texts" (Lozanov 1978: 268) and
notes that the suggestopedic courie directs "the student not to vocab-
ulary memorization and acquiring habits of speech, but to acts ot corrl-
munication" (1978: 109).
Lozanov recommends home study of recordings of "whole meanlngfiil
texts (not of a fragmentary nature)" that are, "above al], interesting."
These are listened to "for the sake of the music of the foreign speech"
(Lozanov 1978: 277). The texts should be lighthearted stories with
emotional content. Lozanov's recornmendations of such stories seems
to be entirely motivational, however, and does not represent a com-
mitment to the view that language is preeminently learned for and used
in its emotive funaion.
In describing course work and text organization Lozanov refers rnost
often to the language to be learned as "the material" (e.g., "The new
material that is to be learned is read o r recited by a well-trained teacher")
(Lozanov 1978: 270). One feels that the linguistic nature of the material
is largely irrelevant and that if the focus of a language course were, say,
memorization of grammar rules, Lozanov would feel a suggestopedlc
approach to be the optimal one. The sample protocol given for an Italian
lesson (Lozanov 1978) does not suggest a theory of language markedly
different from that which holds a language to be its vocabulary and the
grammar rules for organizing vocabulary.
Theory of learning
Suggestion is at the heart of Suggestopedia. T o many, suggestion con~ures
up visions of the penetrating stare, swinging cat's eye, and monotonically
repeated injunctions of the hypnotist. Lozanov acknowledges the Iike-
lihood of this association to Suggestopedia but claims that his own views
separare Suggestopedia from the "narrow clinical concept of hypnosis
as a kind of static, sleep like, altered state of consciousness" (1978 .S).
Lo~anovfurther claims that what distinguishes his method from 1?!:!7-
nosis and other forrns of mind control is that these other forms lack "a
desuggestive-suggeitive sense" and "fail to create a constant set up to
reserves through concentrative psycho-relaxation" (1978: 267). (We in-
trepret reserves as heing something like human memory banks. De-
suggestion seerns to involve unloading the memory banks, o r reserves,
of unwanted or hlocking memories. Suggestion, then, involves loading
the memory banks with desired and facilitating memories.) There are
six principal theoretical components through which desuggestion and
suggestion operate and that set up access to reserves. We will describe
these briefly following Bancroft (1972).
AUTHORITY
The learner learns not only frorn the effect of direct instruction but from
the environment in which the instruction takes place. The bright decor
of the classroom, the musical background, the shape of the chairs, and
the personality of the teacher are considered as important in instruction
as the form of the instructional material itself.
INTONATION, R H S7 H M , AND CONCER'T PSEUDO-PASSIVENESS
Varying the tone aiid rhythm of presented material helps both to avoid
boredom through rnonotony of repetition and to dramatize, ernotion-
techniques. Finally, they observe that not only hurnan biit vegetable
subjects thrive under sixty-beat stimulation. "Plants groivii i i i the charn-
bers given Baroque music by Bach and Indian music by I<iivi Shankar
rapidly grew Iush and abundant ... the plants in the ch;iriiber getting
rock music shriveled and died" (1979: 82). Suggestopeclic learning is
consequently built on a particular type of music and a particular rate
of presentation.
Design
Objectives
Suggestopedia aims to deliver advanced conversatioiinl proficiency
quickly. It apparently bases its learning claims on student inastery of
prodigious lists of vocabulary pairs and, indeed, suggests tu the students
that it is appropriate that they set such goals for thernselves. Lozanov
emphasizes, however, that increased memory power is not an isolated
skill but is a result of "positive, comprehensive stimulation of person-
ality" (Lozanov 1978: 253). Lozanov states categorically, "The main
aim of teaching is not memorization, but the understanding and creative
solution of problems" (1978: 251). As learner goals he cites increased
access to understanding and creative solutions of problerns. However,
because students and teachers place a high value on vocabulary recall,
memorization of vocabulary pairs continues to be seen as 3 i i important
goal of the suggestopedic method.
The syllabus
A Suggestopedia course lasts thirty days and consists oi ten units of
study. Classes are held four hours a day, six days a week. The central
focus of each unit is a dialogue consisting of 1,200 words or so, with
an accompanying vocabulary list and grammatical coinnientary. The
dialogues are graded by lexis and grammar.
There is a pattern of work within each unit and a pnttern of work
for the whole course. Unit study is organized around three days: day 1
- haif a day, day 2 - full day, day 3 - half a day. On the first day of
work on a new unit the teacher discusses the general coritent (not struc-
ture) of the unit dialogue. The learners then receive the priiited dialogue
with a native language translation in a parallel colurnii. The teacher
answers any questions of interest or concern about thc dialogue. The
dialogue then is read a second and third time in ways to be discussed
subsequently. This is the work for day 1. Days 2 ancl 3 a r e spent in
primary and secondary elaboration of the text. Prim;irv elaboration
Suggestopedia
Bibliography
Bancroft, \X' J 1972. The psychology of suggestopedia or learning without
stress. 7'17~Educational Courier Feb.: 16-19.
Bancroft, W. J. 1978. The Lozanov method and its American adaptions. Modern
Language Journal62(4): 167-75.
Blair, R. W. (ed.:. 1982 Innovative App~oachesto Language Teaching. Rowley,
Mass.: Newbury House.
Gaston, E. T. (ed.). 1968. Mwic in Therapy. New York: Macmillan.
Hammerly, H. 1982. Synthesis in Second Language Teaching. British Columbia:
Second Language Publicanons.
Lozanov, G. 1978. Suggestology and Outlines of Suggestopedy. New York:
Gordon and Breach.
Ostrander, S., L. Schroeder, and N. Ostrander. 1979. Superlearning. New York:
Dell.
Scovel, T. 1979. Review of Suggestology and Outlines of Suggestopedy. TESOL
Qwrterlp 13: 255-66.
Stevick, E. W. 1976. Memory, Meaning and Method: Some Psychological Per-
spectiues on Language Leaming. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
Stevidt, E. W. 1980. Teaching Languages. A Way and Ways. Rowley, Mass:
Newbury House.