Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 4
Click Here to Leave a Comment
4.0 Defining the Problem – Characterization
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Site Characterization Approach
4.2.1 Mine Life Cycle Phases
navigation 4.2.2 Sources of Acid Rock Drainage
Main Page 4.2.3 Conceptual Site Model Development
Recent Changes
4.3 Components of Site Characterization
Help
4.3.1 Geo-environmental Models
gard guide chapters
4.3.2 Source Material Geochemical Characterization
Disclaimer and
4.3.3 Watershed Characterization
Restrictions on Use
4.3.3.1 The Hydrologic Cycle
Executive Summary
Resumen Ejecutivo en 4.3.3.2 Water Balance
Español 4.3.3.3 Assimilative Capacity of the Receiving Environment
Sommaire français 4.3.3.4 Biological Receptors
History and
4.4 Summary
Acknow ledgments
4.5 References
Table of Contents
1. The GARD Guide
List of Tables
2. The ARD Process List of Figures
3. Corporate,
Regulatory and
Community Framew ork 4.0 Defining the Problem – Characterization
4. Defining the Problem
- Characterization
5. Prediction
4.1 Introduction
6. Prevention and The generation, release, mobility, and attenuation of acid rock drainage (ARD) is a complex process governed by a combination of physical,
Mitigation chemical, and biological factors (see Chapter 2). Neutral mine drainage (NMD) and saline drainage (SD) are governed by similar factors but may
7. Drainage Treatment or may not involve the oxidation of sulphides. Whether ARD, NMD, or SD enters the environment depends largely on the characteristics of the
8. Monitoring sources and pathways. Characterization of these features is therefore key to the prediction, prevention, and management of drainage impacted by
9. Management and the products of sulphide oxidation at mine sites.
Performance
Assessment In this chapter, the term “ARD” refers to drainage types that are affected by the products of sulphide oxidation, including acid, neutral and saline
10. ARD drainage.
Communication and Environmental characterization programs are designed to collect sufficient data to answer the following questions:
Consultation
11. ARD Management Is ARD likely to occur and what are the potential sources?
in the Future What type of chemistry is expected?
Tables, Figures, and When is likely to start and how much will be generated?
Photos What are the significant pathways that transport contaminants to the receiving environment and can those contaminants be attenuated along
Acronyms/ those pathways?
Abbreviations
What are the anticipated environmental impacts?
Glossary
What can be done to prevent or mitigate/manage ARD?
search
Figure 4-1 shows how the information presented in this chapter is integrated with other chapters of the GARD Guide in the development and
execution of a site characterization program to address these questions.
Go Search
Table 4-4: Geologic Characteristics of Mineral Deposits that Affect Their Environmental Signatures (Plumlee, 1999)
4.2.1.2 Mine Planning Phase (Pre-Feasibility, Feasibility and Approval)
To decide whether a project will progress, the economic viability is assessed during the mine planning phase. This phase includes completion of
a number of trade-off, design and prefeasibility studies, including the environmental and social impact assessment (ESIA) and the feasibility
study (FS). The ESIA includes an assessment of the potential environmental impacts associated with development of the deposit. Mine design,
development of the mine waste management plan and closure planning are incorporated into the ESIA while detailed design and mine permitting
follow and are also considered part of the mine planning phase.
During this phase, the intensity of site and source material characterization is usually high. Laboratory testing programs aim to systematically
evaluate the environmental stability of waste and ore materials, including the occurrence and nature of sulphide minerals and minerals with
neutralization potential and their respective quantities. Intensive baseline monitoring is conducted to characterize existing environmental
conditions. This may include establishment of surface water, groundwater, sediment, and climate monitoring stations. The biological receptors
within the watershed are identified and their habitats characterized.
Environmental characterization programs need to be integrated with activities of other mine departments to optimize both data collection efforts
and the design of the mine facilities. For example, often ARD characterization activities can be combined with geotechnical investigations (e.g.,
collection of samples for ARD characterization of ultimate pit walls during drilling to evaluate pit wall stability). Optimal siting of waste facilities
should integrate information from multiple disciplines, including mining engineering, metallurgy, geochemistry, hydrogeology, hydrology, geology
and geotechnical.
When a positive water balance exists in the beneficiation process and depending upon the expected effluent quality, evaluation of water
management (e.g., treatment and discharge) may be required to manage excess water if it cannot be contained on the mine property during and
after operation.
Characterization during the mine planning phase must be sufficient to allow estimation of any significant long-term costs of ARD management for
inclusion in the economic evaluation of the project. It may not be possible to profitably mine some marginally economic ore bodies or coal
deposits that have high ARD management and closure costs.
Initial design considerations for mine closure should begin as soon as possible during the mine planning phase. This ensures a “design for
closure” approach. Issues such as reduced mine footprint, ARD prevention in waste rock and tailings (and coal refuse), and the avoidance of long-
term water treatment should be integrated into the mine design to ensure that the economic model for mine development fully considers the true
costs of the whole lifecycle, including post-closure.
If ARD or any other geochemical issue has been identified as a potential concern, then development of an ARD/geochemical block model is
usually required during this phase. Integrated with the mine plan, the block model is used to estimate the quantity and production schedule of the
identified geochemical waste types. Incorporation of ARD and other geochemical indicator parameters into the block model facilitates
consideration of environmental risk in ore development plans, waste production scheduling, and potential segregation of waste as part of an ARD
management plan.
4.2.1.3 Construction and Commissioning Phase
Detailed design typically occurs coincidently with and subsequent to the ESIA review by regulators, communities and other stakeholders, and the
securing of mine permits. Modifications to the ARD management plan may be made as a result of this consultation to reflect stakeholder input
and permit conditions. Detailed design transitions into construction of all mine facilities (e.g., mine camp, water treatment plant, and waste
storage facilities) and infrastructure (e.g., water, power, and roads) required for operation of the mine and associated mineral processing.
The characterization programs initiated during the mine planning phase are usually continued during this construction and commissioning phase.
Ongoing laboratory testing of ore and waste materials may now include testing of samples generated during site excavation activities (e.g., pit
pre-stripping and road/tunnel construction). Field-scale testing programs may also be initiated at this time, including large test plots of mine
waste and pilot testing of water treatment options. Routine surface water, groundwater, sediment, climate, and biological receptor monitoring
programs begin during baseline data collection and continue to be implemented during the construction and commissioning phase. Environmental
characterization activities to evaluate the construction of engineering controls intended to prevent ARD migration may also occur during this
phase (e.g., field testing of liners placed at the base of waste facilities to ensure design permeability criteria are met).
4.2.1.4 Operational Phase
The operational phase is usually defined as the start of milling. Note that early mining operations, including pre-stripping of overburden and waste
rock, and ore stockpiling at surface mines or during the development of declines, adits or shafts for underground deposits, often begin in the
construction phase. The majority of ARD sources resulting from ore extraction and establishment of mine waste facilities are created during the
operational phase.
Laboratory and field testing of source materials generally continue during operations to calibrate/validate predictions and validate/modify design of
control measures. Testing also supports tracking of waste segregation by ARD potential, if required. Additional testing must be conducted if
materials not included and/or fully assessed in the initial characterization programs are encountered during excavation. The waste management
plan commonly stipulates specific testing of waste materials to document the composition of waste facilities or, as part of the waste
management protocol, to document operational monitoring (e.g., for segregation of waste materials). Source characterization during operations
often includes collection of runoff and seepage samples from potential ARD sources. In some cases, instrumentation of waste facilities is
required to fulfill specific data needs (e.g., lysimeters or gas monitors within waste rock piles). In general, monitoring of drainage as close to the
source as possible is preferred to minimize dilution effects.
Watershed monitoring (i.e., groundwater, surface water, sediment, climate, and biological receptor) continues during the operational phase with a
focus on the identification of environmental impacts and compliance with applicable regulations. The quality of water removed in association with
dewatering activities should be characterized, even if recycled, to understand the effects on site water quality, and if discharged, the need for
treatment.
During the operational phase, source and watershed characterization data collected during operations are reviewed on an ongoing basis and
compared to expected conditions and compliance requirements. Trigger levels should be established during this phase that indicate the need to
implement contingency measures (e.g., a change or modification to a mitigation measure or engineered source control measure). Trigger levels
may be based on predictive models or permit conditions. As needed, the predictive models are updated to reflect measured conditions.
4.2.1.5 Decommissioning Phase
The decommissioning phase involves activities aimed to reestablish premining conditions (to the extent possible) or conditions suitable for
beneficial post-mining land use. Active mining and the activities associated with mining and processing cease (e.g., cessation of dewatering
activities, cessation of heap leaching). Site reclamation and rehabilitation activities are often conducted during mine operations (progressive
reclamation) but their breadth and intensity increases substantially during the decommissioning phase. The closure measures outlined in the
closure plan are revised as needed based on operational experience and are conducted during this phase. If necessary, water treatment facilities
continue to operate or passive measures are instituted.
Monitoring continues during the decommissioning phase to assess environmental and geochemical conditions with the view to assessing the
performance of the closure plan in meeting targets and/or regulatory requirements, and to identify any need for additional or modified activities.
Models are commonly used to predict the performance of closure measures, and data from laboratory and field scale kinetic test work and
operational monitoring can be used to calibrate and verify these models for longer term predictions. Additional test work may be necessary or the
predictive models themselves may need to be modified.
Water table rebound and surface water inflow during the decommissioning phase present an opportunity to assess actual pit lake or flooded
underground mine water quality. Additional data collection and evaluation, including modeling, may be required to refine long-term water quality
predictions and assess the need for mitigation measures, including water treatment. The rate of water table rebound is measured to confirm
predictions of the time for mine flooding or establishment of a pit lake and its potential consequences (e.g., discharges), including acceptability
for post-closure beneficial uses.
4.2.1.6 Post-Closure Phase
With the advance of mine waste management techniques, the post-closure phase is usually characterized by the absence of a continuous
presence of personnel on the mine site, though some operations might require ongoing water management and treatment. During the post-
closure phase, land use is commensurate with requirements of permits and expectations from adjacent land users and regulatory agencies. The
requirements for post-closure monitoring vary with the post-closure objectives and the remaining facilities. Typically, there is a period of at least
five to ten years of performance monitoring over which there is a decreasing frequency of activity, based on achieving the predicted performance
for chemical and physical stability. Following performance monitoring, some sites may require longer term monitoring and maintenance of, for
example, physical structures such as tailings dams, water retaining structures, or covers. There are a number of management models by which
the post-closure monitoring can be achieved (e.g., the company, contractors, regulatory agencies, communities, or research institutions).
Top of this page
Figure 4-2: Major Steps Involved in Extraction Metallurgy of Metals (adapted from SME, 2008)
This section describes how the geometry, physical properties, and structure of common mine and process facilities influence or control the
production and pathways of ARD. Conceptual models illustrate the chemical reactions occurring within each facility, as well as the movement of
oxygen, heat, and water that govern sulphide oxidation and transport of oxidation products. Additional technical detail on sulphide oxidation and
transport of oxidation products is provided in Chapter 2.
Top of this page
Decommissioning phase
At the cessation of mining, dewatering ceases and groundwater inflow into the underground workings may begin to accumulate and flood the
workings. The mine workings, due to their elevated permeability and porosity relative to the host rock (even if backfilled during mining), become
preferential pathways for groundwater flow. Collapsed or backfilled voids and block cave rubble zones exhibit greater permeability than the
surrounding fractured rock and therefore strongly influence groundwater movement. As the water table rebounds, sulphide oxidation products
present on mine walls or backfilled waste are flushed, resulting in release of sulphate, metals, and acidity to the mine water while alkalinity from
carbonates and other minerals is also introduced to the water. Inundation of sulphide minerals prevents further sulphide oxidation. However,
sulphides that remain above the water table represent a long-term source of ARD. As is the case for pit lakes, underground mine pools are
frequently stratified (Wolkersdorfer, 2008). In Pennsylvania, USA, water levels in flooded underground coal mines show considerable fluctuation in
composition responding to variability in meteoric conditions and local groundwater pumping.
As the water table rebounds, the underground workings may transition from a groundwater sink to a groundwater source. Discharge of mine water
to the environment may occur by groundwater or mine openings. In some cases, these openings are plugged to prevent discharge to surface and
to further raise the water level (ERMITE-Consortium, 2004).
Figure 4-6: Sources and Pathways of ARD, NMD, and SD in a Subaqueous Tailings Storage Facility (modified from Blowes et al.,
2003)
Solution mining makes use of a series of injection and recovery wells to circulate a leach solution through an ore zone. Solution mining is applied
to extract solids that are easily leached or dissolved. Leach solutions may be acidic, neutral or basic, heated, or unheated. Blasting may be
conducted in boreholes before injection to increase the permeability of the ore zone. Solution mining has been used in uranium, copper,
manganese, halite, potash, nahcolite, and sulphur mining (SME, 2008).
Solution mining alters groundwater geochemistry and flow paths near the ore zone. In some applications, leach solutions are oxidants and may
promote ARD. If not contained, leaching solutions, particularly oxidizing solutions and acids, may degrade local or regional groundwater quality.
To avoid groundwater impacts, solution mining requires rigorous evaluation of the groundwater flow system (e.g., flow paths, capture zone
analysis) before injection of leach solutions. Characterization of the groundwater system must include hydrogeologic units in hydraulic connection
with the ore body and aquifers above and below the ore zone. Disposal of waste solutions may pose a concern for surface water resources.
Exploration (1) Prospect Testing – Include sulphur in list of elements By the end of the resource definition phase, there should be
being analyzed for all samples tested; include the full range adequate information to accurately characterize the ARD
of pathfinder elements as defined by ore deposit/exploration potential of the ore body (high and low grade), although
model; collect and record mineralogical data as per further test work will normally be required to characterize the
exploration/ore deposit model; where the geology of the ARD potential of waste rock and ore and hence tailings.
deposit is known include static testing of at least 3 to 5
representative samples of each key material type (i.e.,
lithology, alteration type); analysis of ground water and
surface water for acidity and representative pathfinder
elements.
(2) Resource Definition – All samples tested for sulphur and
representative samples tested for mineralogy as per ore
deposit model. Static testing of at least 5 to 10
representative samples of each key material type.
Collect groundwater and surface water data. Surface water
and groundwater analysis to include acidity as well
representative metal ions.
All testing to include QA/QC samples.
Pre-Feasibility Static testing of several hundred representative samples of Where required, the number of samples must be sufficient
high and low grade ore, waste rock and tailings, the number to populate a “resource” block model of the ore and host
dependent on the complexity of the deposit geology and its rocks that will be affected by mining with a reliable
host rocks. distribution of NAPP [1] data (e.g., acid producing potential
All drillhole samples analyzed must include sulphur analysis (APP), sulphur and acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) (or
and identified representative metal ions. Sampling density is NPR data) on ore, waste rock and wall rock.
dependent on complexity of ore deposit and host rock
geology interval of representative drill holes but should be
restricted to single rock units or lithologies - include
minimums.
Kinetic testing of at least 1 to 2 representative samples of
each material type.
Surface water and groundwater analysis to include acidity as
well as pH, EC and representative metal ions, including Al,
Fe, Mn.
All testing to include QA/QC samples.
Mine Planning, Where required, additional static testing as required for Data set must be sufficient to assess ARD potential to
Feasibility and block waste resource model refinement – increase density of support a management plan. If data are insufficient,
Design NAPP (or NPR) characterization. additional testing will be required.
Statistical analysis of test results is advisable to confirm that a representative data set has been obtained. For example, histograms may be used
to ensure that the entire distribution has been captured in sample selection (Runnells et al., 1997) and samples with “extreme” characteristics
have not been overlooked. The number of samples will increase as the heterogeneity (e.g., particle size and composition) of a material type
increases. For this reason, characterization of process tailings typically requires fewer samples than characterization of waste rock. Sample
representativeness must continually be assessed during the mine life. For example, a change in ore type over the mine life may produce process
tailings with different characteristics. Operational monitoring (see Chapter 8) should include a program of systematic ongoing tailings testing to
identify changes and implement alternative waste management practices, if required.
The goal of material management is to prevent or minimize ARD. Characterization programs must be designed to provide adequate information to
make cost-effective, sustainable, and environmentally protective decisions regarding the management and disposal of waste materials. For
materials with an uncertain ARD potential, resolution of this uncertainty by additional characterization efforts may not be necessary if a decision
is made to manage the waste with the assumption that the material has ARD potential. For example, detailed characterization of the sulphide
content of tailings over time may not be necessary if the tailings will be placed in a contained impoundment with a water cover.
4.3.2.3 Testing Program Overview
Laboratory and field testing is conducted to characterize the acid generation and metal leaching potential of mine materials. Geochemical
characterization programs typically follow a phased approach, beginning with laboratory testing followed by field testing. The design of most
testing programs is dynamic, with each successive phase building on the results of previous phase or phases. A brief summary of the testing
approach is provided below, with significantly more detail presented in Chapter 5.
The laboratory phase of a geochemical characterization program will typically include the following analyses:
Static Tests
chemical composition (whole rock and elemental analysis)
mineralogical analysis
acid base accounting (ABA)
net acid generation (NAG)
water extraction (batch extraction) tests - with solution assay
Kinetic Tests
humidity cell leach testing
column leach testing
Static testing is the first phase of geochemical characterization, and is a precursor to kinetic testing. The objective of static testing is to describe
the bulk chemical characteristics of a material. These tests are designed to evaluate the potential of a particular rock type to generate acid,
neutralize acid, or leach metals. Static tests provide an indication of the presence of minerals that may generate acid as well as minerals that
may act to neutralize any acid formed. In some cases, testing may indicate that a surrogate parameter can be used as an indication of ARD
potential (e.g., iron as an indicator of the amount of sulphide, calcium or carbon as an indicator of the amount of neutralization potential) (see
Chapter 5 for additional information on the use and interpretation of static tests).
Elemental analysis results are commonly compared to average crustal or mean world soil abundance values as a multiple or geochemical
enrichment factor to provide a screening level assessment of elements that are enriched in the sample. A high concentration of a particular
element does not necessary imply that this element will be mobilized in concentrations that may lead to environmental or health impacts, but it
does highlight an issue that should be further investigated. An essential component of static testing is mineralogical analysis that, at a minimum,
includes identification of all sulphur and carbonate minerals. If possible, mineralogical analysis should be quantitative. A description of how
minerals with acid generation and acid neutralization potential occur (e.g., grain size, grain morphology, disseminated, fracture coatings, as
inclusions) is also relevant in the assessment of reactivity (i.e., rate of oxidation or dissolution).
ABA analysis typically includes analysis of paste pH, sulphur speciation, neutralizing potential (NP) or acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) and total
inorganic carbon (TIC). Paste pH is used as an indicator of the presence of stored acidity. Sulphur speciation data, which includes information on
the presence of non-acid generating sulphur minerals, are used to calculate the acid generation potential of the material. NP and ANC provide
estimates of the acid neutralizing potential of a material (NP in the units of tCaCO3 /kt and ANC in the units of kgH2SO4/t). TIC is used to
calculate the carbonate neutralizing value (CNV) or carbonate NP (Ca-NP), and allows assessment of the fraction of NP or ANC attributed to
carbonate mineral phases. In some cases the CNV based on TIC (or even total carbon) can be used as a surrogate to estimate the NP or ANC at
a particular site. In combination, results from ABA, NAG, and elemental and mineralogical analysis are used to assess the relative proportions of
acid generating and acid consuming materials.
Short-term extraction tests (such as 24-hour batch extraction tests using deionised water) provide information on the short term metal leaching
potential. The nature of the sample (e.g., unoxidized vs. oxidized; oxidation products absent vs. oxidation products present), test solution to solid
ratio, lixiviant, reaction time, and sample particle size should all be considered in the evaluation and comparison of leach test results.
Although the results of static testing may indicate a potential for acid rock drainage or metal leaching, kinetic testing is commonly required to
assess the relative rates of the various ARD and metal leaching reactions occurring, and to provide information on the evolution of ARD over time.
Field scale leach tests may be initiated before or during the construction or operational phases of mine development to provide a better
representation of material reactivity under ambient site conditions.
Physical properties of the testing materials (e.g., surface area, particle size distribution) are also determined because these properties affect
material reactivity and are needed in the scale-up of laboratory and field testing results to represent field scale and operational conditions.
Figure 4-8 shows the typical components and evolution of a geochemical characterization program for selected potential source materials. Any
waste, construction, or process stream residues that have the potential to generate ARD must be included in the mine characterization program
so that appropriate disposal practices and mitigation measures can be employed. This includes waste rock, ore, process residues, treatment
sludges, quarried materials for construction, heap leach residues, hydromet residues, slag etc. Chapter 5 presents detailed descriptions of the
laboratory and field scale testing methods and their interpretation for ARD prediction.
Figure 4-8: Source Material Geochemical Testing Program Components
Top of this page
4.4 Summary
Development of an ARD characterization program at a mine site is critical to the prediction, prevention, and management of ARD. The
development of a site characterization program begins with development of a conceptual site model to identify sources of ARD, pathways for
transport, and the receptors within the watershed. This chapter identifies and discusses the common components and data collection activities
associated with a mine site characterization program. Because the distinctions between characterization, prediction, prevention and mitigation
and and monitoring are loosely defined, the contents of this chapter should be reviewed in association with Chapters 5, 6 and 8.
Identification and characterization of source materials is fundamental to the accurate assessment of whether ARD is likely to occur at a particular
mine site. Characterization of materials to assess their ARD and metal leaching potential should begin during the early phases of a mine life and
continue through to the end of operation, and possibly into closure. At a minimum, the characterization program should include testing of the
mineral resource (i.e., ore) and waste materials (waste rock, coal overburden and process residues). Inclusion of other materials (e.g.,
construction material) may also be appropriate.
The scope and development of an ARD characterization program is ultimately site specific. In some cases, the precautionary principle may be
selected as the preferred or most economical method to address uncertainty in material characterization (e.g., placement of tailings in a lined
facility). In all cases, the scope and intensity of the characterization program are determined in an iterative fashion.
Top of this page
4.5 References
Australian Government Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources, 2007. Managing Acid and Metalliferous Drainage, February.
Blowes, D.W., Ptacek, C.J., and J. Jurjovec, 2003. Mill Tailings: Hydrogeology and Geochemistry. In: J.L. Jambor, D.W. Blowes, and A.I.M.
Ritchie (Eds.), Environmental Aspects of Mine Wastes, Short Course Series Vol. 31, Mineralogical Association of Canada, 95-116.
Bowell, R. (Ed.), 2003. Pit Lake Systems: A Special Issue. Mine Water and the Environment, 22(4).
Burger, H.R., Sheehan, A.F., and C.H. Jones, 2006. Introduction to Applied Geophysics: Exploring the Shallow Subsurface. W.W. Norton &
Company, New York, NY.
Castendyk, D.N., and L.E. Eary, (Eds.), in press. Mine Pit Lakes; Characteristics, Predictive Modeling, and Sustainability. ADTI-MMS
Handbook Series Vol. 3, Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Colorado.
Dingman, S.L., 2002. Physical Hydrology, 2nd edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Downing, B.W., and C. Mills, 2007. Quality Assurance/Quality Control for Acid Rock Drainage Studies.
ERMITE-Consortium, 2004. Mining Impacts on the Fresh Water Environment: Technical and Managerial Guidelines for Catchment Scale
Management. In: P. Younger and C. Wolkersdorfer (Eds.), Mine Water and the Environment, 23(Supplement 1):S2-S80.
Fetter, C.W., 2001. Applied Hydrogeology, 4th edition. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Freeze, A.R., and J.A. Cherry, 1979. Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Gammons, C.H., and T.E. Duaime, 2006. Long-Term Changes in the Limnology and Geochemistry of the Berkeley Pit Lake, Butte, Montana.
Mine Water and the Environment, 25(2):76-85.
Geller, W., Klapper, H., and W. Salomons (Eds.), 1998. Acidic Mining Lakes – Acid Mine Drainage, Limnology and Reclamation. Springer,
Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Hammack, R.W., Love, E.I., Veloski, G.A., Ackman, T.E., and W. Harbert, 2003a. Using helicopter electromagnetic surveys to identify
environmental problems at coal mines. Mine Water and the Environment, 22(2):80-84.
Hammack, R.W., Sams III, J.I., Veloski, G.A., and J.S. Mabie, 2003b. Geophysical investigation of the Sulphur Bank mercury mine
Superfund site, Lake County, California. Mine Water and the Environment, 22(2):69-79.
Plumlee, G.S., 1999. The Environmental Geology of Mineral Deposits. In: G.S. Plumlee and M.J. Logsdon (Eds.), The Environmental
Geochemistry of Mineral Deposits, Part A: Processes, Techniques and Health Issues, Reviews in Economic Geology Vol. 6A, Society of
Economic Geologists, Inc., 71-116.
Plumlee, G.S., and M.J. Logsdon, 1999. An Earth-System Science Toolkit for Environmentally Friendly Mineral Resource Development. In:
G.S. Plumlee and M.J. Logsdon (Eds.), The Environmental Geochemistry of Mineral Deposits, Part A: Processes, Techniques and Health
Issues, Reviews in Economic Geology Vol. 6A, Society of Economic Geologists, Inc., 1-27.
Price, W.A., 1997. Draft Guidelines and Recommended Methods for the Prediction of Metal Leaching and Acid Rock Drainage at Minesites
in British Columbia. Reclamation Section, Energy and Minerals Division, Ministry of Employment and Investment, Smithers, BC.
Price, W.A., 2009. Prediction Manual for Drainage Chemistry from Sulphidic Geologic Materials. MEND Report 1.20.1, December.
Runnells, D.D., Shields, M.J., and R.L. Jones, 1997. Methodology for adequacy of sampling of mill tailings and mine waste rock. In:
Proceedings of Tailings and Mine Waste 97, Rotterdam, Balkema, 561-563.
Sams III, J.I., and G.A. Veloski, 2003. Evaluation of airborne thermal infrared imagery for locating mine drainage sites in the Lower Kettle
Creek and Cooks Run basins, Pennsylvania, USA. Mine Water and the Environment, 22(2):85-93.
Seal II, R.R., Foley, N.K., and R.B. Wanty, 2002. Introduction to Geoenvironmental Models of Mineral Deposits. In: R.R. Seal II and N.K.
Foley (Eds.), Progress on Geoenvironmental Models for Selected Mineral Deposit Types, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-195.
Seal II, R.R. and J.M. Hammarstrom, 2003. Geoenvironmental Models of Mineral Deposits: Examples from Massive Sulfide and Gold
Deposits. In: J.L. Jambor, D.W. Blowes and A.I.M. Ritchie, Environmental Aspects of Mine Wastes, Short Course Series Vol. 31,
Mineralogical Association of Canada, 11-50.
Smith, L., and R. Beckie, 2003. Hydrologic and Geochemical Transport Processes in Mine Waste Rock. In: J.L. Jambor, D.W. Blowes and
A.I.M. Ritchie, Environmental Aspects of Mine Wastes, Short Course Series Vol. 31, Mineralogical Association of Canada, 51-72.
Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc. (SME), 2008. Management Technologies for Metal Mining Influenced Water – Basics of
Metal Mining Influenced Water. V.T. McLemore (Ed.).
Swayze, G.A., Smith, K.S., Clark, R.N., Sutley, S.J., Pearson, R.M., Vance, J.S., Hageman, P.L., Briggs, P.H., Meier, A.L., Singleton,
M.J., and S. Roth, 2000. Using Imaging Spectroscopy to Map Acid Mine Waste. Environmental Science and Technology, 34:47-54.
United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2008. Bibliography of Geophysical Methods for Characterizing Mine Waste.
http://crustal.usgs.gov/projects/minewaste/geophysics_mine_pubs.html
Wolkersdorfer, C., 2008. Water Management at Abandoned Flooded Underground Mines – Fundamentals, Tracer Tests, Modelling, Water
Treatment. Springer, Heidelberg.
Top of this page
List of Tables
Table 4-1: Mine Phase Objectives and Activities
Table 4-2: Characterization Activities by Mine Phase
Table 4-3: Source Material Characterization Activities by Mine Phase
Table 4-4: Geologic Characteristics of Mineral Deposits that Affect Their Environmental Signatures (Plumlee, 1999)
Table 4-5: Australian Guidance on Sample Numbers (Australian Government Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources, 2007)
Top of this page
List of Figures
Figure 4-1: Characterization Chapter Road Map
Figure 4-2: Major Steps Involved in Extraction Metallurgy of Metals
Figure 4-3: Sources and Pathways of ARD, NMD, and SD in a Pit during Operation and Closure
Figure 4-4: Sources and Pathways of ARD, NMD, and SD in Underground Workings during Operation and Closure
Figure 4-5: Sources and Pathways of ARD, NMD, and SD in a Waste Rock Pile
Figure 4-6: Sources and Pathways of ARD, NMD, and SD in a Subaqueous Tailings Storage Facility (modified from Blowes et al., 2003)
Figure 4-7: Typical Data Requirements of a Conceptual Site Model (CSM)
Figure 4-8: Source Material Geochemical Testing Program Components
Figure 4-9: Water Balance Box and Arrow Diagram
Top of this page
1. ↑ NAPP – Net Acid Producing Potential expressed as kg H2SO4 per tonne. Calculated by subtracting acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) from acid producing potential
(APP). The Australian Guidelines use NAPP as a measure of the ARD potential. NPR may be used in place of NAPP
This page w as last modified 16:08, 17 May 2012. This page has been accessed 240,674 times. Privacy policy About GARDGuide Disclaimers