Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 8

Development of Monitoring Technology for Steel and Composite Structures

Masanari TOMINAGA*1) ○ Sunaryo SUMITRO*2)


Takuji OKAMOTO*3) Yoshihito KATO*4)
*5)
Shoji KUROKAWA

ABSTRACT Nowadays, maintenance management of infrastructures (in which


mainly consist of steel structures and composite structures) and reduction of their life
cycle cost (LCC), become serious problems those have to be solved urgently. In this
paper, health monitoring based maintenance (HMBM) aimed to reduce structure’s
life cycle cost is proposed. Theoretical background of HMBM and contribution of
monitoring information in LCC reduction are reviewed. As the tools to collect the
structural information, the sensory theory, the sensory system and the effectiveness of
recorded information of new innovative sensory technologies, such as,
elasto-magnetic sensor (EM sensor) and peak sensor technologies are discussed.
Furthermore, Smart structure by utilizing TRIP steels is introduced as well.

Keywords: maintenance, LCC, health monitoring, HMBM, EM sensor, Peak sensor,


TRIP steel, smart material

1. Introduction contradiction to the ‘initial wish’ as


Along the years of civilization, human beings maintenance-free materials, significant
have been creating numerous infrastructure deteriorations spread out everywhere. Especially in
systems for residence, industrial, defense and other the last decades, fatigue and corrosion of steel
various purposes. These heritages have been structures and frost damage, alkaline silica
accumulating as a huge inventory of structures now. response (ASR), carbonation of concrete structures,
Most of those structures were made from harden become serious issues. These phenomena occurred
soil, drying brick, stone and/or wood which have in the time when the ‘true life’ of steel and
been utilized innovatively. concrete have not been verified yet. Therefore, it
About one and a half centuries ago, such gives ‘critical feel’ to us since we wish their health
construction materials have been enriched by steel life at least to be 150 to 200 years.
and concrete. The advantages of these two If the deterioration propagates as the current
materials as ‘easy form’ and ‘high strength’ have speed, in a near future, preservation of the
grown up and speedup the construction of accumulated infrastructures’ inventory need a huge
infrastructures significantly. Even now, most of the amount of reinvestment and it will shake the
structures are built by steel and concrete. However, financial cores from the root.

*1)
Dr. Eng Kawasaki Steel Corporation Senior Adviser (2-18-10, Nishishiba, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0017)
*2)
Dr. Eng Keisoku Research Consultant R&D Chief Engineer (3-22-7, Minamioi, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 140-0013)
*3)
Keisoku Research Consultant President (669-1, Fukuda, Higashi-ku, Hiroshima 732-0029)
*4)
Keisoku Research Consultant Senior Adviser (669-1, Fukuda, Higashi-ku, Hiroshima 732-0029)
*5)
Kisarazu National College of Technology Professor (2-11-1, Kiyomidai Higashi, Kisarazu 292-0041)
Now, the only one choice of the possible solution By considering maintenance management
which can be expressed as: identify the current problem based on the above mentioned structure
degraded condition; stop the structural construction periods, it can be summarized as
deterioration process; choose a suitable follows:
repair/retrofit strategy to a certain service level; 1. As the consequence of the problem of the
perform health monitoring systematically; and first category, huge amount structures
reduce LCC. In order to achieve the above should be rebuilt and reinvested in near
objectives, this paper describes health monitoring future urgently. Therefore, to avoid
based maintenance (HMBM) focused in financial collapse, it is necessary to grasp
fundamental technique to identify structural health their properties of deterioration to find and
condition. perform a suitable repair and/or retrofit
strategy systematically.
2. Current Status and Problems of 2. There are others important problems are
Maintenance of Infrastructures being faced by the first and second
The infrastructure of Japan was getting its categories, such as, how will their
ripeness at the end of 20th century and it is structures perform due to earthquake,
estimated that new construction investment will be typhoon and other unanticipated loads;
reducing while maintenance and reconstruction how to extend their performance due to
costs of existing structures will be increasing service upgrading, e.g., transportation road
rapidly as shown in Figure 11). upgrading due to forecasted large-scale
Technologically, infrastructures those should be container and route expansion.
maintained can be classified into 3 (three) The first step as the solution of the above problem
categories: (1) Infrastructures those were is to collect the maintenance information. However,
constructed and accumulated during high economy it is different from the third category, structural
grow-up after 1950s. In this period, most of the healthy cart of the first and second categories were
structures were built with the composite of steel missing from the beginning of construction.
and concrete materials. For instances, the industrial, Therefore, as the first step to maintain the
transportation and city facilities which formed the structures of the first and second categories,
megalopolis ranging with the Pacific Ocean, the identifying current structural condition and
Seto Inland Sea and Kitakyushu were constructed performing database by conducting health
in a huge quantities in the short period. Such monitoring is an urgent need.
structures are now facing concrete degradation
such as salt injury, carbonation, ASR and steel
reinforcement corrosion problems; (2)
Real investment
Infrastructures those were constructed since before Standard facilities
Investment amount (billion yen)

(imaginary stock)
second world war, accumulated during long period.
As the problem examples of this group, Japan
Standard facilities

New Predicted investment


construction
Railways (JR) infrastructures are facing the fatigue investment
of steel bridges and the collapse of tunnel; and (3)
Infrastructures those were constructed after 1980s.
Reconstruction
Highways and Shinkansen network are the cost

examples of this group. Those structures were Maintenance


cost
provided with sufficient maintenance systems and
telecommunication network installations for Year

accessing recorded structural information. Figure 1. Prediction of future investment on


infrastructure (adopted from Ref 1)
3. Health Monitoring Based Maintenance 3.2 Theoretical Background
(HMBM) During the life of the structure, the expected
3.1 Philosophy total cost CET was proposed by Frangopol5) that
Maintenance management of infrastructures has can be expressed mathematically as follows.
been one of the particular concerns of the
engineering community and responsibility of the C ET = CT + C PM + C INS + C REP + C F (1)
citizens to deliver these heritages in a feasible
performance to the next generation. Most of the CT is the initial cost of the structure, CPM is the
structures were built by using construction expected cost of maintenance, CINS is the expected
materials of steel and concrete which were not cost of performing inspection, CREP is the cost of
‘maintenance free’ materials. Even the ‘true life’ of repair, CF is the cost of failure. In this approach,
those materials have not been verified yet, however, the cost of performing inspection and the cost of
by a suitable systematical maintenance effort, it repair are considered as cost of maintenance.
can be expected to have 150-200 years. This conceptual framework of the proposed
One of the efforts is the engineering reliability-based approach for life-cycle cost design
development of infrastructure life cycle of degrading concrete structures could be modified
management as shown in Figure 22). The objectives to accommodate various structural degradation
of this engineering are: (1) to manage the life cycle condition. Here, it is modified to express the LCC
of structures in the stages of plan, do, see, maintain, based on the concept of HMBM as follows.
and rebuild in a most reasonable way to provide m n
LCC = CT + ∑ C MBM + ∑ C REP + C F (2)
i j
safety and healthy performance systematically; and
(2) to keep in a minimum level of lost due to i =1 j =1

earthquake, typhoon and other unanticipated where CMBMi


is the monitoring based maintenance
loads3). HMBM is the basic technology to collect cost at i interval and CREPj is the repair cost at jth
th

maintenance information, forming a database interval. Figure 3 shows that the healthy degree
system to open to the public or citizens for making of an aging structure will reduce following a
decision on a suitable solution strategy to extend standard degradation curve. Therefore, monitoring
structure’s life4). In practicing this concept, citizens based maintenance is necessary to extend its
are not just as users but also as the owners of an structural life. It is assumed that during a structural
infrastructure. life cycle, there will be m intervals of monitoring
and n intervals of repair of the structure.

Standard
MAINTAIN degradation
curve
Unanticipated
Safety,Deterioration CT
Protection,Repair,Retrofit,Recycle
100
CMBM1 CMBM2 CREP1
Healthy Degree (%)

CMBM3
Infra Design,

PLAN
Evaluate,

SEE
Budget,
monitor, Investment

structure
assess, planning,
Open
information
Contract
Level of Service CF
Construction, Bidding, Betting, Ordering,
manufacturing, construction, quality
control, waste disposal

Standard Life T Extended Life tr


DO 0
Time (year)

Figure 2. LCC management of infrastructure Figure 3. LCC schematic description


The challenge in using the proposed approach is (1) service life of the RC structure is 100 years; (2)
quantifying the uncertainties in the input variables. routine maintenance is scheduled once every two
The rate of degradation, quality of inspection years; (3) in the analyses, all inspection costs are
method, and cost of failure are often subjective and converted to the initial cost of the structure, it is
difficult to obtain, but their values have a great concluded that minimum LCC can be achieved in a
effect on the final result. With reliable input data, it certain quality of inspection technique.
offers the real potential for integrating economic The relationship of the expected inspection cost
and safety issues in structural design. and LCC in various η0.5 is shown in Figure 4.
This approach serves as an initial base on which η 0.5 is the damage intensity at which the
to develop improved life-cycle cost design models. non-destructive evaluation (NDE) method has a
These models have to address additional issues 50% probability of detection.
such as serviceability limit states, use of spatially
distributed random fields for describing the 3.3 Utilization
degradation process, use of Bayesian theory for By considering theoretical background of
estimating the probability of damage detection, use HMBM, efficient monitoring technique and related
of improved time-variant bridge reliability models, effective technologies in the areas of condition and
reliability updating of target reliability level and health assessment, deterioration science and
development of user costs. renewal engineering are carried out and can be
In Japan, this approach was also applied for summarized as listed in Table 1.
optimization of maintenance frequency and time
for RC structures6), and modeling and estimation Table 1. Task flow in HMBM
of future maintenance cost for quaywalls in
Japanese ports7). Task 1 Prepare data base of the
In our previous study8), by utilizing this approach Documentation structures
to evaluate the economic and safety of an existing Task 2 Utilize high performance sensor
RC structure with a non uniform interval Investigation to inspect, evaluate and assess
inspection strategy with the following and current safety and healthy
assumptions: Assessment condition of the structures
Task 3 - Utilize LCC management
4.0 Prediction - Predict future degradation
η0.5 = 0.30 and condition
3.0 Simulation - Analyze financing mechanism
η0.5 = 0.20 - Examine suitable extend life
LCC/CT

η0.5 = 0.05
2.0 strategy
η0.5 = 0.15η0.5 = 0.10 η0.5 = 0.01 Task 4 Open the identified current
1.0 Publication information of structures’ healthy
condition to public (it may be
0.0 accessed through internet)
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
Task 5 Reduce LCC by modifying
CINS/CT
LCC reduction design, revising design code and
developing new technology
Figure 4. Cost of HMBM and LCC and/or new construction method
relationship
4. Innovative Sensory Technology for HMBM 4.1 Elasto-Magnetic Sensor (EM Sensor)
Structures normally behave elastically which are Stress sensor that can reliably monitor
designed to deform and reverse to their original true-stress in tendons and cables has been
configuration. When a structure is loaded beyond developed11) (Figure 5). The elasto-magnetic
its normal limits, it behaves plastically and sensor is a novel new approach to monitor cable
becomes permanently deformed and weakened. forces in bridge cables and anchorages12). Figure 6
Often this damage is invisible, but as strains in the shows the application of EM technology in
structure increase and the structure edges closer to monitoring the real stress of cables in a cable
structural failure9). Changes in girder strains, joint stayed bridge. Based on the fact that the
rotations and crack growth are indicators for permeability of ferromagnetic materials is a
evaluating structural integrity. By monitoring such function of magnetic history and applied field
changes closely, it is possible to provide (stress and temperature), permeability function is
quantitative clarity to assess its structural health. characterized at a technical saturation
New innovative monitoring technologies are experimentally13). Besides fulfilling ‘AtoE’
proposed to investigate local and global structural characteristics, the sensor boasts a theoretically
degradation mechanisms. Related to HMBM unlimited service lifetime and can be applied to
which has been discussed previously, it is any structure built with circular steel
considered that an effective monitoring system reinforcements or cables and does not influence
should be supported by high performance sensors structural integrity in any way.
which fulfill ‘AtoE’ characteristics as follows10):
(A)ccuracy: sensor should have a reliable Primary coil
accuracy; (B)enefit: commercial price of the sensor Secondary coil
should be reasonable; (C)ompact: sensor’s shape
should be small enough; (D)urability: Thermo couple
serviceability of the sensor should be durable and
do φs di
long-lived; and (E)xpress: sensor should be easy to
operate and time consumed for measurement φs : cable diameter
should be close to real time measurement. di : sensor inner diameter
do : sensor outer diameter
Furthermore, a real time monitoring system with
a digital network to acquire, process, store and Figure 5. EM sensor schematic structure
transmit the measured data is discussed. The
proposed real time monitoring system provides
valuable information for directing timely
maintenance relief to those areas of the structure
EM sensor
most in need of repair, so the following items can
be achieved: (1) Planned repair or replacement of
the structure before catastrophic collapse; (2)
Improved allocation of scarce maintenance funding
for the highest risk structure member; (3)
Determination of structural health after
catastrophic events, such as, earthquake, typhoon,
fire, explosions. Stress and permeability relationship
Here, developments of high performance
sensors together with a real time monitoring Figure 6. Application of EM sensor in monitoring
system are provided and discussed. true-stress of bridge cables
4.2 Peak Sensor 4.3 Smart Structure of TRIP Steels
Peak Sensor with a digital data acquisition TRIP (TRansformation Induced Plasticity) steels
network has been developed14). As shown in Figure are high-strength, high-toughness materials
7, one channel of the dual-output gauge measures originally developed as replacement materials for
relative displacement with high precision and the use in applications requiring high-strength,
other channel measures peak displacement and low-alloy steels. TRIP steels gradually transform
passively retains that value for later interrogation. on application of strain from austenite phase to
Therefore, with one of these gauges, the structure martensite phase. The parent austenite is
after a critical event (such as earthquake or paramagnetic and displays no significant
typhoon) can be interrogated, and the maximum ferromagnetic response. The product martensite is
distance of structure deformation during the event ferromagnetic. The transition occurs gradually and
can be determined. These sensors require no irreversibly as a function of applied strain thereby
electrical power except to read out the stored producing a ferromagnetic indicator in the amount
peak-displacement values15). Figure 8 shows the of martensite formed that can be correlated with
application of peak sensor on monitoring the peak the degree of straining.
displacement of bridge pedestal damper. Such self-sensing, self-diagnostic, and
self-actuating intelligent abilities of TRIP steels are
considered for application as structure
shaft①
reinforcement element for earthquake resistant
structures as shown in Figure 916). The amount of
transformed martensite of TRIP steels due to
applied loading was indicated as the change in
electromagnetic induction using electromagnetic
shaft② induction coils previously inserted on the TRIP
Shaft① : for tension
reinforcement bars as shown in Figure 10.
Shaft② : for compression

Figure 7. Peak sensor schematic structure

Solar power
Peak sensor

Data Smart
analysis material
module

Peak displacement data


Interrogator
Figure 8. Application of peak sensor on monitoring Figure 9. Smart structure schematic
peak displacement of bridge pedestal concept
damper
TRIP steel condition from anywhere in the world without
actually visiting structure’s site as shown in Figure
11. Such real-time, quantitative information greatly
Coil sensor improves structural safety inspections and provides
valuable information for directing timely
maintenance relief to those areas of the structure
most in need of repair, so structural life of
structures can be extended.
Figure 10. Coil sensor for smart structure
Engaging this network system with high
performance EM real stress and peak displacement
sensory devices will be the most advanced,
4.4 Network System
efficient and effective monitoring technology to
Multiple sensors are comprised by a complete
ascertain structural health. The engineered
real time monitoring system with a digital network
solutions which are based on these technologies,
to acquire, process and store the measured data. In
offer the following benefits: (i) the systems do not
a periodical intervals, the network returns the data
require continuous power supply which can be
to a central control room by cellular phone,
expensive in remote locations; (ii) the systems
satellite, or conventional telephone circuit. From
measure the most important variables, peak strain
there, the data is distributed confidentially via
and true stress; (iii) the systems allow data to be
intranet or internet, therefore, one whose secret
transmitted confidentially over the internet to any
password can immediately asses the structure’s
location around the world on a real-time basis

SMG034 Data Acquisition Solar


Module Power CELLULAR NETWORK
Supply

IPG 010

SMG032

Network Master Unit


Third party
sensors

Wireless KRC SECSY NET

EM 001

Figure 11. Proposed health monitoring system network


(modified from SMS system network)
5. Conclusion Frequency and Time for RC structures based
The current status of maintenance condition on on Performance-Based Design, J. JSCE, V.47A,
infrastructure inventory is briefly reviewed and a 2001
newly developed innovative HMBM is discussed. 7. Takahashi,H. and Yokota,H.: Modeling and
As the concluding remarks it is summarized as Estimation of Future Maintenance Costs for
follows: Quaywalls in Japanese Ports, J. of JSCE
1. A systematic monitoring for investigation and No.679/VI-51, PP.135-140, 2001
documentation of as-constructed structures, 8. Honjo,Y., Ueki,J., Sumitro,S., Matsui,Y., and
local or global structural health condition is Kato,Y.,: Influences of Quality and Frequency
needed to preserve the huge inventory of of Inspection on Maintenance of Civil
infrastructures. Engineering Structures, Proc. Of JSCE Annual
2. Efficient monitoring technique and related Conference, 2001
effective technologies in the areas of condition 9. Sumitro,S., Okamoto,T., Matsui,Y. and
and health assessment may improve lifecycle Fujii,K.: Long Span Bridge Health Monitoring
performance of infrastructures in which derive System in Japan, Proc. SPIE, 4337-67, 2001
to a LCC reduction. 10. Sumitro,S.: Current and Future Trends in Long
3. Effective monitoring system is suggested to be Span Bridge Health Monitoring System in
supported by high performance sensors those Japan, Proc. Of International Workshop on
fulfill ‘AtoE’ characteristics, i.e., (A)ccuracy, Health Monitoring of Long Span Bridges, UCI,
(B)enefit, (C)ompact, (D)urability and 2001
(E)xpress. 11. Chen,Z.L., Wang,M.L., Okamoto,T. and
4. Real time monitoring system is needed to Sumitro,S: A New Magnetoelastic
perform a ‘warning system’ before Stress/Corrosion Sensor for Cables in
catastrophic collapse of structures. Cable-Stayed Bridges Using Measurement of
Anhysteretic, Paper for 2nd Workshop on
ATUEDM, Kyoto, July 11-13, 2000
REFERENCES 12. Kurokawa,S., Sumitro,S., Wang,M.L.,
1. JSCE R&D Committee: JSCE R&D Shimano,K.: Cable Stress Measurement by
committee evaluation report, 1999 Applying Pulsed EM Phenomenon, Proc. Of
2. Matsuo, M.: Industry Will Change JSCE Annual Conference, 2001
Dramatically, Kashima Press, 2000 13. Kurokawa,S., Sumitro,S., Wang,M.L.,
3. Tominaga,M., Kato,Y. and Sumitro,S.: Shimano,K.: Stress Measurement of Various
Development of New Sensor and Maintenance Cables by EM Sensor, Proc. Of JPCEA Annual
Management Technique for Underground Conference, 2001
Structures, Proc. Of JGS, 2001 14. Thompson,L. and Westermo,B.: A New Strain
4. Tominaga,M., Okamoto,T., Kato,Y. and Measurement Technology For Material
Sumitro,S.: To A Systematic of MBM Damage Assessment, Proc. SPIE V. 2191,
Engineering, Proc. Of JSCE Annual pp.380-391, 1993
Conference, 2001 15. Sumitro,S., et al.: Development of Monitoring
5. Frangopol,M., Lin,K.Y., and Estes,A.C.: System for MBM, Proc. Of JSCE Annual
Life-Cycle Cost Design of Deteriorating Conference, 2001
Structures, J. of Structural Eng. V.123, No.10, 16. Adachi,Y. and Unjoh,S.: Seicmic Damage
pp.1390-1401, 1997 Sensing Technology of Intelligent Structures
6. Akaishizawa,N., Yoshida,I., Yasuda,N. and Using Self-Diagnosis material, Proc. Of JSCE
Miyamoto,K.: Optimization of Maintenance Annual Conference, V.1:B 253, 2000

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi