Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

Page 1 of 4

DAVAO CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL


V. Mapa Street, Davao City

SECOND PERIODIC EXAMINATION


PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (Grade 12)

Name: _________________________ Score: _____________/100_______________


Section: ________________________ Passing Score: ______/64________________
Teacher: Zython Paul T. Lachica Date: December 5 – December 12, 2017____

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: You are almost done with your quantitative research
project. Finalize your research paper by addressing all the comments given to you.
Furthermore, participate in the Project Presentation Fair on December 6, Wednesday.
Your 2nd periodic exam will be marked based on the rubric shown below:

RESEARCH PRELIMINARIES (Except for Abstract)


2 1 0.5 Score
All the research preliminaries are One to two research Three or more research
error free. preliminary/ies has/have technical preliminaries have technical
problems are observed (indention, problems are observed
spelling, capitalization, and the (indention, spelling,
like). capitalization, and the like).
ABSTRACT
3 2 1
The abstract well informs the The abstract presents the objective The abstract should be
reader about the objective of the of the study, methodology reformulated.
study, methodology employed, employed, major results, derived
major results, derived conclusion, conclusion, and significant
and significant recommendations. recommendations, however it can
be further articulated.

It does not exceed 250 words. It does not exceed 250 words. The abstract exceeded 250
words.

Significant key words are used. Significant key words are used. Keywords used should be
replaced.
Chapter I – Introduction
5 4 3 Score
The significant prevailing issues The significant prevailing issues The significant prevailing issues
and causes about the research and causes about the research and causes about the research
topic are clearly cited. The topic are cited. The international, topic are not cited. The
international, national, or local national, or local scenario are international, national, or local
scenario are clearly cited to somehow cited to situate the study. scenario are somehow cited to
situate the study. situate the study.

All parameters of the scope and Some parameters of the scope and Most parameters of the scope
the delimitations are all followed. the delimitations are not followed and the delimitations are not
thoroughly. followed thoroughly.
Purpose/s in conducting the study
and significance of the study is/are Purpose/s in conducting the study Purpose/s in conducting the
clearly stated. Specific and significance of the study is/are study and significance of the
beneficiaries of the study are clearly stated. However, either no study is/are not stated. Specific
enumerated as well as the beneficiaries of the study are beneficiaries of the study are not
corresponding tangible benefits enumerated, tangible benefits that enumerated. No tangible
they can derive from the study. can be derived from the study are benefits derived from the study
Beneficiaries are arranged unclearly stated, or beneficiaries are stated. Beneficiaries are not
according to importance. are arranged according to arranged according to
importance. importance.
The Introduction is error free.
The Introduction has some errors The Introduction has many
(use of I, We, Our, and the like). errors (use of I, We, Our, and
Some paragraphs are not the like). Most paragraphs are
indented. not indented.
All revisions are addressed
accordingly. Some of the revisions are not Most of the revisions are not
addressed accordingly. addressed accordingly or the
original paper is not included in
the submission of the final
paper.
Page 2 of 4

Chapter II – Review of Related Literature


5 4 3 Score
The RRL is organized and The RRL is organized but can The RRL has a weak
clearly outlined. still be improved. organization with illogical
sequencing of topics.

It uses comprehensive and good It uses good material and the The material used is not good
material and the importance of importance of the study is and the importance of the
the study is established. established. study is not well established.

Research hypotheses need to


Appropriate research Research hypotheses (null and be reconstructed again.
hypotheses (null and alternative/research hypothesis)
alternative/research hypothesis) lacked the variables in the study.
are clearly stated.
The RRL has significant errors
The RRL is error free The RRL has some errors (use of (use of I, We, Our, and the like).
I, We, Our, and the like). Some Most paragraphs are not
paragraphs are not indented. indented. Most figures and
Some figures and tables are tables are inappropriately
inappropriately labeled or labeled or positioned in the text
positioned in the text (minor (major sandwiching is
sandwiching is observed). observed).

Most of the revisions are not


All revisions are addressed Some of the revisions are not addressed accordingly or the
accordingly. addressed accordingly. original paper is not included in
the submission of the final
paper.
Chapter III – Methodology
5 4 3 Score
The objectives and the design are The objectives and the design are The research design is
mutually supportive and coherent mutually supportive and coherent. confusing or incomplete with
in an exemplary manner. The The flowchart gave a summary of respect to the objectives. The
flowchart excellently gave a the research methodology and flowchart lacked minor details to
summary of the research design. give a summary of the research
methodology and design. methodology and design.

All the necessary methodological All the necessary methodological The necessary methodological
procedures, sampling techniques, procedures, sampling techniques, procedures, sampling
and/or quantitative analyses are and/or quantitative analyses are techniques, and/or quantitative
excellently outlined. outlined but can still be analyses lacked sufficient
articulated. necessary information.

The Methodology is error free. The Methodology has some errors The Methodology has significant
(use of I, We, Our, and the like). errors (use of I, We, Our, and
Some paragraphs are not the like). Most paragraphs are
indented. Some figures and tables not indented. Most figures and
are inappropriately labeled or tables are inappropriately
positioned in the text (minor labeled or positioned in the text
sandwiching is observed). (minor sandwiching is
observed).

All revisions are addressed Some of revisions are Most of the revisions are not
not
accordingly. addressed accordingly. addressed accordingly or the
original paper is not included in
the submission of the final
paper.
Chapter IV – Results and Discussion
5 4 3 Score
The discussion of each results The discussion of each results The discussion of each results
involves more than three unique involves one to two unique fails to involve literature sources
literature sources (preferably with literature sources (preferably with or most of the sources do not
date) in verifying the results of the date) in verifying the results of the have date, in verifying the
study. study. results of the study.

Tabular, graphical, and textual Tabular, graphical, and textual Tabular, graphical, and textual
statistical/quantitative results are statistical/quantitative results are statistical/quantitative results
in excellent harmony with each fairly in coherence with each fail to exhibit coherence with
other. other but can still be articulated. each other.

The Results and Discussion is The Results and Discussion has The Results and Discussion has
error free. some errors (use of I, We, Our, and significant errors (use of I, We,
the like). Some paragraphs are not Our, and the like). Most
indented. Some figures and tables paragraphs are not indented.
are inappropriately labeled or Most figures and tables are
positioned in the text (minor inappropriately labeled or
sandwiching is observed). Minimal positioned in the text (minor
error on statistical/computational sandwiching is observed). Many
notes are observed. errors on
Page 3 of 4

All revisions are addressed Some of revisions are not statistical/computational notes
accordingly. addressed accordingly. are observed.

Most of the revisions are not


addressed accordingly or the
original paper is not included in
the submission of the final
paper.
CHAPTER V – SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATION
5 4 3 Score
Summary is briefly written and has Summary has introductory Summary has introductory
no or minimal introductory phrases/sentences. Summary of phrases/sentences. Summary
phrases/sentences. Summary of objectives, materials and methods, of objectives, materials and
objectives, materials and and major results is presented. methods, and major results is
methods, major results is not properly condensed.
presented.

The conclusion represents well The conclusion represents the The conclusion fails to represent
the entity of the entire research entity of the entire research the entity of the entire research
process and provides a new process and provides a new process. The conclusion must
information. Word choice and information. Word choice and be reconstructed.
sentence construction for the sentence construction for the
conclusion have a scholar impact conclusion can be articulated.
to the reader.

The recommendation provides an The recommendation provided has The recommendation should be
area for improvement of the some unclear connections to the reformulated. The
research and/or provides an research. recommendation provided has
application of the information or unclear connections to the
knowledge derived from the research.
research.

The Summary, Conclusion, and The Summary, Conclusion, and The Summary, Conclusion, and
Recommendation are error free. Recommendation have some Recommendation have some
errors (use of I, We, Our, and the errors (use of I, We, Our, and
like). Some paragraphs are not the like). Most paragraphs are
indented. not indented.

All revisions are addressed Some of revisions are not


Most of the revisions are not
accordingly. addressed accordingly. addressed accordingly or the
original paper is not included in
the submission of the final
paper.
BIBLIOGRAPHY AND APPENDICES
5 4 3 Score
The Bibliography strictly follows At most one-fifth of the More than three-tenth of the
the APA citation. bibliographies are not cited bibliographies are not cited
accordingly. accordingly.

Appendices contain the raw data Appendices contain the raw data Appendices failed to contain the
and steps for hypothesis testing and steps for hypothesis testing raw data, steps for hypothesis
with manual computations that are with manual computations but are testing with manual
comprehendible. Other supporting comprehendible. Other supporting computations, and other
documents such as photos of data documents such as photos of data supporting documents.
gathering/experimentation, gathering/experimentation,
chemical computations, etc., are chemical computations, etc., are
well presented. well presented.

Both Bibliography and The Bibliography and Appendices The Bibliography and
Appendices are error free. has some errors. Appendices has many errors.
PROJECT DISPLAY
Title of the Project
4 3 2 Score
Title can be read from two meters Either the Title cannot be read from The Title cannot be read from 2
away and is not interesting. 2 meters away or the Title is not meters away and the Title is not
interesting. interesting.
Organization
8 6 4 Score
Contents of the Project Display Contents of the Project Display are Rearrangement of the contents
are organized. arranged accordingly but can still of the Project Display must be
be improved. done.
Creativity
8 6 4 Score
The Project Display is very The Project Display is creative. The Project Display has a
creative. All colors and other However some colors and other satisfactory creativity. However
visual components are in harmony visual components are not color and other visual
to each other. harmony to each other. components are quite
distracting.
Page 4 of 4

Figures and Graph


12 9 6 Score
Graphs and/or Pictures are very Graphs and/or Pictures are very Display lacks Graphs and/or
informative and can be seen from informative but cannot be seen Pictures or has Graphs and/or
one meter away. from one meter away. Pictures but can be hardly seen
from one meter away.
PROJECT PRESENTATION
Organization and Speaking Skills
9 6 3 Score
Provides an excellent explanation Provides explanations of the work; Provides explanations of the
of the work. Communication of the however, communication of the work; however communication
research results or answering research results or answering of the research results or
questions from panel is well questions from panel is not well answering questions from panel
organized. organized. is poorly organized.
Significance of the Research Findings
15 12 9
Researchers have made and Researchers has made and Researchers has made or
presented substantial findings that presented few substantial finding presented no substantial
are evidence based, accurate, or findings are inconclusive. findings and have not met any of
and clearly expressed. the objectives.
Appropriateness of Attire
9 6 3
Researchers are in appropriate At least one of the researchers Only one researcher wears
(business) attire. does not wear appropriate appropriate (business) attire.
(business) attire.

TO T A L S C O R E (100)

“The difference between enduring and thriving is thankfulness.”

Thank you for a wonderful semester!


God bless you all and cherish the remaining days in your Senior High life.
Honor and Excellence.
- Sir Z 

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi