Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Kyle M. Samperton1*, Elizabeth A. Bell2, Mélanie Barboni2, C. Brenhin Keller1†, and Blair Schoene1
Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
1
Department of Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA
2
6.6 San
46
*Current address: Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Liver- Figure 1. Geologic map of the Bergell Intrusion (northern Italy–
more National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, California 94550, USA; southeast Switzerland) adapted from Samperton et al. (2015), with
E-mail: samperton1@llnl.gov. sample locations and key tonalite samples BR10-04 and BR10-03
†
Current address: Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2455 Ridge Road, Berkeley, specified. Representative Al-in-hornblende pressures (kbar) are
California 94709, USA. given in yellow (Davidson et al., 1996). Hybrid.—hybridized.
GEOLOGY, November 2017; v. 45; no. 11; p. 983–986 | Data Repository item 2017333 | doi:10.1130/G38645.1 | Published online 23 August 2017
GEOLOGY
© | Volume
2017 Geological 45 | ofNumber
Society America. | www.gsapubs.org
11 For permission to copy, contact editing@geosociety.org. 983
this magma reservoir at mid-crustal depths (Davidson et al., 1996) resulted U-Pb CA-ID-TIMS date (Ma) U-Pb CA-ID-TIMS date (Ma)
in slow cooling and protracted zircon growth histories; its young age (ca. 32.0 31.8 31.6 31.4 31.2 31.6 31.4 31.2 31.0 30.8
dif
2σ 2σ
fe
Th/U (TIMS)
re
attributable to primary magmatic zircon growth (Samperton et al., 2015). 0.4
nt
iat
ion
A multistep analytical workflow was applied by Samperton et al. (2015)
tre
0.3
to describe Bergell zircon systematics, including in situ trace element
nd
geochemistry and high-precision U-Pb CA-ID-TIMS-TEA (TEA—trace 0.2
element analysis) geochronology and solution geochemistry (Schoene et BR10-04 BR10-03
al., 2010). Trends in tonalitic zircon composition on 105–106 yr time scales 0.1 Δta= 609 ± 90 k.y. Δta= 706 ± 57 k.y.
were interpreted to reflect zircon crystallization during magma evolution; 0.7
e.g., hand-sample–scale trends of decreasing zircon Th/U as a function C D
0.6
of U-Pb date reflect growth coeval with magmatic allanite + epidote on
the basis of known trace element partitioning behavior (Figs. 2A and 2B;
Th/U (SIMS)
0.5
2σ 2σ
Oberli et al., 2004; Samperton et al., 2015). From these data, it was con-
co
0.4
oli
ng
cluded (Samperton et al., 2015) that Bergell tonalitic zircon populations
tre
0.3
nd
are overwhelmingly primary, i.e., the result of pseudo-closed system crys-
tallization during postemplacement cooling, thus satisfying criteria 1 and 2. 0.2
dT/dt = dT/dt =
Comparatively, Bergell zircons from hybridized and granodioritic samples 269 ± 62 °C/m.y. 126 ± 50 °C/m.y.
0.1
are a more complex amalgam of basement-derived xenocrysts, zircon
850 800 750 700 800 750 700
entrained from earlier magma pulses, and primary magmatic domains. Ti-in-zircon temperature (°C) Ti-in-zircon temperature (°C)
Criterion 3 dictates that Ti-in-zircon thermometry of tonalitic zircons
should yield a strong correlation between temperature and a differentia- Figure 2. Zircon age-temperature-compositional trends from Bergell
Intrusion (northern Italy–southeast Switzerland) tonalites BR10-04
tion proxy (Th/U), confirming time-temperature-compositional evolution and BR10-03. A, B: Zircon Th/U evolution as a function of 206Pb/238U
during down-liquidus crystallization. Here we test this hypothesis both date from chemical abrasion–isotope dilution–thermal ionization
through Ti-in-zircon thermometric characterization of Bergell zircon and, mass spectrometry (CA-ID-TIMS) geochronology, recording zircon
in tandem with the integrated U-Pb geochronological-geochemical data compositional evolution (time, ∆ta) over 600–700 k.y. of magma crys-
tallization (Samperton et al., 2015). C, D: Corresponding evolution in
set in Samperton et al. (2015), compare empirical zircon data to a theo-
zircon Th/U as a function of Ti-in-zircon crystallization temperature
retical and an experimentally based zircon crystallization model (thus (T) from secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) microanalysis,
assessing criterion 4). indicating systematically decreasing growth temperatures through
time during cooling and solidification. Magmatic cooling rate: dT/dt
METHODS AND RESULTS (°C/m.y.). Mean internal analytical uncertainties are 2σ.
We present results of in situ zircon geochemical analyses by second-
ary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), including Ti-in-zircon thermometry
(Ferry and Watson, 2007), on a targeted subset of zircon populations uncertainty in magmatic H2O content, 5000 simulations were performed
described in Samperton et al. (2015; see the GSA Data Repository1). This with H2O content ranging between 0 wt% and 10 wt%; results were binned
approach permits determination of zircon temperature-geochemical trends into 2.5 wt% increments and mean model zircon spectra calculated for
by SIMS (Figs. 2C and 2D) that can be directly related to zircon time- each (Fig. 3; Fig. DR16). Simulations were also used to estimate the tita-
geochemical trends resolved by U-Pb CA-ID-TIMS-TEA (Figs. 2A and nia activity (aTiO2) over the melt fraction interval of most tonalitic zircon
2B). Zircon time-Th/U trends parallel zircon temperature-Th/U trends in crystallization (0.60–0.35) using the aTiO2 solubility model of Hayden
tonalite samples BR10-04 and BR10-03 (Fig. 2), indicating progressively and Watson (2007), with calculated aTiO2 increasing from ~0.25 to 0.65
decreasing crystallization temperatures through time and validating the (Fig. DR17). Mean aTiO2 values of 0.44 (sample BR10-04) and 0.33
interpretation that Bergell zircon spectra record protracted growth during (sample BR10-03), in accordance with the estimated range of aTiO2 in
magma cooling. Trends are corroborated by changes in complementary silicic magmas (0.3–0.9; Ghiorso and Gualda, 2013), were used to cal-
crystallization indicators with temperature (e.g., Ce/Ce* and Lu/Hf; Fig. culate Ti-in-zircon temperatures (Figs. 2 and 3). To address a widely rec-
DR1 in the Data Repository). Comparatively, SIMS analyses of grano- ognized offset between MELTS and experimental temperatures, i.e., with
dioritic zircon yielded complex temperature-geochemical relationships MELTS regularly overestimating absolute temperatures by ~25–50 °C
(Fig. DR1), consistent with pervasive zircon inheritance in this Bergell (Ghiorso et al., 2002; Gualda et al., 2012), a systematic minimum cor-
lithology (Samperton et al., 2015). rection of –25 °C was applied to all model curves. Excellent correlation
To further evaluate the hypothesis that zircon age-temperature-com- between the Ti-in-zircon temperature spectra and corrected MELTS mod-
positional spectra reflect magma compositional evolution, we generated els is observed (Fig. 3), with the former best matching relatively hydrous
model zircon spectra from crystallization simulations using the thermo- crystallization simulations (i.e., >2.5 wt% H2O), consistent with evidence
dynamic modeling software MELTS (Ghiorso et al., 2002; http://melts of H2O-enriched Periadriatic parental magmas (Hürlimann et al., 2016).
.ofm-research.org), in which tonalitic whole-rock geochemistry was used Using the primary magmatic U-Pb zircon spectra interpreted in Sam-
as liquid compositions. The zircon solubility model of Boehnke et al. perton et al. (2015), we calculate cumulative distributions of Bergell zir-
(2013) was employed to calculate the mass of zircon crystallized at each con mass crystallized as a function of normalized time (and by exten-
simulation step using the system temperature, melt compositional proxy sion, temperature; Fig. 4). In this scaling, x = 1 denotes the initiation of
(M value), and Zr concentration (Keller et al., 2017). To account for zircon crystallization at Tsat, and x = 0 the termination of crystallization
at Tsolid. Also included in this plot are the cumulative density functions of
GSA Data Repository item 2017333, analytical details, modeling methods,
1 the aforementioned MELTS simulations and Ti-in-zircon temperatures
SIMS and CA-ID-TIMS data tables, is available online at http://www.geosociety (Fig. 3), as well as the zircon growth curve from Zr diffusion modeling
.org/datarepository/2017/, or on request from editing@geosociety.org. of Watson (1996).
5–
0.01
7.
wt%
time scales provides compelling evidence in favor of Ti-in-zircon ther-
5
BR10-04
wt
t%
%
5
aTiO2 = 0.44 mometry as a robust petrologic tool (Fig. 2). In general, due to the low
.5 w
2.5–
volume of young, low-T zircon crystallized during cooling and relatively
0–2
analysis omitted nt
e 4), as the latter distributions may undersample the absolute latest, youngest,
co
5–7.5
r
wate lowest-T stages of zircon growth. Similarly, SIMS analyses of unpolished
increasing
zircon rims can ensure isolation of the outermost zircon domains for Ti-
0.01 in-zircon thermometry (Tierney et al., 2016). Alternatively, that MELTS
%
BR10-03
%
wt
aTiO2 = 0.33
5
2.
–5
2.5
(Coleman et al., 2004; Miller et al., 2007). It is interesting that the absence
of strong zircon age-temperature-compositional covariance in many geo-
chronological-geochemical studies necessitates incremental assembly as
50
an important pluton-forming mechanism (Schoene et al., 2012; Broderick
et al., 2015). Application of the tools described here to other plutons can
therefore help further quantify models of incrementally emplaced plutons.
Watson (1996)
MELTS models CONCLUSIONS
25
Bergell Ti-in-zircon Few magmatic processes are truly instantaneous; the limitation imposed
by analytical resolution can create the illusion of temporal, compositional,
Bergell U–Pb spectra
Samperton et al. (2015) and thermal homogeneity in such systems. We have quantified post-
0 emplacement crystallization and cooling histories in mid-crustal intrusive
rocks on 600–700 k.y. time scales through characterization of zircon age-
1 0.75 0.50 0.25 0
temperature-compositional spectra. Data and modeling in the current study
time,Temperature (normalized to tmax ,Tmax ) corroborate U-Pb zircon spectra as reflecting resolvable time scales of melt
Figure 4. Summary of primary magmatic U-Pb zircon chem- residence and solidification in the middle crust, highlighting the power and
ical abrasion–isotope dilution–thermal ionization mass necessity of treating zircon as a zoned, dynamic archive. Such data are
spectrometry (CA-ID-TIMS) age spectra (Samperton et al., essential for refining models of incremental pluton assembly and harmoniz-
2015), Ti-in-zircon thermometric data, MELTS (see text) zircon
crystallization models, and zircon diffusive growth modeling ing temporal histories of magmatic systems inferred from geothermometry
(Watson, 1996), plotted as cumulative distributions (%) as and geochronology versus those constrained by numerical modeling.
functions of normalized time-temperature. Horizontal axis: 1
= zircon saturation temperature (Tsat) with old, high-T zircon ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
domains; 0 = near solidus (Tsolid) with young, low-T zircon This work was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) grant EAR-
domains. U-Pb spectra are color coded to sample locations 1219766 (Petrology and Geochemistry Program, to Schoene), 2012 Geological
in Figure 1, and MELTS and Ti-in-zircon curves are color Society of America (GSA) Research Grant 9762–12 (to Samperton), a 2012 GSA
coded to Figure 3. MGPV (Mineralogy, Geochemistry, Petrology & Volcanology) Division Student