Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Rodriguez, however, submitted a certification from the Commission of Immigration showing that
Rodriguez left the US on June 25, 1985- roughly five (5) months prior to the institution of the criminal
complaint filed against him before the Los Angeles Court.
Held: No. The Supreme Court reiterated that a “fugitive from justice” includes not only those who flee
after conviction to avoid punishment but likewise who, being charged, flee to avoid prosecution. The
definition thus indicates that the intent to evade is the compelling factor that animates one’s flight from
a particular jurisdiction. And obviously, there can only be an intent to evade prosecution or punishment
when there is knowledge by the fleeing subject of an already instituted indictment or of a promulgated
judgement of conviction.
Intent to evade on the part of a candidate must therefore be established by proof that there has already
been a conviction or at least, a charge has already been filed, at the time of flight. This cannot be applied
in the case of Rodriguez. Rodriguez arrived in the Philippines on June 25, 1985, five months before the
filing of the felony complaint in the Los Angeles Court on November 12, 1985 and of the issuance of the
arrest warrant by that same foreign court. It was clearly impossible for Rodriguez to have known about
such felony complaint and arrest warrant at the time he left the US, as there was in fact no complaint
and arrest warrant — much less conviction — to speak of yet at such time.
Not being a "fugitive from justice" under this definition, Rodriguez cannot be denied the Quezon
Province gubernatorial post. –JOMARI BAYOT