Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

Thesis Proposal Grant

Evaluation Criteria

CRITERIA INDICATORS / DETAILS SCALE POINTS*

Significance The proposal is aligned with the 1 2 3 4 5


(Relevance to art research / creative project agenda
and cultural of OICA
development in
Philippine society) The proposed research / creative 1 2 3 4 5
project is primarily directed
towards the development of arts
and culture in the university.

40% The proposed output/s of the 1 2 3 4 5


proposal show/s valuable impact/s
to the target community.

The proposal is able to produce 1 2 3 4 5


valuable new knowledge and
innovations, and/or is able to
address gaps in cultural
development, arts and culture
education, and/or in existing
literature.

Technicality The problematique (statement of 1 2 3 4 5


(Technical Merits the research problem) is feasible,
of the Proposal) reasonable and coherent.

Objectives are clear and concrete. 1 2 3 4 5

The pieces of literature used in 1 2 3 4 5


30% the proposal are up to date and
relevant.

The proposal is clearly supported 1 2 3 4 5


by a conceptual framework and
the framework is concise and
well-defined.

The methodology and research 1 2 3 4 5


design are clear, sound, and are
able to outline the concrete
outcomes of the project.

The work plan timeline of 1 2 3 4 5


activities and line item budget are
reasonable and feasible.
The proposal is written with 1 2 3 4 5
correct syntax.

Originality and The researcher / proponent of the 1 2 3 4 5


Novelty creative project shows a potential
(Processes and for future research or projects.
approaches of
knowledge The researcher demonstrates 1 2 3 4 5
production strong orientation toward research
involved in the or production of a creative output
Proposal) (based on grades, CVs and
portfolio).
30%

GRAND TOTAL ____________

*Sum of ratings per criterion /No. of indicators x Criterion % weight

Rating Scale Guide:

1 – Strongly Disagree
2 – Disagree
3 – Neutral
4 – Agree
5 – Strongly Agree