Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Communication
The communist theory of mass media came into being along with
the concept of communism. George W. F. Hegel and later, Karl
Marx with Engels were the people who thought of the theory in the
19th century. Mass media in the view of Karl Marx was supposed
to be responsible for socialist system of governance and
communist media was supposed to help in implementing social
policies. The communist and Marxist government rule and
communist theory of mass communication was practically used by the
then Soviet Union (Russia) in 1917. Thus, the theory is also
known as Soviet Theory of Mass Communication. The government
controlled all the media according to this theory and had absolute
power. The theory was implemented to help in achieving the
communist objectives for the benefits of the people.
Concepts of Communist Theory of
Mass Communication
Media is taken as a part of the state in Communist Theory. The
ownership of media is with the state and the country runs the
media as per their wishes to fulfill their propaganda of control.
The communist party owns all the media of the country. Media is
supposed to work for the betterment of the state, communism
and whatever the elite of the communist party tells them to do.
Deterring the growth of communism is taken as a crime.
Criticism of small parts of the government work is accepted but
criticizing the state as a whole is prohibited in communist theory
of mass media. Citizens are taken to be irrational and stupid and
masses are kept away from the government. They are just
provided with propaganda and basic knowledge. Government
activities are not to be known to general public. Whatever rulers
said becomes the ruling idea.
The Authoritarian Theory describes the situation where states view the mass
media as an instrument at all ties. The role of the media is to mainly
educate citizens, and acts as a propaganda tool for the ruling party.
The main difference between the Authoritarian theory and the Soviet-
Communist Theory is that while the former allows both private and public
media ownership, the latter allows strictly only public media ownership.
Another difference is that while the Authoritarian medias are mainly use to
maintain societal status quo, a Soviet-Communist media is often used to
bring about societal changes. (Krishnammurthy Sriramesh, undated)
In the past, the Burmese media has been under an Authoritarian system.
Until 2011, the Burmese media has always portrayed itself as supportive of
the country’s previous military junta. News reports gushed over generals,
attacked foreign media, and remain uncritical of it’s military leadership.
Journalists who wrote reports that threatened the ruling party were
imprisoned. Stiff censorship regulations were in place as well, and only
state-controlled newspapers, usually propaganda-filled, are allowed to
publish daily. Privately run news publications published weekly rather than
daily due to Myanmar’s stifling censorship requirements (Committee to
Protect Journalists, 2006). However, recently, with the uprise of democracy
in Myanmar and transition to a civilian government, the burmese media has
been walking away from it’s extreme authoritarian approach, releasing
imprisoned journalists. From June 2011, half of Myanmar’s privately owned
publications were allowed to published without submitting page proofs to
censors in advance. Also, the government will allow private daily newspapers
from April next year (Aung Hla Tun, 2012).