Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
I learned about the OWRC peer tutor position from my former English professor, Kirin
Wachter-Grene. The support your staff offers to University of Washington students is
impressive and your mission of challenging writers to improve their own work, rather than just
“fixing” their work for them is admirable. My experience as a writer at UW has been a
positive and motivating experience that was very much influenced by encouragement
from my professors and my interactions with the OWRC staff during tutoring sessions. I would
love the opportunity to contribute to the writing community at UW by empowering other
writers to believe in their work as others have done for me.
I have had several experiences that are applicable to this particular job. I have spent a lot
of time working with diverse communities of people, specifically as an employee of the
YMCA as a swim instructor and through various volunteering programs. As a swim instructor
for adolescent and adult swim classes, I work with people who are seeking help but are also
frustrated and embarrassed with their situation. These can be tricky classes to teach
because the students’ swim abilities and confidence issues both have to be addressed
before any progress can be made. This is often the situation that arises when trying to tutor
someone, which I also have had experience with as a chemistry/calculus tutor to my peers
in high school as well as a fourth-grade tutor. When a student usually comes to a tutor it is
because they have hit a wall, something about the material isn’t clicking or they have the
infamous “writer’s block.” I’ve found that a lot of the times a student will actually know how
to proceed with the problem if they look at the problem from a different angle, but their
frustration at that point is clouding their judgment. As a tutor, or a swim instructor, I always
encourage my students to talk about the issue out loud. What specifically about this math
problem is not working? Why do you think the stroke feels awkward? Through guided
questions, a student will usually figure out the solution, or at least a better understanding of
what they need help with, and then from there it is simply up to me to provide them with
the tools to finish on their own.
I would love to be a member of the OWRC team and have the opportunity to help
students at UW find their voice through writing.
Sincerely,
Natalie Pearlman
Natalie Pearlman
Address / Seattle, WA 98195
natpearl@uw.edu – Phone Number - https://www.linkedin.com/in/pearlmannatalie
EDUCATION:
Bachelor of Science- Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Expected June 2018
Overall GPA: 3.67/4.0
University Interdisciplinary Honors Program
Course Highlights- Introductory Biology Series; Introduction to Gender, Women, and Sexuality Studies;
English 111 – Focus on Invisible Man; Epidemiology: Outbreak Investigation and Response
RESEARCH INTERESTS:
UW Med Life
University of Washington RSO
Organization on campus that is affiliated with the national Med Life group
Spends summer and fall quarter fundraising in order to send a group of students to South America over
winter break to provide relief to rural villages and assist in mobile clinics run by local doctors
PRESENTATION:
Pearlman, N. (May 2015) “Exploring the Medical Field Through Experimental Learning Opportunities.”
PowerPoint and speech presented at Spring Celebration of Service and Leadership, University of Washington.
This piece was written as an assignment for my English 111 composition class. The
prompt for this particular paper encouraged students to pick any issue inspired by Ralph
Ellison’s novel, Invisible Man, and to develop a researched academic claim. I chose to research
the effects of gendered stereotypes on women in leadership roles, specifically female leaders in
the political realm. While I had a general idea of what my claim would be, the more research I
did on the topic the more I realized that I had a lot more that I wanted to say than the ten page
limit would allow. It took me a substantial amount of time to pick only the most relevant sources
and to edit my writing until it was as concise as possible. The whole process overall made me
realize that when I find a topic that I am passionate about and interested in, then the actual
writing comes naturally. I realized that even with a narrow list of topics to choose from, if I
could spend the time to find a topic that I actually have an opinion on and want to write about, I
produce a much more convincing paper. Despite how time consuming it may be, I have learned
that spending some time doing basic research on several topic options before picking the actual
topic can be beneficial, and help to avoid the dreaded “writer’s block” in the long run.
Excerpt from: Gendered Stereotypes: The Barriers Holding Back Madame President
understanding of specific stereotypes needs to be established. The focus in this essay are
stereotypes specifically of professional women, or women who work in upper level jobs or in
politicians can be placed. The first stereotype category is aggression, which includes
“boastfulness, loud speech, using swear words, showing anger, and speaking aggressively”
(Robson 208), which is a sharp contradiction to the submissive and gentle persona most often
attributed to the ideal woman. This “aggressive” nature is most often attributed to men and is
viewed as a skill or leadership style, but when a professional woman is seen as “aggressive” she
simply because she is in opposition to the traditional “socially desirable traits” (Robson 207) of a
woman. The demeaning slur of “bitch” is a fitting description for how aggression in a
professional woman is viewed by society. Unfortunately, this stigma is not something only seen
in movies, it transcends into real life and professional women everywhere who are career
focused and driven are plagued with this image of being seen as undesirable bitches. Most
Glenn Beck, a popular radio political satirist, said that female politician, Hillary Clinton, “cannot
be elected President because . . . there’s some- thing about her vocal range…something about her
voice that just drives me—it’s not what she says, it’s how she says it” (Bligh 560). How she says
what exactly? Glenn Beck essentially does not like that Hillary Clinton, a woman, is aggressive
and speaks about her causes and platforms in a firm tone that does not allow for doubts. He
would never vote for her for president because why would he want a “bitch” to lead the country?
aggressive/bitch stereotype. From 1993 to 2001, during her time as the First Lady of the United
Sates, Clinton was “castigated [by the media] for being pushy, meddlesome, and ‘bitchy’”
(Anderson 106) due to her involvement in her husband’s policies and with her own political
activism. While Clinton did not hold other political positions during her time as first lady, she
heavily advocated for public reforms to healthcare, education, and women’s rights. She was
essentially a professional first lady but not in the traditional sense of “reflect[ing] ideals of
home, family, and womanhood” (Anderson 108). The American media did not know how to
treat this woman who so blatantly disregarded the roles of traditional femininity so they targeted
her ruthlessly for her deviations from it. What is interesting though is how the media’s
perception of Clinton changed throughout her political career. While she was never able to shed
the imposed image of a bitchy professional woman, and probably will never be able to, Clinton
was able to reestablish her primary image in the media and within the realms of politics during
her time as the senator of New York. During her campaign she was heavily bombarded with
gendered stereotypes regarding her role as a mother, spouse of an adulterous husband, and
woman but she meticulously combatted these stereotypes so that “she went from being viewed
primarily as a woman to being judged predominantly as a candidate” (Anderson 109). Even with
this transition by the media, Clinton could not completely remove the ideals of femininity from
her various political campaigns and run for president. Instead of embracing them or aggressively
disregarding them, Clinton strategically displayed small amounts of femininity through rhetorical
strategies in her speeches so as not to allow her femininity to define her or be removed from her.
One example of a rhetorical strategy included utilizing a “‘feminine style’ of discourse [in] her
speech…[she] employed concrete language, personal tone, and anecdotal evidence, because it
invited audience identification” (Anderson115) automatically due to the emotion she portrayed
for the audience. Clinton is an example of a woman who took the stereotype assigned to her and
turned it around for her own political gain; she went from the bitch to the “woman leader”
relationships with family members, or rather the lack of ability to form these relationships.
Robson identifies this category as orientation towards family because “[an] ‘appropriately’
feminine woman, the ideal woman, and the good female role model is a wife and mother”
(Robson 212) while the stereotypical professional woman has trouble with intimacy, rejects
relationships because the career comes first, is divorced, is an inept mother, or is struggling to
find a balance between career and family (Ezzedeen 243). The media routinely portrays this
double bind in which women are faced with two contradictory expectations, the expectations of
femininity and the demands of a career. With so few portrayals of professional woman being
able to manage both a family and career, or choosing to not have a family without being
stigmatized for it, it is no surprise that this stereotype is prevalent more than ever in the political
spectrum. Female politicians are often first judged based on whether or not they have a family
because somehow the presence of one is indicative of one’s morals. Women are often trapped in
a double bind, “single women are morally suspect, and married women without children are
deemed deficient” (Robson 212) but woman with children who are vigorously campaigning for
an elected position are seen as unloving and irresponsible for leaving their families. With the
way the media is portraying professional women, there seems to be no way to win.
While the traditional professional woman is viewed as disregarding her family and
essentially being unfeminine, Elizabeth Dole, a one time presidential candidate, embraced her
femininity and is seen in contrast to the non-family oriented stereotype of a professional woman.
The media portrayed Dole as a family woman, an “appropriately cheerful and submissive
political wife” (Anderson 121). Throughout her husband’s failed presidential campaign and her
own presidential campaign several years later, her image was “inextricably linked to her
femininity” (Anderson 121). In the media, Dole was always solely described as the female
candidate and the word female became extremely defining. The media at the U.S. Naval
Academy wrote how great it was that a female could “‘talk tough on military matters’”
(Anderson 121). Other news sources used similar language in articles that seemed to celebrate
the fact that a woman could comment intelligently on political matters rather than writing articles
about the actual politics Dole spoke about. Essentially, Dole’s embracement of gender roles and
traditional female stereotypes “[made] it hard for voters to imagine her as president” (Anderson
107). The media belittled Dole for her embracement of femininity because by being in contrast to
the expected stereotypes of a professional woman, she was viewed as incompetent and a weak
leader.
political candidates’ images as either positive or negative, as well as voters’ overall evaluations
of candidates” (Bligh 565). The way the media depicts a politician can have dire consequences to
their campaign. The media’s use of “gender-stereotyped language (e.g., gentle, warm, weak
leader)” (Bligh 565) can become internalized by individuals in society and be reflected later in
the voting polls. Michelle C. Bligh’s scientific study demonstrated that voter’s feelings toward
female politicians’ likeability and competence after reading various articles about them varied
heavily based on the language and topics discussed in the article. Some would argue that despite
what Bligh’s scientific study concluded, demeaning articles and representations by the media can
only have so much affect of society’s perceptions of women when “female politicians [appear]
occupational stereotypes that disenfranchise women in the political arena” (Robson 206). It is
true that more women than ever are involved in politics and can be seen frequently in society,
their presence though does not negate the many other images of women that society is
bombarded with.