Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
42134225, 1995
Pergamon ElsevierScienceLtd
Copyright ~ 1995Acta MetallurgicaInc.
0956-7151(95)00126-3 Printed in Great Britain.All rights reserved
0956-7151/95 $9.50+ 0.00
Abstract--The thermoelastic transformation of the CuZnA1 shape memory alloy has been studied in situ
and in real time by synchrotron X-ray topography. The white nature of the beam leads access to
crystallographic relations between crystals in ]~ and 9R phases. From our original method deduced from
the Kajiwara theory the experimental and simulated orientations have been compared and the self-accom-
modating character of the transformation has been shown.
4213
4214 JOURDAN et al.: TRANSFORMATION OF A Cu-Zn-A1 SINGLE CRYSTAL--I
is built in such a way to allow the incident and the X-ray source, the diffraction diagrams of the fl
diffracted X-ray beams crossing. and 9R phases are recorded simultaneously on the
Due to the high flux of the incident X-ray beam same film. In Fig. 2(a) (262.7 K) a single transform-
in situ and real time studies are possible. The exper- ation variant is present; in Fig. 2(b) (262.5 K) a
imental technique is such that, when the first nuclei second variant appears; in Fig. 2(c) (262 K) four
of the low temperature phase are detected, the tem- variants are present. The diffraction spots of each
perature is slowly decreased in steps of 0.2 K. To phase are easily identified: the spots of the fl phase
follow the crystal structure evolution and the marten- (initial state) are circular while the spots of the 9R
site plate growth, topograms are recorded at each phase, given by the martensitic plates, are linear.
step on films or nuclear plates. The reverse transform- Moreover, in the fl spots, the white trace (lack of
ation is studied in the same manner as the direct one. diffraction) corresponds to the part of the fl crystal
A computer program (Orient Express) has been which is transformed into 9R phase, therefore it is
used to determine the crystal orientations from the possible to localize the nucleation of the plate and its
experimental Laue diagrams and conversely to simu- interactions with the fl structure. This fundamental
late, from the crystallographic data, the diffraction point will be treated in the second paper. Figure 2(d)
diagrams of crystals in 9R phase. (261.5 K), at a further stage of the transformation
(however, less than half of the crystal is transformed),
3. RESULTS shows the complexity of the diffraction diagram.
3. I. Diagram description This paper is restricted to the crystallographic
study of the transformation.
Figure 1 shows the diffraction diagram given by the
disk-shaped fl single crystal of CuZnA1. This diagram
is in fact a Laue diagram with the following 3.2. Experimental results
peculiarities: the Laue spots have the size of the cross From the crystallographic data (structure and size
section of the incident beam which has been limited of the unit cells), experimental parameters and coor-
to the size of the disk-shaped crystal with the aim to dinates of the diffraction spots, it is possible with the
obtain in the diffraction spot information on the assistance of the computer program "Orient Express"
structure of the whole crystal. According to the fact to determine the crystal orientations. With the same
that the synchrotron beam is a parallel beam, as a software, the validity of the solutions can be checked
matter of fact each diffraction spot is a topography. by the simulation of diffraction diagrams and their
In Fig. 2 a succession of Laue diagrams is shown comparison with the experimental ones. This data
which is recorded in the vicinity of the martensitic processing is easily applied to the fl phase. In Fig. 3
start (Ms) point. According to the polychromatism of the stereographic projection of the fl parent single
Fig. 2. Diffraction diagrams realized during the /~--*9R transformation. This sequence displays the
appearance order of the transformation variants.
crystal is given. The determination of the orientations topographic results and the theoretical work of
of the 9R martensitic plates is not so easy. In the Kajiwara.
direct beam, it is difficult to determine what part of In Fig. 3, the stereographic projection relative to
the incident beam has been diffracted by the marten- the orientation of the crystal in fl phase and the
sitic plates. This difficulty is increased by the fact that photographic enlargement of the 231 reflection have
the trace of the direct beam on the film is surrounded been placed together and positioned in order to
by a diffusion blurring (see Figs 1 and 2). The respect their relative positions. In the 23T reflection
resulting dubiousness in the determination of the the traces of the transformation variants are clearly
coordinates of the fl diffraction spots involves an visible; they are parallel to the intersections of the
uncertainty in the orientation determination. This habit planes of the variants (V~ . . . . . V4) with the
difficulty has been overcome by development of an surface of the sample. The habit planes in the 9R
original method using together the experimental structure are close to the { 110}/~ planes therefore the
{011 } poles corresponding to these habit planes must
tThe traces of V3 and V~ are practically parallel and be close to the direction of the normal to these traces.
apparently intermixed on this topogram. It is seen in Fig. 3(b) that the direction of the normal
JOURDAN et al.: TRANSFORMATION OF A Cu-Zn-AI SINGLE CRYSTAL--I 4217
Fig. 3. Stereographic projection of the single crystal in fl phase and 231 reflection. The relative positions
have been respected and the normals to the variant traces have been drawn: (a) 23]" diffraction spot;
(b) stereographic projection.
to the VI, 112 traces [Fig. 3(a)] are close to the (10i) tested in this study. With the crystallographic data
pole and for V3,V4t close to the (0ii) pole. given in the previous chapter, the direction cosinus
of the habit plane normal (h.p.) and of the shear
3.3. Theoretical analysis
vector d parallel to this plane have been calculated.
In this paragraph, the results of the theoretical They are h.p. VA: X =0.133, y =0.673, Z =0.727,
analysis of the crystallography of the/~ to 9R trans- dVAX = 0.022, y = -0.134 and z = 0.121.
formation of Kajiwara [8] will be applied to our It is seen that the (xyz) habit plane is close
experimental case. The crystallographic orientations to (011)~ for the VA variant. Using the symmetry
of the transformed variants from the/~ single crystal properties of the lattice, the three other self-
will be calculated and their diffraction diagrams accommodating variants, VB, Vc and VD, around the
simulated. The results of this simulation will be (011) pole can be determined. They are (Yyz)VB,
compared to the experimental diffraction diagrams. ( x z y ) V c and (Yz)')VD, then ( - 0 . 1 3 3 0.673 0.727)VB,
All the orientations of the 24 variants will not be (0.133 0.727 0.673)V c and ( - 0 . 1 3 3 0.727 0.673)V D.
calculated but the research will be limited to the two dVB, dV c and dV D are calculated in the same
groups of four variants for which habit planes are manner. (0.022 - 0.134 0.121 )dVA, ( -- 0.02 -- 0.134
close to the (10T) and (01i) poles of the/~ phase. 0.121)dVB...
The Kajiwara treatment allows one to calculate From Kajiwara, with the matrix MA relative to the
the crystallographic characteristics of a variant, VAt variant VA, it is possible to index in the initial fl phase
for example, with respect to the /~ parent phase. any lattice plane of the 9R martensite
The 9R unit cell is taken as an orthorhombic cell.
This treatment has been applied to the /~ to 9R (hkl)~ = (hkl)gR[MA]. (1)
martensitic transformation of the CuZnAI alloy Therefore, if the (001)9R, (100)9R and (010)9R planes
of the variant VA are positioned with respect to the
tin VA 9I'D, the A ... D subscripts are used only in the initial orientation of the crystal in/~ phase, the relative
theoretical approach while the a ... d subscripts are positions of the two unit cells (/~ and 9R) will be
relative to the experimental results. known.
4218 J O U R D A N et al.: TRANSFORMATION OF A Cu-Zn-A1 SINGLE CRYSTAL--I
Table 1
(10i)a Va Vb Vc Vd
y x f y s f z x fi z s f
(0019R)~ 6 w 91 ~ 99 91 91 99 6 91 99 6
(0109R)# 99 ~ 9 w 2 9 w ] 99 w 2 99
(oii b vc vr vg vh
(0019R)# ~9 6 91 99 6 w w w 6 99 91 6
(0109R)# ~ 99 9 2 99 9 ~ 9 99 2 9 99
The MB, Mc and MD matrices which give the to be grouped either around the (10T)B or (0]'T)~
relative orientations of the orthorhombic unit cells of planes. Using the previous results, the (001)9R and
the VB, Vc and VD variants with respect to the same (010)9 R indexes of the planes of the four self-
initial /~ cubic unit cell are obtained from the accommodating variants around (10i)~ are calculated
symmetry operations previously described. in order to calculate in fl phase the poles of these
Such a mathematical approach can be generalized planes. This is done keeping in mind that indexes xyz
to the self-accommodating variants groups around correspond to the (011)~ plane. Using the relation (3)
any {110}/~ plane. the corresponding numerical value has been
attributed to these indices (Table 1).
3.4. Application The indexes of the four self-accommodating vari-
The numerical values of the matrix [MA] are the ants grouped around the (0Ii)p determined by means
following of the same method are given in the same table.
X>O
Z>O
1 Y>O
a b
100
C d
Fig. 4. (a) Stereographic projection of the initial single crystal. The (0019R)# and (0109tt)t~poles have been
added. (0019R)# = ~ 99 w and (0109R)# = w 2 9; (b) stereographic projection of Fig. 4(a) after rotation
so as to (0019R)# pole should be at the center of the projection and (0109R)# at the periphery. X = 80~
Y = - 3 3 ~ Z = -58~ (c) stereographic projection giving the orientation of the unit orthorhombic cell
with (001) pole at the center and (010) pole at the periphery; (d) stereographic projection giving the
orientation of the Vb variant in accordance with the fl parent phase. Habit plane has been indicated by
a star.
(6) The crystallographic orientation of the Vb the (10T)p pole and Fig. 6 is relative to the self-
variant known, its Laue diagram has been accommodating group which habit planes are close to
simulated and compared to the experimental the (0TT)p pole.
diagram to verify the validity of the solution In Figs 5 and 6, Figs 5(a) and 6(a) give the
found. experimental orientation of the parent crystal of fl
Each variant (Va . . . Vd and Ve . . . Vk) has phase, Figs 5(b) and 6(b) give the simulated stereo-
been studied in a same way. The results are gathered graphic projections of the self-accommodating vari-
in Figs 5 and 6. Figure 5 is relative to the self- ants and Figs 5(c) and 6(c) give their simulated Laue
accommodating group which habit planes are close to diffraction diagrams.
4220 JOURDAN et al.: T R A N S F O R M A T I O N OF A C u - Z n AI SINGLE C R Y S T A L - - I
C
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~176 ~ ~176 ~ ~
~ ~ ". ~ . 9 . ~ ~
.
9 . . . . . - : "o~"
..
: . : - - ~"o~:
- "": ~ ..":~.
,"-
": ".2"t~'r~
" a . r .". "
.... " " : ~ - '-:" k;-" "" .o'
9 .. "'- .eli-s,.. 9 -
" " " " 9 001 ....... ::7"-.. ~ ':.:..-'-'...'-'-
. . . . . .~ 1 7 6 . . ... -" ' . "~- . -~
o~,~,~-.'..
9 - -
114 + 9
9 9 1~- . 9~ .-- , , - . ~. ,~ .. . . ~ ."- . - ..'- .. . ' :" %. ~L ~ .7 ."
- _ .- .::..::-...: ..-- ~,,
9 . ~ ~ ~ .~149
9 ~ . ~
. ~ r.
9 . .~
:. .:i - . .-
001
"'-..
".i:."-i
-.-.-'.. ! -_.:3-"
eQ
- . . 9 ~. "'. 9 .~e--"
9 " ~ 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6~114499 1 4"9 ~ ...
i'14 +
111 r
1, 9 . ~ 1 7 6 1 4a 9. ~ 1 7 6 ~ , %~ 9
101
% 9 ....;.,.-- - \
- . . ? - \
001
~'
011
~149
...
110 ~t
o~o
Va
IO0
9 9
~ 82
9 -o......-"
O01
k. Q Q
0 OO
Vc
1OI
9 9
O go
114 ~ 9
001
~t .... ~"" ( ~ ~ 1 7 6 . N ~ .....
- X
OO0 9 9 -'" .-" \ .
Vd
Fig. 5. Simulated results relative to the Va, lib, Vc and Vd variants grouped around the (10i)p pole.
(a) Stereographic projection relative to the orientation of the single crystal in/] phase; (b) simulation of
the stereographic projection of the self-accommodating variants grouped around the (101")~ pole, Va, Vb,
Vc, Vd; (C) simulation of their diffraction diagrams.
JOURDAN et al.: TRANSFORMATION OF A Cu-Zn-A1 SINGLE CRYSTAL--I 4221
b c
9 o 9 ca4 9 9 9 41 4# 9 ~
e e o e e 4 e ~ o ==~6~ ~ ~ ,%~
e'~ ee e~ ~eee 9 oj 9
001
.. : - ' : . . . . " .
..
,0 9 114
-\ ,.
./ ,,
i
ve o.
9 o
9 ~176 ~ 9 9
9/ - ~
- ".'."-"..::.':'"- t .- -.
. - .o . ' . % o .
6
"-. .,-- ":" . ' , P ." - ' - : ' 2 - "
9 . . - ...:::,, ..,,,.
: 514 9
.-...,.--,:~:!i~:i
- :.'-:..-:" . . . .'.-':---
or .-. -. ~ ; .- . . - . ~
* . ;.;. %. % . t 4 t .." ~ ' . " 9176
o
111
. -. ... "~ ! -...'.." ...
O
101 ~ ~ o .. ~176 9 ~ .9 .- -.
~ . ., .
.
.
.
9
..-
9
."
j
]
4 ~'- ~ 9
.~.
","
9 .
-
. .
-
"
~
9 ~ . | ,- . 9 ~
~176
~o~ _ ~ ~o
9 0
110
,oo
9
~ \ / O0 ~
:i:7-'::'.:-".. 9 . oo,
041
9 9 9 9 9 9 q /
W'!" ..............
~
". . . . . o
~ . 9
"-- .. Z"
". " - 2 ...... ' " @ "" .,-.-!~
""-.";:'7!:::-.-...':" :.: : :
......
. o . ,
9 t :'~ ~-.
.. * o'. ". " ,
o . 9 # "-o
. . . . '. 9
Fig. 6. Simulated results relative to the V~, Vf, Vg and Vh variants grouped around the (0]T)~ pole.
(a) Similar to Fig. 5(a); (b) simulation of the stereographic projections of the self-accommodating variants
grouped around the (oIr)~ pole. v~, vf, Vg and Vh; (C) simulation of their diffraction diagrams.
4222 JOURDAN et al.: TRANSFORMATION OF A Cu-Zn-AI SINGLE CRYSTAL--I
Fig. 7. Topograms in white beam realized during the fl---~9R transformation: (a) 262.7K one
transformation variant; (b) 262.5 K two transformation variants; (c) 262 K four transformation variants;
(d) 261.5 K.
The comparison with the experimental results in unambiguously. The crystallographic relationships
Fig. 7 indicates that it is possible to make the connec- between parent and transformed martensite plates are
tion between the experimental and simulated results. deduced from Figs 5 and 6.
The transformation variants are grouped by self-
Figure 7(a): Vl is similar to Va [Fig. 5(c)] accommodating pairs. Indeed, the habit planes of V~
Figure 7(b): V2 is similar to Vd [Fig. 5(c)] and V2 are close to the (10i)a plane and the habit
Figure 7(c): V3 is similar to Vg [Fig. 6(c)] planes of V3 and V4 are close to the (0ii)8 plane. For
Figure 7(d): V4 is similar to Ve [Fig. 6(c)] convenience in the discussion to verify if the vari-
R e m a r k : To detect easily the diffraction diagram
ant-variant and variant-parent crystallographic re-
given by a same variant in Fig. 7, the diffraction spots lationships found in our experiments and if their
given by other variants have been masked. Therefore morphologies are consistent with the previous obser-
in Fig. 7(c) the diffraction spots relative to the V1-V 2 vations, in the standard stereographic projection of
variants have been masked to display the diffraction the fl phase (Fig. 8) which reproduces the notations
spots relative to V3. Their visibility is also increased by used by Saburi and Wayman [13], the numbers 1 ~
the crystallographic indices. To highlight the variant specify the parent close-packed planes which generate
considered the center of the diffraction diagram has the basal planes of the martensite variants. Each
been intentionally shifted [Figs 7(c) and 7(d)]. number can appear with or without prime symbols
when the transformation variants have a common
4. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS basal plane but opposite transformation shear-direc-
tions. The positive or negative sign differentiates two
According to the cross-checking of the experimen- crystallographic equivalent habit planes [13, 14].
tal and theoretical data, the crystallographic charac- A self-accommodating group has habit plane
teristics of the fl to 9R transformation can be given normals clustered about one of the six {110} poles of
JOURDAN et al.: TRANSFORMATION OF A Cu-Zn-AI SINGLE CRYSTAL-- ! 4223
~OO
(loV)s
~. 5+ 6"-
5"-4~ 4~- 6 -
0"1~ ~ i - Gall 2+ "- !OlO
100
Fig. 8. Standard stereographic projection of the single
crystal studied. The habit planes of the transformation
variants have been noted with the Saburi notations. The
arrows indicate the microscopic deformations induced
by the transformation variants after Schroeder and
Wayman [16].
Fig. 9. Diamond-shaped diagram applied to VI-V2 trans-
formation variants.
the parent phase [16]. Among the four variants in
a group, there are three types of twin relations
tered around the (i01)a (or 10i)t~ pole [141 (Saburi,
which are well described by the diamond-shaped
Fig. 3, p. 981) in which the 2(+) and 6 ' ( - )
self-accommodating plate group [16]. experimental variants appear.
From the phenomenological crystallography the-
The variants Ve and Vg have been studied in a same
ory, the (xyz) indices of V A variant have been calcu- manner. Only the results are given
lated. They are respectively equal to (0.13, 0.67, 0.72).
Then the (yxz-) habit plane indices of the V, exper- h.p. Vo: (xyz)=O.13, -0.67, - 0 . 7 2 ) - - , 4 ' ( + ) - - * V4
imental variant are (0.67, 0.13, - 0.72): Table 1. The
h.p. Vg: (x~f) = 0.13, -0.72, -0.67) ~ 6 ( - ) ~ 1/~.
comparison of these indices with the habit planes
indexes for 24 martensite variants, relative to parent 4 ' ( + ) and 6 ( - ) belong to group III with their
phase given by Saburi [13] (Table 2, Saburi, p. 18), self-accommodating habit planes grouped around
shows that the Va variant corresponds to the 2(+) (011) (or 0ii) Fig. 8. (10De and (110)/~ (or i0i and
variant. In a same way the indices of the Vd exper- 110) are the basal planes of 4'(+) and 6 ( - ) , respect-
imental variant which are (0.72, -0.13, -0.67), ively, which is in agreement with the experimental
indicate that this variant is the 6 ' ( - ) variant of observations. The diamond-shaped diagram relative
Saburi. These two variants 2(+) and 6 ' ( - ) belong to to group III is given in Fig. 10.
the same II self-accommodating group (Table 3, From these diagrams, we can foresee the mor-
Saburi, p. 19), with their self-accommodating habit phology of the variants and their crystallographic
planes grouped around 701 (or 107), Fig. 8 (Table 1, relations.
Saburi, p. 17) gives the original basal planes of the The diamond-shaped diagram is divided in four
2(+) and 6 ' ( - ) variants which are respectively, parts labelled A, B, C and D. When the variant A (or
(011)# (or 077) and (110)~ (or 770). These last D) appears, it is followed by the nucleation of the
results are in full agreement with our experimental variant C (or B). These variants are in twining
observation where Va = Vl and Vd = V 2. position, the twining plane being the symmetry plane.
Figure 9 shows the diamond-shaped diagram rela- A spear morphology characterizes the A C or D-B
tive to the four self-accommodating variants clus- pair. Our observations indeed confirm these phe-
nomenological approach. Vl, //2 are the variants 2
and 6 or D and B and their morphology, Fig. 3, is a
Table 2
spear morphology. They are twin-related with respect
Experimental Habit plane 9R Close to to the (T01)r plane (or 10i).
variants close to basal plane {011}~
A similar analysis applied to V3, V4 variants shows
V~ (10I)#//(114)9 R * (001)9 R (01]')#
V2 (10I)6//(114)9a (001)911 (110)# the presence of the C-D pair. This result confirms the
V3 (0iT)a//(11_~)9 R (001)9 R (110) 8 difficulty found in their differentiation from the fl
V, (0I'T)B//(114)9a (001)9a (TOT)a diffraction spot because, in the wedge morphology,
4224 JOURDAN et al.: TRANSFORMATION OF A Cu-Zn-A1 SINGLE CRYSTAL--I
5. CONCLUSION
11. J. De Vos, E. Aernoudt and L. Delaey, Z. Metallkde 69, 19. S. Kajiwara, Phil. Mag. A 43, 1483 (1981).
438 (1978). 20. S. Miyazaki, K. Otsuka and C. M. Wayman, Acta
12. J. De Vos, E. Aernoudt and L. Delaey, Z. Metallkde 69, metall. 37, 1885 (1989).
511 (1978). 21. C. Mai, G. Gu6nin, M. Morin, F. Livet and P. F.
13. T. Saburi, M. Wayman, K. Takata and S. Nenno, Acta Gobin, Mater. Sci. Engng 45, 217 (1980).
metall. 28, 15 0980). 22. J. Gastaldi and C. Jourdan, Physica status solidi(a) 49,
14. T. Saburi and M. Wayman, Acta metall. 27, 979 (1979). 523 (1978).
15. H. Tas, L. Delaey and A. Deryttere, Metall. Trans. 4, 23. G. Grange, J. Gastaldi and C. Jourdan, J. Cryst.
2833 (1973). Growth 104, 851 (1990).
16. T. A. Schroeder and C. M. Wayman, Acta metall. 25, 24. C. Jourdan, J. Gastaldi and G. Grange, Acta metall. 36,
1375 (1977). 2979 (1988).
17. J. L. Pelegrina and M. Ahlers, Acta metall, mater. 40, 25. C. Jourdan, J. Gastaldi, G. Grange, G. Gu6nin and S.
3205 (1992). Bekahla, J. Phys. IV, I, 34 (1991).
18. A. Tolley, D. Rios-Jara and F. C. Lovey, Acta metall. 26. G. Gu6nin, R. Pynn, D. Rios-Jara, L. Delaey and
37, 1099 (1989). P. F. Gobin, Physica status solidi(a) 59, 553 (1980).