Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
In this study, trainers refer to employees in enterprises who integrate training and education
functions into their jobs with varying degrees (from incidental to full-time teaching of trainees and
apprentices). Many countries use the term (workplace) instructor. The trainers train and instruct
students who are taking their initial vocational qualification in either apprenticeship training or an
institutional qualification into which on-the-job learning or practical training is integrated. In this
study the trainer sample includes 50 percent of full-time trainers and 50 percent part-time trainers.
The results presented below represents a mix of the two samples with the result of a relatively high
competence level described. The reason for this is that the boundaries between full-time and part-
time trainers in many countries are quite blurry. Therefore, we have decided to suggest a common
competence framework focusing on the most recorded scope of activities and the corresponding
competences. Consequently, trainers may find themselves doing some of the activities from one
area and all of the activities listed in another area.
The main objective of the following grid is to establish a suggestion for a competence framework
based on the desk research and interviews in the field with practitioners. In addition, data from the
pilot project leading up to the current study has been included in the grid. The grid contains an
outline of the competences necessary to carry out a number of activities in the working life of
trainers. The categories are tied in with the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) which also
serves the purpose of establish the necessary competences.The following terms and definitions will
be used to describe the level of responsibility
Being responsible for/Responsibility: Enabling and ensuring functions. Also being responsible for
monitoring the implementation of functions. These functions take place within a set framework of
regulations or standards.
For the purpose of clarity, the grid is divided into five main areas of research namely
Administration, Training, Development, Quality Assurance and Networking with each category
subdivided into tasks, knowledge and skills.
1
Rasmus Frimodt / DEL March 2008
ADMINISTRATION (Based on interviews and background information)
Activities Knowledge Skills Competences:
IVET trainers should be IVET trainers should have
IVET trainers should be able to: autonomy and responsibility
able to: knowledge of:
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND BUREAUCRACY
– elaborate work schedules – agreements, legislation and Trainers are responsible for implementing
– be systematic and organised
and take part in the regulations administrative procedures in relation to the
– identify opportunities in the work
drafting of contracts and – administrative duties and training while exercising self-management.
process/context for learning
agreements routines This requires differing levels of technical
– interact and communicate
– co-ordinate and co-operate – principles and tools of project and personal skills. Trainers are relatively
– team-work and negotiate
with VET schools in terms management autonomous regarding the general
– network
of recruitment and – agreements, legislation and administration and bureaucracy. (EQF level
– write and report
reporting regulations 3-4)
FINANCES
IVET trainers should be able to implement
– calculate costs – follow-up on the financial situation
– budgeting principles certain concrete and well defined financial
– calculate working hours – calculate and keep the overview of
– financial resources tasks at a limited level of autonomy (under
for payroll the resources available
supervision). (EQF level 2-3)
ORGANISATION
IVET trainers are responsible for
participation in the planning and
– plan and organise tests/
– identify opportunities in the work organisation of the assessment processes in
exams
– occupational field process connection with the training. The trainer
– organise and plan the
– quality assurance processes – interact and communicate implements the procedures and consequently
continuous evaluation of
– evaluation techniques – prepare and develop evaluation needs knowledge of evaluation techniques
the performance of the
tools and QA processes. However, the level of
apprentice in tests
autonomy in this regard is relatively limited.
(EQF level 2-3)
2
Rasmus Frimodt / DEL March 2008