Keshe Technologies

The Keshe Foundation

● Created by Nuclear Engineer M.T. Keshe
● Holder of Intellectual rights
● International Patent Applications, more in progress.
● Methods related to new nuclear processes
● Range of Applications of these processes
● Concepts of static reactors
● Concepts of dynamic reactors.
● Goals: Activate Social and Economic Progress

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Mehran Tavakoli KESHE
● Born in Tehran, Iran. Aug.2,1958
● UK-resident, British-travel docs. Married
● 1979-1981 Engineer Nuclear reactor design and
technology - Queen Mary (Univ. of London)
● 1980 British Nuclear Fuel
● 1981-2004: Private study on nuclear concepts
● 1982-2002: Private owned international trading
● 2002-2006: Full private R&D on plasma reactors.
Several prototypes. Invited to Belgium by FLAG

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Mission Statement
● Apply newly discovered nuclear principles
for Human Benefit
● Deliver solutions for Global Problems:
● Global Warming
● Energy Shortage
● Water related problems
● Food Shortage
● Develop new Technologies and Materials

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

New Approach in Physics
● Today: I.e. Frank Wilzcek (Quarks, Gluons,
Virtual Sea, Vibrations like music tones)
● Keshe vision:
● Interacting Plasmatic Magnetic Energy
● Plasmatic Magnetic Fields can entangle (fuse)
● Plasmatic Magnetic Fields can separate (fissile)
● “Particles” are in fact SEPMAF’s
(Specific Entangled Plasmatic Magnetic Fields)
● Behavior of SEPMAF’s can be influenced in a soft way
in view of a preferred outcome (I.e. at room-temperature)

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Visualization
Specific Entangled Plasmatic Magnetic Fields

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Visualization
Specific Entangled Plasmatic Magnetic Fields

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Visualization
Specific Entangled Plasmatic Magnetic Fields

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Actual Proof of Technology
Proven
Confirmed Carbon separation at atomic level (sp2/sp3,
superconductive properties and atomic insulation layers)
(IMEC, SCK)
Production of voltage and current (SCK)
Production of Cold Plasma (Hydrogen) (SCK)
Generation of EUV (Extreme Ultra Violet)
Generation of EM Fields
Lifting effects measured
Indications
Self-sustaining process (SCK)
Magnetic shield effects

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Proof of Technology
By static reactors By dynamic reactors

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Static reactors
● Tests of static reactor (CO2,
Voltage, Current)
● Simple basic container (Cola
bottle) to be sealed
● Room temperature
● Per test filled with different
compositions of liquids
● Low cost of materials
● Terminals: Cu wires
● Source: RA source or
generated RA Isotopes
● Working for 5 years (if in
correct container)

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Electrodes in a static reactor

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Carbon extraction source

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Carbon from Plastic or CO2

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Treatment of copper wires

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Treatment of copper wires

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Measuring properties

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Measuring diamond properties

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Testing in pure plasma

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

 Dynamic reactors
● Tests of dynamic reactors
● Steel and plastic cores
● Temperature
independent
● Per test filled with
different compositions of
gasses
● Low cost of materials
● Easy manufacturing
● Rotative mechanism
● Source: Low RA source
● Working for … years
(depending of RA
material)

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Conversion systems
● Actual nuclear reactors are thermo-nuclear,
need triggering input, and have waste problems.
Mainly this is the “hard” approach.
● Keshe plasma reactors are
bio-chemical-nuclear, a “soft” approach,
applying inside the cavity a number of
cosmogenic principles, such as double magnetic
fields which can create “gravitational effects” to
provide conditions for atomic and molecular
separation (fission) and recombination (fusion) of
ALL elements of the Periodic Table and their
isotopes.
● Long term self-sustaining processes are possible
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending
Conversion systems
In Keshe bio-chemical nuclear plasma reactors one
or more nuclear sources is used as a longevity
triggering source to provoke a chain of desired
chemical, biological and bio-chemical reactions to
have a preferred output.
Types of output:
Energy (heat, current, cooling, ...),
Creation of specific atoms and molecules (i.e.
Atomic hydrogen, pure C)
Separation of materials (i.e. Polluted H2O),
H 2O
Electro-magnetic fields,
Gravitational effects.

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Large Power systems

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Actual Power systems

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

New Energy Systems

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Keshe Power systems

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Keshe Generator

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Construction similar to Earth

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Fields of Earth

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Construction of a reactor

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Cooperation for Progress

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Application Domains/Markets
● Consumer electronics
● White and brown goods
● Power generation
● Batteries
● Automotive
● Water and Air Treatments
● Medical
● Aircarft and Space Exploration
● Agriculture
● New Materials
● Processing systems
● And much more

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Market: Battery-like/Cells

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Market: Traditional Batteries

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Market: Sales Electricity
Suez: 2001 Sales (mil.): $37,755 , Electrabel S.A.: 2001 Sales
(mil.): $11,143 , RWE: 2001 Sales (mil.): $29,498, E.ON:
2001 Sales (mil.): $70,909, Electricité de France : 2001 Sales
(mil.): $36,066, Vattenfall: 2001 Sales (mil.): $6,528, Alliant
Energy Corporation - 2001 Sales (mil.): $2,777.3, Ameren
Corporation : 2001 Sales (mil.): $4,505.9 , Centrais Elétricas
Brasileiras S.A. - ELETROBRÁS: 2001 Sales (mil.): $9,251
(30,000MW), Chubu Electric Power Company, Incorporated:
2002 Sales (mil.): $16,804 (31,800MW), Comisión Federal de
Electricidad : 2001 Sales (mil.): $11,033 (39,000MW), The
Kansai Electric Power Company, Incorporated: 2001 Sales
(mil.): $20,961 (37,500MW), The Tokyo Electric Power
Company, Incorporated: 2001 Sales (mil.): $41,622
(58,800MW), .... The Israel Electric Corporation Limited 2001
Sales (mil.): $2,381.9. .... and many others.
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending
Market: USA Electricity

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Market: USA $ cents/KWh

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Market: CO2 Collection

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Market: CO2 Emission USA

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Market: GHG emission USA

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Roadmap CO2 Company

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Market: Graphene (sp2)
● $9 Billion market in FET
● Ballistic conductive properties
● Actually to high priced: 400 Euro/gr
● KT : Industrial acceptable prices can boost FET’s

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents

pending
Company structure
Kesh Trust Fund SA (NL)

Kesh Technologies NV (B)

Vertical domain specific c

Vertical domain specific

Vertical domain specific

Vertical domain specific

Vertical domain specific

Knowledge
center

IP Office

Admin

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

 Asset & revenue structure
Kesh Trust Fund SA (NL)
IP owner

Kesh Technologies NV (B) IP top-down

Cost model
licensing

Vertical domain specific c

Vertical domain specific

Vertical domain specific

Vertical domain specific

Vertical domain specific

Knowledge
center

IP Office

Admin

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Prime Partner

● Minority stake in vertical

● Maximum three/four external partners
● Revenue share
● Scope
● Limited license discount
● Sneak preview
● Access knowledge center

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

Collaborative business

● Maximum product development

● Global equal licensing structure
● No direct competition
● Cost share
● Gain share
● Platform level

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

General Remarks
Impact: Sufficiency Model <-> Demand/Offer Model
● Participation of United Nations is essential

● Blocking of technology must be excluded

● Emphasis on Social progress

● Emphasis on development of Local economies

● No active participation in military applications

● Respect for existing industrial infrastructure

1. Offering a time frame for adaptation
2. Offering licensing and cooperation
3. Offering participation in R&D
4. Offering participation in verticals

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

The Value ? Compare …
● Remember Fleischmann & Pons(1989)
● Fleischmann (1996) about Cold Fusion: “I think that it is
a question of economics … I did a first assessment of
what the first successful device would be worth and it
came out at about 300 trillion dollars.”
● “So, at that sort of value, people are prepared to take a
rather high risk on the research. I don't think you should
over-emphasize the value of cold fusion necessarily, but
if you make your list of the ten most valuable projects,
high temperature superconductors will always be on
the list; fuel cells will always be on the list.”
● The difference: KT Replicated by Nuclear Agency
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending