SYLLABUS REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW IT SCHOOL YEAR 2017-2018 PROF. HENEDINO M. BRONDIAL I. PROVISIONAL REMEDIES (Rules 57-61) A. Preliminary Attachment (R-57) 1. Grounds (S-1) 2. Requirements (S-3) 3. Manner of Attaching (S-5) 4. Discharge of Attachment (S-5,12,13) 5. Third Party Claim (S-14) 6. Claim for damages (S-20) Cases: 1. Lim Jr. Vs. Lazaro, 700 SCRA 2. Ligon vs. RTC of Makati, Br. 56, 717 SCRSA 3. Mangila vs, CA, 387 SCRA 4. Chuidian vs. Sandiganbayan, 349 SCRA 5. Alejandro Ng Wee vs. Tankiansee, 545 SCRA 6. Torres vs. Satsatin, 605 SCRA 7. Luzon Dev. Bank vs. Krishman, 755 SCRA, April 13, 201, 8. Northern Luzon Island Co. vs. Garcia, 753 SCRA 603 9. Excellent Quality Apparel vs. Visayan Surety, 761 SCRA 10. Watercraft Venture Corp. vs. Wolfe, 770 SCRA 179 11. Phil. Airconditioning Center vs. RCJ Lines, 775 SCRA 265 B. Preliminary Injunction (R-58) 1. Definition, Classes (S-1) 2. Grounds (S-3); TRO 3. Requirements (S-4) 4, Damages (S-8) Cases: 1. Idolor vs. CA, 351 SCRA 2. Gustilo vs. Real, 353 SCRA 3. Lagrosas vs. Bristo-Myers, 565 SCRA 4, Jenosa vs, Delariarte, 630 SCRA 5. Solid Builders Inc. vs. China Bank, 695 SCRA, 4/3/13. 6. Plaza vs. Lustiva, 718 SCRA, 3/5/14 7. Office of the Ombudsman vs. De Chavez, 700 SCRA (2013) ‘compare with Sison vs. Ombudsman, 612 SCRA (2/2010) 8. Novecio vs. Lim, 754 SCRA 111 9. Liberty broadcasting Network vs. Atlocom, 760 SCRA 10. Republic vs. Cortez, 769 SCRA 267 20C. Receivership (R-59) 1. When writ may issue (S-1) 2. Requirement (S-2) 3. Power of receiver (S-6) 4, Termination and Compensation (S-8) Cases: 1. Larrobis, Jr. vs. Phil Veterans Bank, 440 SCRA 2. Chavez vs. CA, 610 SCRA 3. Koruga vs. Arcenas, 590 SCRA 4. Tantano vs. Espina-Caboverde, 702 SCRA — 7/29/13 D. Replevin (R-60) 1. When writ may issue (S-1) 2. Requirements (S-2) 3. Third Party Claim (S-7) 4, Judgment and Damages (S-9,10) Cases: 1. Orosa vs. CA, 329 SCRA 2. Smart Communiations vs. Astorga, 542 SCRA 3. Hao vs. Andres, 555 SCRA 4. Navarro vs. Escobido, 606 SCRA 5. Agner vs. BPI Family Savings Bank, 697 SCRA, 6/3/13 E. Support (R-61) 1. Application for Support Pendente Lite (S-1) 2. Comment, Hearing, Order (S-2,3,4) 3. Enforcement of Order (S-5) 4, Restitution (S-7) Cases: 1. De Asis vs. CA, 303 SCRA 2. People vs. Manahan, 315 SCRA Lim vs. Lim, 604 SCRA Gotardo vs. Buling, 678 SCRA Republic vs. Yahon, 726 SCRA 438 Del Socorro vs. Van Wilsem, 744 SCRAS1O Lim-Lua vs. Lua, 697 SCRA . Salas vs. Matusalem, 705 SCRA 560 SNA AW 21II. SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS (Rules 62-71) A. Interpleader (R-62) 1. What is an action in Interpleader (S-1) 2. Requisites (S-1) 3. Procedure (S-2 to 7) Cases: 1. Wack-Wack Golf and Country Club vs. Won, 70 SCRA 2. Eternal Gardens vs. IAC, 165 SCRA 3. Pasricha vs. Don Luis Dizon Realty, 548 SCRA 4. Bank of Commerce vs. Planters Dev. Bank, 681 SCRA B. Declaratory Relief and Similar Remedies (R-63) 1. Nature; Kinds (S-1) 2. Parties (S-2) 3. Conversion into ordinary action (S-6) Cases: 1. Almeda vs. Bathala Marketing Ind.,542 SCRA 2. Republic vs. Orbecido, 472 SCRA 3. Malana vs. Tappa, 600 SCRA 4. Chavez vs. Judicial and Bar Council, 676 SCRA 5.Sabitsana vs.Muertegui, 703 SCRA (8/5/13) 6. Republic vs. Roque, 706 SCRA (9/24/13) In relation to Southern Hemisphere case, 632 SCRA October 5, 2010 7. Dept of Finance vs. De la Cruz, Jr., 768 SCRA 73 C. Review of Judgments and Final Orders of the COMELEC and COA (R- 64) - The distinctive nature and procedure of this special civil action Case: Alliance for Nationalism and Democracy vs. COMELEC 705 SCRA 340, September 10, 2013 D, Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus (R-65) 1. Certiorari (S-1) a. grounds b. requirements c. procedure; parties and effects Cases: 1. Ampil vs. Ombudsman, 703 SCRA, 7/31/13 2. AL. Ang Network, Inc. vs. Mondejar, 714 SCRA, 1/28/14 3. Maglalang vs. PAGCOR, 712 SCRA, 12/11/13 4. People vs. Castaneda, 712 SCRA, 12/11/13 5. UP Board of Regents vs. Ligot-Teylan, 227 SCRA 6. Tuazon vs. RD of Caloocan, 157 SCRA 7. Prov. Of Leyte vs. Energy Dev. Corp., 760 SCRA 149 222. Prohibition (S-2) a. grounds b. requirements c. procedure; parties and effects Cases: 1. Vivas vs. Monetary Board of BSP, 703 SCRA 8/7/13 2. Corales vs. Republic, 703 SCRA, 8/27/13 3. Tan vs, CA, 524 SCRA 3. Mandamus (S-3) a. grounds b. requisites c. procedure; parties and effects d. damages Cases: 1. Hipos, Sr. vs. Bay, 581 SCRA 3/17/09 2. Sanchez vs. Lastimosa, 534 SCRA, 9/25/07 3. Social Justice Society vs. Atienza, 517 SCRA, 3/7/07 4. Funa vs. Manila Economic and Cultural Office, 715 SCRA Februry 4, 2014 5. Cudia vs. Superintendent of PMA, February 24, 2015 6. Villanueva vs, JBC, 755 SCRA 182 E. Quo Warranto (R-66) 1. Parties (S-1 to 6) 2. Period (S-8) 3. Limitation (S-11) 4, Judgment for Cost (S-12) Cases: 1, Mendoza vs. Allas, 302 SCRA 2. Calleja vs. Panday, 483 SCRA. 3. Lokin, Jr. vs. COMELEC, 621 SCRA 4, Aratea vs. COMELEC, 683 SCRA 5. De Castro vs. Carlos, 696 SCRA, 4/16/13 6. Velasco vs. Belmonte, 779 SCRA 81 (1/12/16) F. Expropriation (R-67) 1. The right of Eminent Domain -Constitutional provision: “private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation” - RA 7160: The Local Govt. Code, Sec. 19 2. Who may expropriate 3. Two stages in expropriation 1. determination of public use 2. just compensation Cases: 1. City of Manila vs. Serrano, 359 SCRA 2. National Power Corp. vs. CA, 436 SCRA 3. Republic vs. Andaya, 524 SCRA 2B4, Asia’s Emerging Dragon vs. DOTC, 552 SCRA 5. Abad vs. Fil-homes Realty, 636 SCRA 6. NPC vs. YCLA Sugar Dev. Corp., 712 SCRA 550 7. Limkaichong vs. LBP, 799 SCRA 139 (8/2/16) G. Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage (R-68) 1, The Complaint (S-1) 2. The Judgment (S-2) 3. Sale of foreclosed property (S-3) - Equity of Redemption 4, Deficiency Judgment (S-6) Cases: 1. Ramirez vs. Manila Banking Corp., 712 SCRA, 12/2013 2. Marquez vs. Alindog, 714 SCRA, 1/2014 3. Ardiente vs. Provincial Sheriff. 436 SCRA 4. LZK Holdings vs. Planters Dev. Bank, 714 SCRA, 1/2014 5. Goldenway Merchandising Corp. vs. Equitable PCI Bank, 693 SCRA, March 13, 2013 6. Solid Builders vs. CBC, 695 SCRA (also on injunction) 7. Robles vs. Yapcinco, 739 SCRA 75 8. MBTC vs. CPR Promotions and Marketing, Inc., 760 SCRA 59 H. Partition (R-69) 1. The Complaint (S-1) 2. The Order (S-2) 3. Stages of Partition: 4, Rule of Commissioners (S-3 to 7) 5. The Judgment (S-11) Cases: 1. Balus vs. Balus, 610 SCRA 2. Feliciano vs. Canosa, 629 SCRA 3. Mangahas vs. Brobio, 634 SCRA 4. Vda. De Figuracion vs. Figuracion-Gerilla, 690 SCRA I. Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer (R-70) 1. Parties (S-1) 2, Procedure: Summary (8-3 to 15) 3. Judgment (S-17) 4, Immediate Execution (S-19 vs $-21) - preliminary injunction (S-20) 5. Appeals Cases: I. Suarez vs. Emboy, Jr., 718 SCRA 677, 3/12/2014 2. Alconera vs. Pallanan, 714 SCRA 204, 1/2014 "43. Teodoro vs. Espino, 715 SCRA 435, 2/2014 4. Ferrer vs. Rabaca, 632 SCRA 5. CGR Corp. vs. Treyes, 522 SCRA 765 6. Zacarias vs. Anacay, 736 SCRA 508, 9/24/14 7. Manalang vs. Bacani, 745 SCRA, Jan. 12, 2015 8. Supapo vs. De Jesus, 756 SCRA 211, 4/20/15 9. De la Cruz vs. Hermano, 754 SCRA 231 10, Erorita vs. Dumlao, 781 SCRA 551 (1/25/16) J. Contempt (R-71) 1. Kinds: direct (S-1); indirect (S-3) 2. Procedure (S-4 to 9) 3. Judgment and Review (S-11) Cases: 1. Yasay vs. Recto, 313 SCRA 2. Sison vs. Caoibes, Jr., 429 SCRA 258 3. Espanol vs. Formoso, 525 SCRA 4. Marantan vs. Diokno, 716 SCRA 164, 2/2014 5. Capitol Hills Golf and Country Club vs. Sanchez, 717 SCRA 6. Tormis vs. Paredes, 749 SCRA 505, Feb. 4, 2015 7. Pulumbarit vs. CA, 772 SCRA 244 8. Balindong vs. CA, 773 SCRA 27 Ill. SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS (Rules 72 to 109) A. Settlement of Estate 1. Venue vs Jurisdiction (R-73) 2. Kinds of settlement a. Extrajudicial (1) By Agreement (2) By self-adjudication b. Judicial (1) Summary (R-74) (2) By Petition (R-75 to 90) a. Intestate b. Testate (3) By partition (R-69) 3. The Administrator or Executor (a) Special vs Regular (R-80) (b) Bonds (R-81) (c) Powers and Duties (R-84) (d) Accountability (R-85) 4. Claims Against the Estate (R-86) 5. Actions by and against Executor and Administrator (R-87) 6. Distribution and Partition (R-90) 25Cases: 1. San Luis vs. San Luis, 514 SCRA, February 2007 2. Garcia-Quiazon vs. Belen, 702 SCRA, 7/31/13 3. Agtarap vs. Agtarap, 651 SCRA, June 2011 4, Suntay Ill vs, Cojuangco-Suntay, 683 SCRA, October 2012 5. Lee vs. RTC of 0.C., 423 SCRA, February 2004 6. Heirs of Hilario Ruiz vs. Edmond Ruiz, 252 SCRA, January 1996 7. Unionbank vs. Santibanez, 452 SCRA, February 2005 (R-86) 8. Heirs of Maglasang vs. MBC, 706 SCRA 235 9. Pilapil vs. Heirs of M. Briones, 514 SCRA, February 2007 10. Sabidong vs. Solas, 699 SCRA, June 2013 11. Aranas vs. Mercado, 713 SCRA 12, Silverio Sr. vs. Silverio Jr., 733 SCRA 183, (8/13/14) 13. Butiong vs. Plazo, 765 SCRA 227 B. Escheats (R-91) 1. Definition 2. Historical background and legal basis 3. Actions for Revisions (S-5) Cases: 1. Alvarico vs Sola, 382 SCRA 2. Maltos vs. Heirs of Eusebio Borromeo, 770 SCRA 397 C. Guardians and Guardianship (R-92 to 97) as amended by AM. No. 03-02-05-SC, May 1, 2003 1. Venue vs Jurisdiction (S-92) 2. Appointment, kinds, Qualifications (S-93) 3. Requirement (S-94) 4. Power and Duties (-96) 5. Termination (S-97) Cases: 1. Goyena vs. Ledesma Gustilo, Jan. 13, 2003 2. Caniza vs. CA, Feb. 24, 1997 3. Neri vs. Heirs of Hadji Yusop Uy, 683 SCRA 4. Oropesa vs. Oropesa, 671 SCRA (4/2012) 5. Abad vs. Biazon, 687 SCRA (12/2012) D. Trustees (R-98) 1. Parties 2. Kinds/Classes Cases: 1, Advent Capital and Finance Corp. vs. Alcantara, 664 SCRA 2. Land Bank of the Phil. vs. Perez, 672 SCRA 26E. Adoption and Custody of Minors (R-99-100) 1. The Domestic Adoption Act of 1998 (RA 8552) 2. Inter Country Adoption Act of 1995 (RA 8043) 3. Rule of Adoption (A.M. No. 02-6-02-SC dated July 31, 2002, effective Aug. 22, 2002) a, Who may adopt (S-4) b. Who may be adopted ( S-5) c. Venue and Jurisdiction 8.20) Cases: 1. Cang vs CA ~ 296 SCRA 128 2. Vda de Jacob vs CA 312 SCRA 772 3. Republic of the Phil. Vs Hon. Jose R. Hernandez- 253 SCRA 509 4. Republic vs CA — 255 SCRA 99 5. Reyes vs. Mauricio, 636 SCRA 6. In the Matter of Stephanie Nathy Astorga-Garcia, 454 SCRA 7. Petition for Adoption of Michelle and Michael Lim, 588 SCRA 98 (2007) 8. Nery vs. Sampana, 734 SCRA 9. Castro vs. Gregorio, 738 SCRA 10. Bartolome vs. SSS, 740 SCRA F. Habeas Corpuz (R-102) 4. Definition and Nature or Scope (S-1) 5. Requisites for Application (S-3) 6. Disallowance or Discharge of Writ (S-4) 7. Preliminary citation vs writ (S-6) 8. The return: when evidence; when plea (S-10,12,13) Cases: Ilusorio vs Bildner, 332 SCRA 169 Serapio vs Sandiganbayan- 396 SCRA 443 Lacson vs. Perez, 357 SCRA 756 . Sangca vs. City Prosecutor of Cebu, 524 SCRA 610 Mangila vs. Pangilinan, 701 SCRA 355 Tujan-Militante vs. Cada-Deapera, July 28, 2014 . Datukan Malang Salibo vs. The Warden, 755 SCRA 296 NAWAWNS H. Change of Name vs. Correction/Cancellation of Entries, as amended R.A. 9048 and 10172 (Rule 103 vs. Rule 108) 1. Venue vs Jurisdiction 2. Contents of Petition/Grounds 3. Hearing 4. Judgment 5. R.A. 9048 and its Implementing Rules 27Cases: 1, Eleosida vs Civil Registrar of 0.C.~ May 9, 2002 2. Republic vs. Kho — 526 SCRA 3. Petition for Change on Name of Julian Lim Carulasan Wang — 454 SCRA 4. Braza vs. Civil Registrar of Neg. Occ. — 607 SCRA (2009) 5. Republic vs. Silverio — 537 SCRA 6. Republic vs. Cagandahan ~565 SCRA 7. Republic vs. Uy— 703 SCRA (August 12, 2013) 8. Minoru Fujiki vs. Marinay, June 26, 2013 9. People vs, Merlinda Olaybar, February 10, 2014 10. Onde vs. CR of Las Pinas, 734 SCRA, Sept. 2014 I. Prerogative Writs A. Writ of Amparo Cases: 1. Tapuz vs. Del Rosario, 554 SCRA 2. Canlas vs. Napico Homeowners Asso., 554 SCRA 3. Castillo vs. Cruz, 605 SCRA 4. Razon vs. Tagitis, 606 SCRA 5. Roxas vs. GMA, 630 SCRA 6. Burgos vs. Esperon, 715 SCRA, February 2014 B. Writ of Habeas Data Cases: 1. Caram vs. Segui, August 5, 2014 2. Vivares et Al. vs. St. Therese College, Sept. 29, 2014 3. Meralco vs. Lim, 632 SCRA 4. Lee vs. agan, 738 SCRA 59 C. Writ of Kalikasan Cases: 1. Dolot vs. Paje, 703 SCRA (continuing Mandamus) 2. Paje vs. Casino, 749 SCRA 39 (Writ of Kalikasan) 3. Arigo vs. Swift, 735 SCRA 102 4. Resident Marine Mammals of the Protected Seascape Tanon Strait vs. Angelo Reyes et Al., 756 SCRA 513, April 21, 2015 5.West Tower Condominium vs. Phil. Ind. Corp., 758 SCRA 28Iv. EVIDENCE (Rules 128-134) A. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION 1. Definition/Meaning and Scope of E. 2. Kinds and Classifications of B. 3. Axioms of Admissibility a. Relevancy b. Competency c. Authenticity d. Offer 4. Kinds of admissibility a. conditional b. multiple c. curative Cases: 1. Ong Chia vs. Republic, 328 SCRA 2. Zulueta vs. CA, 253 SCRA 3. People vs. Yatar, 428 SCRA 3. Tating vs. Marcella, 519 SCRA 4. People vs. Salafranca, 666 SCRA 5.SCC Chemicals Corp. vs. CA, 353 SCRA B. WHAT NEED NOT BE PROVED 1. Judicial Notice a. mandatory and discretionary b. when to take judicial notice 2. Judicial Admissions a. when is there judicial admissions Cases: 1. LBP vs. Banal, 434 SCRA 2. People vs. Kulais, 292 SCRA 3. Laureano vs. CA, 324 SCRA 4, Maquiling vs. COMELEC, 700 SCRA 5. People vs. Baharan, 639 SCRA 6. Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, 662 SCRA 7, Ligtas vs. People, 767 SCRA 1 29C. RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY 1. Object/Real Evidence Cases: 1. People vs. Mallilin, 553 SCRA 2. People vs. Pagaduan, 627 SCRA 3. Salas vs. Matusalem, 705 SCRA 4, People vs. Posing, 703 SCRA 5. People vs. Gani, 711 SCRA 2. Documentary Evidence a. The Best Evidence Rule Cases: 1. Citibank Mastercard vs. Teodoro, 411 SCRA 2. Loon vs. Power Master, Inc., 712 SCRA 3. Dimaguila vs. Monteiro, 714 SCRA b. Parole Evidence Cases: 1. Ortanez vs. CA, 266 SCRA 2. Lapu-Lapu Foundation vs. CA. 421 SCRA 3. Leoveras vs. Valdez, 652 SCRA c. Electronic Evidence - AM. 01-7-01-SC, Rules on Electronic Evidence - R.A. 8792, E-Commerce Law 1. Heirs of Sabanpan vs. Comorposa, 408 SCRA 2. Torres vs. PAGCOR, 661 SCRA 3. Ang vs. Republic,618 SCRA 4. People vs. Enojas 5. Syhunliong vs. Rivera, June 4, 2014 3. Testimonial Evidence b. Qualifications: “one who can perceive and perceiving can make known his perception” i. ability to observe/perceive ii. ability to recall/remember iii. ability to relate/communicate c. disqualifications: Case: Marcos vs. Heirs of Andres Navarro, 700 SCRA i, mental incapacity or immaturity Case: People vs. Golimlim, 427 SCRA 30ii. marital disqualification Cases. 1 Alvarez vs, Ramirez, 473 SCRA. 2.People vs. Castaneda, 88 SCRA ili. death or insanity (dead man’s statute) Cases: 1. Razon vs. CA, 207 SCRA 2. Sunga-Chan vs. Chua, 363 SCRA 3. Bordalba vs. CA, 374 SCRA iv. privileged communication Cases: 1. Chan vs. Chan, 702 SCRA 2 Lacurom vs. Jacoba, 484 SCRA. 3.Samala vs. Valencia, 512 SCRA 4, Almonte vs. Vasquez,244 SCRA 5. Syhunliong vs. Rivera, 725 SCRA Discuss Executive Privilege under the doctrines laid down in Senate of the Philippines vs. Ermita (488 SCRA) and Neri vs. Senate Committees (435 SCRA) d. Testimonial Privilege e, Admissions ~ by third parties ~ by partners - by conspirators - by privies - by silence Cases: 1. Constantino vs. Heirs of Pedro Constantino, Jr. 706 SCRA 2.People vs. Gandia, 423 SCRA 3.Doldol vs. People, 470 SCRA f. .Confessions - judicial vs. extra-judicial Cases: 4. Ladiana vs. People, 393 SCRA 5. People vs. Ulit, 423 SCRA 6. People vs. Sayaboc, 419 SCRA 4, Tanenggee vs. People, 699 SCRA g. Conduct and Character Cases: 1. People vs. Santos, 221 SCRA 715 2. People vs. Nardo, 353 SCRA 339 3. RP vs. Heirs of Alejaga, Sr., 393 SCRA 361 31h, Hearsay Evidence Rule Cases: Patula vs. People, 669 SCRA Espeneli vs. People, 725 SCRA, June 9, 2014 i, Dying Declaration: Pp vs. Montanez, 425 SCRA 675 ii, Declaration against interest: Pp vs. Bernal, 274 SCRA iii, Declaration about pedigree: Tizon vs. CA, 276 SCRA iv. Family Reputation: Jison vs. CA, 286 SCRA y. Common reputation vi. Res gestae: Pp vs. Lobrigas, 394 SCRA; Pp vs. Villarico, 647 SCRA; Pp vs. Palmones, 336 SCRA vii. Entries in the course of business: Phil. Airlines vs Ramos, 207 SCRA 461 viii. Entries in Official Records: Lao vs. Standard Insurance, 409 SCRA 43; Sabili vs. COMELEC, 670 SCRA ix, Commercial lists: Meralco vs. Quisumbing, 336 SCRA x. Learned treatises xi. Testimony or deposition at a former proceeding: Pp vs. Ortiz-Miyako, 279 SCRA; Go vs. People, 677 SCRA Child Witness Rule: People vs. Ibanez, 706 SCRA People vs. Esugon, 759 xii. h. Opinion Rule i, Expert Witness: Pp vs. Abriol, 367 SCRA; Bautista vs. CA, 436 Avelino vs. People, 701 SCRA ii. Ordinary Witness: Pp vs. Duranan, 349 SCRA i. Character Evidence Case: People vs. Deopita, 436 SCRA 794 D. BURDEN OF PROOF AND PRESUMPTIONS 1. Burden of Proof vs. Burden of Evidence Case: FEBTC vs. Chante, 707 SCRA 2. Presumptions a. Conclusive presumptions i. Ibaan Rural bank vs. CA, 321 SCRA Icaraz vs. Tangga-an, 401 SCRA i. University of Mindanao vs. PSP, 778 SCRA (1/11/16) b. Disputable presumptions i. Rosaroso vs. Soria, 699 SCRA Heirs of Trazona vs. Heirs of Canada, 712 SCRA iii. Uy vs. Lacsamana, 767 SCRA iv, Diaz vs. People, 776 SCRA 43= suppression of testimony: People vs. Padrigone, 382 SCRA Metrobank vs. CA, 333 SCRA - Official duty: De los Santos vs. COA, 703 SCRA People vs. Candidia, 707 SCRA - cohabitation: People vs, Edualino, 271 SCRA - survivorship; absence; legitimacy E. PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE. 1. Order of Presentation of Evidence. People vs Fabre, 385 SCRA 2. Leading and Misleading Questions. People vs. Perez, 397 SCRA 3. Impeachment. People vs. Castellano, 400 SCRA 4. Reference to Memorandum g. Present Memory Revived, People vs. Plasencia, 249 SCRA h. Past Recollection Recorded, Canque vs. CA, 305 SCRA 5. Classes of Documents i. Public Documents Cases: 1. Jwasawa vs. Gangan, 705 SCRA 2. Asian Terminals vs. Philam Insurance, 702 SCRA j. Private Documents 6. Offer of Evidence. Aludos vs. Suerte, 673 SCRA; Westmont Investment Corporation vs. Francia, Jr., 661 SCRA 7. Tender of Excluded Evidence Fortune Tabacco Corp. vs. Com of Int. Rev.,761 SCRA 173 F. WEIGHT AND SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE The Hierarchy of Evidence i, Overwhelming evidence ii, Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt 1. People vs. Caliso ~ 659 SCRA 2. People vs. Patentes — 716 SCRA iii, Clear and Convincing 1. Supreme Court vs. Delgado ~ 658 SCRA 2. Govt of Hongkong Special Adm. Region Vs, Olalia, Jr. ~ 521 SCRA 3. People vs. Fontanilla - 664 SCRA 33