No.

Matricula Nombre
1 1544877 ACOSTA VALDEZ JOSE ANTONIO

2 1574794 ACUÑA CHAVEZ ISAI SALOMON

3 1585042 BERRONES EGUILUZ MIGUEL ANGEL

4 1600456 BRISEÑO ZAMARRIPA DAVID MARCELO

5 1590558 CAVAZOS HERNANDEZ JULIO CESAR

CERRILLO CLEMENTE JENNIFFER THALIA
6 1693792 VALERIA

7 1598207 ESCAMILLA ALANIS PATRICIA SELENA

8 1582420 ESCAMILLA GARCIA HECTOR EDUARDO

9 1693782 FLORES GALINDO ULISES

10 1590498 GARCIA CANTU CRISTINA LISSETTE

11 1587050 GARCIA MORENO RENE

12 1550552 GARZA RODRIGUEZ DAVID ANDRES

13 1550072 GARZA ROMERO JOSE ALBERTO

14 1578333 GONZALEZ LOPEZ EDUARDO PATRICIO

15 1593383 GONZALEZ MARTINEZ JESUS FELIPE

16 1693813 GRIMALDO SALAZAR ANDREA

17 1591742 GUERRERO GALINDO FATIMA

18 1596868 JACOBO CONTRERAS ALBED FRANCISCO

19 1568377 JIMENEZ POCEROS GILBERTO SEBASTIAN

20 1599825 LOPEZ ZUÑIGA ANTONIO SALATIEL

21 1580291 MARTINEZ LIMON OSMAR EZEQUIEL

22 1578897 MARTINEZ MELCHOR ANGEL

23 1584503 MOLINA ALEJO NESTOR ALEJANDRO

24 1579158 ORTIZ GOMEZ JOSE ANGEL

25 1595107 OSORIO DURAN ARANZA AKETZALLI

26 1585387 OVALLE MALDONADO GUILLERMO GABRIEL

27 1526854 PEREZ CARDENAS LUIS JAVIER

28 1588136 RESENDIZ HERNANDEZ ROBERTO HAZIEL

29 1693816 REYNA GONZALEZ ARLENY GUADALUPE

30 1512599 ROCHA MORUA LUIS EDUARDO

31 1693835 RODRIGUEZ CAVAZOS SABINA

32 1591927 SEPÚLVEDA GÓMEZ ORLANDO

33 1580016 SILVA DUQUE NELSON

34 1523654 SOTO SALINAS JUAN DANIEL

35 1693815 VELOZ MARTINEZ EDWIN PAUL

Equipo 1 02/11/2018
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas
Chemical Engineering undergraduate program
Rubric 1
Class: Chemical Reaction Engineering
Professor: Dr. Javier Rivera
Date:
Evidency No 1 To calculate two chemical continuous reactors and analyse with the Levenspiel graph method

Team Number:
Stundents data
UANL register Evaluation for
Number in the list Surnames and Names number Global calification ABET
0
0
0
0
0
Title of the presentation:

Description of the evidency to show the competencies.

The team must present a print report and oral presentation where two continues reactor are calculated
for two different reactions. The analysis must be for Levenspiel plot method.
RUBRIC FOR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA:
Exemplary Well Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Points
The cover only The cover only The cover presents
presents a mistake presents more than one more than two
The Report consisted of: Cover page with identification and conclusions or mistakes and graph mistakes and the
data, with full names of team members. analysis are wrong. method and RDE, grap method,
Methodology and presentation was in the next sequence: 1. Not misspellings conclusions or analysis and
analysis are wrong. conclusions are
Report (40 Introduction, 2. Scheme with known conditions and Presents more than 3 wrong. Presents
points) variables to be resolved, 3. Reaction or chemical reactions,
4. Reactor design equations (RDE), 5. Replacing the misspellings more than 5
variables in the EDR with values and right units 6. Mention misspellings
the solution method of RDE 7 Graphic(s) to analyze the
results 8. Final basic engineering drawing with reponse
variables 9 Conclusions 10. References from database of
UANL 11. Not misspellings.

2
Equipo 1 02/11/2018
The presentation consisted of: Cover page with The presentation The presentation The presentation
covered all 12 points. covered less than 12 covered less than 10
identification data, with full names of team members.
The team answered points and more than points . The team not
Methodology and presentation was in the next sequence: 1.-
the questiosn with 10. The team not answered well the
Ejecutive Resume 2. Introduction, 3. Scheme with known doubts.The time of answered well the questions.The time
conditions and variables to be resolved, 4. Reaction or exposition was more questions.The time of of exposition was
than 10 minutes and exposition was more more than 12
Oral chemical reactions, 5. Reactor design equations (RDE), 6. less than 12 than 10 minutes and minutes.
Exposition (60 minutes. less than 12 minutes.
points) ABET Replacing the variables in the EDR with values and right
G2 units 7. Mention the solution method of RDE 8.- Graphic(s)
to analyze the results 9. Final basic engineering drawing
with response variables 10. Conclusions 11. References
from database of UANL 12. No misspellings. No more than
10 minutes. The team answered the questions in rigth way.
Sum of Points
ABET Competencies.
(G) an ability to communicate effectively
2 The estudent knows how to use specialized technical language in a verbal, written and graphic manner, to present results in a professional
way.

3
Equipo 1 02/11/2018

4
Equipo 2 02/11/2018
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas
Chemical Engineering undergraduate program
Rubric 1
Class: Chemical Reaction Engineering
Professor: Dr. Javier Rivera
Date:
Evidency No 1 To calculate two chemical continuous reactors and analyse with the Levenspiel graph method

Team Number:
Stundents data
UANL register Evaluation for
Number in the list Surnames and Names number Global calification ABET
0
0
0
0
0
Title of the presentation:

Description of the evidency to show the competencies.

The team must present a print report and oral presentation where two continues reactor are calculated
for two different reactions. The analysis must be for Levenspiel plot method.
RUBRIC FOR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA:
Exemplary Well Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Points
The cover only The cover only The cover presents
presents a mistake presents more than one more than two
The Report consisted of: Cover page with identification and conclusions or mistakes and graph mistakes and the
data, with full names of team members. analysis are wrong. method and RDE, grap method,
Methodology and presentation was in the next sequence: 1. Not misspellings conclusions or analysis and
analysis are wrong. conclusions are
Report (40 Introduction, 2. Scheme with known conditions and Presents more than 3 wrong. Presents
points) variables to be resolved, 3. Reaction or chemical reactions,
4. Reactor design equations (RDE), 5. Replacing the misspellings more than 5
variables in the EDR with values and right units 6. Mention misspellings
the solution method of RDE 7 Graphic(s) to analyze the
results 8. Final basic engineering drawing with reponse
variables 9 Conclusions 10. References from database of
UANL 11. Not misspellings.

5
Equipo 2 02/11/2018
The presentation consisted of: Cover page with The presentation The presentation The presentation
covered all 12 points. covered less than 12 covered less than 10
identification data, with full names of team members.
The team answered points and more than points . The team not
Methodology and presentation was in the next sequence: 1.-
the questiosn with 10. The team not answered well the
Ejecutive Resume 2. Introduction, 3. Scheme with known doubts.The time of answered well the questions.The time
conditions and variables to be resolved, 4. Reaction or exposition was more questions.The time of of exposition was
than 10 minutes and exposition was more more than 12
Oral chemical reactions, 5. Reactor design equations (RDE), 6. less than 12 than 10 minutes and minutes.
Exposition (60 minutes. less than 12 minutes.
points) ABET Replacing the variables in the EDR with values and right
G2 units 7. Mention the solution method of RDE 8.- Graphic(s)
to analyze the results 9. Final basic engineering drawing
with response variables 10. Conclusions 11. References
from database of UANL 12. No misspellings. No more than
10 minutes. The team answered the questions in rigth way.
Sum of Points
ABET Competencies.
(G) an ability to communicate effectively
2 The estudent knows how to use specialized technical language in a verbal, written and graphic manner, to present results in a professional
way.

6
Equipo 2 02/11/2018

7
Equipo 3 02/11/2018
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas
Chemical Engineering undergraduate program
Rubric 1
Class: Chemical Reaction Engineering
Professor: Dr. Javier Rivera
Date:
Evidency No 1 To calculate two chemical continuous reactors and analyse with the Levenspiel graph method

Team Number:
Stundents data
UANL register Evaluation for
Number in the list Surnames and Names number Global calification ABET
8 Escamilla García Héctor Eduardo 1582420 0
18 Jacobo Contreras Albed Francisco 1596868 0
14 González López Eduardo Patricio 1578333 0
2 Acuña Chávez Isaí Salomon 1574794 0
15 González Martínez Jesús Felipe 1593383 0
Title of the presentation:

Description of the evidency to show the competencies.

The team must present a print report and oral presentation where two continues reactor are calculated
for two different reactions. The analysis must be for Levenspiel plot method.
RUBRIC FOR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA:
Exemplary Well Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Points
The cover only The cover only The cover presents
presents a mistake presents more than one more than two
The Report consisted of: Cover page with identification and conclusions or mistakes and graph mistakes and the
data, with full names of team members. analysis are wrong. method and RDE, grap method,
Methodology and presentation was in the next sequence: 1. Not misspellings conclusions or analysis and
analysis are wrong. conclusions are
Report (40 Introduction, 2. Scheme with known conditions and Presents more than 3 wrong. Presents
points) variables to be resolved, 3. Reaction or chemical reactions,
4. Reactor design equations (RDE), 5. Replacing the misspellings more than 5
variables in the EDR with values and right units 6. Mention misspellings
the solution method of RDE 7 Graphic(s) to analyze the
results 8. Final basic engineering drawing with reponse
variables 9 Conclusions 10. References from database of
UANL 11. Not misspellings.

8
Equipo 3 02/11/2018
The presentation consisted of: Cover page with The presentation The presentation The presentation
covered all 12 points. covered less than 12 covered less than 10
identification data, with full names of team members.
The team answered points and more than points . The team not
Methodology and presentation was in the next sequence: 1.-
the questiosn with 10. The team not answered well the
Ejecutive Resume 2. Introduction, 3. Scheme with known doubts.The time of answered well the questions.The time
conditions and variables to be resolved, 4. Reaction or exposition was more questions.The time of of exposition was
than 10 minutes and exposition was more more than 12
Oral chemical reactions, 5. Reactor design equations (RDE), 6. less than 12 than 10 minutes and minutes.
Exposition (60 minutes. less than 12 minutes.
points) ABET Replacing the variables in the EDR with values and right
G2 units 7. Mention the solution method of RDE 8.- Graphic(s)
to analyze the results 9. Final basic engineering drawing
with response variables 10. Conclusions 11. References
from database of UANL 12. No misspellings. No more than
10 minutes. The team answered the questions in rigth way.
Sum of Points
ABET Competencies.
(G) an ability to communicate effectively
2 The estudent knows how to use specialized technical language in a verbal, written and graphic manner, to present results in a professional
way.

9
Equipo 3 02/11/2018

10
Equipo 4 02/11/2018
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas
Chemical Engineering undergraduate program
Rubric 1
Class: Chemical Reaction Engineering
Professor: Dr. Javier Rivera
Date:
Evidency No 1 To calculate two chemical continuous reactors and analyse with the Levenspiel graph method

Team Number: EQUIPO 4

Stundents data
UANL register Evaluation for
Number in the list Surnames and Names number Global calification ABET
5 CAVAZOS HERNANDEZ JULIO CESAR 1590558 0
9 FLORES GALINDO ULISES 1693782 0
16 GRIMALDO SALAZAR ANDREA 1693813 0
24 ORTIZ GOMEZ JOSE ANGEL 1579158 0
32 SEPÚLVEDA GÓMEZ ORLANDO 1591927 0
Title of the presentation:
Diseño de reactores para la Hidrogenolisis del Glicerol y la Síntesis del Acetato de Vinilo mediante el gráfico de Levenspiel.
Description of the evidency to show the competencies.
The team must present a print report and oral presentation where two continues reactor are calculated
for two different reactions. The analysis must be for Levenspiel plot method.
RUBRIC FOR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA:
Exemplary Well Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Points
The cover only The cover only The cover presents
presents a mistake presents more than one more than two
The Report consisted of: Cover page with identification and conclusions or mistakes and graph mistakes and the
data, with full names of team members. analysis are wrong. method and RDE, grap method,
Methodology and presentation was in the next sequence: 1. Not misspellings conclusions or analysis and
analysis are wrong. conclusions are
Report (40 Introduction, 2. Scheme with known conditions and Presents more than 3 wrong. Presents
points) variables to be resolved, 3. Reaction or chemical reactions,
4. Reactor design equations (RDE), 5. Replacing the misspellings more than 5
variables in the EDR with values and right units 6. Mention misspellings
the solution method of RDE 7 Graphic(s) to analyze the
results 8. Final basic engineering drawing with reponse
variables 9 Conclusions 10. References from database of
UANL 11. Not misspellings.

11
Equipo 4 02/11/2018
The presentation consisted of: Cover page with The presentation The presentation The presentation
covered all 12 points. covered less than 12 covered less than 10
identification data, with full names of team members.
The team answered points and more than points . The team not
Methodology and presentation was in the next sequence: 1.-
the questiosn with 10. The team not answered well the
Ejecutive Resume 2. Introduction, 3. Scheme with known doubts.The time of answered well the questions.The time
conditions and variables to be resolved, 4. Reaction or exposition was more questions.The time of of exposition was
than 10 minutes and exposition was more more than 12
Oral chemical reactions, 5. Reactor design equations (RDE), 6. less than 12 than 10 minutes and minutes.
Exposition (60 minutes. less than 12 minutes.
points) ABET Replacing the variables in the EDR with values and right
G2 units 7. Mention the solution method of RDE 8.- Graphic(s)
to analyze the results 9. Final basic engineering drawing
with response variables 10. Conclusions 11. References
from database of UANL 12. No misspellings. No more than
10 minutes. The team answered the questions in rigth way.
Sum of Points
ABET Competencies.
(G) an ability to communicate effectively
2 The estudent knows how to use specialized technical language in a verbal, written and graphic manner, to present results in a professional
way.

12
Equipo 4 02/11/2018

13
Equipo 5 02/11/2018
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas
Chemical Engineering undergraduate program
Rubric 1
Class: Chemical Reaction Engineering
Professor: Dr. Javier Rivera
Date:
Evidency No 1 To calculate two chemical continuous reactors and analyse with the Levenspiel graph method

Team Number: EQUIPO 5

Stundents data
UANL register Evaluation for
Number in the listSurnames and Names number Global calification ABET
6 CERRILLO CLEMENTE JENNIFFER THALIA VALERIA 1693792 0
11 GARCIA MORENO RENE 1587050 0
17 GUERRERO GALINDO FATIMA 1591742 0
28 RESENDIZ HERNANDEZ ROBERTO HAZIEL 1588136 0
35 VELOZ MARTINEZ EDWIN PAUL 1693815 0
Title of the presentation:
Diseño de reactores por el método de Gráfico de Levenspiel para la hidrodealquilación de tolueno y oxidación de amoniaco.
Description of the evidency to show the competencies.
The team must present a print report and oral presentation where two continues reactor are calculated
for two different reactions. The analysis must be for Levenspiel plot method.
RUBRIC FOR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA:
Exemplary Well Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Points
The cover only The cover only The cover presents
presents a mistake presents more than one more than two
The Report consisted of: Cover page with identification and conclusions or mistakes and graph mistakes and the
data, with full names of team members. analysis are wrong. method and RDE, grap method,
Methodology and presentation was in the next sequence: 1. Not misspellings conclusions or analysis and
analysis are wrong. conclusions are
Report (40 Introduction, 2. Scheme with known conditions and Presents more than 3 wrong. Presents
points) variables to be resolved, 3. Reaction or chemical reactions,
4. Reactor design equations (RDE), 5. Replacing the misspellings more than 5
variables in the EDR with values and right units 6. Mention misspellings
the solution method of RDE 7 Graphic(s) to analyze the
results 8. Final basic engineering drawing with reponse
variables 9 Conclusions 10. References from database of
UANL 11. Not misspellings.

14
Equipo 5 02/11/2018
The presentation consisted of: Cover page with The presentation The presentation The presentation
covered all 12 points. covered less than 12 covered less than 10
identification data, with full names of team members.
The team answered points and more than points . The team not
Methodology and presentation was in the next sequence: 1.-
the questiosn with 10. The team not answered well the
Ejecutive Resume 2. Introduction, 3. Scheme with known doubts.The time of answered well the questions.The time
conditions and variables to be resolved, 4. Reaction or exposition was more questions.The time of of exposition was
than 10 minutes and exposition was more more than 12
Oral chemical reactions, 5. Reactor design equations (RDE), 6. less than 12 than 10 minutes and minutes.
Exposition (60 minutes. less than 12 minutes.
points) ABET Replacing the variables in the EDR with values and right
G2 units 7. Mention the solution method of RDE 8.- Graphic(s)
to analyze the results 9. Final basic engineering drawing
with response variables 10. Conclusions 11. References
from database of UANL 12. No misspellings. No more than
10 minutes. The team answered the questions in rigth way.
Sum of Points
ABET Competencies.
(G) an ability to communicate effectively
2 The estudent knows how to use specialized technical language in a verbal, written and graphic manner, to present results in a professional
way.

15
Equipo 5 02/11/2018

16
Equipo 6 02/11/2018
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas
Chemical Engineering undergraduate program
Rubric 1
Class: Chemical Reaction Engineering
Professor: Dr. Javier Rivera
Date:
Evidency No 1 To calculate two chemical continuous reactors and analyse with the Levenspiel graph method

Team Number:
Stundents data
UANL register Evaluation for
Number in the list Surnames and Names number Global calification ABET
0
0
0
0
0
Title of the presentation:

Description of the evidency to show the competencies.

The team must present a print report and oral presentation where two continues reactor are calculated
for two different reactions. The analysis must be for Levenspiel plot method.
RUBRIC FOR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA:
Exemplary Well Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Points
The cover only The cover only The cover presents
presents a mistake presents more than one more than two
The Report consisted of: Cover page with identification and conclusions or mistakes and graph mistakes and the
data, with full names of team members. analysis are wrong. method and RDE, grap method,
Methodology and presentation was in the next sequence: 1. Not misspellings conclusions or analysis and
analysis are wrong. conclusions are
Report (40 Introduction, 2. Scheme with known conditions and Presents more than 3 wrong. Presents
points) variables to be resolved, 3. Reaction or chemical reactions,
4. Reactor design equations (RDE), 5. Replacing the misspellings more than 5
variables in the EDR with values and right units 6. Mention misspellings
the solution method of RDE 7 Graphic(s) to analyze the
results 8. Final basic engineering drawing with reponse
variables 9 Conclusions 10. References from database of
UANL 11. Not misspellings.

17
Equipo 6 02/11/2018
The presentation consisted of: Cover page with The presentation The presentation The presentation
covered all 12 points. covered less than 12 covered less than 10
identification data, with full names of team members.
The team answered points and more than points . The team not
Methodology and presentation was in the next sequence: 1.-
the questiosn with 10. The team not answered well the
Ejecutive Resume 2. Introduction, 3. Scheme with known doubts.The time of answered well the questions.The time
conditions and variables to be resolved, 4. Reaction or exposition was more questions.The time of of exposition was
than 10 minutes and exposition was more more than 12
Oral chemical reactions, 5. Reactor design equations (RDE), 6. less than 12 than 10 minutes and minutes.
Exposition (60 minutes. less than 12 minutes.
points) ABET Replacing the variables in the EDR with values and right
G2 units 7. Mention the solution method of RDE 8.- Graphic(s)
to analyze the results 9. Final basic engineering drawing
with response variables 10. Conclusions 11. References
from database of UANL 12. No misspellings. No more than
10 minutes. The team answered the questions in rigth way.
Sum of Points
ABET Competencies.
(G) an ability to communicate effectively
2 The estudent knows how to use specialized technical language in a verbal, written and graphic manner, to present results in a professional
way.

18
Equipo 6 02/11/2018

19
Equipo 7 02/11/2018
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas
Chemical Engineering undergraduate program
Rubric 1
Class: Chemical Reaction Engineering
Professor: Dr. Javier Rivera
Date:
Evidency No 1 To calculate two chemical continuous reactors and analyse with the Levenspiel graph method

Team Number: EQUIPO 7

Stundents data
UANL register Evaluation for
Number in the list Surnames and Names number Global calification ABET
3 BERRONES EGUILUZ MIGUEL ÁNGEL 1585042 0
4 BRISEÑO ZAMARRIPA DAVID MARCELO 1600456 0
10 GARCÍA CANTÚ CRISTINA LISSETTE 1590498 0
19 JIMÉNEZ POCEROS GILBERTO SEBASTIÁN 1568377 0
29 REYNA GONZÁLEZ ARLENY GUADALUPE 1693816 0
Title of the presentation:

Description of the evidency to show the competencies.

The team must present a print report and oral presentation where two continues reactor are calculated
for two different reactions. The analysis must be for Levenspiel plot method.
RUBRIC FOR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA:
Exemplary Well Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Points
The cover only The cover only The cover presents
presents a mistake presents more than one more than two
The Report consisted of: Cover page with identification and conclusions or mistakes and graph mistakes and the
data, with full names of team members. analysis are wrong. method and RDE, grap method,
Methodology and presentation was in the next sequence: 1. Not misspellings conclusions or analysis and
analysis are wrong. conclusions are
Report (40 Introduction, 2. Scheme with known conditions and Presents more than 3 wrong. Presents
points) variables to be resolved, 3. Reaction or chemical reactions,
4. Reactor design equations (RDE), 5. Replacing the misspellings more than 5
variables in the EDR with values and right units 6. Mention misspellings
the solution method of RDE 7 Graphic(s) to analyze the
results 8. Final basic engineering drawing with reponse
variables 9 Conclusions 10. References from database of
UANL 11. Not misspellings.

20
Equipo 7 02/11/2018
The presentation consisted of: Cover page with The presentation The presentation The presentation
covered all 12 points. covered less than 12 covered less than 10
identification data, with full names of team members.
The team answered points and more than points . The team not
Methodology and presentation was in the next sequence: 1.-
the questiosn with 10. The team not answered well the
Ejecutive Resume 2. Introduction, 3. Scheme with known doubts.The time of answered well the questions.The time
conditions and variables to be resolved, 4. Reaction or exposition was more questions.The time of of exposition was
than 10 minutes and exposition was more more than 12
Oral chemical reactions, 5. Reactor design equations (RDE), 6. less than 12 than 10 minutes and minutes.
Exposition (60 minutes. less than 12 minutes.
points) ABET Replacing the variables in the EDR with values and right
G2 units 7. Mention the solution method of RDE 8.- Graphic(s)
to analyze the results 9. Final basic engineering drawing
with response variables 10. Conclusions 11. References
from database of UANL 12. No misspellings. No more than
10 minutes. The team answered the questions in rigth way.
Sum of Points
ABET Competencies.
(G) an ability to communicate effectively
2 The estudent knows how to use specialized technical language in a verbal, written and graphic manner, to present results in a professional
way.

21
Equipo 7 02/11/2018

22