Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10956205
CITATIONS READS
5,833 3,989
3 authors, including:
Shohei Hori
The University of Tokyo
60 PUBLICATIONS 15,452 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Shohei Hori on 31 May 2014.
cpm (x10-5)
100
duced very little but detectable IL-2, IFN-␥, 0.3
pg/ml
IL-4, and IL-10 as compared to GFP⫹ 0.2
0.2
+
1
1
on
R
freshly isolated CD25⫹CD4⫹ cells (fig. S2),
25
IG
IG
al
D
No. of GFP+ cells (x10-4)
+M
-
+C
25
3/
cytokine-producing cells were largely con-
xp
D
C
Fo
fined to cells expressing low levels of GFP
+
(and hence Foxp3).
Naturally arising CD25⫹CD4⫹ TR cells C 1.4 DO.RAG- D 1.5 OVA peptide 1.5 anti-CD3
characteristically express CD25, cytotoxic T 1.0
1.2 1.2
lymphocyte-associated antigen– 4 (CTLA-4), 0.6
cpm (x10-5)
cpm (x10-5)
glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor 0.2
0.9 0.9
receptor family–related gene (GITR), and
0.6 0.6
CD103 (␣E integrin) (6–10, 24–28). Al-
0.1
though the activation of CD25–CD4⫹ cells 0.3 0.3
for retroviral infection led to expression of
0.0 0.0 0.0
these molecules in both Foxp3/MIGR1- and 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
MIGR1-infected cells, GFP⫹ cells in the
No. of GFP+ cells (x10-4) No. of GFP+ cells (x10-4)
former expressed CD25, GITR, and CTLA-4
at higher levels than GFP– cells or GFP⫹
MIGR1-infected cells (Fig. 2D, table S1).
E 1.5 0.75
Among the GFP⫹ Foxp3-transduced cells,
the higher the level of GFP (Foxp3) expres-
cpm (x10-5)
l) 1
1
αIL-10R αTGF-β
β
on
el R
R
PBS
αTGF-ββ
G
IG
+α
al
an 3/
p3
(tr xp
D
o
+F
+F
110 * *
4 cells can convert these cells to a regulatory T
gastritis score
colitis score
100
3
2 cell phenotype functionally similar to naturally
90 occurring CD25⫹CD4⫹ TR cells. This result
2
80 1 suggests that Foxp3 may be a master regulatory
70 1 gene for cell-lineage commitment or develop-
mental differentiation of regulatory T cells in
60 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 the thymus and the periphery. Our results also
e
e
e
+M 1
e
1
+M 1
on
on
on
R
on
R
R
IG
IG
IG
N
al
/M
/M
i
i
p3
p3
R
R
ox
ox
5
5
-4
+F
+F
25
25
Scaffold proteins are known to play a critical be required for signaling. Thus, because Ste5
role in a growing number of signaling path- is essential for signaling, and because of ev-
ways, including several mitogen-activated pro- idence supporting conformational changes in-
tein kinase (MAPK) cascades (1– 4). In the duced by scaffold-kinase association (10, 11), Fig. 1. Yeast mating and high-osmolarity MAPK
pathways require scaffold proteins Ste5 and
budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the an alternative model is that Ste5 plays a more Pbs2. Both pathways require the shared MAP-
scaffold proteins Ste5 and Pbs2 are essential for complex catalytic role, precisely orienting KKK Ste11 but exhibit no cross-signaling under
the mating and high–osmolarity response and/or allosterically regulating pathway ki- normal conditions. Ste5 has distinct docking
MAPK pathways, respectively (5– 8). These nases (4). One way to distinguish between sites for Ste11, the MAPKK Ste7, and the MAPK
scaffold proteins contain binding sites for each these models would be to probe pathway Fus3 (or the partially redundant MAPK Kss1,
of the pathway kinases, as well as for upstream sensitivity to perturbations in assembly not shown for simplicity) (5–7). Input to Ste5
occurs through a docking site for Ste4, the G
signaling input proteins (Fig. 1). mechanisms. If pathway function depended subunit of the heterotrimeric guanine nucleo-
Despite their importance, little is known on precise catalytic participation of the scaf- tide–binding protein activated upon phero-
about the mechanism by which scaffold pro- fold, then strict stereochemical requirements mone binding to the ␣-factor receptor, Ste2.
teins such as Ste5 contribute to efficient and for kinase recruitment would be expected. Pbs2 functions as both the scaffold and MAPKK
specific signaling (9). One model is that scaf- We therefore tested whether non-native of the osmolarity pathway: It has a MAPKK
fold proteins simply tether pathway compo- protein-protein interactions could be used to domain, and it has been shown to bind Ste11
and the MAPK Hog1 ( precise binding sites have
nents, increasing their likelihood of acting on build a scaffolded assembly capable of me- not been identified) (8). Pbs2 also binds the Src
one another. However, one might expect a diating proper mating pathway connectivity homology 3 (SH3) domain from the upstream
simple tethering scaffold to enhance but not and function. We took advantage of several osmosensor Sho1 through a proline-rich dock-
known mutations in Ste5 that selectively de- ing site (residues 94 to 100), indicated by PxxP
stroy recruitment of the MAPK kinase kinase (26). A second branch of the osmoresponse
Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology pathway involving the two-component sensor
and Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Uni-
(MAPKKK) Ste11 and the MAPK kinase
protein Sln1 has been omitted for simplicity
versity of California, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Fran- (MAPKK) Ste7. These mutations, respective- (27). This branch of the pathway does not
cisco, CA 94143, USA. ly termed Ste5* and Ste5**, each resulted in require Sho1 or Ste11. All of the studies de-
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E- a nonfunctional mating pathway (12). Defec- scribed here were performed with strains lack-
mail: wlim@itsa.ucsf.edu tive recruitment interactions were then re- ing this pathway branch (ssk2⌬ and ssk22⌬).