Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
In this lab the binary batch distillation of a methanol-water solution was investigated. A 10 wt%
methanol solution was distilled in a distillation column while being run at total reflux. During the
initial phase of this lab known methanol-water solutions were created and their indices of
refraction were measured using a refractometer. Using this data a calibration curve was created
whichwas used to determine the methanol percent in samples taken during the lab. During the
second phase of the lab the 10 wt% methanol solution was allowed to reach equilibrium in the
distillation column and then both liquid and vapor samples were taken from each tray and
measured with the refractometer. It should be noted that although the objective of this
experiment was to obtain samples once the column was running in steady state, because of a leak
at the top of the unit steady state was never totally achieved (this is discussed in further depth in
The data gathered to create the calibration curve nicely fit a parabolic trend. When compared
with the curve of actual refractive index data for methanol-water solutions the two functions
were very similar only varying in the lowest order term. This data was used to determine the
After analyzing the data a weight percent of 78 was obtained for the top tray methanol vapor and
a weight percent of 95 was measured for the top tray methanol liquid. There is clearly error
present in these data points because the weight percent of methanol should be higher in the vapor
than in the liquid (cause for these errors is discussed in the discussion section). However, when
looking at the liquid sample it is shown that a high purity methanol sample is reached on the top
tray of the distillation column. As anticipated the distillate measured at the top of the column
should be very rich in methanol. This was due to methanol’s much lower boiling point than
water. Because of the condensation-evaporation cycles occurring on each tray a higher purity of
methanol solution should have been measured in each sequential stage. This trend of increasing
methanol purity was not observed from each try to the next most likely because of the fore
mentioned errors.