Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1. WATER POLLUTION
1.1 WATER POLLUTANTS
Water constituents of interest in pollution studies are as follows:
1) Toxic compounds which result in destruction or inhibition of biological activity in the
water such as heavy metals, phenols, pesticides and radio isotopes.
2) Pathogens - disease causing microorganisms
3) Substances that consume dissolved oxygen (DO). The substances may be organic
matter, which exert a biological oxygen demand, or inorganic reducing agents.
4) Substances which hinder re-oxygenation e.g. oils, greases and detergents that form a
protective film on the water surface.
5) Heated discharges - the saturation concentration of DO reduces with increasing
temperature.
6) High concentrations of inert suspended or dissolved solids which can blanket the
bed of a stream preventing the growth of certain organisms. E.g. china clay washing.
1.1
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
Because of the variety of organic matter, it is not practical to compute and sum up the oxygen
demand for each organic compound in a waste. Instead, the quantity of organic matter in
a waste is commonly defined by the collective biochemical oxygen demand, (BOD), the
amount of oxygen required by bacteria while stabilizing decomposable matter under
aerobic conditions.
The BOD Test is carried out in 300 ml sample bottles. The bottle are filled with dilution water,
saturated with oxygen and enriched with nutrients required for biological growth. Several
dilutions are used depending on sample strength. The measured oxygen consumption after
5 day incubation at 20oC corrected for dilution is the BOD5. Seeding with bacteria may be
required unless the waste contains a population of microorganisms, e,g. untreated
wastewater.
The 20oC temperature used is the average value for slow moving streams in temperate
climates and is easily duplicated in an incubator.
The O2 equivalent of the organic matter that can be oxidized is measured by using a strong
oxidizing agent in acidic reaction. Potassium dichromate has been found excellent for this
purpose. The test is performed at elevated temperature and a catalyst (silver sulphate) is
added to aid oxidation. The principal reaction may be rpresented by the following
unbalanced equation.
catalyst
Organic matter (CaHbOc) + Cr2O72- + H+ → Cr3+ + CO2 + H2O
heat
The COD is generally higher than BOD because more compounds can be chemically oxidized
than can be biologically oxidized. For many wastes, it is possible to correlate BOD with COD,
for example, BOD is approximately 67% COD for domestic waste.
1.2
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
1.3
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
For polluted water and wastewater, a typical value of K (base 10, 20 oC) is 0.10 day-1. The
value of K varies significantly with the type of waste and ranges from 0.05 to 0.3 day-1.
The rate constant at any other temperature may be determined from the Van’t Hoff-
Arrhenius equation
The effects of nitrification become significant only after 8 – 10 days. Nitrification can be
inhibited in BOD samples by addition of inhibitory agents such as methylene blue or
thiorea.
1.6 SELF-PURIFICATION
Any body of fresh water can assimilate a certain amount of pollution without serious effects
because of a biological cycle which adjusts itself to the supply of food or other changed
conditions.
Self-purification cycle
1.4
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
1.5
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
1.8 REAERATION
The combination of the above theories show that the solution of atmospheric oxygen in
moving water is proportional to the saturation deficit.
1.6
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
Rather than using the re-aeration constant K2, it is preferable to adopt a parameter which
measures the re-aeration rate per unit area. D.O. deficit – this is the exchange rate
coefficient f
where C1 and C2 are D.O. concentration at the two stations with a time flow between them
of t (V/t = Q).
1.7
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
qw, Cw rR
dV
Qr, Cr A
Q, C Q,
C + δC/δx
δx X
It is assumed that the river water and the waste are mixed completely at the point of
discharge, then the concentration of a constituent in the river-waste mixture at X = 0 is
given by
1.8
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
The change in oxygen resources of a river can be modelled by assuming that the river is
essentially a plug-flow reactor (as opposed to complete mix). Over any incremental volume
dV, the following mass balance can be written as:
1.9
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
1. A city discharges 1.33 m3/s of wastewater to a stream whose minimum rate of flow is
8.5 m3/s. The velocity of the stream is about 3.2 km/hr. The temperature of the
wastewater is 20 oC and that of the stream is 15 oC. The 20 oC BOD5 of the wastewater is
200 mg/l and that of the stream is 1.0 mg/L. The wastewater contains no dissolved
oxygen but the stream is 90% saturated upstream of the discharge. At 20 oC, k’ is
estimated to be 0.30 day-1 and k2’ 0.7 day-1. Determine the critical oxygen deficit and its
location. Also, estimate the BOD5 of the sample taken at the critical point. Use
temperature coefficient of 1.135 for k’ and 1.024 for k2’. Also plot the dissolved oxygen
sag curve Cs = 10.2 mg/l at 15oC.
Temperature oC 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Oxygen Concentration (mg/L) 14.81 12.79 11.25 10.04 9.07 8.27 7.50
2. A stream with a flow of 4 m3/s, BOD 1 mg/L and saturated with oxygen (D.O. 9.1 mg/L)
receives at A, a sewage effluent discharge of 2 m3/s with BOD 20 mg/L and DO 4 mg/L.
At point B, 20 km downstream of A, a tributary with a flow 2 m3/s, BOD 1 mg/L and DO
8 mg/L joins the main stream. A further distance 20 km, downstream at C the stream
receives another effluent of 2 m3/s with BOD 15 mg/L and DO 6 mg/L.
Determine the DO deficit at Point D, 20 km downstream of C assuming constant
temperature of 20 oC for which saturation DO is 9.1 mg/L. For all reaches of the stream
K’1 = 0.23 day-1 and K’2 = 0.81 day-1. Velocity of flow = 0.3 m/s. (Ans – 2.23 mg/L)
1.10
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
The law states that no discharge shall create conditions that violate set standards. Where
there are a series of effluent discharges, the one downstream will be forced to discharge
less. The approach is therefore not fair to everyone.
2) Effluent Standards
These stipulates the quality of the effluent which can be discharged into a particular
receiving water body taking into account the self-purification capacity and beneficial use of
the water.
As an example, discharge from sewage works treating sewage should be
BOD < 20 mg/L
SS < 30 mg/L (Suspended solids)
These standards are commonly referred to as 20/30 standards
The basic information that are necessary to set standards include
1.11
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
Effluent Standards for Discharge into Natural Water Courses (The Environmental
Management & Co-ordination Water Quality Regulations, 2006)
1.12
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
Sulphide 0.1mg/l
Hexavalent chromium VI compounds 0.5mg/l
Phenols 0.001mg/l
Simazine 0.03mg/l
Detergents nil
Tetrachloroethylene 0.1mg/l
Thiobencarb 0.1mg/l
Thiram 0.06mg/l
Total Cyanogen Nd
Mercury 0.005
Trichloroethylene 0.3mg/l
Whole effluent toxicity Nil
Total Phosphorous 2mg/l
Total Nitrogen 2mg/l
Note:- The standard adopted for Coliform count is that of ministry of water and irrigation
since that of 30m/100ml suggested by EMCA is not achievable.
Parameter Standard
pH 6.0-9.0
BOD (5days at 200c) not to exceed 500mg/l
COD not to exceed 1000mg/l
0
Temperature not to exceed c 20-35
Oil and Grease (mg/l)- where conventional 5
treatment shall be used
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/l) not to exceed 20
Substance with an obnoxious smell Shall not be discharged into the sewers
Arsenic (mg/l) 0.02
Mercury (mg/l) 0.05
Cadmium not to exceed 0.5 mg/l
Lead 1.0mg/l
Chromium (Total) 2.0 mg/l
Copper 1.0 mg/l
Zinc 5.0 mg/l
Selenium 3.0 mg/l
Nickel 3.0 mg/l
Nitrate 20 mg/l
Phosphates 30 mg/l
Cyanide 2 mg/l
Sulphide 2mg/l
Phenols 10mg/l
Detergents 15mg/l
Colour Less than 40 Hazen Unit
Alkyl Mercury Not Detectable
Free and Saline Ammonia as N 4.0mg/l
Calcium Carbide Nil
Chloroform Nil
Inflammable solvents Nil
Radioactive residues Nil
1.13
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
2) Fixtures Basis (American Practice). The type of fixtures in a house are checked e.g.
a. Showers
b. Bath tub
c. Water basin
d. Water closet
e. Urinal
f. Washing machines
3) Actual Measurements of Existing Sewered Areas similar to the proposed
development area
Peak Flow
Wastewater flow is not uniform throughout the day; rather it varies with the nature and
level of activities generating the flow. Typical variations are as follows
In Kenya, the ratio between daily peak and average flow rate of domestic sewage is in the
order 2½. However, because of storage in the sewer line and lag time in the flow of sewage
to the large sewers, smaller peak factors are used for the larger sewers. The WHO Report
No. 9 adopts the peak factors recommended by Babbitt – Sewerage and Sewage Treatment.
1.14
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
Other peak factor equations are the Gritt Equation and Duncan Mara. See table below for
population P in 1000’s.
Note: This approach, however, requires that the sewer diameter is assumed before the peak
flow can be computed more convenient to link peak flows to pipe sizes. The Nairobi City
County uses peak factor based on dry weather flow (DWF).
In general, sewers are designed for the peak domestic sewage when running half full.
If it is a partially separate system, the capacity should be the sum of the following.
i. Maximum domestic sewage computed as shown
ii. Maximum industrial and commercial flow expected
iii. Maximum rate of storm water (Q = CAI - rational formula)
iv. Maximum rate of inflow of groundwater (infiltration) through cracks and defective
mortar joints
2) Colebrook-White equation
Charts are available, for example, Hydraulic Research, Wallingford. The Nairobi City Council specifies
a roughness coefficient of 1.5 mm.
Self-Cleansing Velocity
If the flow in a gravity sewer is too low, solids contained in the sewage tend to settle out. A
minimum velocity of 0.75 m/s or self-cleansing velocity is required to prevent the settling
of solids. It is customary to design the sewer so that this velocity is achieved at least once a
day.
1) If a there is a problem of hydrogen sulphide generation, then minimum velocity of 1
m/s is used to avoid accumulation of the gas and acid which could cause corrosion.
2) During commissioning of a new sewer, a minimum of 0.6 m/s may be permitted.
3) Maximum velocity of 3 m/s to avoid scour.
1.16
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
GRP pipes are corrosion resistant composite pipes that meet demanding needs of transport of
corrosive and non-corrosive fluids. These pipes are manufactured with polyester, vinylester
and epoxy resins using either the dual helical filament winding (discontinuous) or the
continuous advancing mandrel filament winding technique for diameter of up to 3000 mm in
diameter. The pipes provide superior corrosion resistance, high mechanical and physical
properties as well as the ease of handling, transportation and installation when compared to
traditional materials. Special features of these pipes include:
2. Are low in weight (25% the weight of ductile iron and 10% weight of concrete pipe)
1.17
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
225 to 450 mm – 60 m
525 to 825 mm – 90 m
900 mm and above – 100 m
c) From a contour map or levels taken in the field, prepare a surface profile for each street
along the centre line of the proposed sewer
d) Sketch on the map the limits of each area tributary to each manhole i.e. area covered by
each collector line between manholes. Plannimeter or otherwise measure and record
the incremental area.
e) Estimate future population density in each area to be served; preferably, this should be
the land carrying capacity as sewers are expensive to duplicate.
g) Estimate rate of groundwater infiltration. U.K. code of practice states that when testing
with 1.2 m head, a sewer should not lose during one hour, more than 0.4 litres per meter
length per metre of nominal diameter of sewer. An infiltration rate of 0.5 L/s/km may be
adopted for design.
k) Starting at the upper end of the system, deign the system from manhole to manhole.
Provide drop manholes where there are excessive differences in levels to avoid
excessive sewer depths. Except at drop manholes, the crown of all pipes should be at
1.18
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
the same elevation. A pipe should never discharge into another with a smaller
diameter.
1.19
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
0.6<V< Invert
V full Qactl/ V actual 3.0 from Level
m/s Qfull d/D V/ Vfull m/sec m/sec MH (m) cover m
1.20
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
(2) Screw Pumps – These operate on the principle of Archimedean screw and comprise an
inclined screw which rotates relatively slowly within a trough. The rotation of the screw
slowly raises the sewage between the open threads which are made of sheet metal and
the trough floor.
- Capacity 10 – 1300 l/min
- Maximum lift (limitation)- 6 m – Used in series for larger lifts
- Can operate at zero flow
(3) Pneumatic Ejection – An ejector comprises of a closed tank into which sewage flows by
gravity. When certain depth is reached, an automatic control introduces compressed air
which forces sewage up the pumping main. When the tank is emptied, the valve on the
compressed air inlet is closed and the cycle is repeated.
Note : - No clogging
- No continuous pumping - only when the tank is full and so economical
- Capacity less than 360 l/min, Head about 12 m
-
(4) Air Lift Pumps
Head – about 6 m
Capacity – depends on amount of compressed air forced into the system.
1.21
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
PUMPING STATIONS
1) Dry Well station
The substructure of such station comprises two compartments, (i) a dry well to house
the pumps and (ii) a sewerage sump.
1.22
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
with the peak flow i.e. 100% standby. In large stations, the standby should not be less
than 33%.
Capacity of wet wells sewage sumps
General recommendation is to have capacity equivalent to about 30 min of dry weather
flow i.e. minimum flow.
E
2169
D
B
600
25
1040
990
895
845
A A
25
2169
D
E
B
1.23
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
2) Secondary Treatment
A. Biological Oxidation
1. Filters
a. Intermittent sand filters
b. Contact filters – rock medium
2. Aeration
a. Activated sludge process
1.24
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
6. Chemical precipitation
7. Nitrification – denitrification
8. Reverse osmosis
4) Methods of Treating Sewage Solids
A. Screenings
1. Shredding followed by sludge digestion
2. Incineration followed by disposal of ash
3. Burial of untreated screening
B. Settled Sludge
1. Digestion in sludge digester
2. Conditioning with chemicals
3. Vacuum filtration
4. Pressure filtration or cake filtration
5. Drying on beds or kiln
6. Dumping into the sea
5) Bar racks
1.25
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
7) Comminutor
1.26
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
8) Grit Chambers
Grit chambers are designed to remove grit consisting of sand, gravel or other heavy solid
materials that have subsiding velocity higher than that of organic solids in wastewater to
prevent (i) wearing of machinery and (ii) settling at the entrance.
Types
(A) Horizontal Flow Grit Chambers
These are designed to maintain a velocity as close to 0.3 m/s as practical, by one of the
following methods.
3. A parallel of channels which are cut in and out of service to control
velocity as flow varies
1.27
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
The typical design information for horizontal flow grit chamber with Parshall flume
control
- Detention time (s) – 45 – 90
- Horizontal velocity - 0.25 – 0.4 m/s
- Settling velocity for removal - 0.21 mm dia – 1.0 -.1.3
- - 0.15 mm dia - 0.6 – 0.9
- Headloss in control section
as percent of channel depth - 30 - 40
- Allowance for inlet turbulence = 2Dm – 0.5L
Where Dm = maximum depth, L = length of chamber
Tutorial Problem
Design a grit chamber with three channels with a flow-through velocity of 0.3 m/s for a
plant with a maximum design flow of 1.32 m3/s, an average flow of 0.66 m3/s and a
minimum flow of 0.264 m3/s. Assume that the maximum width of each channel is 1.8 m
and design each channel for a maximum emergency flow of 0.66 m3/s, a normal
maximum flow of 0.44 m3/s, an average flow of 0.22 m3/s and a minimum flow of 0.088
m3/s. Use a fixed-width control section with vertical sides and a well rounded and
smooth approach, so that the head loss may be assumed equal to 10% of the velocity
head. The flow at the control section will be at critical depth and the critical depth
equation will apply.
1.28
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
Sedimentation tanks for sewage treatment are now most commonly radial flow tanks.
They are circular in plan with floor slopes (2½ -7½o). The initial baffle (to minimize
turbulence) and flows outwards to the overflow weir . Mechanical scrappers are provided
for sludge collection and surface scum removal.
It is preferable to use 50 mm deep notches placed 150 to 300 mm c/c for even weir
loading.
Performance
Primary sedimentation of domestic sewage may be expected to accomplish 30 to 45%
removal of BOD and 40 to 60% removal of suspended solids.
On the surface, there develops a microbial film and the bacteria which constitutes most of
this film oxidize the sewage as it flows downwards.
1.30
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
Design Criteria
A) Distributors
(1) Rotary distributor (reaction type)
The arms are rotated by the reaction of discharge from orifices. NB: A minimum
pressure and flow are required for operation
(2) Motor driven – rotation independent of pressure
(3) Longitudinal travelling distributor
1.31
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
(NB – filter media may dry out while the distributor is travelling thus interfering
with metabolism).
1.32
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
Microorganisms
Organic matter + O2 + nutrients CO2 + H2O + microorganisms
Mechanism of Removal
1) Removal by entanglement of suspended solids with gross sludge matrix.
2) Slow progressive stabilization of the organic matter by bacteria
Flow Diagrams
a) Conventional – As above
b) Tapered Aeration
1.33
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
treatment in the main plant. The settled solids are withdrawn as sludge for dewatering and
ultimate disposal.
1.35
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
11.1Introdution
Waste stabilization ponds are largely shallow basins in which raw wastewater is treated by
entirely natural processes involving both algae and bacteria. Because these processes are
unaided by man, the rate of oxidation is slow. As a result, they have long hydraulic retention
times that require large tracts of land compared to conventional wastewater treatment
methods (e.g. activated sludge process). WSP are the preferred method of water treatment
in developing countries where sufficient land in normally available and where temperature
is most favorable for their operation. There are three principal types of ponds; namely,
(i) Anaerobic
(ii) Facultative
(iii) Maturation
Advantage of WSP
1. Simple to construct (mainly earth moving), operate and maintain (cutting grass on
embankments and removing scum and floating objects).
2. Low cost in comparison with other wastewater treatment options especially no
mechanical equipment.
3. High efficiency – over 90% removal of BOD, and SS. Especially efficient in removing
feacal pathogens.
4. Robustness – due to long hydraulic retention time, they can absorb shockwave.
5. Unskilled labor
6. Low energy requirements – mainly sunlight
Disadvantages
1. Odour release – All overloaded microbiological wastewater treatment methods have
odor problems. Proper design, operation and maintenance reduce odour problems.
2. Land – require much more land; cf. one time capital outlay and recurrent power costs.
Design criteria
Design at the moment is purely empirical
1.36
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
The basic difference between facultative ponds and other biological treatment processes
(such as the biofilter is that O2 supply for bacteria metabolism comes not from the
atmosphere but from photosynthetic activity of algae. To grow and so produce oxygen,
algae needs carbon dioxide and this is supplied as an end product of bacteria metabolism.
Thus, there is a cycle of interdependence or symbiosis between ponds bacteria and algae.
Design
The best way to design a facultative pond is to assume that it is a completely mixed
biological reactor in which BOD removal can be reasonably represented by a simple first
order kinetic model. The governing equation can be derived as follows.
Rate of accumulation = Inflow – outflow + Consumption
For steady state conditions:
1.37
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
Design
Removal of faecal bacteria in a pond is given by the following equation.
1.38
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
1.39
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
To control the rate of solids accumulation in the ditch, a proportion of the ditch solids must
be wasted each day. For a solids retention rate, SRT, 100/SRT percent of the solids must be
wasted. If the sludge wasting is through the recycle line the percent of sludge wasted must
be corrected for change in concentration due to sedimentation. Sludge concentration is
expressed as a weight percentage. For example
1.40
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
1.41
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
1.42
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
The above systems may incorporate filtration and chlorination of the effluents
1.43
FCE 581: Public Health Engineering 1B
Examples
1. Ventilated Impound Pit Latrine (VIP) is a hygienic low-cost sanitation technology.
1.45