Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

August 18, 2016

In Focus
Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958): Presentation
of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
On August 18, 2016, the Financial The FASB’s NAC and other stakehold- colleges and universities, nongov-
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ers told the Board that while existing ernmental health care providers, cul-
issued an Accounting Standards standards for financial statements of tural institutions, religious organiza-
Update (ASU) that improves exist- not-for-profits are sound, they could be tions, and trade associations, among
ing standards for financial state- improved to provide better informa- others.
ment presentation by not-for-profit tion to donors, grantors, creditors, and
organizations. other users of financial statements. What Kind of Outreach Did
the FASB Undertake When
Who Would Be Affected by the Developing the ASU?

T he FASB’s NAC and other stake-


holders told the Board that while
existing standards for financial state-
Changes in This ASU?

The ASU affects substantially all not-


When developing the ASU, the FASB
participated in extensive outreach
ments of not-for-profits are sound, for-profits as well as donors, grant- activities and received significant
they could be improved to provide bet- ors, creditors, and others that use input from a wide variety of stake-
ter information to donors, grantors,
their financial statements. holders. Outreach activities are sum-
creditors, and other users of financial
statements. marized below:
Those not-for-profits typically in-
clude charities, foundations, private
Why Is the FASB Improving
GAAP for Financial Statement
Presentation by Not-for-Profits? 3 roundtables
260+ comment letters with 35+ users,
The FASB originally initiated this on 2015 Exposure Draft preparers, & auditors
project on the basis of the recom-
mendations made by the Not-for-
Profit Advisory Committee (NAC)
in 2011. This was also part of the 10 workshops & 12 meetings
FASB’s ongoing review of Gener- fieldwork meetings with FASB’s
ally Accepted Accounting Principles with preparers of Not-For-Profit
(GAAP) standards to ensure they various types & sizes Advisory Committee
continue to meet the evolving needs
of a dynamic financial reporting OUTREACH
environment.

This guidance will be the first major 25 meetings 60 meetings


set of changes to not-for-profit with Not-For-Profit with various
financial statement presentation industry groups stakeholders
standards since the issuance of FASB 10 meetings
Statement No. 117, Financial State- with FASB’s
ments of Not-for-Profit Organizations, in
Not-For-Profit
1993, which established the current
Resource Group
reporting guidance.
Page 2 FASB In Focus

What Areas of Not-for- „„ Changes the net asset function, as well as an analysis
Profit Financial Statement classification of the underwater of expenses by both nature
Presentation Does the ASU Seek amounts of donor-restricted and function. This analysis
To Improve? endowment funds and requires can be presented on the face
additional disclosures for of the statement of activities,
The ASU focuses on improving underwater endowment funds as a separate statement, or
the current net asset classifica- in the notes to the financial
„„ Eliminates the over-time
tion requirements and information statements—supplemented with
presented in financial statements approach for the expiration of
enhanced disclosures about the
and notes that is useful in assessing restrictions on capital gifts in
methods used to allocate costs
a not-for-profit’s liquidity, financial favor of the placed-in-service
among functions.
performance, and cash flows. approach, in the absence of
explicit donor stipulations. „„ All organizations to present
More specifically, it addresses the fol- investment return net of
lowing issues raised by stakeholders: Information about Liquidity and Avail- all related external and
ability of Resources direct internal expenses
1. Complexity and understandability
of net asset classifications
and eliminates the currently
The ASU includes some specific required disclosure of those
2. Deficiencies in information requirements directed at improving a netted expenses.
about liquidity and availability of financial statement user’s ability to as-
resources sess a not-for-profit’s available finan- Presentation of Operating Cash Flows
cial resources and its management of
3. Lack of consistency in the type liquidity and liquidity risk. Specifically,
of information provided about The ASU allows not-for-profits to
the ASU requires the following: continue to present the net amount
expenses and investment return
„„ Qualitative information that of operating cash flows using either
4. Misunderstandings about and the direct or indirect method of
communicates how a not-for-
opportunities to enhance the utility reporting, while no longer requiring
profit manages its liquid available
of the statement of cash flows. the presentation or disclosure of the
resources to meet cash needs for
indirect method reconciliation if us-
What Major Changes Does This general expenditures within one
ing the direct method.
ASU Make to These Areas of year of the balance sheet date
Financial Reporting? „„ Quantitative information that How Will These Changes
communicates the availability Improve Financial Reporting?
Net Asset Classification of a not-for-profit’s financial
assets at the balance sheet date Net Asset Classification
The ASU accomplishes the to meet cash needs for general
following: expenditures within one year Requiring only two (rather than
of the balance sheet date. three) classes of net assets to be
„„ Replaces the existing
Availability of a financial asset presented on the face of financial
three classes of net assets
may be affected by: statements will reduce complexity in
(unrestricted, temporarily financial reporting and increase the
restricted, and permanently 1. Its nature understandability of the information
restricted) with two new classes
2. External limits imposed by
of net assets—net assets with
donor restrictions and net assets
without donor restrictions
donors, grantors, laws, and
contracts with others, and R equiring only two (rather than
three) classes of net assets to be
presented on the face of financial
3. Internal limits imposed by statements will reduce complexity in
„„ Retains current requirements
governing board decisions. financial reporting and increase the
to provide information about
understandability of the information
the nature and amounts of Information about Expenses and Invest- provided.
different types of donor- ment Return
imposed restrictions,
highlighting how those The ASU requires:
restrictions affect the use of
„„ All not-for-profits to provide
resources, including their
expenses by nature and
liquidity
Page 3 FASB In Focus

provided. This is responsive to to help begin their assessment of a the reported amounts of investment
changes in laws now allowing or- not-for-profit’s liquidity and finan- expenses.
ganizations, within the bounds of cial flexibility.
prudence, to spend from a perma- Presentation of Operating Cash Flows
nently restricted endowment even Information about Expenses and Invest-
though the fair value of the fund ment Return Continuing to allow not-for-profits
may have fallen below the endowed to present operating cash flows us-
gift amount. Additionally, enhanced The reporting of expenses by both ing either the direct method or the
disclosures will provide information their function (required in current indirect method retains the current
about limits placed on net assets by GAAP) and nature will add infor- flexibility and freedom in financial
governing boards and donors. mation useful to donors, grantors, reporting.
creditors, and others in understand-
Not-for-profits will now be required ing a not-for-profit’s expenses and in Allowing the presentation of the
to use the placed-in-service approach assessing: direct method without requiring the
(without specific donor restrictions indirect reconciliation provides an
1. The degree to which they are
stating otherwise) to report expira- opportunity for some not-for-profits
fixed or discretionary
tions of restrictions on gifts of cash to reduce costs and to present infor-
or other assets to be used to acquire 2. How the related resources are mation about cash flows in a way that
or construct a long-lived asset. This being allocated, and may increase the understandability
will improve comparability and bet- and its usefulness to particular types
3. The costs of the services
ter reflects the economics of such of financial statement users.
provided.
transactions.
When Will the Amendments Be
The reporting of investment return
Effective?

T
net of related expenses provides a
he new disclosures will provide
more comparable measure of invest-
more transparent information that The amendments in this Update
will enable financial statement users ment return across all not-for-profits,
regardless of whether their invest- are effective for annual financial
to have a better understanding of how
ment activities: statements issued for fiscal years
a not-for-profit manages its liquid
available resources and its liquidity beginning after December 15, 2017,
risks. and for interim periods within fiscal
„„ Are managed by internal staff, years beginning after December
outside investment managers, 15, 2018. Application to interim
volunteers, or a combination of financial statements is permitted
Information about Liquidity and Avail- those, or but not required in the initial year
ability of Resources of application. Early application of
„„ Employ the use of mutual
the amendments in this Update is
The new disclosures will provide funds, hedge funds, or other permitted.
more transparent information that vehicles for which management
will enable financial statement users fees are embedded in the
to have a better understanding of investment return of the
how a not-for-profit manages its liq- vehicle.
uid available resources and its liquid-
ity risks. Furthermore, the additional No longer requiring the disclo- For more information
transparency about the nature and sure of those netted expenses also about the project, please visit
extent of internal and external limits eliminates the difficulties and related the FASB’s website at
on available resources will provide a costs in identifying embedded fees www.fasb.org.
foundation of information for users and the resulting inconsistencies in

© Copyright 2016 by Financial Accounting Foundation, Norwalk, CT. Reproduction of these


materials, in whole or part, shall only be as permitted by Financial Accounting Foundation.
This Copyright Notice must be prominently displayed on any such reproduction.
401 Merritt 7, PO Box 5116
The views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the FASB. Official Norwalk, Connecticut 06856-5116
positions of the FASB are arrived at only after extensive due process and deliberation. T: 203.847.0700 | F: 203.849.9714

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi