Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Bacani v.

NACOCO Digest
1. The keeping of order and providing for the protection of persons and
G.R. No. L-9657 Nov. 29, 1956 property from violence and robbery.
Two-fold Function of the Government 2. The fixing of the legal relations between man and wife and between
FACTS: parents and children.
1. Bacani and Matoto are court stenographers both assigned in the CFI of Manila. 3. The regulation of the holding, transmission, and interchange of property,
During the pendency of another civil case (Civil Case No. 2293 entitled 'Francisco and the determination of its liabilities for debt or for crime.
Sycip vs. NACOCO'), Alikpala, counsel for NACOCO(Nat’l Coconut Corporation) , 4. The determination of contract rights between individuals.
requested the said stenographers for copies of the transcript of the stenographic 5. The definition and punishment of crime.
notes taken by them during the hearing. Plaintiffs complied with the request by 6. The administration of justice in civil cases.
delivering to Counsel Alikpala the needed transcript containing 714 pages and 7. The determination of the political duties, privileges, and relations of
thereafter submitted to him their bills for the payment of their fees. The NACOCO citizens.
paid the amount of P564 to Bacani and P150 to Matoto for said transcript at the rate 8. Dealings of the state with foreign powers: the preservation of the state
of P1 per page. from external danger or encroachment and the advancement of its
international interests.’
2. Subsequently, the Auditor General required the plaintiffs to reimburse said
amounts by virtue of a DOJ circular which stated that NACOCO, being a government B. The most important of the ministrant functions are: public works, public
entity, was exempt from the payment of the fees in question. education, public charity, health and safety regulations, and regulations of trade and
industry. The principles deter mining whether or not a government shall exercise
3. Petitioners countered that NACOCO is not a government entity within the purview of certain of these optional functions are:
section 16, Rule 130 of the Rules of Court while the defendants set up as a defense 1.that a government should do for the public welfare those things which
that the NACOCO is a government entity within the purview of section 2 of the private capital would not naturally undertake and
Revised Administrative Code of 1917 hence, exempt from paying the stenographers’ 2. that a government should do these things which by its very nature it is
fees under Rule 130 of the Rules of Court. better equipped to administer for the public welfare than is any private individual or
group of individuals.
ISSUE: Whether or not NACOCO can be considered as a government entity and
exempt from fees

Ruling: NACOCO has a ministrant functions and not considered as a government


entity hence is required to pay fees. Government function is divided into two:
Constituent and Ministrant. Constituent constitute the very bonds of society and
compulsory in nature. Ministrant functions are undertaken only by way of advancing
the general interest of society and merely optional

A. President Wilson enumerates the constituent functions as follows:

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi