Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Table 1. Demographics
Age Height Weight 1 Weight 2 Change % Change BMI start BMI end Change
years cm kg kg kg in Weight in BMI
Group 30.4 168.5 85.1 79.8 -5.3 -6.2 29.7 28.0 -1.7
mean
Group 8.5 9.6 18.6 17.8 1.9 2.1 4.8 4.8 0.9
SD
Male 32.0 175.2 96.8 91.2 -5.7 -6.0 31.5 29.9 -1.8
mean
Male SD 4.3 8.3 14.7 15.0 1.7 1.9 5.0 5.3 0.9
Female 29.0 163.0 75.5 70.6 -5.0 -6.4 28.1 26.5 -1.6
mean
Female 10.9 6.8 16.1 14.6 2.1 2.3 4.3 3.9 0.9
SD
Figure 1. Subject using 6 Second Abs Figure 2. Subject during VO2 measurements.
machine.
program, sustained for one week, on tions: 1) What would the compliance in a
weight loss and cardiovascular indica- 1-month program be? 2) How much
tors (ie, blood pressure).13 We found would body girth measurements change
that the combination of aerobic and if the study were sustained for 1 month?
anaerobic exercise programs and 3) What long-term benefits in choles-
abdominal exercise with a 1200 calorie terol and triglycerides would be seen in
per day diet can cause a dramatic reduc- a 1-month program? and, 4) What
tion in weight, girth, and blood pressure changes would be seen in overall muscle
in just one week. However, this study fitness? Therefore, the present investi-
raised the following additional ques- gation was conducted to do a more sys-
30.4 years ± 8.5 years. There was no sta- 18.6 kg with an average weight loss of
tistical difference between the age of the 5.3 ± 1.9 kg after the diet. This weight
male and female subjects. However, the loss amounted to a reduction of 6.2% of
average height of the group was 168.5 body weight. While the men lost more
cm ± 9.6 cm, and was greater in the male weight than women (Table 1), the per-
subjects (175.2 cm ± 8.3 cm) when com- cent change in body weight was actually
pared to the female subjects (163.0 cm ± higher in the women than the men, aver-
6.8 cm) (P<0.05). The average weight of aging 6.4% ± 2.3% in the women and
the group before the diet was 85.1 kg ± 6.0% ± 1.9% in the men. The average
loss in body weight in both groups against the chest, while the base of the
amounted to change in body mass index rectangle is placed on top of the middle
(BMI) of 1.7 units ± .9 units. of the quadriceps muscles. Both the
upper and lower rectangles of the
METHODS machine are padded.
6 Second Abs Machine
The 6 Second Abs machine is a commer- Diet
cial exercise device (Savvier LP, The diet consisted of a low-fat, low-sodi-
Carlsbad, Calif). It consists of a rectan- um diet. The total calories averaged
gular plastic frame with rubber bands on about 1300 calories per day. The diet is
the inside to adjust resistance. listed in Tables 2, 3, 4, and 5. A stringent
Resistance can be increased in a number diet of an average 1200 calories per day
of different stages so that it becomes was followed in the first week (Table 2)
increasingly more difficult to compress and then the diets for the second week
the rectangle (Figure 1). As the (Table 3), third week (Table 4) and
machine is compressed to the first, sec- fourth week (Table 5) were more
ond, and third click position, there is a relaxed. It was a low-fat diet (12% fat)
linear increase in load. The upper part with a balance of protein and carbohy-
of the rectangle is placed under the sub- drates. To avoid hunger, 3 snacks were
ject’s arms (under the triceps muscles, provided between meals each day. The
bilaterally) or held in the subject’s arms composition of the first week of the diet
Table 8. Cardiovascular Changes Before and After Weight Loss and Exercise Program*
Systolic BP Systolic BP Diastolic BP Diastolic BP
pre post Change % pre post Change % HR pre HR post Change
Group mean 135.6 127.1 -8.6 -6.0 87.3 84.5 -2.8 -2.8 76.0 73.1 -2.9
Group SD 10.5 10.6 11.0 7.6 8.6 9.5 9.0 10.1 11.8 12.8 9.9
Male mean 135.3 128.4 -6.9 -4.7 88.8 84.1 -4.7 -4.4 71.0 67.9 -3.1
Male SD 11.3 7.6 10.8 7.4 10.2 5.0 9.1 10.0 9.7 13.1 9.8
Female mean 135.8 125.9 -9.9 -7.2 86.0 84.8 -1.2 -1.5 80.0 77.4 -2.6
Female SD 10.3 12.8 11.5 8.0 7.2 12.2 9.1 10.5 12.3 11.4 10.5
*
BP indicates blood pressure; HR, heart rate; pre, before exercise and weight loss program; and post, after exercise and weight loss program.
ments were taken to assess the effective- Subjects entered a diet program
ness of both the diet and the exercise shown in Tables 2, 3, 4, and 5. The first
program. The measurements taken week of the diet was more stringent and
before and after weight loss included involved a diet that averaged only 1207
body fat content, abdominal muscle calories per day. During the second,
strength, abdominal max Vo2 using a third, and fourth weeks, the diet was
modified Bruce protocol, abdominal somewhat easier but still only averaged
muscle size, and girth of major areas of approximately 1400 calories per day as
the body. A modified Bruce protocol shown in Tables 2, 3, 4, and 5. In addi-
was used for abdominal exercise in the tion to the diet, during which all gro-
supine position using the 6 Second Abs ceries were provided to maintain
machine and the load was increased continuity, subjects were also provided
every two minutes by changing resist- with a 6 Second Abs machine and exer-
ance bands. Load increments for the cise videos. The total daily exercise
stages were 15, 25, 30, 40, 55, 70, 80, and schedule is shown in Table 7. Subjects
110 lbs. These were applied at 2-minute were encouraged to stick with the exer-
intervals until exhaustion. Thus, the test cise and diet program. The total work-
continued until the subject could no out time varied from 30 to 35 minutes
longer maintain the required power out- per day. To exercise the abdominal mus-
put. During the entire test, VO2 was cles, subjects engaged in 4 bouts of 10
measured every 3 breaths, as well as contractions of the abdominal muscles
ventilation and the respiratory quotient. three times per week. This involved
Heart rate was measured every 30 sec- exercise with weight distributed equally
onds. on both thighs during abdominal exer-
Lactates were measured before and cise for 10 repetitions in each position.
after the exercise, as described above. Abdominal exercise was performed in
During the 5-minute post-exercise peri- the seated position with the body turned
od and for 5 minutes pre-exercise, the at 45o to exercise the oblique muscles
subjects placed a hand in a 9-inch glass and lying on the floor with the feet
bowl, three-quarters filled with 40˚C to against the wall to exercise the rectus
45˚C water to increase arterial blood abdominus muscles. The workload on
flow to the fingertips for the blood sam- the bands was adjusted based on meas-
ples. urement from VO2 max, so that subjects
Two 5-cc tubes of blood were drawn could not maintain the entire workload
from all subjects to assess blood elec- of 40 contractions. If they could main-
trolytes, cholesterol, HDL, LDL, lipids, tain the workload, then the strength of
red cell count, white cell count, and the bands was increased for the next
triglycerides, both before and after the experimental day. In this manner, then,
study. the day-by-day workload was increased
on the abdominal muscles. whereas for men it was 4.5%. The loss
As stated above, all experimental in body fat was significant in both
procedures were repeated on 2 occa- groups (P<0.01). DEXA also showed
sions, both before and after the one- that there was a loss in lean body mass.
month diet and exercise program. The average subject lost 4.13% ± 3.58 %
lean body mass. There was some vari-
RESULTS ability from one subject to another, but
Results are shown in Figures 1 to 4 and the loss was significant (P<0.05).
Tables 8 to 11. The average body weight These reductions in weight and
of the group before the weight loss pro- body fat content are not surprising con-
gram was 85.1 kg ± 18.5 kg. After one sidering that there was a large reduction
month, the average weight was reduced in girth in most parts of the body. For
to 79.8 kg ± 17.8 kg. This was a loss of example, Table 9 shows changes in girth
5.3 kg ± 1.9 kg or a reduction of 6.22% in the waist (measured one inch above
in body weight. The women lost less the umbilicus in cm), and the hip for
weight than the men (5.0 ± 2.1 kg for men, women, and the entire group. For
women and 5.7 kg ± 1.7 kg for men), but example, for the group, there was a
the women lost a greater percentage of reduction in waist size of 5.2% ± 5.5%,
their body weight (6.4% ± 2.3% com- whereas one inch above the waist, we
pared to 6.0% ± 1.9% for the men) recorded the greatest reduction, 7.2% ±
(Table 1). The reduction in weight loss 3.8%. For the hip, there was a reduction
associated with the diet was significant of 3.8% ± 2.9%. The changes were a
(P<0.01). reduction of 5.2 cm in waist size for the
The weight loss was associated with group, a reduction of 7.2 cm one inch
a reduction in body mass index averag- above the waist, and 4.2 cm reduction at
ing 6.0% ± 3.1% for the men, and 5.6% the hip. Whereas all the reductions in
± 3% for the women. The total reduc- body girth listed above were significant
tion in body mass index was 1.69 units ± (P<0.01), other significant girth changes
0.89 units for the entire group. This included, a reduction of 0.95 cm or 3.0%
reduction was also statistically signifi- ± 2.24% of the upper arm circumference
cant (P<0.01). for the group. For the men, the loss in
The changes in body mass index the upper arm girth was 0.8 cm ± 0.9 cm,
were paralleled by changes in body fat whereas for the women the loss was 1.0
content. DEXA data showed an aver- cm ± 0.5 cm. In a similar manner, the
age reduction of body fat of 4.15% ± girth of the forearm was reduced by 0.3
3.64% for the group. Some members of cm ± .68 cm for the group.
the group had small changes in body fat, Measurement of the circumference of
whereas others averaged as high as the wrist on about one third of the
10.34% loss in body fat. The average group showed a significant reduction in
body fat change for women was 3.8%, size, whereas for the rest of the group,
there was no change in the measure- exercise compliance for the group was
ment of the wrist. Consistently, for the 5.6 ± 0.94. The total overall compliance,
entire group, there was a large reduction diet and exercise combined, averaged
in the circumference around the but- 12.08 out of 13 for the group or a 92.9%
tocks. For the group, for example, there compliance rate.
was a loss of 4.03 cm ± 2.73 cm. This Women complied better with the
amounted to a 3.68% ± 2.42% reduc- diet averaging 6.7 ± 0.3 out of 7, whereas
tion. This was significant (P<0.01). The the men had an average total compli-
reduction was the greatest among the ance of 6.3 ± .9 units. For the exercise,
men averaging 5.0 cm ± 2.5 cm; the men averaged 5.8 ± 0.7, whereas for the
reduction for the women was 3.2 cm ± women the average exercise compliance
2.7 cm. This amounted to buttocks was 5.4 ± 1.1.
reductions of 4.5% for the men and Although the men reported that
3.0% for the women. Another area their exercise compliance was better
showing a reduction in girth was the than that of the women, the women
thigh, which averaged 2.1 cm ± 2.3 cm demonstrated greater improvement in
for the group, 3.2 cm for men, and 1.2 terms of the workload used on the 6
cm for the women. This resulted in an Second Abs machine during the home
average reduction in thigh size of 3.15% exercise program. As shown in Figure 4,
for the group. The largest reduction in the total work (product of number of
thigh size was in the men, averaging repetitions and load) on a given day
4.8%, and the average reduction in increased by over 400% during the pro-
women was 1.8%. gram for the group. The average final
These losses in weight and circum- work product was 401 ± 131 units for
ference are not surprising considering the group. However, at the end of the
the high degree of subject compliance first week, as an example, the women
with the diet and exercise program. averaged 146 ± 49 units and men aver-
During the first week of the diet (Figure aged 200.8 ± 110.7 units, by the end of
3), diet compliance averaged 6.78 ± 0.55 the fourth week the workload of the
on a 7-point scale and exercise compli- women was 402 ± 119 units and the
ance averaged 5.67 ± 1.41, out of a 6- workload of the men was 399 ± 155
point scale. This computed to a total units. Thus for the women, a greater
compliance of 12.44 ± 1.46. There was gain in abdominal endurance was seen
no statistical difference between the in these studies.
compliance of men and women The change in total strength, calcu-
(P>0.05). During the second, third, and lated based on the strength at the begin-
fourth week of diet, compliance changed ning vs the strength at the end of the
very little (Figure 3). Thus, for the entire study, averaged 35.3 kg ± 18.8 kg for the
diet period, the total diet compliance for men and 22.7 kg ± 11.5 kg for the
the group was 6.48 ± 0.65 and the total women, these differences being signifi-
cant (P<0.05). At the beginning of the increased during the one-month period.
study, the average strength for the group This is paralleled by an increase in venti-
was 28.38 kg ± 16.11 kg. At the end of lation during the VO2 max testing as
the one-month period, the group well. The increase in aerobic training is
strength had increased to 59.8 kg ± 23.6 also reflected in lactic acid measure-
kg, an increase of 31.4 kg or 157% of the ments. The lactate acid for the group
baseline values. For the men, the averaged 1 ± 1.34 units before training
strength increase was 35.3 kg ± 18.8 kg and 0.61 ± 1.13 units after training. This
to 71.8 kg ± 18.7 kg, or a gain of 174.6%. difference was statistically significant
For the women, the increase in strength (P<0.05).
from 22.7 kg increased to 50.0 kg, or an Finally, some of the most dramatic
increase of 144.2%. These increases in changes were in the blood measure-
strength were significant (P<0.01). Thus, ments. Cholesterol decreased by 24.2%
while the women were doing more work in the group (Table 11). The largest
each day, the absolute change in muscle decrease was in men but women still
strength was less. The changes in work showed a decrease of 12% in choles-
done and strength were all significant terol. In a similar manner, triglycerides
for both subgroups and the pooled data decreased by 52.3% with again, the
(P<0.01). The implication then is that largest decrease in men. Of the triglyc-
the women were pushing themselves erides, LDL cholesterol decreased by 4.2
harder than the men during the exercise units for the group. Blood glucose was
bout. The abdominal muscle mass, when reduced from 98.7% ± 10.81 units
measured with ultrasound, increased on before the diet to 93.75 ± 13.0 units after
the average by 5% for the group. the diet, or a reduction of 5.01% for the
Given all of these changes in fitness, group. This difference was statistically
it is not surprising that there was a posi- significant (P<0.05). There was a small
tive change in cardiovascular indicators reduction in sodium (5.41 ± 3.36 units)
and blood chemistry. As shown in Table throughout the diet, reflecting the low-
8, systolic blood pressure was reduced sodium diet, whereas potassium and
by an average of 6% in the group, and other electrolytes showed no significant
the largest reduction in systolic blood changes. There was no significant
pressure occurred in women. Diastolic change in red blood cell count or white
blood pressure did not significantly blood cell count from the beginning to
change (P>0.05), whereas heart rate the end of the study. Hematocrit showed
showed a decrease of about 3% in the an increase of 2.25% during the study.
group, with the largest reduction occur-
ring in men. DISCUSSION
As shown in Table 10, VO2 for the In numerous studies, diet and exercise
group (including both men and women) programs have been shown to increase
cardiovascular fitness and increase gen- large increases in aerobic fitness, using a
eral health by lowering triglycerides, combination of aerobic exercise, abdom-
cholesterol, and other cardiovascular inal exercise on a 6 Second Abs
risk factors.1,5 Certainly, a diet and exer- machine, and a diet program for one
cise program is beneficial in reducing week.13 The exercise, while being con-
the potential for both cardiovascular dis- ducted only for one week, also caused
ease and diabetes by increasing glucose significant increases in aerobic capacity
uptake in muscle and energy expendi- and muscle strength. But questions
ture in the body.14 Whereas fasting remained to be answered regarding
reduces energy expenditure in the compliance, if the diet was extended to
body,15 a proper diet low in fat but high one month, and how the program would
in carbohydrates and protein increases change blood chemistry and body fat
thermogenesis and adds to potential content, if extended to one month.
weight loss.2 A secondary effect of a Compliance was good in both the
low-fat diet is a decrease plasma leptin, previous study and in the present inves-
a hormone that is produced by adipose tigation. In fact, compliance was better
tissue to signal high stores of fat in these here than in the one-week study.
cells. When leptin is low, PPAR, a pro- Perhaps, the difference was that the pre-
tein that activates DNA to produce vious study involved 75 people. To
enzymes in order to increase the use of achieve this number, supervision was
carbohydrates as a fuel, is activated. minimal and the selection process did
Some of the genes that are thereby acti- not involve extensive interviews for
vated, lower tissue cytokines, reducing motivation. In the present investigation,
cardiovascular inflammation.11,12 This with a smaller group of subjects, the
has a dramatic effect in reducing heart selection process for motivation was
disease, preventing diabetes, and reduc- much more extensive and the results
ing the symptoms of people who have showed a group of highly motivated
diabetes.13,16 people that maintained both the diet
In a previous study, we have shown and exercise program.
significant reductions in weight and In the present investigation, there
were large losses in girth all over the in nature for all but the abdominal mus-
body. The greater weight loss achieved cles, does not help preserve the loss of
here compared to the one-week study, lean body mass on a low-calorie diet.
published previously, was due to the This is consistent with other diet and
longer duration of aerobic and abdomi- exercise programs.
nal exercise, which contributed to a However, even with the weight
more balanced weight loss across the observed here, a more interesting obser-
entire body in both the male and female vation was a decrease in overall cardio-
subjects. The majority of the loss in vascular and diabetes risk factors such
girth was due to losses in fat. However, as cholesterol, blood glucose, and triglyc-
the losses in girth would have probably erides. Further, the reduction in blood
been much greater if there was no pressure (systolic), in both groups of
increase in muscle mass. The exercise subjects, shows a reduction in stress on
program did show an increase in muscle the heart. The reductions in blood pres-
strength in the abdominal muscles. sure, triglycerides, and cholesterol are
Since muscle mass increases body not merely additive, but are synergistic
weight, the actual loss in body weight of in reducing the risk of heart disease and
the subjects would have been much stroke.
greater if not for the increase in muscle Considering abdominal exercise was
mass. Thus the weight loss here was not only performed for 5 minutes per day,
4 times that of the previous 1-week the increases in muscle strength, aerobic
study, probably due partly to an increase endurance, and muscle thickness of the
in muscle mass in the abdominal area. abdominal muscles show the effective-
This result is not surprising when an ness of the 6 Second Abs machine and
exercise program is added to a diet. its part in providing a fast and efficient
Further, in the first few weeks of a diet, progress-resistant exercise program.
the weight loss is much more exaggerat- With a large increase in the daily work-
ed than longer dietary programs. load, almost a doubling in muscle
The loss in girth in other areas strength, exercising for only 12 sessions
seems, from DEXA data, to be due part- (3 times per week for 4 weeks) showed
ly to a loss of fat and partly to a loss in rapid and significant improvements in
lean body mass. The fact that exercise tone of the abdominal area.
was aerobic and not isokinetic anaerobic As pointed out previously, the