Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Kevin Black, a trader with Holdfast Securities, was awarded his CFA charter after passing the
Level III exam last year and satisfying all other requirements for holding the designation.
One of Black's clients, Cynthia Redding, has given him written instructions to use Daybreak
Brokers to execute all trades from her account. Black believes that, although Daybreak Brokers
provide a reasonable level of service and no clients have complained about their commission
rates, Thompson Partners - a rival broker - offers better execution at a more attractive price.
Another of Black's clients, Albert Warren has a nondiscretionary account, meaning that Black
only executes orders from his client. However, because Warren has no preference about which
brokerage is used, Black directs all trades for this account to Daybreak Brokers.
Recently, Black noticed some irregularities that prompted him to review his file on Ian Clarkson,
a former client. Based on his analysis, Black has credible evidence that Clarkson has violated
securities laws. Unsure what to do with this information, Black consults Holdfast's policy on
client confidentiality, which prohibits sharing information about current and prospective clients
with unauthorized individuals. Black decides to draft a memo documenting his suspicions about
Clarkson's apparent illegal activities and shares it with his friend Blair Jacobson, one of
Holdfast's sell-side equity analysts. Jacobson, who does not work with any of Black's clients,
encourages his friend to discuss his suspicions with officers in Holdfast's compliance
department.
Three months ago, Jacobson initiated coverage of RC Industries (RCI). Several of the
assertions made in Jacobson's initial report were supported by the conclusions of three studies
conducted by a government agency. He maintained a detailed bibliography of sources, but no
copies of the government studies, which he accessed on the agency's website last week as he
prepared a follow-up report on RCI.
For the past month, Jacobson has been staying late after work as he prepares to write the Level
III CFA exam. In particular, Jacobson is having difficulty differentiating between various
behavioral biases and he shares this concern in an email to Black, who replies: "I wouldn't worry
about this too much about this. There was only one item set covering behavioral finance on the
Level III exam last year, and I found those questions pretty easy to answer."
Question 1
According to the guidance for the Standards, Black should *most likely*:
Question 2
In using Daybreak Brokers to execute trades for Warren's account, has Black *most likely*
violated the Standards?
A. Yes
B. No, because this is a nondiscretionary account
C. No, because there is no directed brokerage arrangement
Question 3
Is Holdfast's policy on client confidentiality *most likely* consistent with the Standards?
A. Yes.
B. No, because the policy does not prohibit the sharing of information about former clients
C. No, because the Standards do not require information about prospective clients to be
kept confidential
Question 4
Has Black *most likely* violated the Standards by discussing his suspicions about Clarkson's
possible illegal activities with Jacobson?
A. Yes
B. No, because Jacobson is a Holdfast employee
C. No, because Black has an obligation to report suspected illegal activity
Question 5
Has Jacobson *most likely* violated the Standards with respect to his retention of records
related to his report on RCI?
A. Yes
B. No, because he kept a bibliography of sources
C. No, because the studies were freely-available online
Question 6
In sharing information about last year's CFA exam with Jacobson, Black *most likely* violated
the Standards with respect to:
P i = b0 + b1 Di + εi
where:
P is fuel price (in USD per gallon) and D is the demand for fuel (in millions of barrels
per day, worldwide) of firm i.
Gardner uses the following assumptions for his linear regression model:
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.8571
R2 0.7346
Adjusted R2 0.7269
Observations 36
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Total 35 135.1409
For 34 degrees of freedom, the critical value for a one-tailed t-test at the 1% significance
level is 2.441. Also, for 34 degrees of freedom, the critical value for a one-tailed t-test at
the 5% significance level is 1.691.
Gardner shares this result with a colleague, Travis Robert, who is also working on the
same project. The modified regression equation, including refining costs, is given by:
P i = b0 + b1 Di + b2 Ri + εi
Robert includes one more independent variable, refining costs (in USD per gallon), in
the regression equation, denoted by Ri . After Robert runs the regression, he obtains
the following results:
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.9580
R2 0.9178
Adjusted R2 0.9128
Observations 36
ANOVA
df SS MSS F Significance
F
Total 35 135.1409
Coefficients Standard
Error
For 33 degrees of freedom, the critical value for a one-tailed t-test at the 1% significance
level is 2.445. Also, for 33 degrees of freedom, the critical value for a one-tailed t-test at
the 5% significance level is 1.692.
Gardner asks Robert to test whether, as a group, the independent variables explain the
dependent variable.
Finally, Robert would like to test the hypothesis that fuel prices decrease as demand
increases. He wants to test this hypothesis at the 1% level of significance.
The critical value for a one-tailed t-test at the 1% significance level with 33 observations
is 2.445.
Question 7
Which of the following models will *best* describe the fuel price?
A. P i = b0 + b1 D i + εi
B. P i = b0 + b1 Di + b2 Ri + εi
C. P i = b1 Di + b2 Ri + εi
Question 8
Question 9
A. Assumption 1
B. Assumption 2
C. Assumption 3
Question 10
Gardner's regression model *most likely* suffers from which of the following specification
errors?
A. Nonstationarity is present
B. The functional form is incorrect
C. There is time-series misspecification
Question 11
Which of the following tests should Robert use for Gardner's request?
A. T-test
B. F-test
C. Durbin-Watson test
Question 12
Based on Exhibit 2, what is the most appropriate null hypothesis and the most
appropriate conclusion regarding the magnitude of price change relative to the demand
(reflected by the coefficient b1 )?
Empire Distribution, based in the United Kingdom, sells pre-packaged meals to retailers
across Europe as well as in other countries through its subsidiaries. Its inputs are
sources from a network of suppliers located in various countries. The company issues
financial reports in accordance with IFRS and uses the UK pound (GBP) as its
functional currency.
Each of the transactions listed above was recorded on credit at the time of delivery and
settled in cash 90 days later, on 31 March 2016. Relevant currency exchange rates are
shown in Exhibit 1.
Paul Bird, Empire's CFO, is having a conference call with Sandra Herbert, President of
Farmer's Kitchen, Empire's American subsidiary and Gavin Henry, President of Oceania
Foods, Empire's Australian subsidiary. The three colleagues are reviewing financial data
for 2016, which ends today.
Bird and Herbert engage in a discussion of the similarities and differences between US
GAAP and IFRS with respect to disclosure requirements for companies with
multinational operations. In response to a question from Herbert, Bird replies,
"Although US GAAP do require companies to identify the specific line item on the
income statement in which transaction gains or losses on foreign currency transactions
are recorded, Empire issues financial reports in accordance with IFRS, which impose no
such requirement."
Later in the conversation, Herbert makes the following claim: "In cases where a foreign
entity is disposed, US GAAP require disclosure of the value of the translation
adjustment that is transferred from the parent's balance sheet to its income statement.
However, this requirement does not exist under IFRS."
The conversation then turns to the Australian subsidiary's Empire has consolidated
Oceania's financial information as of the end of 2016 into its financial statements using
the current rate method. Key financial data for Oceania is reported in terms of
Australian dollars (AUD), which is the subsidiary's functional currency, is provided in
Exhibits 2. Relevant data on GBP/AUD exchange rates in 2016 appears in Exhibit 4.
Sales 145,000,000
Inventory 16,700,000
Later in the call, Bird and Henry discuss the potential impact on Empire's financial
statements if Oceania's results were consolidated using the temporal method. As the
colleagues are concluding their discussion, Henry mentions that Oceania is considering
selling an intangible asset that it is currently carrying at AUD 178,000 for an equivalent
amount of cash.
Question 13
Based on the exchange rates quoted in Exhibit 1, Empire will *most likely* record a gain
attributable to which of the following?
A. Transaction A
B. Transaction B
C. Transaction D
Question 14
Is Bird's claim about disclosure requirements related to transaction gains *most likely* correct?
A. Yes
B. No, because IFRS do require specific line item disclosure of transaction gains
C. No, because US GAAP do not require specific line item disclosure of transaction gains
Question 15
Herbert's claim about disclosure requirements related to translation gains is *most likely*:
A. correct.
B. incorrect with respect to IFRS.
C. incorrect with respect to US GAAP.
Question 16
Upon being translated into its parent's presentation currency using the current rate method,
Oceania's gross profit margin for 2016 will be *closest* to:
A. 20.7%.
B. 21.0%.
C. 22.1%.
Question 17
All else equal, translating Oceania's financial information using the temporal method rather than
the current rate method would *most likely* have had what effect on Empire's ratios for 2016?
Question 18
Assuming that Empire continues to use the current rate method and Oceania executes the
proposed sale of intangible assets, the company's net asset balance sheet exposure would
*most likely* be:
Charles Wei covers FanMaker (FMK), a manufacturer and distributor of residential and
commercial fans in developing markets. The company will be reporting its earnings for
the first quarter of 2017 tomorrow. Wei's supervisor, Meagan Ying, has asked him to
determine whether the company's stock is trading near its fair value using a
market-based valuation approach.
FMK's sales are cyclical - peaking in the summer months and surging during years with
above-average temperatures. Additionally, the company's success is influenced by the
business cycles of the companies in which it operates. Based on a review of historical
data shown in Exhibit 1, Wei concludes that FMK's stock, which is currently trading at
$64.78 per share, exhibits the Molodovsky effect.
Book value per share $36.20 $39.22 $42.30 $45.54 $49.27 $52.88
Wei considers a stock to be fairly valued if it is trading within plus or minus 5% of its
justified price based on a forecast of earnings, which are expected by be $4.20 over the
next twelve months and grow at a long-term rate of 3.9% annually, and the historical
average P/E, which he calculates for FMK using data from Exhibit 1. The company's cost
of equity is currently 9.2%, reflecting a recent increase in financial and operational
leverage, and management maintains a 20% earnings retention ratio.
Having analyzed FMK using the company's own historical data and forecasts of its
future performance, Wei decides to compare certain metrics to those of other firms in
the industry. Before conducting this peer group analysis, Wei shows his preliminary
work to Ying, who makes the following statements:
Statement 1: "Using either forward P/E ratios or earnings yields will produce a
consistent and meaningful ranking of comparable companies."
Question 19
Wei's conclusion about FMK's stock is *most likely* based on having observed a pattern of:
A. countercyclical earnings.
B. low P/E ratios during recessions.
C. low P/E ratios during economic expansions.
Question 20
FMK's normalized P/E ratio using the company's historical average return on equity is *closest*
to:
A. 12.34.
B. 15.72.
C. 18.90.
Question 21
A. overvalued.
B. fairly valued.
C. undervalued.
Question 22
A. both its justified trailing P/E ratio and its justified forward P/E ratio.
B. its justified forward P/E ratio and less than its justified trailing P/E ratio.
C. its justified trailing P/E ratio and less than its justified forward P/E ratio.
Question 23
A. correct.
B. incorrect with respect to earnings yields.
C. incorrect with respect to forward P/E ratios.
Question 24
A. Yes
B. No, because the PEG ratio does not account for differences in operating risk
C. No, because the PEG ratio does not assume a linear relationship between P/E and
growth
Matthews first requests that Pritchard calculate the arbitrage-free value of Bond A using
a yield-to-maturity curve. Bond A has a par value of $100, a coupon rate of 8.0%, and a
3-year maturity. The yield-to-maturity in year 1 is 4.0%, the yield-to-maturity in year 2
is 5.5%, and the yield-to-maturity in year 3 is 6.0%.
Exhibit 1: Yield to Maturity Par Rates for One-, Two-, and Three-Year Annual Pay
Option-Free Bonds
Next, Matthews asks Pritchard to price Bond B, a 2-year bond with a par value of $100
and a coupon rate of 5.0% by using a binomial interest rate tree:
Satisfied with the pricing work, Matthews then asks Pritchard to calibrate this binomial
tree to match a specific term structure. The one-year spot rate is 3.5% and the two-year
spot rate is 4.75%. The interest rate volatility is 20% per year.
After valuing these bonds with interest rate trees, Pritchard wants to understand their
general properties. Pritchard tells Matthews she has heard that interest rate trees
describe closely interrelated economic items. Matthews responds with the following
about them:
Property 1: Interest rate trees generate cash flows dependent on interest rates.
Property 2: Interest rate trees produce interest rates used to determine the present value
of cash flows.
Matthews asks Pritchard to consider another alternative to value bonds. Specifically, she
asks Pritchard to use pathwise valuation to price Bond C, a 2-year bond with a coupon
rate of 3% and par value of 100.
1 3.0% 3.6%
2 3.0% 3.6%
3 3.0% 2.7%
4 3.0% 2.7%
Pritchard, curious about the applications of pathwise valuation, asks Matthews about
the Monte Carlo method. She states the following:
Remark 1: Monte Carlo models are often used to value fixed-income securities whose
behavior depend on prepayments, such as mortgage-backed securities.
Remark 2: Since increasing the number of paths in a Monte Carlo model increases its
statistical accuracy, it also implies that the model is closer to the fundamental value of a
security.
Question 25
According to the term structure described in Exhibit 1, the arbitrage-free price of Bond
A is closest to:
A. $105.39.
B. $105.56.
C. $105.77.
Question 26
Using the interest rate binomial tree shown in Exhibit 2, the arbitrage-free price of Bond
B is closest to:
A. $100.50.
B. $101.00.
C. $104.25.
Question 27
When calibrating the binomial tree shown in Exhibit 2, the value of the interest rate in
the upper node of time 1 is closest to:
A. 4.92%.
B. 6.85%.
C. 7.35%.
Question 28
Question 29
A. 98.67.
B. 99.86.
C. 102.23.
Question 30