Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ASSIGHMENT OF
GROUP-2
SEMESTER-I
STUDENTS : I5-A-GCI
2017-2018
Institut de Technologie du Cambodge Projet du pont
CONTENTS
I. Hypothesis: ......................................................................................................................Page:
Page0101
VIII. Applicability ofLive Load for Decks and Deck Systems: ...........................................Page:
Page04 04
XVII. Conclusion:...............................................................................................................Page:
Page2222
Page 1
Institut de Technologie du Cambodge Projet du pont
I. Hypothesis
Structure
Clear Span Length L= 14000 mm
TotalWidth W W= 10760 mm
Roadway Wr Wr = 10000 mm
Wearing Surface dw dw = 75 mm
Width of Barrier B B= 380 mm
Materials
Density of Wearing Surface ρw = 2250 kg/m3
Concrete Density ρc = 2400 kg/m3
Concrete Strength f'c = 30 Mpa
Reinforcement Strength fy = 400 Mpa
Elastic Modulus of Concrete Ec = 27691.5 Mpa
Elastic Modulus of Steel Es = 200000 Mpa
L
SOIL SOIL
ELEVATION VIEW
B Wr B
Future Wearing Surface
h
SECTION VIEW
B
Wr/2
Wr
W
Wr/2
B
TOP VIEW
1.2[S mm + 3000mm]
hmin = = 680 mm
30
U = 0.75 (LL+IM)
Coefficient
Strength I Limite State Service Limite State Fatigue
γDC 1.25 1.00 -
γDW 1.50 1.00 -
γLL 1.75 1.00 0.75
IM 0.33 0.75
L1 = min(L,18m) = 14000 mm
W1 = min(W,9m) = 9000 mm
W1 =min(W,18m) = 10760 mm
NL = 2.78
We take: NL = 2
EMint = 3572.826 mm
According to clause [4.6.2.1.4b], the effective width of a strip without edge beam is the sum
of distance between the edge of the deck and theinside face of the barrier, plus 300mm, plus
one-quarter of the strip width specified in Article 4.6.2.1.3 and also 4.6.2.3 or 4.6.2.10 but
Slab-type bridges shall be designed for all of vehiclar live loads sprcified in AASHTO
1. Maximum Shear Force - Axle Loads on Slab Bridge Observed Point at support
145kN 145kN
35kN
L1 Lk=4.3to 9m 4.3m 4.3m
110kN 110kN
1.2m
9.3 kN/m
L
9.3 kN/m
Lm1
Lm2
Lm3
(𝑃 ∗ 𝐿𝑚 )
𝑃−
𝐿𝑡
Vtrappuis = η1*P1 + η2*P2 + η3*P3 𝜂=
𝑃
Vtrappuis= 258.96 kN
Vteappuis = 210.5714 kN
q= 9.3 kN/m
l
V appuis =1/2*q*L = 65.1 kN
The static effect design truck or tendem shall be increased by percentage of IM ( Dynamic
Load Allowance), but not be applied to the design pedestrain load or to the design lane load.
1.2. Maximum Bending Moment at Mid-Span - Axle Load We observe at L/4 & L/2
1.2.1. Design Load of Truck
Influence Line at L/2 L/2 = 7 m
145kN 145kN
35kN
L1 Lk =4.3to 9m 4.3m 4.3m
Lm1
Lm2=L/2
Lm3
M( @ L/2 )= 750.5 kN
145kN 145kN
35kN
4.3m Lk=4.3 ~ 9m
Lm2=L/4
Lm3
1.2m
L/2
L
1.2m
L/4
L
The Static Effect for Moment is taken (1+IM), but not be applied for lane load deign [3.6.2.1]
Shear and Bending Moment are given in VIII is per multiple strip Eint where Eint = 3573 mm
𝑉𝐿𝐿+𝐼𝑀
𝑉𝐿𝐿+𝐼𝑀 = VLL+IM = 114.62 kN
𝐸𝑖𝑛𝑡
𝑀𝐿𝐿+𝐼𝑀
𝑀𝐿𝐿+𝐼𝑀 = MLL+IM = 343.15 kN.m At L/2
𝐸𝑖𝑛𝑡
2. Exterior Strip
One lane width was considered is 3600mm, but Eedge = Eext = 1800 mm
1 𝑉𝐿𝐿+𝐼𝑀 𝑥1.2
𝑉𝐿𝐿+𝐼𝑀 = VLL+IM = 136.51 kN
2 𝐸𝑖𝑛𝑡
1 𝑀𝐿𝐿+𝐼𝑀 𝑥1.2
𝑀𝐿𝐿+𝐼𝑀 = MLL+IM = 408.67 kN.m At L/2
2 𝐸𝑖𝑛𝑡
1
𝑉𝐷𝑊 = ∗ 𝑤𝐷𝑊,𝑖𝑛𝑡 ∗ 𝐿 = 11.81 kN per m
2
1
𝑀𝐷𝑊,𝑖𝑛𝑡 = ∗ 𝑤𝐷𝑊,𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝐿2 = 41.34 kN.m per m
8
DC :
𝑤𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑟
𝑤𝐷𝐶,𝑒𝑥𝑡 = 𝑤𝐷𝐶,𝑖𝑛𝑡 + = 18.903 kN/m per m
𝐸𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟
1
𝑉𝐷𝐶,𝑒𝑥𝑡 = ∗ 𝑤𝐷𝑐𝐶𝑖𝑛𝑡 ∗ 𝐿 = 132.32 kN per m
2
1
𝑀𝐷𝐶,𝑒𝑥𝑡 = ∗ 𝑤𝐷𝑐𝐶𝑖𝑛𝑡 ∗ 𝐿2 463.13 kN.m per m
8
DW :
(𝐸𝑒𝑥𝑡 − 𝐷𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑟 )
𝑤𝐷𝑊,𝑒𝑥𝑡 = 𝑤𝐷𝑤,𝑖𝑛𝑡 + = 1.33 kN/m
𝐸𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟
VDW = 9.319 kN per m
Cover for Unprotected Main Reinforceing Steel(mm), Ref. [Table 5.12.3-1] such as below:
Trail Reinforcement:
𝑀
𝐴𝑠 =
𝑓𝑠 𝑗𝑑
Assume: j= 0.875
As formula above:
𝑍
𝑓𝑠 ≤ 𝑓𝑠𝑎 = 1 ≤ 0.6𝑓𝑦
𝑑𝑐 ∗ 𝐴 3
with b= 1.00 m
𝑀
𝑓𝑐 = = 10.18 Mpa
1 2
6∗𝑏∗ℎ
B= 1 m
x
d
d-x
Strain Stress
B = 42.54773
c = 53950.52
𝑥 = −𝐵 + 𝐵2 + 𝐶 = 193.5896 mm
dc = is concrete cover measured from the extreme tension fiber to the center of nearest
===> dc = 46 mm
As = 6792.992 mm2
B = 49.06
C = 62210.6
x= 205.14 mm
b= 1000 mm
fs = 235.3875 Mpa
A = 10222.22 mm2
fs < fsa OK
Institut de Technologie du Cambodge Projet du pont
3. Deformations [5.7.3.6].
1
𝑀𝐷𝐿 = ∗ 𝑤𝐷𝐿,𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 ∗ 𝐿2 = 4836.1 kN.m
8
By using Ie [A5.7.3.6.2]
5 𝐿4
∆𝐷𝐿 = ∗ 𝑤𝐷𝐿,𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 ∗
384 𝐸𝑐 𝐼𝑒
3 3
𝑀𝑐𝑟 𝑀𝑐𝑟
𝐼𝑒 = ∗ 𝐼𝑔 + (1 − 𝐼𝑐𝑟 ≤ 𝐼𝑔
𝑀𝑎 𝑀𝑎
𝐼𝑔
𝑀𝑐𝑟 = 𝑓𝑟 ∗
𝑦𝑏
Ig = 2.82E+11 mm4
Ma = 3401.0 kNm
fs = 240 Mpa
By Using Ig [5.7.3.6.2]
𝐼𝑒
∆𝐷𝐿,𝐼𝑒 = ∆𝐷𝐿,𝐼𝑔 ∗ = 12.65 mm
𝐼𝑔
Long-term deflection factoris take = 4
Camber = 50.5869 mm
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
∆𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝐿𝐿+𝐼𝑀 = = 17.5 mm
800
Use design truck alone or design lane load plus 25% truck load [A.6.1.3.2]. When design truck
alone, it should be placed so that the distance between its resultant and the nearest wheel is bisected
m= 0.85
The value of Ie changes with the magnetude of the applied moment Ma. The moment associated
with the live load deflection includes the dead load moment plus the truck moment.
(Mcr / Ma )3 = 0.084024
Ie = 1.3E+11 mm4
For P3 = 35 kN = 79.135 kN
𝑃1 ∗ 𝑥1 + 𝑃2 ∗ 𝑥2 + 𝑃3 ∗ 𝑥3
𝑥𝐺 =
𝑃1 + 𝑃2 + 𝑃3
145kN 145kN
35kN
Lk =4.3to 9m 4.3m
L
CL
Lk = 4.3 ~ 9m 4.3m
P3 R P2
P1
a a
xG
Mmax= ? kNm
P3 R P2
Institut de Technologie du Cambodge P1 Projet du pont
a a
xG
Mmax= ? kNm
b
P3 = 79.135 kN
x1 = 0 m Then xG = 5.76 m
x2 = 4.3 m a= 0.728 m
x3 = 8.6 m b= 1.972 m
x= 7.73 m
𝑥
∆1 = 𝑃3 ∗ 𝑏 ∗ 𝐿2 − 𝑏 2 − 𝑥 2
6𝐸𝐼𝐿
Δ_P3 = 0.547 mm
b
P2 = 327.845 kN b= 6.27 m
x= 7.73 m
Δ_P2 = 5.28 mm
P1 = 327.85 kN b = 3.43 m
x= 6.27 m
Institut de Technologie du Cambodge Projet du pont
Δ_P1 = 3.50 mm
5 𝐿4 𝑞𝐿𝑎𝑛𝑒 = 1 + 𝐼𝑀 ∗ 𝑤𝐿𝑎𝑛𝑒 ∗ 𝑚 ∗ 𝑁𝐿
∆𝐿𝑎𝑛𝑒 = ∗𝑞 ∗
384 𝐿𝑎𝑛𝑒 𝐸𝑐 𝐼𝑒
qLane = 21.0273 kN/m
Δlane = 3.03 mm
We consider tendom load as a cencentrated load located at mid span for having a critical deflection
P=110kN
L/2 L/2
1 𝐿3
∆ 𝑇𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑚 = ∗ 𝑞𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑚 ∗
48 𝐸𝑐 𝐼𝑒
qtendom = 497.42 kN
Δtendom = 8.2 mm OK
f'c = 30 Mpa
β= 0.84
Strength I.
Minterior = η*Σγi.Qi = 1.05*[1.25*MDC + 1.5*MDW + (1+IM )*MLL+IM ]
c = 110.574 mm
a = β*c = 92.40854 mm
ratio of c and ds is = OK
Φ= 0.9
b= 1000 mm
𝐴𝑆 ∗ 𝑓𝑦
𝑐=
0.85 ∗ 𝑓 ′ 𝑐 𝛽 ∗ 𝑏
c = 127.504 mm
a = β*c = 106.5567 mm
ratio of c and ds is = OK
Φ= 0.9
The amount of bottom transverse reinforcement may be takent as a percenage of the main
1750
reinforcement required for positive moment as % ≤ 50%
𝐿
a) Interior Strip
ρ= 0.148
ρ= 0.148
The shrinkage or temperature reinforcement shall not be spaced farther than 450mm or 3 time of
compenent thickness.
Ash > 0.11*Ag / fy = 187 mm2 / m DB10 @313.3 In the both directions
U = 0.75*(LL+IM) IM = 15%
Fatigue load shall be one design truck with 9000mm axial spacing no multiple present factor
applied (m =1).
4.3 m 9m
P1 P2 P2
fallowable = 145-0.33*fmin +55(r/h) where fmin =0, because deck is treated as a simple beam, thus, there
ff = 161.5 Mpa
η= 1.00
γ= 0.75
CL
x
P1 R P2 P3
A C B
L/2+x/2 L/2-x/2
x1 x2 x4
L= 14000 mm
P1= 35 kN
P2 = 145 kN
x= 0.836 m x4 = 6.5819 m
x2 = 4.3 m
x1 = 3.12 m
x= 193.59 mm b = 1000 mm
Institut de Technologie du Cambodge Projet du pont
Φ= 25 mm
𝑏𝑥 3 12𝜋Φ4 𝑥2
𝐼𝑐𝑟 = + + 𝑏𝑥 + 𝑛𝐴𝑠 𝑑2 = 2.2E+10 mm4
12 64 4
fmax = 80.02565 Mpa < ff OK
XVII. Conclusion
Après avoir fait ce projet du pont, il nous permet d'avoir le concept, le dimesionnement et le calcul
sur le pont dalle de béton armé (solide slab bridge) par le norme AASHTO. En plus,il nous donne
aussi un model pour calculer d'autres types du pont.
Dans ce projet, on n'a calculé que les sections d'armatures de la portée L/2 et L/4. Pour qu'on peut
économiser l'argent sur l'utilisation d'armatures, on doit calculer plusieurs points sur cet portée.
Et on a vérifier seulement le milieu de la portée L/2, le point le plus critique qu'on doit considérer
comme le flèche et le moment. On n'a pas vérifier l'effort tranchant parce qu'il n'est pas le point
critique pour le pont dalle grâce au largeur de la dalle importance. En conclusion, on a adopté sur
la vérification et le calcul de ce pont dalle en béton armé.
XVIII.
680mm
DB32@120 DB32@100 DB16@180 DB32@120
Sketch of Bridge Section in Rebar Detail
380mm 380mm
Page 23