Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
VI
STRATEGIC STRATEGIC
TECHNIQUES
POLICIES OBJECTIVES
EFFICIENCY
• Performance
COMPETITIVENESS Market Surveys Policy PAY • Quality
Definitions Lines STRUCTURE
• Customers
• Stockholders
Seniority Performance Merit INCENTIVE
• Costs
CONTRIBUTORS Based Based Guidelines PROGRAMS
FAIRNESS
COMPLIANCE
ADMINISTRATION Planning Budgeting Communication EVALUATION
Chapter
17
Learning Objectives
After studying Chapter 17, students should be able to:
1. Discuss the government’s role in compensation.
2. Discuss how trying to achieve the objective of
compliance with laws and regulations could conflict
with other objectives in the pay model.
3. Explain the provisions and importance of relevant
wage laws.
4. Discuss the type of proof required in discrimination
cases.
5. Discuss the concept of comparable worth and its
relationship to the objectives of compliance and
fairness.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
17 - 5
Minimum Wage:
! Minimum wage legislation is intended to provide
an income floor for workers in society’s least
productive jobs.
! Federal minimum wage is $5.15 an hour (set in 1997)
!Administrative Employees
!Outside Salespeople
!Professionals
Overtime (continued)
! Overtime is paid on time worked, not time
compensated.
! A workweek is any fixed, recurring period of 168
consecutive hours
2001
Disparate treatment:
Disparate impact:
Comparable Worth
! Establishing a comparable worth plan typically
involves the following four basic steps:
! Adopt a single job evaluation plan for all jobs within a
unit.
! All jobs with equal job evaluation results should be
paid the same.
! Identify general representation (percentage male and
female employees) in each job group.
! The wage-to-job evaluation point ratio should be
based on the wages paid for male-dominated jobs
since they are presumed to be free of pay
discrimination.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
17 - 37
Differences
Differences Differences
Differences
in
in in
in
Organizations
Organizations employees
employees
Differences
Differences in
in Differences
Differences Differences
Differences
Employee
Employee Work
Work inPay
in Pay in
in
Behaviors
Behaviors Unions
Unions
Differences
Differences Differences
Differences in
in
in
in Discrimination
Discrimination Labor
Labor Market
Market
Work
Work Conditions
Conditions
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
17 - 38
Summary
! Governments around the world play varying roles in the
workplace.
! Legislation in any society reflects people’s expectations about
the role of government.
! Beyond direct regulation, government affects compensation
through policies and purchases that affect supply and demand
for labor.
! In the United States, legislation reflects the changing
nature of work and the workforce.
! 1930s legislation was concerned with the social safety net
! 1960s legislation turned to the issue of civil rights
Summary (continued)
! Pay discrimination laws require special attention for
several reasons.
! First, these laws regulate the design and administration of pay
systems.
! Second, the definition of pay discrimination, and thus the
approaches used to defend pay practices, are in a state of flux.
! Many of the provisions of these laws simply require sound
practices that should have been employed in the first place.
! Sound practices are those with three basic features:
! They are work related.
! They are related to the mission of the enterprise.
! They include an appeals process for employees who disagree
with the results.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
17 - 40
Review Questions
1. What is the nature of government’s role in
compensation?
2. Explain why changes in minimum wage can affect
higher-paid employees as well.
3. What is the difference between access discrimination
and valuation discrimination?
4. Consider contemporary practices such as skill /
competency-based plans, broad banding, market
pricing, and pay-for-performance plans. Discuss how
they may affect the pay discrimination debate.