0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
246 vues5 pages
This document is a form for rapidly appraising an enhanced school improvement plan (SIP). It contains 4 chapters that assess different components of the SIP: 1) vision, mission, and core values; 2) the school's current situation; 3) priority improvement areas and planning; and 4) monitoring and evaluation of projects. Each chapter contains several items to evaluate based on described criteria. Ratings of yes or no are provided along with space for comments. The form also lists 12 annexes that are components of the full SIP containing details like community data, surveys, analysis templates, and reporting templates. The division appraisal committee will determine if the SIP passes based on this rapid appraisal.
This document is a form for rapidly appraising an enhanced school improvement plan (SIP). It contains 4 chapters that assess different components of the SIP: 1) vision, mission, and core values; 2) the school's current situation; 3) priority improvement areas and planning; and 4) monitoring and evaluation of projects. Each chapter contains several items to evaluate based on described criteria. Ratings of yes or no are provided along with space for comments. The form also lists 12 annexes that are components of the full SIP containing details like community data, surveys, analysis templates, and reporting templates. The division appraisal committee will determine if the SIP passes based on this rapid appraisal.
This document is a form for rapidly appraising an enhanced school improvement plan (SIP). It contains 4 chapters that assess different components of the SIP: 1) vision, mission, and core values; 2) the school's current situation; 3) priority improvement areas and planning; and 4) monitoring and evaluation of projects. Each chapter contains several items to evaluate based on described criteria. Ratings of yes or no are provided along with space for comments. The form also lists 12 annexes that are components of the full SIP containing details like community data, surveys, analysis templates, and reporting templates. The division appraisal committee will determine if the SIP passes based on this rapid appraisal.
Appraisal I. SPT endorsement ▪ Participatory Yes for acceptance by planned with the SDS. complete No signatures. II Message ▪ Is the message Yes data-based, holistic and No clear of its direction?
Appraisal I Vision statement ▪ Is the Vision Yes shared and understood by No all based on data and prioritized areas for improvement? ▪ II Mission Statement ▪ Does the mission Yes statement influence the No priority programs and projects? III Core Values ▪ Do the core Yes values present in the entirety of No the plan?
Appraisal II=B Physical facilities ▪ Is the Situational Yes (Content) Analysis of Physical No Facilities logical and complete? II-C Fiscal ▪ Are the Yes Management resources mobilized and No managed in linkage to the VMG and the schools priority need/s? II-D Performance ▪ Are the Yes Indicators Performance indicators valid No and linked to the VMG and Situational Analysis?
Appraisal III- A Priority ▪ Have Yes Improvement appropriate Areas processes been No (Process) used to develop the priority areas? III-B Priority ▪ Are the priority Yes Improvement areas clearly Areas stated with an No (Content) evident linkage to the VMG? III-C Priority ▪ Is there an Yes Improvement evident linkage Areas to Division No (Validity and Priorities Feasibility) (Improved Educational Quality, Access to Schools, Improved Educational Service Delivery, and Equity and to the Situational Yes Analysis and VMG? No Page 3 of 5
Appraisal ▪ Are the priority areas directed towards improving school effectiveness? ▪ Are the projects Yes identified following the No basic principles of continuous improvement?
Appraisal IV-A Project Design ▪ Was an Yes teams’ appropriate organization process used to No Implementation identify project and Monitoring and design teams’ Evaluation organization (Process) implementation requirements and the M& E system? VI.A Project Design ▪ Are sufficient Yes Teams details provided Organization of the C.I project No Structure Required design (Content) implementation structure? VI.B Monitoring and ▪ Is the M&E plan Yes Evaluation comprehensive (Content) and complete? No VI. A Project ▪ Is there a clear Yes &B Implementation, linkage between Monitoring and the SIP priority No Evaluation improvement (Validity and areas and the CI Feasibility) projects design implementation structure and the M&E plan?
▪ Are the project
design Yes implementation structure and the No M&E Plan technically, financially and managerially feasible? Page 4 of 5
LIST OF ENHANCED SIP ANNEXES
SIP Annex 1A - School Community Data
SIP Annex 1b - Child Mapping Tools SIP Annex 2A - Child Friendly School Survey SIP Annex 2B - Child Protection Policy SIP Annex2C - Student Led Watching & Hazard Mapping SIP Annex 3 - Gap Analysis Template SIP Annex 4 - Priority Improvement Areas SIP Annex 5 - Planning Workshop SIP Annex 6 - Guidelines for Voice of Learners & Stakeholders SIP Annex 7 - Walk the Process Guidelines SIP Annex 8 - Root Cause Analysis SIP Annex 9 - Project Work Plan & Budget SIP Annex 10 - Annual Implementation Plan SIP Annex 11 - School Report Card Summary of Information SIP Annex 12A - School Report Card Template (Basic) SIP Annex 12B - School Report Card Template (advanced)
Action of the Division Appraisal Committee: Passed? YES - /__/ NO- /__/ Page 5 of 5