Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1
A scientific paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements in General Biology I laboratory
under Ms. Charo B. Chipeco, 1st sem., 2015-2016.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Enzymes are protein catalysts that increase the velocity of a chemical reaction, and
are not consumed during the reaction they catalyze (Champe, Harvey, & Ferrier, 2005).
During a chemical reaction, enzymes are the ones which speed up the reaction thus giving
results that will eventually happen. The reactant an enzyme acts on is the substrate (Reece,
Meyers, Urry, Cain, Wasserman, Minorsky, Jackson, & Cooke, 2014). In the experiment,
six substances were used as substrates to test whether or not the complexity of the substrate
can affect the respiration rate of a substance. In this case, yeast was used. The six substrates
used were starch, lactose, sucrose, glucose, fructose, and distilled water. Starch is a
Jackson, & Cooke, 2014). Lactose is a disaccharide composed of glucose and galactose.
Glucose and fructose are monomers but they differ in structure. If the complexity of a
substance does affect its respiration rate, then a more complex substance will have a lower
2. to determine the other factors affecting the diffusion rate of a substance other than
Six Smith fermentation tubes were obtained and were filled with different solutions
namely 15 mL of starch, lactose, sucrose, glucose, fructose, and distilled water. Then
additional 15 mL of distilled water and 10% yeast suspension were also added to the Smith
fermentation tubes. The tubes were gently shook and it was double checked to make sure
that there are no trapped bubbles in the tube before plugging their openings with cotton
balls. The vertical arms where the evolved carbon dioxide will be trapped were tied
together. The tubes were then left under observation with minimal disturbances under thirty
minutes. The volume of the evolve carbon dioxide was measured every five minutes.
After thirty minutes, the final volume of the evolved carbon dioxide was used to
get the respiration rate using the formula final volume over time.
There was no change in the height (cm) of starch as it remained 0 while minimal
change can be observed from lactose and distilled water from 0 cm to 0.08 cm. Gradually
different changes in sucrose and glucose were observed. By the end of the thirty-minute
elapsed time, both have the same height of 3.06 cm. The said differences can be seen in
Table 1.
Since starch is a complex molecule, its respiration rate is low thus supporting the
hypothesis. The tube with the distilled water and no substrate is the controlled variable
which has the same respiration rate as lactose, a disaccharide. The tubes containing glucose
and sucrose have minimal differences in their heights thus resulting to the same respiration
rate. Fructose, a monomer just like glucose only with different structure, has the highest
respiration rate.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
In order to prove the hypothesis, an experiment was conducted using the Smith
fermentation tube method. Starch, lactose, sucrose, glucose, fructose, and distilled water
were placed in the Smith fermentation tube together with 15 mL distilled water and 15 mL
10% yeast suspension. After plugging the tubes with cotton balls, minimal disturbance was
made to minimize error in the experiment and the height of the evolved carbon dioxide in
each tubes were measured every five minutes for thirty minutes.
After the elapsed time, it was seen that the fructose has the highest height among
the six setups. Its simple structure can be counted as one of the factors affecting the result.
The next with the highest height are glucose and sucrose, followed by lactose and distilled
With this result, it can be concluded that the more complex the substance, the lower
its respiration rate. However, the complexity of the substrate is not the only factor that can
affect the results. The condition of the environment should also be taken in account as this
LITERATURE CITED
Bibliography
Champe, P. C., Harvey, R. A., & Ferrier, D. R. (2005). Biochemistry (Lippincott Illustrated Reviews Series).
Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Jane B. Reece, N. M., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., Jackson, R. B., & Cooke,
B. N. (2014). Campbell Biology Australian and New Zealand version. Australia: Pearson Higher
Education.