Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Ans. Essentially, the principle means that we hold the natural resource
treasures of the earth in trust for the benefit, enjoyment and use of the
generations of humankind yet to come. It is therefore a trust endowed upon us
as trustee and depository to use and enjoy. While our generation has the right
to use the earth’s resources, as a trustee and depository, we are also duty
bound not to misuse or exhaust it, so that those of our species to come in
much later years will still have something to use. This, in simple terms is the
meaning of sustainable development, using natural resources without
exhausting them. “We find no difficulty in ruling that they can, for themselves, for
others of their generation and for the succeeding generations, file a class suit. Their
personality to sue in behalf of the succeeding generations can only be based on the concept
of intergenerational responsibility insofar as the right to a balanced and healthful ecology is
concerned. Such a right, as hereinafter expounded, considers the "rhythm and harmony of
nature." Nature means the created world in its entirety. Such rhythm and harmony
indispensably include, inter alia, the judicious disposition, utilization, management,
renewal and conservation of the country's forest, mineral, land, waters, fisheries, wildlife,
off-shore areas and other natural resources to the end that their exploration, development
and utilization be equitably accessible to the present as well as future generations. 10
Needless to say, every generation has a responsibility to the next to preserve that rhythm
and harmony for the full enjoyment of a balanced and healthful ecology. Put a little
differently, the minors' assertion of their right to a sound environment constitutes, at the
same time, the performance of their obligation to ensure the protection of that right for the
generations to come.” (Oposa v. Factoran, G.R. No. 101083 July 30, 1993).
Ans. Doctrine of incorporation. Intl. Law. The doctrine that states that the rules
of Intl. Law form part of the law of the land and no legislative action is
required to make them applicable to a country. The Phils. follows this doctrine,
because Sec. 2. Art. II of the Const. states that the Phils. adopts the generally
accepted principles of international law as part of the law of the land.
“[T]he President shall nominate and, with the consent of the Commission on
Appointments, appoint the heads of the executive departments, ambassadors,
other public ministers and consuls, or officers of the armed forces from the
rank of colonel or naval captain, and other officers whose appointments are
vested in him in this Constitution. He shall also appoint all other officers of the
Government whose appointments are not otherwise provided for by law, and
those whom he may be authorized by law to appoint. The Congress may, by
law, vest the appointment of other officers lower in rank in the President
alone, in the courts, or in the heads of departments, agencies, commissions, or
boards.”
Section 15, Article VII of the 1987 Philippine Constitution provides that two
months immediately before the next presidential elections and up to the end
of his term, a President or acting President shall not make appointments
except temporary appointments to executive positions when continued
vacancies therein will prejudice public service or endanger public safety.
As a general rule, the power of removal may be implied from the power of
appointment. However, the President cannot remove officials appointed by
him where the Constitution prescribes certain methods for separation of such
officers from public service, e.g., Chairmen and Commissioners of
Constitutional Commissions who can be removed only by impeachment, or
judges who are subject to the disciplinary authority of the Supreme Court. In
the cases where the power of removal is lodged in the President, the same may
be exercised only for cause as may be provided by law, and in accordance with
the prescribed administrative procedure. (from nachura reviewer)
He shall also have the power to grant amnesty with the concurrence of a
majority of all the Members of the Congress.
xxxx
Section 5. No pardon, amnesty, parole, or suspension of sentence for violation
of election laws, rules, and regulations shall be granted by the President
without the favorable recommendation of the Commission.
(1)impeachment cases;
(2) cases that have not yet resulted in a final conviction; and
(3) cases involving violations of election laws, rules and regulations in which
there was no favorable recommendation coming from the COMELEC.
Therefore, it can be argued that any act of Congress by way of statute cannot
operate to delimit the pardoning power of the President.