68 vues

Transféré par Anonymous GnfGTw

- ADF.pdf
- Shear Strength and Deformation Modulus
- 06-technical-committee-20-tc214-28.pdf
- 829-832
- potence calcul
- Cost Benefit Analysis for Selection of Pile Tests 4cb_secured
- 1369-1372
- 2004.11.22 Dalles Lignes de Rupture
- 615-618
- COUPLED MODELLING OF OBSERVED PORE PRESSURE DISSIPATION AFTER HELICAL PILE INSTALLATION
- Cálculo de Pressão _ Esteiras
- Osterberg Load Cell Testing Results and Analysis for Rock Socket Design Validation - Bridge over Beauharnois Canal, Autoroute 30, Montreal by Andrew Cushing, et. al.
- Equivalent Pier Theory for Piled Raft Design
- Value of pile tests to inform detailed design in Canada
- 423.pdf
- 547-550
- Dim Piliers Miniers
- energie de déformation
- 1 Introduction
- Russo Chart Explanation

Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 17

bY

SYNOPSIS

The present Paper describes a procedure for L’article suivant donne une description de la

estimating the danger of a base failure in a strutted methode theorique pour la calculation du danger

excavation in clay. Terzaghi and Tschebotarioff d’un soulevement du fond d’une fouille cadragee

dans l’argile. Terzaghi et Tschebotarioff ont deja

have previously given formulae for such calculations, donne des formules pour un calcul pareil. mais ces

but these are limited to shallow excavations. formules ne sont valables que pour des fouilles de

On the basis of the familiar bearing capacity petite profondeur

calculations for foundations on clay a new approach BasCe sur les formules de la capacite portante des

fondations dans l’argile, une nouvelle solution du

to the problem is developed, in which the critical probleme de soulevement du fond a 6th developpee.

depth of an excavation is given by : La profondeur critique d’une fouille est don&e

par :

DC= NC.2

Y D, = NC. :

Y

where s and y are the undrained shear strength oh s et y sont respectivement 1: resistance au cisaille-

and density of the clay, respectively. NC is a ment et le poids d’unite de I’argile. Ne Ctant un

dimensionless coefficient depending on the form of coefficient sans dimensions et dependant de la forme

the excavation, i.e., the width/length ratio and the de la fouille, c’est-a-dire de la proportion largeur-

longueur et de la proportion profondeur-largeur.

depth/width ratio. The values of NC are identical

Les valeurs de N,, identiques aux valeurs donnees

to those given by Skempton (1951) for bearing par Skempton (1951) pour la capacite portante,

capacity formulae. sont montrees graphiquement dans la Figure 2.

The reliability of the formula is indicated by com- La validite de ces formules a Cti: examinee par

parisons with fourteen excavations. In seven of comparaison de quatorze fouilles. Dans sept de

ces fouilles, un soulevement total du fond a eu lieu,

these excavations complete failure occurred, the les coefficients theoriques de securite donnant comme

theoretical safety factor having an average of 0.96. valeur moyenne de 0.96. Quatre fouilles, oh on

In four excavations a partial failure was obtained, constatait un soulevement partiel du fond, ont

with an average theoretical safety factor of 1.11. fourni une valeur moyenne des coefficients thcoriques

The last three excavations were successfully per- de securite de 1,ll. Les trois dernieres fouilles ont

Cti: accomplies sans Bvenements speciaux, mais des

formed, but site observation indicated that, with

observations sur place indiquaient que, avec une

further depth, danger of failure would be serious. profondeur agrandissante, on aurait dh craindre un

These excavations had an average theoretical safety soulevement du fond, la valeur moyenne des coeffi-

factor of 1.08. cients theoriques de securite &ant de 1,OS.

Les resultats obtenus ci-dessus montrent, ainsi,

These investigations therefore indicate that the

que la methode d&rite nous permet d’estimer avec

danger of base failure in excavations in clay may une prCcision suffisante le danger d’un soulevement

be estimated from the above theoretical approach du fond d’une fouille dans I’argile, et que la methode

with sufficient accuracy for most practical purposes. suffit pour la plupart des usages pratiques.

INTRODUCTION

While excavating in soft Norwegian clays base failure sometimes occurs, accompanied by

a consequent sinking of the surrounding ground. Such failures have occurred in excavations

for basements, in trenches for water and disposal pipes, and in a number of shafts for piers

for the foundations of buildings.

For shallow excavations of great width compared to the depth the danger of base failure

may be estimated by a conventional stability analysis. For deep excavations and shafts,

however, experience shows that a conventional stability analysis will lead to unreliable

estimates.

The problem of calculating the stability of strutted excavations in clay has become of

increasing importance in Norway during the last few years. The areas available for new

buildings are limited and, consequently, there is a big demand for basement floors in new

32

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

STABILITY OF STRUTTED EXCAVATIONS IN CLAY 33

structures. Again, the increasing use of floating foundations for buildings on soft clay has

posed the problem of estimating the danger of failure in the excavations for the basements.

Finally, the stability problem has become of particular importance in Oslo, in connexion with

the design of a subway through the town centre.

The Norwegian Geotechnical Institute commenced work on this problem shortly after its

establishment in 1952. This work has consisted mainly of collecting case records of base

failures, together with a theoretical treatment of the problem. The results of this work are

presented in the present Paper, and a comparison is made between field experience and

theoretical analysis.

METHOD OF CALCULATION

The problem to be treated is confined to the stability of excavations which are sufficiently

strutted to prevent horizontal displacements of the walls. Furthermore, only temporary

excavations are considered ; that is, no attention is directed to changes in shear strength of

the clay which, in permanent excavations, may occur with time.

During removal of the clay shear stresses are set up underneath an excavation, since the

weight of the surrounding soil masses will tend to press the clay towards, and up into, the

excavation. If the shear strength of the clay is sufficient to withstand the imposed shear

stresses, then the excavation is stable. If, however, the shear strength of the clay is smaller

than the applied shear stresses, the bottom of the excavations will be forced upwards and the

soil masses on one or several sides of the excavation will sink vertically. The problem is thus

one of stability, the solution of which requires a consideration of the direction of movement

and the extent of the failure zone.

In the literature, this stability problem was discussed by Terzaghi (1943), later by Terzaghi

and Peck (1948), and by Tschebotarioff (1951).

Terzaghi, as shown in Fig. 1, considers a clay mass alongside the excavation as exerting a

certain pressure on the clay on a plane level with the bottom of the excavation. The bearing

of excavation according to

Terzaghi (1943)

capacity qf is calculated by the usual methods, and for an excavation of great length compared

to the width the following equation is applicable :

qf = 5.7s

where s is the undrained shear strength pf the clay (assumed to be saturated).

When calculating the pressure applied by the surrounding mass to a plane level with the

bottom of the excavation, Terzaghi considers a section of clay of width i 1/s, this width being

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

34 L. BJERRUM AND 0. EIDE

determined by the position of the failure zone. The weight of the clay block is reduced by the

shear strength D . s on the plane of section. Thus the vertical stress is :

When the excavation reaches the depth where failure occurs, then :

Pv = 9f

Thus the critical depth D, of the excavation is given by :

5.7s

D, = . . . . . . . . (1)

only a different shape of the failure zone. He also considers the ratio,of the length L to the

breadth B of the excavation, and his expression for the critical depth is :’

(2)

On the basis of observations from excavations in Oslo where bottom heave has occurred,

it can be stated that Terzaghi’s equation (1) gives a reliable estimate of the stability of an

excavation, provided that (a) the width of the excavation is large compared with the depth,

and (b) the clay is comparatively homogeneous with no stiff upper layer (weathering crust).

In cases of deep excavations, where the ratio depth/width is great, or in cases where the

surface clay has a stiff drying crust, equation (1) gives unreliable results.

In other words, failure occurs at considerably smaller depths than indicated by equation

(1) ; and corresponding divergencies between theory and field observations are found with

Tschebotarioff’s equation (2).

These divergencies can be explained by shortcomings of the theoretical assumptions

regarding the shape of the failure zone. Both equations (1) and (2) assume a circular sliding

surface underneath the bottom of the excavation, and that this surface extends vertically up

to the ground surface. The formulae thus assume that the shear strength of the clay is fully

mobilized right up to the surface. For very deep excavations this assumption will not hold

true. Underneath a deep excavation, such as a shaft., for a pier, failure will occur without

fully mobilizing the shear strength of all the upper clay layers.

In order to obtain a reliable estimate of the stability of deep excavations it is thus neces-

sary to consider the danger of local failure below the bottom of the excavation. An exact

treatment of this problem is not possible at present since the necessary plasticity theory is

not available. The calculation of the bearing capacity of foundations, however, presents a

corresponding problem, for which a satisfactory approximate solution has recently been

found. The solution of this problem may be applied to the calculation of the stability of

excavations.

The bearing capacity of a footing on clay is expressed by the equation :

qf = yD + IV,. s . . . . . . . . . (3)

where qf = the bearing capacity of the footing,

Y = the density of the clay, .

S undrained shear strength of the clay,

D z depth of footing,

N, = coefficient depending on the shape and depth of the footing.

For foundations of great width compared to the depth, NC may be calculated by assuming

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

STABILITY OF STRUTTED EXCAVATIONS IN CLAY 35

that the sliding surface is extended up to the ground level. For shallow footings NE will

thus increase approximately linearly with depth. If the depth of the foundation is increased

NC will, however, not increase correspondingly. When the depth exceeds about three times

the breadth NC will remain constant. This is because, when a deep footing is loaded to

failure, a local failure zone will be produced underneath the footing and the surrounding soil

masses will be pressed aside without mobilizing the full shear strength of clay in the upper

layers. The value of NC will thus remain constant for depths greater than about three times

the width of the footing.

A complete discussion of the problem of calculating the bearing capacity of deep founda-

tions was given by Skempton (1951). In this Paper he mentions the investigations carried

out by Meyerhof and Wilson, but his main treatment is based on a calculation method

developed by Bishop, Hill, and Mott for metals and later extended by Gibson to include clays.

According to this treatment, failure is caused under a deep circular footing by the formation

of a spherical plastic zone underneath the footing whilst the surrounding clay remains in an

elastic state.

For this case NC, Gibson derives the equation :

,=$log;+l] +l

where E is the elastic modulus of the clay for undrained deformation. E may be obtained

from the inclination of the stress/strain curve of the clay, determined by unconfined com-

pression tests. For ordinary clays, the ratio E/s varies between 50 and 200. This corresponds

to a variation of N, from 7.6 to 9.4. In the sensitive Norwegian clays, E/s will vary between

100 and 200 and N, will consequently vary between 8.5 and 9.4.

On the basis of all existing theoretical determinations and a number of model tests,

Skempton finally sums up the present knowledge of this problem by giving a diagram showing

NC as a function of the depth and the shape of the foundation. This diagram is shown in

Fig. 2.

A comparison between calculated and observed bearing capacities has confirmed the

reliability of this diagram, although loading tests seem to indicate that the values for NCmay

be slightly conservative.for sensitive Norwegian clays (Bjerrum, 1955).

Professor Skempton pointed out to the Authors in 1952, that it was probable that the

above calculation method for the bearing capacity of foundations may, without any adapta-

tions, be used to calculate the stability of excavations ; in fact, the two problems are analogous.

In the first case we have to determine the additional load which, at a certain depth, will

cause failure in the clay. In the second case, the question is to what limit the clay, by an

excavation, may be unloaded before failure occurs. As the shear stresses in the two cases

simply have opposite signs, one can directly derive from equation (3) the following expression

for the critical depth of excavation :

D,=N,s . . . . . . . . . .

Y

More generally the safety factor against base failure may be expressed by the equation :

F=N$- . (5)

rD+q ’ ’ ’ * * * ’ *

where F = the safety factor,

D = the depth of the excavation,

y = the density of the clay,

S = the undrained shear strength of the clay in a zone underneath and immediately

around the bottom of the excavation,

p = the surface surcharge,

NC = a coefficient depending upon the dimensions of the excavation.

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

36 L. BJERRUM AND 0. EIDE

D = depth of excavation

B = width of excavation

1 = length of excavation

p = surcharge

S = undrained shear strength of clay

y = density of clay

NC = coefficient

F = safety factor

9

8

7

6

5

4 I I I I I

D/B

I 2 3 4 5 6

Nc rectanyu~ar - (0.84+0.16

s/l).Ncyua~

calculated on the basis of the bearing

capacity theory. Values of NC from

Skempton (1951).

the NC-values for the bearing capacity of footings on clay may be directly used in equations

(4) and (5). But the accuracy of this theory must be investigated by field observations.

Indeed, one cannot ignore the fact that the NC-values for an excavation may differ from those

in Fig. 2, the latter being valid for the calculation of the bearing capacity of a rigid

foundation with uniform deformations, whereas the deformations at the bottom of an

excavation may take place freely and therefore will be greater in the middle of the excavation

than along the edges.

The reliability of the above theory is investigated by field observation from fourteen deep

excavations, given in the following examples.

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

STABILITY OF STRUTTED EXCAVATIONS IN CLAY 37

A typical example of base failure occurred in October 1954 during the excavations for a

sewage tank in OxenGvegen, Fornebu, Oslo.

The dimensions of the excavation were 5 x 5 m and it was designed to be excavated to

a depth of 3.20 m below ground level. The excavations were made within heavy wooden

sheet piling, with tongue and groove connexions. The sheet piling itself was securely strutted.

As the work proceeded the excavated soil was removed from the vicinity of the excavation

so that no surface surcharge loads were acting.

When the excavation reached a depth of 3.0 m (Fig. 3) a total failure occurred. The bot-

tom rose about O-5 m and there was a simultaneous sinking of the surrounding ground of

piling

De th OF excovotion

Per Mure

OF

Depth OF excovobon

betbre &lure

-%%t-

-*-,

Rock *-%a.

about 1 m on that side where the ground was at its highest. Furthermore, cracks appeared

in the ground around the excavation. Apart from small displacements the sheet piling

remained intact during the heave.

Shortly after the failure field investigations were carried out by the Norwegian Geotechnical

Institute. Four vane borings were made around the excavation, and one in the middle.

Furthermore, in one boring undisturbed samples were taken for detailed laboratory investi-

gations.

Underneath a fill of thickness 0.4-0.7 m there was a relatively stiff and dry clay crust

down to about 1.4 m below ground level. Vane borings and samples showed that below this

crust there was a layer of very soft and very quick clay which went down to rock, which was

found at a depth of 3-9 m below ground level. The shear strength of the quick clay was

nearly constant throughout the depth and equalled 0.75 ton/sq. m. A vane boring per-

formed in the excavation showed that the clay was completely disturbed to a depth of 2-2.5 m

below the bottom of the excavation.

A stability calculation indicated an NC-value of 7.0 corresponding to a safety factor

of 1-O. The theoretical value corresponding to a depth/width ratio of the excavation equal

to 060 is 7.2. When the failure occurred the theoretical safety factor was thus 1.03.

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

38 L. BJERRUM AND 0. EIDE

A failure occurred during the excavation for a store house in Drammen in August 1954,

just before the required depth of excavation of 2.5 m had been reached. Further work

proved to be fruitless and the basement floor was abandoned since, with further excavation,

clay masses were forced up in the bottom of the excavation.

The work was performed by a mechanical excavator, leaving the sides of the excavation

vertical and not strutted. In spite of the bottom heave the unstrutted sides remained intact

and vertical. Furthermore, there was no appreciable sinking of the ground immediately

around the excavation, but at a distance of 4-5 m from the work marked cracks and settle-

ments were observed. The continued excavation after the base failure had occurred led to

considerable sinking of a nearby road fill about 1.5-2.0 m high.

According to earlier field investigation of this area the ground may be described as having

a firm clay crust down to a depth of 2 m. Underneath this crust was a layer of very soft and

very sensitive clay. Rock was found to a depth of 6-7 m. The shear strength of the clay

was, to a depth of 3-4 m, 1.0-1.6 ton/sq. m. The average value of the shear strength was

estimated to be 1.2 ton/sq. m. The weight of the excavator together with other loads

amounted to a surcharge of approximately 1.5 ton/sq. m. As the density of the clay was 1.9

ton/cu. m, the coefficient N, will be 5.1 for a critical depth of excavation of 2.4 m. The

depth/width ratio was approximately 0.5, leading to a theoretical NC-value of 5.9. The

calculated safety factor was thus 1.16. Such a high figure may possibly be explained by the

load from the nearby road filling, but it is difficult to consider this factor in the calculation.

In 1930 a block of flats was built in Nordenskioldsgatan in Gdteborg. The building was

founded on steel piles driven down to rock. The structure was built on a slope with a com-

paratively steep gradient, and that may be the reason for the slow creep which has been

observed in the slope. Shortly after the building was completed horizontal movements were

observed, causing cracks and other damage in the building.

In 1954 the damage had become so comprehensive that the building had to be pulled down.

A new building on the same site was designed, but this time the foundations were to be piers

down to rock. Circular pier shafts were excavated to rock at a depth of 25 m. Sheet piling,

strutted by concrete rings, was successively .driven down as excavating proceeded. At the

surface the shaft had a diameter of 1.30 m, this diameter decreasing gradually to 0.90 m at

the rock.

The foundation work was, on the whole, successfully performed in the above manner.

Only one pier shaft had to be abandoned because of base failure. In this shaft the excavation

had almost reached the rock at a depth of 25 m. At this point the rock sloped steeply.

Just before the failure occurred the distance down to the rock was approximately O-3 m on

one side of the shaft and 1.3 m on the other. The workman who was in the excavation

relates that the bottom rose so quickly that he only just managed to climb up before the clay

masses reached him. The bottom rose about 5 m, and repeated attempts to complete the

excavation failed since, when further clay was removed, new clay masses continued to flow

into the shaft.

Field investigations carried out in connexion with the planning of the building showed

the existence of clay layers from ground level down to rock. The top layer was a post-glacial

clay containing some organic matter, whereas the bottom layer was a marine clay of high

sensitivity (St = 20-50).

The water content of the clay decreased from about 80% in the upper layer to about 55%

at a depth of 20 m. The average density of the clay was 1.54 ton/cu. m. The undrained

shear strength increased linearly with depth. Underneath a weathering crust 3-4 m thick

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

STABILITY OF STRUTTED EXCAVATIONS IN CLAY 39

the shear strength was 1.5 ton/sq. m, increasing to approximately 3.5 tons/sq. m at a depth of

20-25 m.

As the depth of excavation was 25 m when failure occurred, the total overburden at the

bottom of the excavation was 38.5 tons/sq. m. The shear strength of the clay being 3.5

tons/sq. m, N, will in this case be 11. According to the theory for the D/B ratio of 28, an

NC-value of 9.0 is indicated. The high actual value of NC may be partly due to the close

proximity of the rock surface to the bottom of the excavation.

During the construction of a nursing-home in Drammen in August 1952, a failure occurred

in the excavation for a sewage tank. The dimensions of the excavation were 5.5 x 8.0 m,

with a designed depth of 4.5 m. Down to a depth of 3.5 m, a stiff clay was encountered, but

as soon as the underlying soft, quick clay was reached the bottom of the excavation started

to rise, and continued during the subsequent attempt to complete the excavation. The

excavation was not braced, and in spite of the bottom failure the walls of the upper stiff clay

remained intact and vertical. Several attempts to complete the excavation within sheet

piles driven well below the final depth proved to be unsuccessful, and only after the removal of

the upper soil layers surrounding the excavation was the intended depth reached.

Soil investigations carried out after the failure showed that below an upper drying crust

there was a soft, quick clay of shear strength approximately 1 ton/sq. m, with a density of

1.8 tons/cu. m. Based on the collected data an NC-value is calculated for the conditions

immediately before the first failure, which took place at a depth of 3.5 m. A surcharge of 1

ton/sq. m on the surface around the excavation was taken into account. The result of this

calculation is that NC should be 7.2 to obtain the safety factor 1.0. The theoretical value is

6.7, but it is emphasized that this excellent agreement between observation and theory may

be somewhat fortuitous since there are some uncertainties in the estimate of the shear strength

and the surcharge.

In connexion with the design of a new subway in Oslo, three trial shafts were excavated

in 1953for the purpose of determining the reliability of the theoretical analysis of the stability

of excavations.

For all three shafts thorough soil investigations were made including sampling, vane tests,

and pore pressure measurements. During the excavation large samples were cut out at

different depths for a detailed laboratory investigation. At different stages of the excavation

vane tests were made from the bottom in order to investigate possible changes in shear strength

of the clay.

The excavation was started by digging a lG1.5 m-deep circular hole with a diameter

just exceeding 1.5 m. A number of 1.5-m C$rings, made by welding 30-mm C$ steel bars,

were placed in the bottom of the hole and 2-in. timber planks were driven down as sheet

piles outside the rings. The sheet piles were driven successively as the clay was excavated,

splicing each plank to the preceding one as they were driven into the ground. The rings were

lowered in steps each time leaving the top ring behind. In this way the rings were distributed

along the shaft at a distance of 0.5 m from each other, thus forming a regular support for the

sheet piles (Fig. 4).

The northern shaft (N) was excavated through 1.5 m of fill and then through 2 m of stiff

drying crust. Below the drying crust a soft-and in parts a very soft-quick clay was en-

countered. The quick clay continued down to a depth of lo-11 m, and from this depth,

continuing down to rock at a depth of 15 m, was a sandy clay.

The shaft (N) was terminated at a depth of 7 m, at which point failure was expected. The

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

40 L. BJERRUM AND 0. EIDE

Depth

in metres fi Sheur shwgth

Cross-section after failure

failure did not occur, however, until two weeks after the excavation had been completed.

The bottom rose about 2 m and, as shown in Fig. 5, a sinkhole appeared in the ground close

to the sheet piling. Two vane tests carried out after the failure showed that the clay was

remoulded to 19-1.5 m below the original shaft bottom.

The clay below the bottom of the shaft had a shear strength of 1.2 ton/sq. m, and the

average density of the soil was 135 ton/cu. m. A calculation based upon these values

shows that NC should be 10.8 in order to obtain the safety factor 1.0. This is 20% in excess

of the theoretical value.

In 1913 a total failure occurred in an excavation in Oslo. The excavation was 5.8 x 8.1 m

in area and was designed to reach a depth of 5 m, but a base failure took place at a depth at 4.5

m. Even after the driving of heavy sheet piling the bottom continued to rise as the clay was

removed. The work was finally completed by excavating small sections which were covered

with concrete and then loaded.

Investigations carried out in 1954 by the Norwegian State Railways showed the soil to

consist of a soft clay. The shear strength of the clay layer from 4.5 m-at which depth

the failure took place-down to 7.5 m was determined, by vane tests, to be 1.4 ton/sq. m.

A calculation of the stability of the excavation immediately before failure led to a safety

factor of 1.08. A surcharge loading of approximately 1 ton/sq. m due to building materials

was included in the calculation.

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

STABILITY OF STRUTTED EXCAVATIONS IN CLAY 41

“ Kronibus ” shaft, Tyholt

During the last war the German occupation authorities started the construction of a

railway tunnel in clay near Trondheim (Hartmark, 1955). A German contractor, who was

supposed to be a specialist, made an attempt to sink a 20-m-deep shaft midway on the tunnel

length. At this site the soil consists of a very sensitive clay. When the shaft had reached

a depth of 19.7 m a failure occurred and the shaft was partly filled with liquid clay. The work

was thereupon abandoned and the tunnel was not completed until after the war, when it

was built by the shield-driving method.

The dimensions of the shaft were 2.7 x 4.4 m. The shear strength of the clay at the

bottom of the shaft was approximately 3.5 tons/sq. m, as determined by vane tests carried

out by the Norwegian State Railways. The density of the clay was 1.8 ton/cu. m.

A calculation of the stability indicates a theoretical safety factor of 034. The N,-value

which gives a safety factor of 1.0 is 10.1, compared with the theoretical value &5.*

Pumping station, Jernbanetorget, Oslo

In 1943 a deep excavation was made for a pumping station in Oslo. During the work

a movement in the surrounding ground was experienced, and Mr S. Skaven-Haug, civil

engineer of the Norwegian State Railways, was consulted. His report, and additional informa-

tion required for the calculations, was placed at the disposal of the Norwegian Geotechnical

Institute.

The dimensions of the excavation were 12.2 x 8.5 m with an intended depth of about

9 m below ground level. The top 2.5 m of the excavation was strutted, and from this depth

slender and unsatisfactory sheet piles about 10 m long were driven.

When the excavation reached a depth of 6.3 m below ground level cracks appeared around

the hole at a distance of about 8-10 m, i.e., at a distance relatively large compared with the

depth. Mr Skaven-Haug explained the cracks as being caused by movements in the under-

lying clay masses, following slight base failure in the excavation. A complete failure did

not occur.

The existing struts were strengthened, and the work was completed by the excavation of

small sections which were then loaded by casting the base of the footing.

Site investigations were made in advance by a private firm, and vane tests to a depth of

19 m were carried out by the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute in 1952. Under 2 m of fill,

soft to medium-firm clay was encountered to great depth. The shear strength of the clay as

determined by vane tests was about 2-3 tons/sq. m, the lowest values being experienced at a

depth of about 12 m below ground level. The shear strength near the bottom of the excava-

tion, when the cracks occurred, was about 2.2 tons/sq. m. The average density of the clay

was 1.9 ton/cu. m. For a failure at a depth of 6.3 m an NC-value of 5.5 may be expected.

A calculation according to the above theory indicates an NC-value of 6.9. This means that

deformations occurred at a depth at which the calculated safety factor is 1.25. It is probable

that the excavation could have been deepened without total failure occurring. The critical

depth according to the theory is about 8 m.

During the summer and autumn of 1954, excavations were dug for a new store house in

Oslo. The building was supported partly by steel piles to rock, and partly it rested directly

* The theoretical NC-value 8.5 is Skempton’s value. The present Authors suggest that the effect of

the width/length ratio on the NC-value may be questioned as far as deep shafts are concerned. For shafts

with depth/width as well as depth/length ratios greater than 4 (see Fig. 2) it may be that the theoretical

NC-value should be 9 instead of 8.5 as used in this case.

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

42 L. BJERRUM AND 0. EIDE

on the rock, which was encountered at depths varying from 5-20 m below ground level. The

depth to rock, of interest in the present Paper, was about 9 m at a side wall, where the rock

sloped somewhat towards the centre of the building. The depth of excavation was about 5 m,

as shown in Fig. 6.

II

@npmry excovotion

Cross-section through excavation

The work was carried out with a side slope of 1 : 1 to a depth of 0.5 m above the required

depth. At this stage a small slide occurred in the side slope, but this had no effect on the

underlying clay. The excavation was widened to vertical walls in small sections, which were

strutted. After the sides were strutted and the piles driven, the foundations for the outside

walls and columns were cast. Excavation of the remaining 0.5 for the basement, and the

casting of the basement floor, was carried out after completion of the walls, columns, and

ground floor of the building.

The placing of the foundation and walls up to ground-floor level, and also a little higher,

was completed by May 1955, and then work on the basement commenced. Before the casting

of the basement floor the remaining 05 m was excavated and at that time a settlement of the

ground outside the wall was noticed.

The gable wall of a single-storey brick workshop without a basement was situated about

3 m from the side wall. The gable wall had settled slightly during the first part of the excava-

tion, but the settlements increased noticeably with the excavations for the basement, to an

extent of about 10 cm. Cracks were noticed on the ground, and the settlement near the side

wall was less than that near the gable wall. Those settlements, and the cracks, indicated

that the safety factor against base failure in the basement was very small, and the basement

slab was cast as soon as possible.

The Norwegian Geotechnical Institute carried out two vane borings and took samples

before the excavation commenced. The top 3 m consisted of a hard weathering crust and,

under that, the shear strength of the clay decreased with depth to a minimum value of 1.4

ton/sq. m at a depth of 6 m, and then increased to 2.5 ton/sq. m at a depth of 10 m.

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

STABILITY OF STRUTTED EXCAVATIONS IN CLAY 43

At a depth of 5 m, with a density of clay of 1.9 ton/cu. m, together with a surcharge load

of 0.5 ton/sq. m due to the workshop, the pressure was 10 tons/sq. m. The average shear

strength of the clay was 1.6 ton/sq. m, which gave an NC-value of 6.25 at that depth.

The excavation was very long compared to the width, and since the depth to rock was

limited the depth/breadth ratio was approximately equal to 1.0 which gave a theoretical NC-

value of 6.4 with a safety factor of only 1.02.

In connexion with the construction of a pumping station at Shellhaven, in the Thames

Estuary clays, a shaft of 55 m dia. was excavated and, at a depth of 5.2 m, a slight failure

occurred. Messrs John Mowlem kindly supplied the relevant facts and gave permission for

their publication in this Paper. The excavation was supported by cast-iron rings. A total

failure was not experienced and it was thought that the work could possibly have proceeded

a further O-5 m. But a movement of the surrounding ground had been noticed and, for

safety, the work was stopped for a while, and then completed under air pressure.

Site investigations have been described by Skempton and Ward (1952) and Skempton and

Henkel (1953) in connexion with adjacent works at Shellhaven. Under a hard brown clay a

soft-to-fairly-soft sensitive clay is found, with occasional layers of peat and silt. The shear

strength of the clay in the vicinity of the bottom of the shaft at the depth of 5.2 m is about

1.6 ton/sq. m.

The pressure due to the clay mass, together with a surcharge load of 1 ton/sq. m, gives a

pressure of about 9 tons/sq. m at the base of the excavation. The average shear strength

of the clay being 1.6 ton/sq. m, NC-values of 5.6 and 6.1 are obtained, corresponding to depths

of 5.2 and 5.7 m.

According to theory, an NC-value of 7.5 and a critical depth of 7.6 m are indicated. A com-

parison between the theoretical values and the field experience indicates that a partial failure

occurred when the safety factor was 1.34. Part of this divergence between theory and prac-

tice may be explained by the decrease in shear strength due to remoulding at the bottom of the

shaft.

In a similar manner to the test shaft at Ensjoveien a test shaft was excavated near the

tunnel at Sorligaten, Oslo. Here also, extensive site investigations, including vane borings

and samplings, were performed, and several blocks of the clay were obtained for laboratory

investigations. The shaft is shown in Fig. 7.

The ground conditions may be described as follows. Under a 1*5-m-thick top layer of

fill, silt is encountered to a depth of 3 m, and then a fairly sensitive clay is found to a depth

of 10 m, the shear strength of which decreases from 4 tons/sq. m to l-5-2 tons/sq. m. At a

depth of 9-11 m the clay contains some sand and gravel, and below this-to rock at 17 m-

is a quick clay of shear strength about 2 tons/sq. m.

Excavation proceeded to a depth of 13 m without failure. Tests performed during the

work showed a decrease in the shear strength of the clay underneath the bottom of the shaft

when a depth of 12 m was reached. That may be considered as the critical depth, as the

decrease in the shearing strength was due to large shear deformations. The decrease in shear

strength could be seen very clearly from a vane boring carried out, after the excavation,

about 0.5 m away. That local failure did not, however, lead to a complete failure.

At a depth of 12 m the shear strength of the clay is 2.1 tons/sq. m and, with an average

density of 1.85 ton/cu. m, an NC-value of 10.6 is obtained. The depth/diameter ratio for the

shaft is 8.0 and the theoretical NC-value is 9, giving a safety factor of 0.85.

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

44 L. BJERRUM AND 0. EIDE

Depth

in metres

P’wood piles -

3Omm q

steel rinys

- Sheor drenglh

L?.--_ be/&e cxcadan

- Sheur a/&y%

uFhzr CXCOVOtIM

13 m where the safety factor is 0.75.

It is possible that total failure was retarded by the relatively hard top layer preventing

the development of deformations.

In the summer of 1952 a 6-7-m-deep excavation for two basement floors was made in the

central part of Oslo. The excavation was carried out in sections within sheet piles, and as

soon as a section was excavated concrete was placed and loaded with sand.

Careful soil investigations were made by the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute. The

shear strength of the soft and partly quick clay was 1.75 ton/sq. m and the density was 1.9

ton/cu. m. The depth to rock was 13-15 m.

The above data are valid for the place where the most critical section was excavated.

The dimensions of that section were 8 x 4 m and the depth was 6.7 m. Corresponding to the

depth/width ratio of 1.7, the theoretical NC-value is 8.0. The safety factor is thus only 1.10.

During the excavation careful observations were made, including an attempt to measure

the rise of the bottom of the excavation. Those measurements proved to be very difficult,

and were only partly successful. From the results it was, however, concluded that the

bottom of the critical section rose about 2 cm. The excavation was situated close to neigh-

bouring buildings and some settlements and cracks of secondary importance were observed.

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

STABILITY OF STRUTTED EXCAVATIONS IN CLAY 45

Subway in Chicago

One of the examples used by Tschebotarioff (1951) in his treatment of the problem was a

deep excavation for the Chicago subway. A detailed description of the work and of the site

conditions is given by Peck (1943), but it must be remarked that Peck does not direct attention

to the question of stability. At one particular point in the subway the excavation was 16.0

m wide and 11.3 m deep. The excavation was strutted, but a maximum horizontal deforma-

tion of 6 cm occurred.

During excavation a maximum heave of 10 cm was observed together with a sinking of the

adjacent ground of about 3-15 cm, the largest values being nearest the excavation. Although

a complete failure did not occur it is clear that the safety factor was low.

The clay underneath the excavation had, according to Tschebotarioff, a shear-strength of

3.5 tons/sq. m. A calculation of the stability of the excavation shows a theoretical N,-value

of 6.1 with a safety factor of 1.0.

,4s described earlier, two test shafts were excavated at Ensjoveien, Oslo, in the summer of

1953. Whilst a total failure was obtained in the northern shaft, the southern shaft was

excavated to a depth of 11 m, which was not sufficient to produce failure. The dimensions

and method of excavation of the test shafts have already been described.

The shear strength of the clay at the bottom of the shaft was 2.7 tons,sq. m, the average

density of the clay was 1.93 tonjcu. m, the depth/diameter ratio was 7.3, and a theoretical

S,-value of 9.0 was obtained. The theoretical safety factor was 1.11. The test shaft was

kept open for 12 months without any sign of failure.

The data of the investigated excavations are summarized in Table 1, which also gives

the factors of safety against base failure calculated by the proposed method. From the

data presented in Table 1 the following conclusions may be drawn :

(1) The theoretical safety factor for the se\-en cases in which complete failure occurred

varies between 032 and 1.16. The average value is 0.96. The field observations

therefore confirm the reliability of the theoretical analysis, and the accuracy

with which the observed total failures could have been predicted by this method

is considered to be satisfactory.

(2) Also the four excavations in which pavtial failures were observed support the

theoretical approach, since the calculated safety factors vary between 035 and

1.25 with an average of 1.11.

(3) The three successful excavations are selected cases in which the safety factors against

base failure are judged to be small. The theoretical safety factors of these cases

vary between 1.0 and 1.14 with an average value of 1.08. If compared with the

field observations made during the excavations, the calculated safety factors are

believed to give a correct evaluation of the stability. It is very likely that a

further excavation of the two cases which show the lowest safety factors would

have led to failure.

(4) Included among the excavations with a total or partial base failure are four shafts

of great depth compared to the width. It is immediately seen from Table 1 that

the safety factors of these four shafts are remarkably low compared with the

other cases. The safety factors of the four shafts vary between 0.82 and 0.85

with an average of 0.84. These results may be explained by a too low theoretical

W,-value for deep excavations, and it is thus possible that Skempton’s IV,-values,

which are confirmed by field observations of foundation failures or loading tests

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

46 L. BJERRUM .4KD 0. EIDE

Table 1.

Data concerning instability of excavations

Fornebu, Oslo 5.0 Y 5.0 ~ 3.0 0.0 1.75 0.60 1 7.2 1.03 failure

3. Pier shaft, GGteborg 4 04 , 25.0 0.0 11.54 3.5 i 20~~50~1.0 ~28.0 ~ 9.0 0+X2

4. Sewage tank, I

Drammen 5.5 x 8.0 3.5 1.0 ~1.80 ~1.0 20 ~0.69 10.64 6.7 0.93

EnsjGveien, Oslo

6. Excavation, Grev j I

Vedels pl., Oslo I 5.8 x s.1 4.5 1.0 1 ,SO 1.4 5510 0.72 ~0.78 1 7.0

___~ ‘-_-

7. “ Kronibus shaft,” ~

Tyholt, Trondheim 2.7 X 4.4 19.7 0.0 1.80 3.5 40 10.61 ~7.3

--_

I

8. Pumping station,

Jernbanetorget, Oslo ~12.2 x 8.5 6.3 0.0 1.40

-__

I

9. Storehouse, Freia, i

Oslo 5.0 Y cc 5.0 0.0 1.90 1.6 12 0.0 11.00 I 6.4 1.02 ’ do.

- I

10. Shaft, Shellhaven .$5.5 j.2 14 i 1.54 1.61 6 1.o : 095 ! 7.5 1.34 do.

--____

11. Test shaft, Sijrligaten I I 1

Oslo : 41.5 12.0 ~ 04 ~1.85 2.1 60 1.0 ~f+()(J1

~ 9.0

j do.

~ 0+?5 ~

Storgaten Oslo ~8.0 x 4.0 6.7 i 0.0 ~I.90 1.75 10-20 0.5 1.70 s.0 i 1.10 failure

/ 3.5 ~ ~_

13. Subway, Chicago i 16~~ 0.0 ~0.70 6.1 1.00 j do.

I

14. Test shaft (S),

Ensjdveien, Cslo I 4 1.5 11.0 0~0 1 1.93 2.7 1 200 / 1.0 7.30 / 9.0 1.14 d(,.

on English clays, are somewhat smaller than the values valid for the sensitive

Norwegian clays with a high value of E/s. A better agreement would result if

NC was assumed to be 10 for deep shaft excavations instead of 9.

The observations made during excavation of the test shaft in Sijrligaten indicate,

however, another explanation of the low safety factors of the deep shafts. This

test shaft proved that under certain conditions it is possible to excavate a shaft

to a greater depth than that calculated theoretically without obtaining a total

failure. If a shaft is dug through a stiff clay down to soft clay, the upper stiff-

clay layer will prevent, at least for a time, a local overstressing of the soft clay

below the bottom of the shaft from extending to a total failure. This effect of

an upper stiff-clay layer was observed in the test shaft in Siirligaten which was

excavated down to almost 2 m below the calculated critical depth. Moreover,

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

STABILITY OF STRUTTED EXCAVATIONS IN CLAY 47

this effect may explain why the Iota1 failure in the test shaft (N) at Ensjiiveien

occurred a certain time after the excavation was completed.

(5) The scattering of the calculated safety factors for some of the excavations seems

to indicate that the danger of failure will increase if the excavation is not suffici-

ently braced to prevent excess horizontal deformations. If the upper clay layers

are stiff, and the depth of the excavation is small, the danger of a base failure

seems to be less affected by the bracing.

(6) Experience cannot yet indicate exactly how much the danger of a base failure is

reduced if sheet piles are driven below the bottom of an excavation. The stabiliz-

ing effect of sheet piling seems, however, to be small for the cases where the shear

strength of the clay does not increase with depth.

XCKXOWLEDGEMENTS

Four of the described fourteen case records were collected by Mr Skaven-Haug, chief

engineer of the Norwegian State Railways. The Authors are indebted to Mr Skaven-Haug

for permission to use and publish his field observations. The Authors are, moreover, in-

debted to the Planning Office for Suburban Lines and Subways, Oslo, whose support made

it possible to excavate the three test shafts. The Authors also wish to express their particular

gratitude to Professor A. W. Skempton and to Dr A. W. Bishop for valuable discussions on

the problem, and to the Directors of John Mowlem & Company for permission to use and

publish the Shellhaven case records. Finally, the Authors acknowledge the assistance of

their colleagues, especially the work done by Mr I. Johannessen, during the laboratory and

field investigations.

REFERENCES

BJERRUM, L., 1955. Stability of Natural Slopes in Quick Clay. Gtotechnique, 5 : 101.

CUEVAS, I. A., 1936. Foundation Conditions in Mexico City. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Soil Mrch. (Cambridge),

3 : 233.

HARTMARK, H., 1955. Geotekniske Observasjoner fra utfdrelsen av Tyholdt Jordtunnel. Teknisk Ukeblad,

27 : 565.

JANBU, N., 1952. Stabilitet av skjaeringer i apen sjakt. Norges Geotekniske Institutf. Int. r@ort F 13,

OSLO.

PECK, R. B., 1943. Earth pressure measurements in open cuts, Chicago (Ill.) subway. Trans. Amer. Sot.

Civ. Eqrs, 108 : 1008.

SKEMPTON, A. W., 1951. The Bearing Capacity of Clays. Sldg Res. Cong., London, 1951. Papers pre-

sented in Div. 1. DD. 180-189.

SKEMPTON,A. W., and WARD, W. H., 1952. Investigations Concerning a Deep Cofferdam in the Thames

Estuary Clay at Shellhaven. Giotechnique, 3 : 119.

SKEMPTON. A. W., and HENKEL, D. J., 1953. The Post-glacial Clays of the Thames Estuary at Tilbury

and Shellhaven. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Soil Mech. (Zurich), 1 : 302.

TERZAGHI, I<., 1943. Theoretical soil mechanics. W&y, Niw York.

TERZAGHI, I<., and PECK, R. B., 1948. Soil mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, New York.

TSCHEBOTARIOFF,G. P., 1951. Soil mechanics, foundations, and earth structures. McGraw-Hill, New

York.

Downloaded by [ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

- ADF.pdfTransféré parakshay
- Shear Strength and Deformation ModulusTransféré parJoseCampana
- 06-technical-committee-20-tc214-28.pdfTransféré parArief Rachman
- 829-832Transféré parAnonymous D5s00DdU
- potence calculTransféré paramine dhiba
- Cost Benefit Analysis for Selection of Pile Tests 4cb_securedTransféré paronuruman
- 1369-1372Transféré parAnonymous D5s00DdU
- 2004.11.22 Dalles Lignes de RuptureTransféré parBleri
- 615-618Transféré parNomui Joyuimo
- COUPLED MODELLING OF OBSERVED PORE PRESSURE DISSIPATION AFTER HELICAL PILE INSTALLATIONTransféré parAlex
- Cálculo de Pressão _ EsteirasTransféré pardemidover
- Osterberg Load Cell Testing Results and Analysis for Rock Socket Design Validation - Bridge over Beauharnois Canal, Autoroute 30, Montreal by Andrew Cushing, et. al.Transféré parAndrew Cushing
- Equivalent Pier Theory for Piled Raft DesignTransféré parjpsorcerer
- Value of pile tests to inform detailed design in CanadaTransféré parAndrew Cushing
- 423.pdfTransféré pargreenday3
- 547-550Transféré parCristi Neagu
- Dim Piliers MiniersTransféré parmohamedouffa
- energie de déformationTransféré parMaxton Hunter
- 1 IntroductionTransféré parOussama Kettab
- Russo Chart ExplanationTransféré parFederico Singh Amadineep
- 895Transféré parSeif Eddine
- diagTransféré parDjamila Haddi
- generalites_www.cours-examens.orTransféré parAbdelhak Guetti
- 14Transféré parNarayan muduli
- 114 Contraintes de 0 a Elu2 Circ v2 2Transféré parLounès Tarzalt
- étude d'un batiment R+2.pptTransféré parAlla Eddine G C
- 11 TractionTransféré parYoussef Youri
- meyerhof 1953.pdfTransféré parWILSON
- Chap7- Flexion ComposeeTransféré parYossri Abdelwahed
- Chap.03 PrédimensionementTransféré parIyad Eddi Bakar

- 1Transféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Observations During Recent Earthquakes and Developments in Liquefaction AnalysisTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Perspectives in Forensic Geotechnical EngineeringTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Challenges and shortcomings in geotechnical engineering practice.pdfTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Modelling and Testing-Muir WoodTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Back Calculation of a Flow Slide in Sensitive Clays-ThakurTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Back Calculation of a Flow Slide in Sensitive Clays-ThakurTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Failure Analysis of Malin LandslideTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- New Generation Geo Engineering BarendsTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- New Generation Geo Engineering BarendsTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Teaching Rock Mechanics in the Classroom and on the UNI-Nettuno Network-BarlaTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- What Should Geotechnical Engineers Be Able to Do and How Should They Acquire These SkillsTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- 27.11.2017 Registros en La Fase de EjecuciónTransféré parCristhine Cristicitas R
- 1. a.B. Huang - Pg. 3 - Chatacterization of Silt-sand SoilsTransféré parLisa Higgins
- Indian National Report on Codes, Regulations and Practices of ‘Braced Excavations in Soft GroundTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Manual Expediente TécnicoTransféré parDanna Ramosc
- Lectura de Planos y Metrados en EdificacionesTransféré parmacckof
- Métodos para Dosificar C° de Elevado Desempeño-Oreally.pdfTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Practical Soil Mechanics at Muskingum IV-Knappen & PhilippeTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Practical Soil Mechanics at Muskingum II-Knappen & PhilippeTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Practical Soil Mechanics at Muskingum III-Knappen & PhilippeTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Earth Pressure Against Retaining Walls, Excavation Sheeting, Tunnel Linings, Etc-CasagrandeTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Soil Problems in Highway Engineering Including Frost Action in SoilsTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Soil Problems in Highway Engineering Including Frost Action in SoilsTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Durabilidad y Patología del Concreto - ENRIQUE RIVVA L.Transféré parKevin Anthony Plasencia Blanco
- Problem Solving in Soil Mechanics-AysenpdfTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Bearing Capacity of Piles-CrandallTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Practical Soil Mechanics at Muskingum I-Knappen & PhilippeTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Groundwater Movement and Seepage-JustinTransféré parAnonymous GnfGTw
- Manual técnico EterboardTransféré parCasilisto

- Curso de Michel Fichant Sobre a CRP de KantTransféré parpjonas.almeida2990
- Dtu 13 12Transféré parQuang Huy
- Double Et Moitié Ce1 Exercices de NumérationTransféré parMeoLuoi13
- Documentation CMT FroniusTransféré parRicardo Camargo
- La Flexion Plane Simple (Cours 3 Sct)Transféré parMIMFS
- Lagrange_cours.pdfTransféré parAlinour Vi
- Silo_cirTransféré parMazenAyadi
- Tp 2arbres Coli RotTransféré parfatiham
- Trans Fo Trib is Cours 1Transféré parMouncef El Marghichi
- cst_1Transféré parAbdellah Bahadi
- (Nouveaux Actes Sémiotiques 1) Jacques Fontanille (Ed.)-Le Discours Aspectualisé-John Benjamins Publishing Company (1991)Transféré parRicardo
- Stage Entreprise RapportTransféré parIBtihal Betty
- isométrieTransféré parNour Ben Messaoud
- Composes FonctionnelsTransféré parPhytomenadione La Vitamine K
- Transmission Sur Lignes ARC NE ChTransféré parCatherine Peters
- Resume Series Laurent ResidusTransféré parCheria Ali
- Soluflow 3090Transféré parHamza Djellal
- Cours Elément Machine 2015 CH4-EngTransféré parjaweher
- RICOEUR, Paul - Kant Et HusserlTransféré parg.lotus
- Rap Kods Fin 404Transféré parhamzaoui612
- A7135Transféré parhacenescribd
- Biochimie_alimentaire L3Transféré parArsène Divo
- Msi Chimie-structure AtomeTransféré parGeek Former
- Paris13 c2 Codage 26Jan05Transféré parGhada Elia
- Parole et Traduction (En Portugais) Boum - Charles TrenetTransféré parAntônio Meurer
- Mesures de La BiodiversiteTransféré parSitta Ledanti
- OMPPS Activités 2016_3Transféré parBen Fah
- Appel Candidature Doctorat 2013 2014Transféré parAbdelwahad Saghrouchni
- Devoir+de+Synthèse+N°2+-+Sciences+physiques+-+Bac+Informatique+(2009-2010)+Mr+Daghsni+Sahbi (1)Transféré parMahmoud Essahbi Sahbi Daghsni
- extrait_42576210Transféré parNAFISSA BOURQUIA