Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1. Students will be able to explain how an author I can statements for Language Objectives:
develops a first person point of view by reading
Wonder. 1. I can explain how an author develops the point
2. Students will be able to create a first-person of view of the narrator or speaker in a text.
narrative based on the details and events that 2. I can explain relevant ideas and information
happened from their reading of Wonder. from Wonder through an organized written
3. Students will be able to produce clear and assignment and oral discussion.
coherent writing in which the development, 3. I can write narrative stories with good
organization, and style are appropriate to task, technique, appropriate detailed descriptions
purpose, and audience about their reading. and logical sequences.
4. I can produce clear writing with organization
and style according to my role, audience,
format, and topic.
5. I can collaborate through discussions to
express and expand upon other’s ideas.
KEY VOCABULARY: SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS:
● ordinary ● Wonder by RJ Palacio
● cleft palate ● Wonder Preview #1
● hysterical ● Wonder Preview #2
● hindsight ● Wonder Website
● anomaly ● Google Classroom
● obnoxious ● Vocabulary definitions
● schlep ● Vocabulary Word Hunt Handout
● precept ● Anticipation Guide (Wonder Quotes)
● stampede ● Journal Questions
● mortality ● Google logins (their student emails)
● aversion ● Padlet
● first person narrative ● Feedback Visual
● context clues ● R.A.F.T. Handout
● R.A.F.T. Rubric
SIOP FEATURES
PREPARATION SCAFFOLDING GROUP OPTIONS
REFLECTIONS:
After Reading:
● Ask class to write student composed questions. Each student will be need to think about their reading
from that day and write a question based on their reading. Not only will they be asked to write a question,
but they will need to write the possible answers! Questions should require in depth answers (meaning
they should require more than one word answers). Let students know that their questions and answers
will be featured on tomorrow’s Quizizz to review their reading before continuing Wonder! This will help
student motivation.
DAY 2 (WRITING BLOCK):
Begin Quizziz using their questions and answers from the day previous. Review answers with class using details
from the text once activity is complete.
● After completing the quiz, ask students to reflect on what they read in a writing journal on Google
Classroom. In their writing journal, they will need to answer the following questions:
○ Describe the setting(s) and explain why you think it is important to the story.
○ Describe one of the characters in detail.
○ From what point of view is Wonder being told? How does the point of view affect the story? How
would the story change if it was told from a different point of view?
○ Quote a line from the text that stands out to you. Why did you choose this line?
○ List 5 events from Wonder in chronological order, using transition words (first, second, next, then,
finally). Briefly describe each event in your sequence chart (on their Google Document).
○ Predict what you think will happen next in the story. Explain your prediction.
● The second reflection will apply their knowledge of first-person narratives as well as transform their
knowledge from their reading into a different first person narrative. This will be a R.A.F.T. assignment
where learners will type in their Padlet account (using their student Gmail as their login information). I will
give them 2 options to choose from (allowing them the choice of more than one option to increase
motivation):
○ Assignment: Reread the chapter How I Came to Life again.
■ Role: Auggie’s doctor
■ Audience: Himself
■ Format: Diary Entry
■ Topic: Imagine that you are the doctor on duty during Auggie's birth. Include details of
what actually happened, and how you felt afterwards. Mention what was expected (“small
anomalies”), Auggie's actual appearance, the reaction of the nurses, and of Auggie's
parents. Include how you feel as a result of what happened to you, and any thoughts you
may have for Auggie and his family.
○ Assignment: Reread the chapters The Grand Tour and The Performance Space
■ Role: Charlotte or Julian
■ Audience: A friend (you can choose a name!)
■ Format: Email
■ Topic: Write an email to a friend in which you give details of how you became involved in
today's activities, your initial reaction to seeing Auggie, any thoughts or feelings meeting
him has evoked, and any thoughts relating to the other students who were with you today
and their reaction/behaviour towards Auggie.
DAY 3 (WRITING BLOCK):
● The final part of this assignment is for students to get in groups of 2-3. Group members will be assigned
by me. In their groups, they will be giving peer assessment, according to a rubric I have shared with
them. Each student must share their Padlets with groupmates using their student emails. Each student
needs to share their work using the “can write” tool. The “can write” tool allows students to view original
posts and add posts about other’s work. Groups must read Padlet R.A.F.T. assignments and give
feedback in the form of a compliment, suggestion, and correction. They will give feedback by adding a
comment to the Padlet page. Teacher needs to model for learners how to add a comment and what can
be included in comments (text, pictures, websites, videos, gifs, voice recording, drawings, maps, and
links to other Padlets). Explain that no matter how they choose to demonstrate their feedback, the
compliment, suggestion, and correction must be clearly provided for the reader. Also explain that,
“feedback is an important way for them to share their opinions with classmates while allowing them to
learn from others to guide their work. Sharing compliments, suggestions, and corrections about each
other’s work gives us the opportunity to revise and improve!” Their feedback should include:
■ One compliment (according to the rubric):
● What are some things that you liked about the author’s work?
● Tell the writer what part/area you think they did well.
■ One suggestion (according to the rubric):
● What are some specific ideas for making changes?
○ “Be honest but mindful of another’s feelings. Phrase your suggestion
positively!”
● Things you can comment about:
○ Organization of content
○ Use of details to explain
○ Purpose of work
○ Word Choice
○ Sentence length
○ Clarity of thoughts and ideas
■ One correction (according to the rubric):
● Corrections mean checking your peer’s work for:
○ Spelling mistakes
○ Grammar mistakes
○ Missing or incorrect punctuation
○ Incomplete or run-on sentences
The R.A.F.T. assignment has a rubric that will be shared and reviewed with the class prior to writing so they
know what to include in their assignment. They will have time to edit and revise their R.A.F.T. assignment prior
to submitting the final draft to me. They will edit their work using the feedback they receive from their
classmates. They may get more students to offer them feedback if they wish. Each student will be provided with
a feedback visual (includes the information above for compliments, suggestions, and corrections) and sentence
starters they can use for each compliment, suggestion, and correction.
Template adapted from Echevarria, Vogt, and Short (2008), Making Content Comprehensible for English Learners:
The SIOP ® Model.
Lesson Rationale:
This lesson is designed to focus on the following 6th-grade content standards:
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.6.1 Engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups,
and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grade 6 topics, texts, and issues, building on others' ideas and
expressing their own clearly; CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.6.6 Explain how an author develops the point of view of
the narrator or speaker in a text; CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.6.3 Write narratives to develop real or imagined
experiences or events using effective technique, relevant descriptive details, and well-structured event sequences;
and CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.6.4 Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and
style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. This will support students’ literacy/language development
and content knowledge because it provides opportunities for peer discussions about the content, addresses how
an author develops a first-person point of view, and allows students to write in an organized structure that meets
6th-grade content objectives. I designed the lesson so that it incorporates 6th grade reading material as well as
writing, listening, and speaking assessments that address my language objectives for this lesson. This lesson is
meant to be completed over a 3 day period. Everyday, my 6th grade schedule has a one hour block of reading and
a one hour block of writing, so they will be completing these assignments according to the day and reading or
writing block. The reading block is where we will focus on the pre-reading and reading of Wonder. The writing
block is where students will be writing their fictional narrative according to their chosen R.A.F.T. writing assignment
and giving feedback.
Assessment Rationale:
After reviewing this lesson, there was a few assessments I wanted to include in the sections “during
reading” and “after reading”. Some of these changes focused on informal assessments. The first assessment I
wanted to include during reading was an informal assessment called “turn and talk”. Instead of asking questions as
a whole class discussion, I wanted students to do “turn and talk” so everyone had the chance to reflect on their
reading. In this exercise, both students have a chance to speak and I will have the opportunity to walk around and
listen. The second informal assessment that I decided to include was “teach a friend”. I thought this would be
helpful because it gives students the opportunity to educate others on their reading strategies. This gives me
feedback on how they are comprehending the stories as well as giving other students the ability to hear new
strategies they can possibly use in the future. The final informal assessment I wanted to include was having
students create their own “student composed questions”. For this activity, students are asked to write questions
about their reading as well as the possible answers. These questions need to be asked in a way that shows an in
depth understanding of the chapters we read in Wonder. When they finish creating these questions and answers,
they will need to hand them in to me. From this, I am able to then review their level of understanding from our
reading. By reusing these student composed questions for the next day’s Quizizz, I am creating motivation for
them to create questions that are well thought out. These three new informal assessments help me address and
support further the following language objectives: I can explain relevant ideas and information from Wonder
through an organized written assignment and oral discussion and I can collaborate through discussions to express
and expand upon other’s ideas. It also addresses the CCSS ELA Literacy Standard SL.6.1.
The revisions I included that focused on the formal assessment was through peer feedback. I felt it was
important to revise this aspect because I think it is important to give students a frame of reference when giving
feedback (so it doesn’t feel daunting or like too much pressure). By supplying them with a rubric to assess another
student, it allows them the ability to read another learners work and understand what they are looking for. They are
able to use the supplied rubric to give feedback that is meaningful and helps the author work towards attaining
their language goals for this assignment: I can write narrative stories with good technique, appropriate detailed
descriptions and logical sequences and I can produce clear writing with organization and style according to my
role, audience, format, and topic. It also addresses the CCSS ELA Literacy Standards W.6.3 and W.6.4.
Technology Rationale:
The technology integration in the beginning of the lesson (the Wonder “website walk”) enhances the
student’s learning experience by building their background knowledge. I am using this tool as another way to
increase motivation for the students. When students have pair-share discussions about what they see, what they
notice about the art, and how they think the art relates to the story, it allows them the ability to practice their
listening, and speaking skills with their classmates. They will also have the ability to use this introduction activity to
make a prediction about what they are going to come across in the book. Finally, by exploring different parts of the
website, they are able to read (with text-to-speech support if needed) parts of the website they are being exposed
to key information from the story. For example, in the Choose Kind tab, they are being pre-exposed to the theme of
the book. For the Character tab, they are “meeting” the multiple characters they will meet throughout the book,
read their descriptions, as well as see visuals for those characters.
The technology integration at the end of the lesson (using Padlet as a publication and feedback tool) is a
way for students to publish their work. By using Padlet, it allows buy-in from the students (especially because
feedback can include multiple media formats such as text, pictures, website links, videos, gifs, voice recording,
drawings, maps, and links to other Padlets). By making their post available for others to share, respond, and
comment, it falls into the modification category of the SAMR Model, which enhances deeper learning. This
assignment addresses the standard CCSS.ELA.Literacy.W.6.6 (use technology, including the Internet, to produce
and publish writing as well as to interact and collaborate with others; demonstrate sufficient command of
keyboarding skills to type a minimum of three pages in a single sitting). This assignment also provides further
access and mastery to language objective number 5: I can collaborate through pair-share discussions to express
and expand upon other’s ideas. Padlet is a social tool of learning that allows my students to share their R.A.F.T
narratives and respond to each other’s work focusing on specific feedback goals (one compliment, one suggestion,
and one correction). All students by the end of this activity should receive feedback on their assignments. They will
use this feedback to see what’s working in their writing and what should be edited or revised before turning in their
final draft to me. This allows them the ability to go through the writing process and understand how important
drafting is within literature.