Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
5291
FRESN CA 937
H LE '~
MAR 03
,
2838
F RESNOCOUNTYSUPEMORCOURT
BY._____________________w
DEPUTY
11
FRANK D’AMBROSIO, CaseNo.: CE CG 00 7 8-1
12
Plaintiff,
COMPLAINT TO QUIET TITLE
13
VS.
14
ESTELLA M. CORTEZ an INDIVIDUAL,
15 DAVID R. CORTEZ an INDIVIDUAL,
DAVID RICHARD CORTEZ & ESTELLA
p
17
right, title, estate, lienor interest in the
18 property described in the complaint adverse
to Plaintiff’s title or any cloud on Plaintiff’s
19
title thereto, and DOES 1 through 10,
20 inclusive,
21 Defendants
22
23 Plaintiff alleges:
24 1. Plaintiff was a resident of California, and has resided and paid for the
25 taxes and upkeep on the subject property for over ten (10)
all years.
26
2. At all times mentioned, Defendant, ESTELLA M. CORTEZ an
27
INDIVIDUAL, DAVID R. CORTEZ an INDIVIDUAL, DAVID RICHARD CORTEZ &
28
ESTELLA M. CORTEZ as Trustees and all persons unknown, claiming any legal or equitable
l
right, title, estate, lien or interest in the property described in the complaint adverse to Plaintiffs
title or any cloud on Plaintiffs title thereto has claimed an interest in the subject tangible
property.
3. These Defendants, and each of them, claim some right, title, estate, lien, or
interest in the hereinafter-described property adverse to Plaintiffs title; and their claims, and
4. The Defendants herein named as “all persons unknown, claiming any legal
or equitable right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the property described in the Complaint adverse
to Plaintiffs title, or any cloud on Plaintiffs title thereto” (hereinafter sometimes referred to as
10 “the unknown Defendants”) are unknown to Plaintiff. These unknown Defendants, and each of
11
them, claim some right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the hereinafter-described property adverse
12
to Plaintiffs title, and their claims, and each of them, constitute a cloud on Plaintiffs title to that
13
property.
14
5. Plaintiff is ignorant of the true names and capacities of Defendants sued
15
herein as DOES 1 through 10, and therefore sues these Defendants by such fictitious names.
16
Plaintiff will amend this complaint to allege their true names and capacities when ascertained.
17
Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that each of these fictitiously named
18
Defendants claim some right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the hereinafter-described property
19
adverse to Plaintiffs title, and their claims, and each of them, constitute a cloud on Plaintiffs
20
title to that property.
21
6. Plaintiff is the sole owner of certain real property, namely:
22
5291 W. YALE AVENUE, FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93722, Fresno County, and more
23
particularly described as, PARCEL 3 OFPARCEL MAP ACCORDING TO THE MAP
5253,
24
TTHEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 34 PAGE 37 OF PARCEL MAPS, FRESNO COUNTY
25
RECORDS. APN: 312-270-36
26 7. The basis for Plaintiffs title is Plaintiffs actual, open, exclusive, hostile,
27 and adverse possession of the above-described property for more than five years preceding the
28
described property for the five years immediately preceding the commencement of the action.
8. Plaintiff is seeking a quite title action against Defendants, and each of
them, granting the above-described tangible property to FRANK D’AMBROSIO as against the
claims of the Defendants, successor Defendants, the claims of all unknown Defendants, whether
or not the claim or cloud is known to Plaintiff, and the unknown, uncertain, or contingent claims,
if any. Defendants and each of them have no right, title, estate, lien, or interest whatever in the
18
RANK D’AMBROSIO
3, “7/
19
20
M2
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
foregoing complaint and know the contents thereof. The same is true of my own knowledge,
except as to those matters-which are therein stated on information and belief, and as to those
W
matters, I believe it to be true.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
I
Dated this 2 day of March, 2016
'
10
FRANK D’AM‘EKOSIO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1o
11
Plaintiff,
PENDENCY OF ACTION
13
PARCEL 3 OFPARCEL MAP 5253,
14 vs.
ACCORDING TO THE MAP TTHEREOF
ESTELLA M. CORTEZ an INDIVIDUAL, RECORDED IN BOOK 34 PAGE 37 OF
15
DAVID R. CORTEZ an INDIVIDUAL, PARCEL MAPS, FRESNO COUNTY
RECORDS. APN: 312-270-36
16 DAVID RICHARD CORTEZ & ESTELLA
M. CORTEZ as Trustees and all persons
17
unknown, claiming any legal or equitable
JVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
20
title thereto, and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
21
Defendants
22
23
NOTICE IS GIVEN that the above action was commenced on or before May 21, 2014, in
24
25
FRANK D’AMBROSIO, Plaintiff, against ESTELLA M. CORTEZ an
the above court by
INDIVIDUAL, DAVID R. CORTEZ an INDIVIDUAL, DAVID RICHARD CORTEZ &
26
27
ESTELLA M. CORT EZ as Trustees and all persons unknown, claiming any legal or
equitable right, title, estate, lien or interest in the property described in the complaint
28
The above action alleges a real property claim affecting certain real property that
The real property is commonly known as 5291 W. YALE AVENUE, FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
93722, Fresno County, and more particularly described as, PARCEL 3 OFPARCEL MAP 5253,
ACCORDING TO THE MAP TTHEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 34 PAGE 37 OF PARCEL
MAPS, FRESNO COUNTY RECORDS. APN: 312-270-36
10
Dated March 2016
'I
7,
11
12
FRANK D’AMBROSIO
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28