Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

Forensic Science International 139 (2004) 89–92

Announcement of population data


Genetic data on 19 STR loci in south-east Poland
Piotr Kozioła,*, Marzanna Ciesielkaa, Roman Ma˛droa,
Andrzej Krajkab
a
Department of Forensic Medicine, University School of Medicine in Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
b
Department of Mathematics, University M. Curie-Skłodowska in Lublin, pl. M. Curie-Skłodowskiej 2, 20-080 Lublin, Poland
Received 31 July 2003; received in revised form 1 October 2003; accepted 3 October 2003

Abstract

Allele frequencies for the 19 STRs loci, D3S1358, D5S818, D7S820, D8S1179, D13S317, D16S539, D18S51, D21S11,
CSF1PO, F13A01, F13B, FESFPS, FGA, LPL, Penta D, Penta E, TH01, TPOX and VWA were obtained from a sample of 203–
1188 unrelated individuals living in the area of south-east Poland.
# 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: STRs; Population database; Polish population

Population: Unrelated individuals living in the region of Other remarks: The alleles frequency comparisons
south-east Poland who requested for paternity testing. between our region and other regions of Poland: 19 mar-
Extraction: Genomic DNA was isolation from blood sam- kers—South [6–8]; 17 markers—North [9,10], North East
ples by the Blood DNA Prep Plus kit (A&A Biotechnology). [11,12], Central Pomarania Kujawy [13,14]; 8 markers—
PCR: One to five nanograms target DNA following to Central Warsaw [15,16], were performed by test of homo-
manufacturer’s instructions (GenePrint1 Fluorescent STR geneity (RxC contingency table test with 2000 shuffling
Systems, Promega). experiments—data not shown). Comparison of data shown
Typing: Hitachi FMBIO II fluorescent scanner, ILS 600 regional differences (P < 0:05) at the FGA locus (between
as internal standard and allelic ladder (Promega). our data and North, North East), at the D21S11 locus
Results: See Table 1 (between our data and North East) and at the CSF1PO locus
Quality control: Proficiency testing of the Paternity (between our data and Central Pomarania Kujawy, North
Testing Workshop—ISFG. East). In other comparisons no differences found. This paper
Analysis of data: Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, follows the guidelines for publication of population data
observed and expected heterozygosity were calculated requested by the journal [17].
within TFPGA of Miller [1], polymorphism information Access to the data: Available upon request: pkoziol
content (PIC) [2], power of discrimination (PD) [3], power @asklepios.am.lublin.pl.
of exclusion (PE) [4], minimum allele frequencies [5].

*
Corresponding author. Tel.: þ48-81-7425794;
fax: þ48-81-7476427.
E-mail address: pkoziol@asklepios.am.lublin.pl (P. Kozioł).

0379-0738/$ – see front matter # 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.10.001
90 P. Kozioł et al. / Forensic Science International 139 (2004) 89–92

Table 1
Allele frequencies for 19 STR systems in the population of south-east Poland

Allele D3S1358 D5S818 D7S820 D8S1179 D13S317 D16S539 D18S51 D21S11 CSF1PO
(N ¼ 714) (N ¼ 515) (N ¼ 517) (N ¼ 714) (N ¼ 517) (N ¼ 517) (N ¼ 714) (N ¼ 714) (N ¼ 496)

3.2 – – – – – – – – –
4 – – – – – – – – –
5 – – – – – – – – –
6 – – – – 0.0010 – – – –
7 – 0.0019 0.0097 – – – – – –
8 – 0.0010 0.1625 0.0091 0.1112 0.0068 – – 0.0020
9 – 0.0544 0.1518 0.0147 0.0832 0.0880 – – 0.0615
9.3 – – – – – – – – –
10 – 0.0854 0.2979 0.0644 0.0493 0.0571 0.0070 – 0.2822
11 0.0014 0.3505 0.1992 0.0735 0.3811 0.2921 0.0189 – 0.2792
12 – 0.3447 0.1557 0.1723 0.2398 0.3211 0.0945 – 0.2944
13 0.0028 0.1485 0.0193 0.3116 0.0861 0.1905 0.1037 – 0.0655
14 0.1478 0.0126 0.0039 0.2332 0.0435 0.0425 0.1695 – 0.0071
15 0.2255 – – 0.1016 0.0048 0.0019 0.1555 – 0.0081
16 0.2430 0.0010 – 0.0182 – – 0.1639 – –
17 0.2220 – – 0.0007 – – 0.1134 – –
18 0.1435 – – 0.0007 – – 0.0805 – –
19 0.0119 – – – – – 0.0392 – –
20 0.0021 – – – – – 0.0336 – –
20.2 – – – – – – – – –
21 – – – – – – 0.0126 – –
21.2 – – – – – – – – –
22 – – – – – – 0.0070 – –
22.2 – – – – – – – – –
23 – – – – – – 0.0007 – –
23.2 – – – – – – – – –
24 – – – – – – – – –
24.2 – – – – – – – – –
25 – – – – – – – – –
25.2 – – – – – – – – –
26 – – – – – – – 0.0021 –
27 – – – – – – – 0.0315 –
28 – – – – – – – 0.1891 –
28.2 – – – – – – – 0.0007 –
29 – – – – – – – 0.1926 –
29.2 – – – – – – – 0.0028 –
30 – – – – – – – 0.2458 –
30.2 – – – – – – – 0.0469 –
31 – – – – – – – 0.0518 –
31.2 – – – – – – – 0.0855 –
32 – – – – – – – 0.0147 –
32.2 – – – – – – – 0.0882 –
33 – – – – – – – 0.0021 –
33.2 – – – – – – – 0.0420 –
34.2 – – – – – – – 0.0042 –
Min. freq. 0.0037 0.0049 0.0051 0.0038 0.0050 0.0051 0.0040 0.0039 0.0053
Hobs 0.786 0.709 0.768 0.814 0.754 0.762 0.878 0.840 0.756
Hexp 0.799 0.726 0.798 0.799 0.767 0.763 0.878 0.844 0.748
Pw2 0.93 0.99 0.33 0.30 0.41 0.92 0.71 0.99 0.66
Pexact 0.64 0.99 0.18 0.37 0.46 0.85 0.46 0.84 0.29
PIC 0.767 0.680 0.768 0.771 0.736 0.725 0.865 0.826 0.704
PD 0.929 0.884 0.929 0.929 0.912 0.905 0.971 0.958 0.886
PE 0.596 0.491 0.600 0.611 0.568 0.546 0.753 0.692 0.514
P. Kozioł et al. / Forensic Science International 139 (2004) 89–92 91

Table 1 (Continued )

F13A01 F13B FESFPS FGA LPL Penta D Penta E TH01 TPOX VWA
(N ¼ 308) (N ¼ 251) (N ¼ 308) (N ¼ 714) (N ¼ 351) (N ¼ 203) (N ¼ 712) (N ¼ 1132) (N ¼ 1188) (N ¼ 1078)

3.2 0.0747 – – – – – – – – –
4 0.0390 – – – – – – – – –
5 0.1786 – – – – – 0.0709 0.0013 – –
6 0.3117 0.0916 – – – – – 0.2253 0.0008 –
7 0.3442 0.0159 0.0016 – 0.0014 0.0025 0.1376 0.1387 – –
8 0.0032 0.2092 0.0292 – 0.0028 0.0049 0.0169 0.1016 0.5783 –
9 – 0.2450 0.0032 – 0.0470 0.2414 0.0119 0.2107 0.0825 –
9.3 – – – – – – – 0.3127 – –
10 – 0.4343 0.2565 – 0.4430 0.1158 0.1166 0.0088 0.0653 –
11 0.0016 0.0040 0.4806 – 0.2308 0.1355 0.1096 0.0009 0.2445 0.0014
12 – – 0.1916 – 0.2522 0.2118 0.1355 – 0.0286 –
13 0.0049 – 0.0373 – 0.0214 0.1946 0.1173 – – 0.0051
14 0.0097 – – – 0.0014 0.0566 0.0667 – – 0.1039
15 0.0162 – – – – 0.0246 0.0562 – – 0.1109
16 0.0162 – – 0.0007 – 0.0123 0.0506 – – 0.1878
17 – – – 0.0007 – – 0.0400 – – 0.2551
18 – – – 0.0063 – – 0.0351 – – 0.2324
19 – – – 0.0833 – – 0.0183 – – 0.0918
20 – – – 0.1520 – – 0.0126 – – 0.0116
20.2 – – – 0.0007 – – – – – –
21 – – – 0.1737 – – 0.0028 – – –
21.2 – – – 0.0014 – – – – – –
22 – – – 0.2346 – – – – – –
22.2 – – – 0.0112 – – – – – –
23 – – – 0.1127 – – 0.0014 – – –
23.2 – – – 0.0126 – – – – – –
24 – – – 0.1191 – – – – – –
24.2 – – – 0.0028 – – – – – –
25 – – – 0.0672 – – – – – –
25.2 – – – 0.0007 – – – – – –
26 – – – 0.0147 – – – – – –
27 – – – 0.0056 – – – – – –
28 – – – – – – – – – –
28.2 – – – – – – – – – –
29 – – – – – – – – – –
29.2 – – – – – – – – – –
30 – – – – – – – – – –
30.2 – – – – – – – – – –
31 – – – – – – – – – –
31.2 – – – – – – – – – –
32 – – – – – – – – – –
32.2 – – – – – – – – – –
33 – – – – – – – – – –
33.2 – – – – – – – – – –
34.2 – – – – – – – – – –
Min. freq. 0.0083 0.0099 0.0079 0.0039 0.0072 0.0133 0.0041 0.0023 0.0020 0.0025
Hobs 0.734 0.693 0.646 0.840 0.715 0.817 0.900 0.762 0.583 0.822
Hexp 0.746 0.700 0.665 0.853 0.685 0.825 0.905 0.778 0.594 0.814
Pw2 0.99 0.82 0.14 0.79 0.85 0.83 0.43 0.66 0.49 0.68
Pexact 0.90 0.70 0.10 0.71 0.75 0.63 0.64 0.66 0.40 0.43
PIC 0.704 0.649 0.611 0.836 0.629 0.799 0.896 0.742 0.544 0.788
PD 0.892 0.860 0.831 0.961 0.839 0.943 0.982 0.917 0.783 0.938
PE 0.521 0.451 0.411 0.706 0.428 0.648 0.806 0.565 0.356 0.631
Hobs (observed heterozygosity), Hexp (expected heterozygosity), Pw2 (Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, probability of chi-square test), Pexact
(Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, probability of exact test based on 10,000 total permutations), PIC (polymorphism information content), PD
(power of discrimination), PE (power of exclusion), N (number of samples), min. freq. (minimum frequency).
92 P. Kozioł et al. / Forensic Science International 139 (2004) 89–92

References dziewie˛ ciu loci typu STR z zestawu Profiler Plus w próbce
populacyjnej z obszaru polski, Arch. Med. Sa˛ d. Krym. 50
[1] M. Miller, Tools for Population Genetic Analyses (TFPGA) (2000) 207–213.
v1.3, 1997, Free program distributed by author over the [10] Z. Szczerkowska, J. Wysocka, E. Kapińska, L. Cybulska,
internet at http://herb.bio.nau.edu/miller/tfpga.htm. Genetyczna zmienność w obrebie 14-tu loci typu VNTR w
[2] D. Botstein, R. L White, M. Skolnick, R.W. Davis, populacji Polski Północnej, Arch. Med. Sa˛ d. Krym. 51 (2001)
Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using 227–232.
restriction fragment length polymorphisms, Am. J. Hum. [11] J. Janica J, W. Pepiński, M. Skawrońska, J.A. Berent, The
Genet. 32 (1980) 314–331. STR systems FES/FPS and F13B in a Polish population, Int.
[3] A.T. Kloosterman, P. Daselaar, B. Budowle, E.L. Riley, J. Legal. Med. 110 (1997) 329–330.
Population genetic study on the HLA DQa and the D1S80 [12] W. Pepiński, J. Janica, M. Skowrońska, A. Niemcunowicz-
locus in Dutch Caucasians, in: Proceedings of the Third Janica, I. Sołtyszewski, Population genetics of 15 STR loci in
International Symposium on Human Identification, Promega the population of Podlasie (NE Poland), Forensic Sci. Int. 124
Corporation, 1992, pp. 392–335. (2001) 226–227.
[4] P. Wiegand, B. Budowle, S. Rand, B. Brinkman, Forensic [13] D. Miścicka-Śliwka, J. Czarny, T. Grzybowski, M. Woźniak,
validation of the STR systems SE33 and TC 11, Int. J. Legal Population genetics of the STRs: vWA, TH01, TPOX,
Med. 105 (1993) 315–320. CSF1PO, D5S818, D13S317, D7S820, D16S539, LPL, F13B,
[5] B. Budowle, K.L. Monson, R. Chakraborty, Estimating FESFPS, F13A01and ACTBP2 in the Pomerania-Kujawy
minimum allele frequencies for DNA profile frequency region of Poland, Forensic Sci. Int. 119 (2001) 119–122.
estimates for PCR-based loci, Int. J. Legal Med. 108 (1996) [14] J. Czarny, Population genetics of the STRs 3S1358, FGA,
173–176. D2S1338, D8S1179, D21S11, D18S51 and D19S433 in the
[6] B. Turowska, M. Sanak, B. Opolska-Bogusz, Cze˛ stość alleli Pomerania-Kujawy region of Poland, Forensic Sci. Int. 125
systemów STR:LPL, F13B i HPRTB w populacji Polski (2002) 90–92.
Południowej, Arch. Med. Sa˛ d. Krym. 69 (1999) 149–152. [15] P. Kuzniar, L. Soltyszewski, R. Plowski, Population genetics
[7] B. Turowska, M. Sanak, Frequency data on the loci vWA, of 10 STR loci in a population of central Poland, Forensic Sci.
FES/FPS, F13A01, TH01, TPOX and CSF1P0 in a population Int. 130 (2002) 55–57.
from south Poland, Int. J. Legal Med. 113 (2000) 123–125. [16] A. Tucholska-Lenart, J. Wujec, J. Samborski, E. Grejcz
[8] P. Wolańska-Nowak, W. Branicki, T. Kupiec, STR data for Jakubowska, Allele frequencies for 10 STR loci in a
SGM Plus and Penta E and D loci in a population sample population from central Poland, Forensic Sci. Int. 129
from south Poland, Forensic Sci. Int. 127 (2002) 237–239. (2002) 131–133.
[9] R. Pawłowski, A. Dettlaff-Ka˛ kol, G. Jezierski, A. Macie- [17] P. Lincoln, A. Carracedo, Publication of population data of
jewska, R. Paszkowska, M. Reichert, Genetyka populacyjna human polymorphisms, Forensic Sci. Int. 110 (2000) 3–5.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi