CATEGORY 5 4
Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name,
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no
errors. Well organized
RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s
purpose in a single sentence, which is
engaging, and thought provoking
CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful
supporting detail sentences that develop
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt.
and studies. Used research methodology
correctly.
CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data.
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle
sequencing of ideas through
well-developed paragraphs; transitions
are used to enhance organization.
CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The
conclusion is engaging and restates the
research problem. Recommendations
were objective.
MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation,
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and
spelling.
Clearly organized
Clearly states the paper’s purpose.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
Each paragraph has sufficient
supporting detail sentences that
develop the main idea. Used some
related litt. and studies. Used
research methodology correctly.
Used graphs/tables in presenting
data. Paragraph development
present but not perfected.
Summary of findings is clear. The
conclusion restates the research
problem. Most recommendations
were objective.
Almost no errors in grammar,
punctuation, capitalization, bullets,
page numbers and spelling.
3 2
Incompletely organized
Somehow states the paper’s
purpose.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
Each paragraph lacks
supporting detail sentences.
Used few related litt. and
studies. Used research
methodology correctly.
Used graphs/tables in
presenting data. But Logical
organization of ideas was not
fully developed. .
Summary of findings is
inconsistent The conclusion
does not adequately restate the
research problem. Some
Recommendations were
subjective.
Many errors in grammar,
punctuation, capitalization
bullets, page numbers and
spelling.
1 SCORE
Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and 5
organized
Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and 2
organized
There is no clear Poorly evident and 5
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.
Each paragraph fails to Content is not 5
develop the main idea. applicable to the said
study
insufficient related litt. and
studies. Used research
methodology.
Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used 5
presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
evidence of structure or presenting data. And
organization has no evidence of
structure or
organization
Incomplete summary of No summary of 2
findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
conclusion. Most conclusion.
Recommendations are Recommendations
subjective. need total revision.
Numerous and distracting Poorly written. 3
errors in grammar,
punctuation, capitalization,
bullets, page numbers and
 spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident 5
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references 5
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
references references. references. 6-7 major references.

Charmaine Huang- 03/12 11:44pm 37/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and 2
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and 3
purpose in a single sentence, which is purpose. organized
engaging, and thought provoking

CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
There is no clear Poorly evident and 3
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not 5
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some study
Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and
and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used
studies. Used research studies. Used research
correctly. research methodology correctly.
methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used 5
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization
 CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of 3
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.

MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written.
3
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
spelling. page numbers and spelling. bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident 4
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references 5
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
references references. references. 6-7 major references.

Pauline Glenn Dela Cruz 03/12 10:59 33/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and 4
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and 5
purpose in a single sentence, which is purpose. organized
engaging, and thought provoking

CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
There is no clear Poorly evident and 4
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not 4
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some
 and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and study
correctly. research methodology correctly. studies. Used research studies. Used research
methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used 4
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization

CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of 3
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.

MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written.
4
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
spelling. page numbers and spelling. bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident 5
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references 5
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
references references. references. 6-7 major references.

JAYMEILYN CLEMENA 03/13 10:22 PM 38/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and 5
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and 5
purpose in a single sentence, which is
 engaging, and thought provoking purpose. organized

CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
There is no clear Poorly evident and 5
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not 4
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some study
Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and
and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used
studies. Used research studies. Used research
correctly. research methodology correctly.
methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used 5
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization

CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of 4
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.

MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written.
4
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
spelling. page numbers and spelling. bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident 5
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references 5
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
 references references. references. 6-7 major references.

JOHN ROQUE 03/12 10:00 PM 42/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and 5
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and 3
purpose in a single sentence, which is purpose. organized
engaging, and thought provoking

CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
There is no clear Poorly evident and 4
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not 5
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some study
Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and
and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used
studies. Used research studies. Used research
correctly. research methodology correctly.
methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used 5
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization

CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of 3
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.
 MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written.
4
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
spelling. page numbers and spelling. bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident 5
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references 5
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
references references. references. 6-7 major references.

RONAN QUING 03/14 4:17 39/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and 4
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and 5
purpose in a single sentence, which is purpose. organized
engaging, and thought provoking

CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
There is no clear Poorly evident and 5
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not 5
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some study
Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and
and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used
studies. Used research studies. Used research
correctly. research methodology correctly.
methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used 4
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
 well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization

CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of 4
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.

MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written.
5
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
spelling. page numbers and spelling. bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident
5
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references 5
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
references references. references. 6-7 major references.

BENEDICT SAN JOSE 03/14 4:55 PM 42/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and 4
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and 5
purpose in a single sentence, which is purpose. organized
engaging, and thought provoking

CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews The introduction clearly states the The introduction states the There is no clear Poorly evident and 3
the structure of the paper and states the main problem of the study and main problem of the study but introduction or main organized
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF. other components of chapter 1, does not adequately preview problem of the study and
and previews the structure of the the structure of the paper. the structure of the paper is
 paper. missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not 5
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some study
Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and
and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used
studies. Used research studies. Used research
correctly. research methodology correctly.
methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used 3
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization

CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of 4
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.

MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written.
4
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
spelling. page numbers and spelling. bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident
5
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references 5
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
references references. references. 6-7 major references.

BERNADETTE TAN 03/14 4:10 PM 38/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE
 Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and 4
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and 5
purpose in a single sentence, which is purpose. organized
engaging, and thought provoking

CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
There is no clear Poorly evident and 3
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not 5
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some study
Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and
and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used
studies. Used research studies. Used research
correctly. research methodology correctly.
methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used 4
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization

CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of 3
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.

MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written. 3
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
spelling. page numbers and spelling. bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.
CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident
5
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references 5
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
references references. references. 6-7 major references.

RAPHAEL GOH TO KANG 03/14 6:20 37/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and 4
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and 3
purpose in a single sentence, which is purpose. organized
engaging, and thought provoking

CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
There is no clear Poorly evident and 3
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not 5
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some study
Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and
and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used
studies. Used research studies. Used research
correctly. research methodology correctly.
methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used 5
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization

CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of 3
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
 research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.

MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written. 3
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
spelling. page numbers and spelling. bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident
5
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references 5
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
references references. references. 6-7 major references.

VALNESSON TAN 03/14 6:23 36/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and 4
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and 3
purpose in a single sentence, which is purpose. organized
engaging, and thought provoking

CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
There is no clear Poorly evident and 3
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not 5
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some study
Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and
and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used
studies. Used research studies. Used research
 correctly. research methodology correctly. methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used 3
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization

CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of 1
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.

MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written. 3
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
spelling. page numbers and spelling. bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident
5
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references 5
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
references references. references. 6-7 major references.

CARL TAN 03/14 6:35 32/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and 4
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and 4
purpose in a single sentence, which is purpose. organized
engaging, and thought provoking
 CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
There is no clear Poorly evident and 4
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not 5
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some study
Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and
and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used
studies. Used research studies. Used research
correctly. research methodology correctly.
methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used 3
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization

CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of 3
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.

MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written. 4
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
spelling. page numbers and spelling. bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident
5
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references 5
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
references references. references. 6-7 major references.
 JERALD KING 37/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and
purpose in a single sentence, which is purpose. organized
engaging, and thought provoking

CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
There is no clear Poorly evident and
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some study
Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and
and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used
studies. Used research studies. Used research
correctly. research methodology correctly.
methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization

CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.

MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written.
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
 spelling. page numbers and spelling. spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
references references. references. 6-7 major references.

/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and
purpose in a single sentence, which is purpose. organized
engaging, and thought provoking

CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
There is no clear Poorly evident and
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some study
Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and
and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used
studies. Used research studies. Used research
correctly. research methodology correctly.
methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization
 CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.

MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written.
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
spelling. page numbers and spelling. bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
references references. references. 6-7 major references.

/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and
purpose in a single sentence, which is purpose. organized
engaging, and thought provoking

CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
There is no clear Poorly evident and
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some
 and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and study
correctly. research methodology correctly. studies. Used research studies. Used research
methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization

CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.

MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written.
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
spelling. page numbers and spelling. bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
references references. references. 6-7 major references.

/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and
purpose in a single sentence, which is
 engaging, and thought provoking purpose. organized

CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
There is no clear Poorly evident and
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some study
Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and
and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used
studies. Used research studies. Used research
correctly. research methodology correctly.
methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization

CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.

MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written.
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
spelling. page numbers and spelling. bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
 references references. references. 6-7 major references.

/45

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title Student’s Name, Teacher’s Name, Clearly organized Incompletely organized Evidence of 2 or less Poorly evident and
Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no organized
errors. Well organized

RESEARCH PROBLEM Clearly and concisely states the paper’s Clearly states the paper’s purpose. Somehow states the paper’s Incomplete and unfocused. Poorly evident and
purpose in a single sentence, which is purpose. organized
engaging, and thought provoking

CHAPTER 1 The introduction is engaging, previews
the structure of the paper and states the
SOTP, SAD, SOTS and DOF.
The introduction clearly states the
main problem of the study and
other components of chapter 1,
and previews the structure of the
paper.
The introduction states the
main problem of the study but
does not adequately preview
the structure of the paper.
There is no clear Poorly evident and
introduction or main organized
problem of the study and
the structure of the paper is
missing.

CHAPTER 2 AND 3 Each paragraph has thoughtful Each paragraph has sufficient Each paragraph lacks Each paragraph fails to Content is not
supporting detail sentences that develop supporting detail sentences that supporting detail sentences. develop the main idea. applicable to the said
the main idea. Used sufficient related litt. develop the main idea. Used some study
Used few related litt. and insufficient related litt. and
and studies. Used research methodology related litt. and studies. Used
studies. Used research studies. Used research
correctly. research methodology correctly.
methodology correctly. methodology.

CHAPTER 4 Used graphs/tables in presenting data. Used graphs/tables in presenting Used graphs/tables in Used graphs/tables in Didn’t used
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle data. Paragraph development presenting data. But Logical presenting data. But no graphs/tables in
sequencing of ideas through present but not perfected. organization of ideas was not evidence of structure or presenting data. And
well-developed paragraphs; transitions fully developed. . organization has no evidence of
are used to enhance organization. structure or
organization

CHAPTER 5 Complete summary of findings. The Summary of findings is clear. The Summary of findings is Incomplete summary of No summary of
conclusion is engaging and restates the conclusion restates the research inconsistent The conclusion findings and/or unfocused findings and/or
research problem. Recommendations problem. Most recommendations does not adequately restate the conclusion. Most conclusion.
were objective. were objective. research problem. Some Recommendations are Recommendations
Recommendations were subjective. need total revision.
subjective.
 MECHANICS No errors in grammar, punctuation, Almost no errors in grammar, Many errors in grammar, Numerous and distracting Poorly written.
capitalization, bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization, bullets, punctuation, capitalization errors in grammar,
spelling. page numbers and spelling. bullets, page numbers and punctuation, capitalization,
spelling. bullets, page numbers and
spelling.

CITATION AND APPNEDIX All cited works, both text and visual, are Some cited works, both text and Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text Poorly evident
done in the correct APA format with no visual, are done in the correct APA and visual, are done in the
errors. format. correct format.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the correct format with no Done in the correct format with few Done in the correct format with Done in the correct format Less than 5 references
errors. Includes more than 10 major errors. . Includes 10 major some errors. Includes 8 major with many errors. Includes were used.
references references. references. 6-7 major references.

/45