QUESTION: Evaluate on the Advantages of In-House Unions
establishment of in-house unions in a
Better management union relations country. because no interference from In-house unions are in the private sector outsiders. of employees. In-house union has more One where members are all employed understanding of company’s needs by the same employers and workplace problems rather The government’s policy is to than a full time unions official of a encourage the formation and growth of nation wide occupational unions. such unions. They feel in-house union leaders In 1985, there were only 52 in- house are more likely to adopt a unions with a membership of less than cooperating rather. 500. By comparison in 2011, there were 325 Disadvantage of In-House Unions in-house unions with the membership 25,000 in Generally weak because the private sector. memberships is limited and Example the in-house unions in the confined to workers in one country: particular company. Telekom Bhd Employees. Chosen from the small number Tenaga Nasional Bhd Employees Unions. of members which may give Malaysian Airlines Employees rise to the possibility of the Unions Alam Flora Employees Unions employer trying to exploit such leader. Government believes that they are more Fear of victimization among likely to be appreciates of the situation in their unions leader, terminations of place of employment and problems of their employment, transfer and employer and less influenced by ‘outsiders’. assignment of duties which There will be a closer relationship management prerogatives between the employer and the unions which Will unable to provide will lead to more peaceful industrial relations. scholarships and other benefits for their members.. QUESTION: Evaluate on the Advantages of In-House Unions establishment of in-house unions in a Better management union relations country. because no interference from In-house unions are in the private sector outsiders. of employees. In-house union has more One where members are all employed understanding of company’s needs by the same employers and workplace problems rather The government’s policy is to than a full time unions official of a encourage the formation and growth of nation wide occupational unions. such unions. They feel in-house union leaders In 1985, there were only 52 in- house are more likely to adopt a unions with a membership of less than cooperating rather. 500. By comparison in 2011, there were 325 Disadvantage of In-House Unions in-house unions with the membership 25,000 in Generally weak because the private sector. memberships is limited and Example the in-house unions in the confined to workers in one country: particular company. Telekom Bhd Employees. Chosen from the small number Tenaga Nasional Bhd Employees Unions. of members which may give Malaysian Airlines Employees rise to the possibility of the Unions Alam Flora Employees Unions employer trying to exploit such leader. Government believes that they are more Fear of victimization among likely to be appreciates of the situation in their unions leader, terminations of place of employment and problems of their employment, transfer and employer and less influenced by ‘outsiders’. assignment of duties which There will be a closer relationship management prerogatives between the employer and the unions which Will unable to provide will lead to more peaceful industrial relations. scholarships and other benefits for their members..