HOW TO REVIEW

•Remember the purpose

•Read with a purpose
•Write with a purpose

REVIEW THIS ARTICLE AND FILL THE INFORMATION TO THE LITERATURE REVIEW TABLE

1. Family Home Food Environment and Nutrition-Related Parent and Child Personal and Behavioral Outcomes of the
Healthy Home Offerings via the Mealtime Environment (HOME) Plus Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212267217303465

2. The influence of early feeding practices on fruit and vegetable intake among preschool children in 4 European birth
cohorts
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/98/3/804.short

DV : RESPONDING VARIABLE

IV : MANIPULATED VARIABLE
LITERATURE REVIEW TABLE

Research Objective Variable Methodology Finding Strength Weakness

Author /Year Main & Sub-Obj DV & IV Study The result Comments/critics on the research
design/instrument
1 June 2017 To describe Randomized - Compared with - The
Jayne family home controlled trial. – control parents, intervention
A.Fulkerson food Baseline intervention improved two
PhD environment - post parents showed nutrition-
Sarah and nutrition- intervention greater related
Friend related parent (12 months, improvement over behaviors.
MPH, RD and child 93% retention), time in scores of - Therefore it
Melissa personal and and follow-up self-efficacy for may inform
Horning behavioral (21 months, identifying the design of
PhD outcomes of 89% retention) appropriate future family
Colleen the Healthy data (surveys portion sizes, meal
Flattum MS, Home and dietary with significant interventions
RD Michelle Offerings via recalls) were differences in
Draxten the Mealtime collected. adjusted means at
MPH, RD Environment Participants/settin both post-
Dianne Plus program, g intervention
Neumark- the first - Children aged (P=0.002) and
Sztainer rigorously 8 to 12 years follow-up
PhD, RD tested family (N=160) and (P=0.01).
Olga meals their parents - Intervention
Gurvich intervention were children were less
MA targeting randomized to likely to consume
Ann childhood intervention at least one sugar-
Garwick obesity (n=81) or sweetened
PhD Mary prevention. control (n=79) beverage daily at
Story PhD, groups. post-intervention
RD Martha than control
Y. Kubik Intervention children (P=0.04).
PhD - five parent
goal-setting
calls.
- 10 monthly
sessions
delivered to
families in
community
settings that
 focused on
experiential
nutrition
activities and
education,
meal planning,
cooking skill
development,
and reducing
screen time.
-Analyses used
generalized linear
mixed models.
-Associations
between early
feeding practices,
such as
breastfeeding and
timing of
complementary
feeding, and fruit
and/or vegetable
intake in 2–4-y-old
children were
tested by using
logistic regressions

July 17, 2013 - to examine 4 European - Large differences in

Blandine de whether cohorts: early feeding
Lauzon- early - the British practices were
Guillain, feeding Avon highlighted across
Louise practices Longitudinal the 4 European
Jones, influence Study of cohorts with longer
Andreia later fruit Parents and breastfeeding
Oliveira, and Children duration in the
George vegetable (ALSPAC) Generation XXI Birth
Moschonis, intake in - the French Cohort and earlier
Aisha preschool Etude des introduction to
Betoko, children. Déterminants complementary
Carla pre et foods in ALSPAC.
Lopes, postnatals de la - Longer
Pedro santé et du breastfeeding
Moreira, développement duration was
Yannis de l'Enfant consistently related
Manios, study to higher fruit and
Nikolaos G - the Portuguese vegetable intake in
Papadopoul Generation XXI young children.
os, Pauline Birth Cohort - the associations
Emmett, - the Greek with age of
and Marie EuroPrevall introduction to fruit
Aline study. and vegetable
Charles Fruit and vegetable intake were weaker
intake was assessed and less consistent
in each cohort by across the cohorts.
food-frequency - Mothers’ fruit and
questionnaire. vegetable intake
(available in 3 of
the cohorts) did not
substantially
weaken the relation
with breastfeeding
duration.