Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
This paper presents the Philippine higher education system-its current trends and
developments. The following topics are discussed:
INTRODUCTION
Higher education is at the apex of the Philippine educational system. College students
enter higher education normally at the age of 16 to 18 years old. Students come from the
basic education level for about ten years to include six years of elementary education and
four years of secondary education.
2
FIGURE 1
The administration and supervision of the Philippine higher education rests on the
Commission on Higher Education or CHED as mandated by the Higher Education Act of
1994, while basic education is with the Department of Education or DepED as stipulated
in the TechVoc with TESDA and Basic Education Act of 2001.
FIGURE 2
Higher education institutions in the Philippines numbered one thousand seven hundred
and ten (1,710) distributed as follows: (a) state universities and colleges (SUCs) 110; (b)
local colleges and universities (LCUs) 70; (c) other government schools- 16; and (d)
private colleges and universities (PHEIs)-1,514.
State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) are funded by the national government and are
governed by their own charters. There are increasingly rising LCUs, whose funds are
coming from their local government and whose policies and programs are governed by
elected Local government officials.
SUCs charters ensure their autonomy and academic freedom. They are empowered to
develop their own curricula, introduce competitive institutional programs, and award
their own degrees. CHED ensures that SUCs adhere to the Higher Education
Modernization Act (Republic Act 8292), which provides among others, the uniform
composition of Governing Boards of SUCs with CHED as the Chairman.
3
PHEIs are owned and administered by private individuals, groups or organizations. They
are classified as sectarian and non-sectarian. Sectarian schools are usually non-stock,
non-profit educational institutions owned and operated by religious orders (Catholic and
Christian schools), while non-sectarian refers to those operated by private corporations,
which are not affiliated to any religious organizations. Majority of the non-sectarian
schools are stock corporations and only a few are non-stock, non-profit corporations,
while a number of them are registered as foundations.
Private higher education institutions experience some degree of freedom, only when their
programs are given CHED recognition and when they have attained accreditation by
FAAP. Recognition of academic programs is awarded to PHEIs who complied with the
minimum requirements prescribed by CHED. About eighty (80) PHEIs were granted
autonomous and deregulated status of the Commission.
The Commission on Higher Education is the governing body covering both public and
private higher education institutions as well as degree-granting programs in all tertiary
educational institutions in the Philippines. It was established in May 18, 1994 through
Republic Act 7722 or the Higher Education Act of 1994. The Commission, pursuant to its
Medium Term Higher Education Development and Investment Plan (MTHEDIP) 2001-
2004 and its successor, the Medium-Term Plan for the Development of Philippine Higher
Education (MTDPHE) 2005-2010 had set four (4) strategic goals for higher education in
the country, namely: quality and excellence, relevance and responsiveness, access and
equity, and efficiency and effectiveness.
4
2. Relevance and Responsiveness – Responding to the diverse needs of a dynamic
society; ensuring labor market responsiveness of higher education; strengthening the
research and extension functions of HEIs.
Major programs and projects are: national higher education research agenda (NHERA),
Republica Awards, curriculum re-engineering and development, integrated research
utilization program (IRUP), technology commercialization and corporatization, graduate
tracer studies (Project GTS), utilization of information and communication technology,
academe-industry linkages/summits, retooling and lifelong learning.
Major programs and projects are: prebaccalaureate bridging program (Project ENRICH),
strengthening outside learning programs, ladderization program, interfacing of TESDA
and CHED programs (EO 358), Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency and
Accreditation Program (ETEEAP, EO 330), student financial assistance programs
(scholarships, student loan schemes), transnational education.
Major programs and projects are: complementation and networking between and among
public and private HEIs, strengthening institutional capability, SUCs income generating
projects; normative financing in budget allocation, typology of HEIs, capability building
of CHED personnel, higher education development center (HEDC)
The Commission on Higher Education, since its establishment, has aspired to make
education in the Philippines global and at par with the educational standards of highly
industrialized countries. This it does by constantly reviewing the curricular offerings in
the various disciplines in an attempt to make these increasingly responsive to national
goals and the international quest for quality and relevance. Cross-border education has
developed recently with the advent of joint degrees, twinning and distance education. The
Commission supports and enhances these initiatives but without sacrificing the value-
dimension involved in these.
5
Higher education has always had an important international dimension, and all these
scientific and technological advances ushered in new modes of learning, greater mobility
and global competition creating a new world for learning and teaching.
Access
1. Executive Order 358 – Ladderized Education Program (LEP). Executive Order (EO)
358 “Institutionalizing a Ladderized Interface between Technical-Vocational Education
and Training (TVET) and Higher Education (HE)” stipulates that the unified and
articulation mechanism by Technical Education and Skills Development Authority
(TESDA) constitutes the following:
In the field of nursing a LADDERIZED education program means two (2) years of Tech-
Voc courses (e.g. care-giving etc) and then two (2) more years of Nursing Proper. In
Engineering, it is two (2) years of Tech-Voc (drafting, surveying) and three to four years
of Engineering Proper. In HRM, it is three years of Tech-Voc and one year to one-and-a-
half years of HRM Proper. Figure 2 presents illustration of ladderized scheme.
6
FIGURE 3
The Ladderized Education is a mechanism that allows students and workers progression
between technical vocational educational and training (TVET) and higher education (HEI)
or college and vice-versa.
The Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA) and the
Commission on Higher Education (CHED) in consultation with the concerned sectors
and stakeholders shall develop and implement a unified national qualifications
framework that establishes equivalency pathways and access ramps for a ladderized
system allowing for easier transitions and progressions between TVET and HE.
The framework shall include as far as practicable but no limited to, the following unified
qualification and articulation mechanisms: national system of credit transfer, post-TVET
bridging programs, and system of enhanced equivalency. Adoption of ladderized
curricula/programs, modularized program approach, competency-based programs,
network of dual-sector colleges or universities, accreditation recognition of prior learning.
7
Research and Development
Extension, Outreach and Linkages
Institutional Qualifications
Teacher Education 14 5 19
FIGURE 4
At present, there are 109 academic programs awarded as CHED COEs and CODs in the
fields of Science and Mathematics, Business and Management Education, Teacher
Education and Information Technology Education. These programs have proven
excellence in teaching, research and instructions all over the country. CHED has
awarded them with scholarship grants, faculty development programs, laboratory and
library upgrading and support for extension and instructional materials development.
The grant of autonomous and deregulated status to deserving private colleges and
universities is thus aimed at recognizing private HEIs that have consistently shown
exemplary performance in the provision of education, research and extension services, at
the same time rationalizing supervision of private HEIs through progressive deregulation.
8
4. Expanded Tertiary Education, Equivalency And Accreditation (ETEEAP)
Accreditation is a process for assessing and upgrading the educational quality of higher
education programs through self-evaluation and peer judgment. It leads to the grant of
accredited status by an accrediting agency and provides public recognition and
information on educational quality (CMO # 1 Series 2005)
9
5.1 Accreditation Levels [CHED Memorandum Order (CMO) # 1, Series 2005]
Candidate Status: for programs which have undergone a preliminary survey visit and are
certified by the federation/network as being capable of acquiring accredited status within
two years;
Level I accredited status: for programs which have been granted initial accreditation after
a formal survey by the accrediting agency and duly certified by the accreditation/network,
effective for a period of three years;
Level II re-accredited status: for programs which have been re-accredited by the
accrediting agency and duly certified by the accreditation federation/network, effective
for a period of three or five years based on the appraisal of the accrediting agency;
Level III re-accredited status: for programs which have been re-accredited and have met
the additional criteria/guidelines set by the federation/network for this level.
Only programs that have been granted “clean” re-accreditation, meaning that no
progress report or interim visit is required within the five-year accreditation period, may
apply for Level III status.
Level IV accredited status: accredited programs which are highly respected as very high
quality academic programs in the Philippines and with prestige and authority comparable
to similar programs in excellent foreign universities.
10
6. Institutional Monitoring And Evaluation For Quality Assurance (IQUAME)- CMO
# 15 Series of 2005 on May 25, 2005 institutionalized IQUAME as a monitoring and
assessment mechanism towards quality assurance of higher education institutions in their
entirety.
The overall approach to monitoring and evaluation is developmental. CHED will work
with institutions to assist them in strengthening their management of academic and
administrative processes so that they are better able to achieve their educational
objectives. Where there are serious weaknesses, or failures to comply with conditions
attached to permits or recognitions, CHED expects remedial action to be taken by higher
education institutions. Notwithstanding this, review teams will approach their
engagements with institutions in a spirit of cooperation, and with the intention of
supporting developments and strengthening academic management.
Based on the IQUAME assessment higher education institutions in the country may be
categorized into A(r), A(t), B or C.
Category A (r). These are institutions that undertake the full range of higher education
functions, including research. Such institutions undertake advanced and extensive
researches and will normally be evaluated against all the indicators in the framework.
11
To be placed in Category A (r) an institution would have to achieve scores of at
least 3 in 75% of the indicators against which it was assessed, no scores less than 2, and a
score of at least 3 in the research indicator.
Category A (t). These are institutions that have teaching as their core business. Although
faculty will keep up to date with developments in their discipline through their personal
study and scholarship. They will undertake other forms of advanced scholarships, the
results of which will often merit publication in refereed journals, in fields such as
professional practice and higher education pedagogy. They may undertake such activities
as extension and networking, and they may house centers of excellence or development.
Such institutions will be evaluated against all indicators except research capability.
Category B. This category contains institutions that are in a stage of development, and
which have the potential to be placed in one of the A categories at a future date. Usually,
they will undertake only those activities covered by the core indicators. As they mature,
they are likely to add activities covered by some of the other indicators; as they reach that
stage, they may qualify for one of the A categories. While in Category B, they will
normally be evaluated against the core indicators only.
12
Standards and Guidelines (PSG) for the Transnational Education (TNE), which was
issued by the Commission through a CMO No. 2, Series 2008. The policies and
guidelines of TNE defined the following: Scope, Extent of regulation, Procedures for
registration, Mechanics of recognizing foreign higher education providers and their
courses/programs offered in the country, and Mechanics of recognizing Philippine higher
education institutions engaged in transnational education.
7.1.a Distance Education – examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Partners enter into an equal relationship and deliver programs via distance
education, with both institutions awarding the credit or degree.
2. The program is offered directly by an awarding institution with no local
agent/franchisee/partner. The institution may be an FHEP with students in the
Philippines (IB1), or a Philippine HEI with students abroad (IB2).
3. A Philippine HEI uses programs/courses owned or created by a FHEP under a
license agreement. Credit is granted by the local HEI.
7.1.c Blended Learning – examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Partners enter into an equal relationship and deliver programs using blended
learning techniques, with both institutions awarding the credit or degree.
2. Conventional programs are offered transnationally by an FHEP with a local
branch in the Philippines (IIIB1), or a Philippine HEI with a foreign branch
(IIIB2), using a mix of face-to-face and distance education.
3. Conventional programs are offered by an FHEP thru a franchiser or a local
partner using a mix of face-to-face and distance education. Credit is granted
by the FHEP.
13
8. Academic Mobility - Academic exchanges between Philippines and foreign
universities have steadily increased over the last two decades. Philippine Higher
Education Guide (2000 and 2005) showed that most of the country’s COEs and CODs
participate actively in academic mobility programs. Majority of the students who
participate in exchange programs are in four courses: Science and Mathematics, Business
and Economics, Computer Sciences and Liberal Arts.
Faculty exchange program is also becoming popular. There are initiatives on visiting
professors, fellowships and sabbatical leave abroad. Majority of the college faculty
involved in mobility programs are specialists in International Studies, Science and
Technology, Engineering, Business Administration and Research.
Bilateral and multilateral agreements help facilitate the growth of academic mobility.
Some of these programs include the University Mobility in Asia and the Pacific (UMAP),
the Abroad in Komaba Program of the University of Tokyo, the Asia and the Pacific
Forum, the Global Youth Exchange Program, the ASEAN Ship for Southeast Asia, the
APEC Youth Network, and the Reciprocal Government of Canada Scholarship Program.
Please see Table 1 on Growth of Philippine Academic Mobility Programs in higher
education.
14