Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Bahjat R. J. Muhyedeen
Department of Chemistry, College of Science
University of Baghdad, Jadriyah, Baghdad, Iraq
Amman, Jordan, retired in August 2007, previously
Professor of Quantum and Nuclear Chemistry
E-mail: nucleardata@gmail.com
Abstract
The concept of conversion between mass and energy is discussed in chemical and
nuclear reactions to show it is incorrect and the annihilation reactions of electron-positron
are pseudo processes. A primitive nuclear model is suggested to focus on two main things,
the outer shells of the nucleus, which called electromagnetic belt and the inner nuclear
shells as a new hybrid model of Shell Model in addition to Quark Model. The nuclear
fusion reactions are discussed and showed to pass the fifth state of matter called nuclear
transparency then finally to the sixth state of matter of black hole.
The quantization of light by Planck is argued to be of waveform and not particle
form represented by photons. These discrete packets of energy are called frequentons.
A new non-relativistic mass-energy equivalence is derived as E=mbc, where b is a
derived universal constant and equal to 0.624942 x 108 m/s which gives
to E M = 1.87354 x1016 J / Kg or 1AMU= 194.177 MeV. The ratio of mbc/mc2 is
equal to (194.177) / (931.49) = 0.209 which gave 41.7 MeV for the Total Kinetic Energy
(TKE) of fission fragments of 29.4-37.8 MeV rather than 200 MeV given by E=mc2. Other
non-relativistic quantum equations are derived for high speed charged particles such as
P=mb, b=λυ, λ=h/mb, E=mvb and E=mb2.
1. Introduction
The physical concepts of mass and energy and their relation to the universe were continually changed
through the history since the philosophers of the Greek, Arab and china. But the most acceptable
definitions for mass and energy were translated into formula since Leibniz over the period 1676-1689.
The mass concept is usually related to the energy. The mass is a fundamental concept in chemistry and
it is a central concept of classical mechanics and related subjects. Although inertial mass (f=ma),
passive gravitational mass (f=Mg) and active gravitational mass are conceptually distinct, no
experiment has ever clearly demonstrated any difference between them. The concept of energy and its
transformations is extremely useful in explaining and predicting most natural phenomena. Energy
transformations in the universe over time are characterized by various kinds of potential energy which
On a Heuristic Viewpoints Concerning the Mass, Energy and Light Concepts in Quantum Physics 585
has been available since the Big Bang, later being released (i.e. transformed to more active types of
energy such as kinetic or radiant energy), when a triggering mechanism is available.
In the duration from 19th century to 20th century the concepts became more realistic for both
issues and a lot of scientists shared in crystallization of the concepts to understand deeply the secret of
the universe.
In the early 20th century the scientists started investigation the atom structure after the discovery
of the electron, theorized by G. Johnstone Stoney (1874) and discovered by J.J. Thomson (1897), the
proton theorized by William Prout (1815) and discovered by Ernest Rutherford (1919) and the neutron
discovered by James Chadwick (1932). The theoretical and experimental researches on the energy,
atom, waves and particles led to the branch of fundamental sciences that deals with atomic and
subatomic systems which we today call quantum mechanics. It is the basic mathematical framework of
many fields of physics and chemistry, including condensed matter physics, solid-state physics, atomic
physics, molecular physics, computational chemistry, quantum chemistry, particle physics, nuclear
physics, quantum chromodynamics and quantum gravity. The foundations of quantum mechanics were
established during the first half of the 20th century by Max Planck, Albert Einstein, Ernest Rutherford,
Niels Bohr, Louis de Broglie, Max Born, Werner Heisenberg, Erwin Schrödinger, John von Neumann,
Paul Dirac, Wolfgang Pauli and others.
The theoretical and experimental works in nuclear physics result in formation of Standard
Model (1970 to 1973) (Agrawal et al, 1998; Bromley, 2000; Kane, 1987). Although the Standard
Model well describes the elementary particles and composite particles, but it is still considered as a
provisional theory rather than a truly fundamental one. Many physicists find this model to be
unsatisfactory due to its many undermined parameters, many fundamental particles, the non-
observation of the Higgs boson and other more theoretical considerations such as the hierarchy
problem.
Therefore some new speculative theories beyond the Standard Model extruded attempts to
remedy these deficiencies. According to Preon Theory -coined by Jogesh Pati and Abdus Salam in
1974- (Pati and Salam, 1974; Dugne et al, 2002), there are one or more orders of particles more
fundamental than those found in the Standard Model called preons, which are derived from "pre-
quarks" which look like “particle zoo model” that came before it. The interest in preons has vanished
since the simplest models were experimentally ruled out in the 1980s.
The Grand unification Theory attempts to combine the electroweak interaction with the strong
interaction into a single 'grand unified theory' (GUT) (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2008). GUT predicts
that at extremely high energies (above 1014 GeV), the electromagnetic, weak nuclear, and strong
nuclear forces are fused into a single unified field (Parker, B 1993; Hawking S., 1988). Such a force
would be spontaneously broken into the three forces by a Higgs-like mechanism. However, the non-
observation of proton decay made it less important.
The Supersymmetry tried to extend the Standard Model by adding an additional class of
symmetries to the Lagrangian. These symmetries exchange fermionic particles with bosonic ones. In
other words, in a supersymmetric theory, for every type of boson there exists a corresponding type of
fermion, and vice-versa. Such symmetry predicts the existence of supersymmetric particles,
abbreviated as sparticles, which include the sleptons, squarks, neutralinos and charginos. But these
particles are so heavy that they need more experiments to be verified, (Baer and Xerxes, 2006). As of
2008 there is no direct evidence that supersymmetry is a symmetry of nature (Martin, 1999; Lykken,
1996; Drees, 1996; Bilal, 2001; Arygres, 2001).
String Theory is an incomplete mathematical approach to theoretical physics, whose building
blocks are one-dimensional extended objects called strings, rather than the zero-dimensional point
particles that form the basis for the standard model of particle physics, (Arygres, 2001; Cooper et al,
1995; Junker, 1996).
The string theory, mainly M-theory out of five string theories, suggest that all "particles" that
make up matter and energy are comprised of strings, measuring at the Planck length
586 Bahjat R. J. Muhyedeen
energies when they collide their electromagnetic fields will interfere in constructive way which results
in producing radiation.
When these particles are accelerated toward each others they will gain kinetic energies plus a
high electromagnetic energy because these are moving charged particles. At collision, an elastic
scattering occurs under the laws of conservations in addition to happening of two events, first a
collision radiation due to the thermal impact of their high kinetic energies which stopped through a
sudden clash, second, the interference of their electromagnetic fields which result in the emission of
radiation appearing as a spark of light. What they gained through acceleration they will lose during
impact. No mass-energy conversion. If these processes are real annihilation, then matter will be lost
and the universe will be in a great disaster.
will try to give detailed picture showing how the nuclear reaction energy is based on pure binding
energy, and not on converting some mass of baryons to binding energy, which is similar to electron
atomic orbital energy. The primordial binding energies came from the big bang and later star nuclear
reactions. We will discuss our sun fusion reaction as a sample: The nuclear shells have similar
behaviour to the atomic electron shells in which the lower shells are of high energy (as in 2D, 3T, 4He)
and the higher shells are of low energy (as in 235U, 239Pu). The electromagnetic belt of the small nuclei
is more dens and more Coulumbic than in the larger one. I think that the profound understanding of
unfathomable coulomb barrier surround the nucleus is very important. Why this coulomb barrier is
strong in small nuclei and weak in bigger one? If it is really coulomb in nature then the uranium-235
nucleus, as an example, should have most strong barrier than helium-4.
reaction occurred at region place little far from the sun core (i.e. in the circumferences of the core
region) which release high energies. This phase may be representing a fifth state of matter beyond
plasma (meta-plasma in which the electrons are free) in which protons and neutrons are moving more
freely in their nuclei. This phase may be called “Nuclear Transparency” which endures extra super
high temperature and pressure and electromagnetic field. In such Nuclear Transparency phase there is
good probability to build the more stable nuclei of magic number in the sun core such as Fe, Ni, O, Si,
S, Mg, C, Ne, Ca, and Cr and even higher nuclides (actinides). The fifth state may be responsible for
the state of hydrostatic equilibrium, neither contracting nor expanding over time.
VI- In the deep core of the sun and stars, the nuclei become completely bare of electromagnetic
belt and the nucleons become free of their nuclei after passing the Nuclear Transparency phase. In this
region the nucleons of all types analyses to their elementary particles and magnetic sub-quarks,
magnetons, and start getting cold because no heat can pass or be emitted due to absence of the atomic
orbitals and become more dense than the nuclei density and of high magnetic property and they bind
each other through a very strong nuclear forces.
This region may be born in the core of the sun and it moves up toward the surface as “cold”
mass so called a sunspot. These sunspots collect together through a million of years to form a black
hole state and this state of matter may be called the sixth state of matter. The black hole is the original
region for creation of elements and then the compounds in the universe. When the star gets old it starts
losing its gases and the plasma region will evaporate leaving the cold and magnetic black hole alone.
The number of black holes is an indicative for the age of the star. The end life of any star is a black
hole. If a big mass of hydrogen gas will strike the black hole it will ignite it again to create a new star
and so on.
This phase -Black hole- is beyond the meta- Nuclear Transparency and looks like the results
announced by CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research) that they discovered a "new state
of matter" in 2000” which called quark-gluon plasma, it is a phase of quantum chromodynamics,
which exists at extremely high temperature and/or density and consists of (almost) free quarks and
gluons which are the basic building blocks of matter.
I can say the CERN quark-gluon plasma state is a transition state between Nuclear
Transparency and the black hole sixth state of matter.
VII- I suggest to the workers in nuclear research laboratories, to try to get a controlling fusion
reaction, through main three setting 1- high force of electromagnetic field; 2- high pressure; 3- flash of
high temperature, on Deuterium and Tritium nuclei to make their electromagnetic belt more loose in
term of picoseconds to reach the Nuclear Transparency phase and get a controlled fusion reaction
through controlling the force of the electromagnetic field taking into consideration of Lawson
criterion (Lawson, 1957). The trials should go farther than tokamaks and stellarators technology (as in
Torsatron, Heliotron and Helias). The weakness point in stellarator technology is the luck of high
pressure. The used technology in magnetic confinement fusion and inertial confinement fusion are
usually using only two of the three setting mentioned above that lessen their efficiency. But, generally,
the magnetic field is more important than the pressure therefore, as I expect, the future of magnetic
confinement fusion technology is more promising than the inertial confinement fusion. The magnetic
field is very necessary to loosen the electromagnetic belts which help the nuclei to get into Nuclear
Transparency to undergo fusion reactions.
In conclusion, the nuclei in the universe have been built in the Nuclear Transparency phase and
huge binding energies are saved in the nuclei and these energies librated during the nuclear processes
and the conservons will keep the law of conservations. The same thing happens to nuclear fission and
decay processes and no mass will convert to energy or vice versa.
590 Bahjat R. J. Muhyedeen
1
From a particle theory point of view, René Descartes (1596-1650) declared that light was a disturbance of the plenum, the continuous substance of
which the universe was composed. Pierre Gassendi (1592-1655), an atomist, proposed a particle theory of light which was published posthumously
in the 1660s. Isaac Newton studied Gassendi's work at an early age, and preferred his view to Descartes' theory of the plenum. He stated in his
Hypothesis of Light of 1675 that light was composed of corpuscles (particles of matter).
From a wave theory point of view, Robert Hooke published a wave theory of light in 1660s. Christiaan Huygens worked out his own wave
theory of light in 1678, and published it in his Treatise on light in 1690. He proposed that light was emitted in all directions as a series of waves in a
medium called the luminiferous ether. As waves are not affected by gravity, it was assumed that they slowed down upon entering a denser medium.
On a Heuristic Viewpoints Concerning the Mass, Energy and Light Concepts in Quantum Physics 591
(energy), the molecule can, rotate, translate, vibrate, and undergo electronic transition which leads to
full a spectrum due to the electronic, vibrational and rotational energies of the molecules.
Finally, I can say that the electromagnetic spectrum is a pure wave and does not have dual
character like electrons and any small charged particles.
The quantum defects and other parameters (effective Z and N) were treated (Muhyedeen, Al-
Thib and Derwish, 1993) and more accurate data than those of Slater and Clementi were calculated and
extended to radon.
Starting from black body treatment of Max Planck (Planck, 1901), we realize that the emission
of electromagnetic radiation from the black body is depend and on the temperature which also
determines the frequency of the emitted radiation.
If we used the two universal constantly of Max Planck (hPlanck= 6.62606896*10-34 J.sec),
(kPlanck= 1.429*10-23 J/deg) (in oK) we can see that the energy can be given from these two constants;
E=hPlanckν and E=kPlanckT. Please note that this constant is also known as Boltzmann2. The success of
Max Planck treatment which results in finding the two constants hPlanck and kPlanck was based on three
assumptions that the energy is quantized; the temperature is in Kelvin and the wavelength at its max
value. These assumptions and in addition to some theorem and some experimental values led him to a
historical success of black body radiation.
Now, we have to use the same three assumptions to find the new converting factor (mass-
energy equivalence formula). If we start from the relation between the temperature of the black body
radiation and the energy through the second constant KPlanck we will get the following equation:
E=KPlanck Tblackbody (1)
Here the value of Tblackbody should be one Kelvin. During the black body radiation treatment,
this temperature is well related with the wavelength of electromagnetic radiation. The most genuine
relation between Tblackbody and λmax is coming from Wien’s displacement law (Mehra,1982) which
states that there is an inverse relationship between the wavelength of the peak of the emission of black
body and its temperature as follow:
b
λmax = (2)
Tbalckbody
Where:
λmax is the peak wavelength in meter
T is the temperature of the blackbody in Kelvin’s (oK), and
b is a constant of proportionality, called Wien’s displacement constant and equals
2.8977685(51)x10-3 meter* Kelvin 3;
Hence we have;
2.8977685 * 10 -3 m ∗ o K
λmax =
T oK ( ) (3)
or
2.8977685 * 10 -3 m ∗ o K
( )
T K =o
λmax (4)
Now, if substitute equation .4 into 1 at one Kelvin due to Max Planck assumptions, we get;
2
Of course, the KPlanck constant is calculated by Max Planck through his treatment of black body radiation when he used the entropy equation as
appeared in his reprint in item 2 eq=3”
§2. We now set the entropy SN of the system proportional to the logarithm of its probability W, within an arbitrary additive constant, so that the N
resonators together have the energy EN:
(#3) SN = k log W + constant
And in item 11, in eq. no. 14 he related both h and k as appeared in his reprint” “(14) k4/h4 = 1.1682 *1015”.
And in item 12, he related both h and k in another formula as appeared in his reprint” h/k=(4.9561*0.294)/3.1010=4.866x10-11
In the literature, this KB is called Boltzmann constant (which given by R/Na or It is the gas constant divided by the Avogadro constant), and this
equation SN = k log W + constant is called Boltzmann equation.
My comment is that, Planck reached this formula and calculated the k constant with h constant. Of courses, Planck mentioned in his paper that
such expression used by L. Boltzmann for a similar idea.
3
Of course, the b is a constant of proportionality, called Wien’s displacement constant and equals 2.8977685(51) x10-3 meter* Kelvin, which can be
given by (hc/k)/4.965114. If you use these constants (hc/k) directly and not from b constant, then you will get a similar formula, E=(1/4.965114)*mc2
or E=0.20846*mc2.
On a Heuristic Viewpoints Concerning the Mass, Energy and Light Concepts in Quantum Physics 595
2.8977685 * 10 -3 m
E = K Planck * (5)
λmax
Now, what we search is to find a mass-energy equivalence formula that relates between the
mass of any particle and its energy and this may be done through the wavelength of the blackbody
radiation which gives the emission spectra of the excited moving electrons. We can use the mass of any
fundamental particles which move in high velocity and has a dual character such as electron. The sole
relationship between m and λ is coming from De Broglie (De Broglie, 1924) expression which relates
the wavelength and the momentum of these particles through Planck constant, hPlanck. So, we can write
p = hPlanck / λmax (6)
Or
hPlanck
λmax = (7)
P
The momentum of the high speed particle which moves near velocity of light can be given by
the following equation;
p=mc (8)
Where:
m is the mass of the particle, and;
c is the velocity of light equals to 2.99792*108 m/s
We now substitute the value of momentum P from equation 8 into the wavelength of the black
body in equation 7;
hPlanck
λmax = (9)
mc
And by substituting the value of the wavelength by its corresponding momentum from equation
9 into equation no.5, we get;
2.8977685 * 10 -3 m
E = K Planck * * mc (10)
hPlanck
Or
1.429 *10 -23 J/deg 2.8977685 * 10 -3 m
E= * * mc (11)
6.62606896 *10 -34 J.sec
Or
E = 0.624942362 x108 * mc (12)
This equation may be rewrite as a general formula as E=(mb)c or as follow:
E=mbc (13)
b is universal constant and equals to 0.624942362 x 108 m/s which may represent the optimum speed
for electrons or any light charged particle.
Now, we can write the mass-energy equivalent as follow:
E
= 0.624942362 x108 * c (14)
m
The mass-energy equivalence will gets its final value if we substitute for the velocity of light
2.99792*108 m/s, as follow:
E
= 1.87354 x1016 J / Kg (15)
m
596 Bahjat R. J. Muhyedeen
For one atomic unit, amu, the mass-energy equivalent is calculated as follow:
1amu = (1.66054 *10-27 kg)* 1.87354*1016 J/kg (16)
1amu = 3.111*10-11 J (17)
The equivalent energy to one amu in MeV is calculated as follow:
1 amu (in MeV) = 3.111*10-11 J * MeV/ 1.60218*10-13 J (18)
Or
1 amu = (194.177) MeV (19)
If we relate our value of the mass-energy equivalence in MeV with that of Einstein then we get
the following; the ratio of mbc /mc2 is equal to (194.177 MeV/ 931.49 MeV) = 0.20846
Let us now test our mass-energy equivalent of (E/m) from our equation E=mbc in relation to
the speculative equation of Einstein E=mc2 in the calculation of the energy released from nuclear
fission where the Einstein equation E=mc2 overestimated the Q-value.
In laboratory it is confirmed (Hambsch,1989; Thiereus, 1981) that using thermal neutrons the
Total Kinetic Energy (TKE) of fission fragments (of the mass=3.55x10-28Kg) that results from of U-
235 and Pu-239 is 20-60MeV less than Q-value of reaction predicted by Einstein’s equation E=mc2
(200MeV for U-235). These observations are more than three decades old (Bakhoum, 2002). Some
alternate suggestions have been made to explain the total kinetic energy of fission fragments by
extending the successful Liquid-Drop Model of Bohr and Wheeler (Straede, 1987; Wilkins, 1976).
Bakhoum has attempted to explain the same with Wave Mechanical equation E=mv2 (Bakhoum,
2002). Let the TKE of fission fragments is 175MeV (as experimentally it is observed less), instead of
expected 200MeV.
The Experimental Vlaue From Our Equation From E=mc2 From E=mv2 From Gaussian graph
(Hambsch,1989;Thiereus, 1981) E=mbc (Einstein,1905) (Bakhoum,2002)
scaled-values 29.4-37.8 MeV 41.7 MeV 200 MeV 175 MeV
which can be applied for light particles such as electron, muon and neutrino and others.
Consequently, for the momentum, P, value for electron in excited atomic orbital or in Beta
decay from nucleus can be calculated from the following:
P=bme, me=9.109x10-31 Kg
P=0.624942362 x 108 m/s x 9.109x10-31 Kg
P=5.692599975458x 10-23 Kg m/s
The wavelength of the electron of excited atomic orbital or Beta decay can be calculated from b
constant.
h
λ= = 1.164x10-11m
Bm
The frequency of the electron is given by:
E MBC
υ= = =25.7736 x 10-18 Hz
h h
The energy of beta decay may be calculated from E=mbc directly as follow:
E=mbc = 1.704375 x10-14 J or E= 0.107 MeV
The remainder of the beta energy will appear as excess energy of the neutrino. The energy
equation E=hυ=hb/λ can be used in particles physics for heavy particles more than alpha based on its
speed. The speed should be near the b-value. For the heavy charged particles the formula E=mvb can
be used in estimation of its velocity.
components are loosely bound and free to endure a nuclear reaction due to the weakness of the
electromagnetic belt. The sixth state represent the black hole structure in which there are no nuclei
identities but only elementary particles that combined with very strong nuclear forces. This state
represents the basic building blocks of matter.
I discussed the nature of light and I explained it is composed of wave discrete packets of
"frequentons " to differentiate them from discrete packets of photons of particle nature. I concluded
that light is not of dual character.
I also explained both the photoelectric effect and Compton’s effect based on the new wave
concept of light represented by frequentons. I maintained that moving charged particles are dual in
nature due to their charge and its inherent electromagnetic field. I also maintained that the radiating
body will not lose any mass.
Finally, I derived a simple semi-empirical formula for non-relativistic mass-energy equivalence
E=mbc, where b is universal constant in term of speed units and equals to 0.624942362 x 108 m/s. This
constant is equal to 0.2085 of speed of light. In my opinion that this constant represents the optimum
speed to be reached by the moving charged particles. If this fact is proved experimentally then the
Lorentz factor will be of low values that in turn will decrease the relativity idea of relative mass, time
dilation, length contraction and other ideas of relativity. Finally, we can use this constant to relate the
wavelength and the frequency of the elementary particles in such that b=λυ. Other non-relativistic
quantum equation are derived for high speed charged particles such as p=mb, λ=h/mb, E=hb/λ, E=mb2,
E=mvb and E=mbc. I believe that this b constant is not less importance in non- relativistic quantum
mechanic than Planck constant h.
Acknowledgement
The author is highly indebted to Professor Dr. G. A. W. Derwish for his valuable and fruitful
discussions, suggestion and comments.
On a Heuristic Viewpoints Concerning the Mass, Energy and Light Concepts in Quantum Physics 599
References
[1] Agrawal V., S.M. Barr, J.F. Donoghue, D. Seckel, 1998. "The anthropic principle and the mass
scale of the Standard Model". Physical Review D 57 (9), pp. 5480 – 5492.
[2] Arygres P., 2001. “An Introduction to Global Supersymmetry”
[3] Baer H. and T. Xerxes, 2006. “Weak Scale Supersymmetry”, Cambridge University Press.
[4] Bakhoum, E. G., 2002. Physics Essays, 15, 1 (Preprint archive: physics/0206061).
[5] Bartocci, U. Albert Einstein e Olinto De Pretto, 1999. “la vera storia della formula pi`u famosa
del mondo” (Ed. Andromeda, Bologna).
[6] Bilal A., 2001. “Introduction to Supersymmetry”.
[7] Boltzmann L., 1877. Proceedings of imperial Academy of Science, Vienna, (II) 76, pp. 428.
[8] Bohr N., 1913. “On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules”, Philosophical Magazine, Series
6, 26. pp. 1-25.
[9] Bromley D. A., 2000. “Gauge Theory of Weak Interactions”, Springer. ISBN 3-540-67672-4
[10] Clementi, E. and D.L. Raimondi, 1963. J. Chem. Phys., 38, pp. 2686.
[11] Clementi, E., D.L. Raimondi, and W.P. Reinhardt, 1967. J. Chem. Phys., 47, pp. 1300.
[12] Cohen, A. B., 1971. “Concepts of Nuclear Physics”, McGraw-Hill. Chap 4.
[13] Compton Arthur H., 1923. “ A Quantum Theory of the Scattering of X-Rays by Light
Elements”, Physical Review.
[14] Cooper, F., A. Khare and U. Sukhatme, 1995. "Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics”. Phys.
Rep. 251, pp. 267-85.
[15] Davisson C.,1965. "The Discovery of Electron Waves", Nobel Lectures, Physics 1922-1941.
Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Company. Retrieved on 2007-09-17.
[16] Davisson C.,1937. Nobel Foundation. " The Nobel Prize in Physics 1937". Les Prix Nobel.
Retrieved on 2007-09-17.
[17] Drees M., 1996. “An Introduction to Supersymmetry”.
[18] De Broglie L., 1924. “Recherches sur la théorie des quanta” (Researches on the quantum
theory), Thesis, Paris.
[19] Dugne, J.-J.; Fredriksson, S.; and Hansson, J.; Preon Trinity, 2002. “A Schematic Model of
Leptons, Quarks and Heavy Vector Bosons”, Europhys. Lett., 57, pp. 188.
[20] Eidelman S. et al, 2004. “Particle data group: the quark model”, Physics Letters B 592, pp. 1.
[21] Einstein, A., 1905. Annalen der Physik 18, pp. 639.
[22] Encyclopedia Britannica, 2008 Grand unified theory (GUT), Ultimate Reference Suite.
Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
[23] Fernbach S., R. Serber, and T.B. Tayler, 1949. “The Scattering of High-Energy
[24] Neutrons by Nuclei”, Phys. Rev. 75, pp.1352.
[25] Freedman R. and, H.Young, 2004, “University Physics with Modern Physics”, 11th
international edition, Sears and Zemansky, 1633-4. ISBN 0-8053-8768-4.
[26] Georgi H., “Lie algebras in particle physics”, Addison-Wesley Longman, ISBN 0-7382-0233-9.
[27] Goodman, J. W., 1996. “Introduction to Fourier optics”, New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-
024254-2.
[28] Hambsch, F.J. et al., 1989. Nucl. Phys. A, 491, pp. 56.
[29] Hawking S., 1988. “A Brief History of Time”.
[30] Hertz H.R.,1887 May. "Ueber sehr schnelle electrische Schwingingungen", Annalen der
Physik,2, 31, pp. 421.
[31] Hertz H.R.,1888 March. "Ueber Einwirkung einer geradlinigen electrische Schwingingung",
Annalen der Physik, 2, 34, pp. 155.
[32] Hertz, H.R.,1888 May. "Ueber Ausbreitungsgeschwindigkeit der electrodynamische", Annalen
der Physik, 2, 34, pp. 551.
[33] Heisenberg W., 1927. "Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und
Mechanik", Zeitschrift für Physik, 43, pp. 172-198.
600 Bahjat R. J. Muhyedeen
[34] Junker, G., 1996. “Supersymmetric Methods in Quantum and Statistical Physics”, Springer-
Verlag.
[35] Kane G. L., 1987. “Modern Elementary Particle Physics”, Perseus Books, ISBN 0-201-11749-
5.
[36] Lykken J. D., 1996. “Introduction to Supersymmetry”.
[37] Lawson J. D. 1957. Proceedings of the Physical Society B, Vol. 70, pp. 6.
[38] Martin S., 1999. “A Supersymmetry Primer”.
[39] Maxwell J. M., 1861. “On Physical Lines of Force”.
[40] Maxwell J. M., 1865. “A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field”.
[41] Mehra, J. and H. Rechenberg, 1982. "The Historical Development of Quantum Theory",
Volume 1 Chapter 1, Springer.
[42] Muhyedeen B. R. J., A. T. Al- Thib, and G. A. W. Derwish, 1993. Iraqi J. Chem., 11, 3.
[43] Newton, Sir Isaac, 1704. “Opticks”, pp. CVX, (reprinted by Dover Publications, Inc., New
York, (1952).
[44] Ohrl H and Wien F. Sitzungen, 1904. F. Ann. der Phys. IIA, 113, pp. 1039; Ohrl H., 1905. F.
Ann. der Phys. 16, pp. 589.
[45] Oberst H., D. Kouznetsov, K. Shimizu, J. Fujita, F. Shimizu, 2005. “Fresnel diffraction mirror
for atomic wave”, Physical Review Letters, 94, pp. 013203.
[46] Parker B., 1993. “Overcoming some of the problems”, pp. 259-279.
[47] Pati, J. C. and A. Salam, 1974. “Lepton number as the fourth "color", Phys. Rev. D10, pp. 275-
289.
[48] Planck M. 1901. ”On the Law of Distribution of Energy in the Normal Spectrum”, Annalen der
Physik, 4, pp. 553.
[49] Planck M., 1908. Ann. Phys. 26, pp. 1.
[50] Planck, M, 1907. Sitz. der preuss. Akad.Wiss., Physik. Math. Klasse 13 (June).
[51] Poincar´e J.H., 1900. Arch. neerland. sci., 2, 5, pp. 232.
[52] Poincar´e J.H., 1900. In Boscha, pp. 252.
[53] Preston S. T., 1875. “Physics of the Ether”, E. & F. N. Spon, London; see also,
http://itis.volta.alessandria.it/episteme/ep6/ep6-bjerk1.htm
[54] Pretto O. De, 1904. “Ipotesi dell’etere nella vita dell’universo”, Reale Istituto Veneto di
Scienze, Lettere ed Arti, Feb. 1904, tomo LXIII, parte II, pp. 439-500.
[55] Rohlf, J. W., 1994. “Modern Physics from a to Z0”, Wiley.
[56] Rutherford E., 1904. “ Radio-activity, 2nd ed. (1905), ISBN 978-1-60355-058-1
[57] Rutherford E., 1906. “Radioactive Transformations”, ISBN 978-160355-054-3
[58] Rutherford E., 1904. “Radiations from Radioactive Substances”.
[59] Rutherford E., 1926. “The Electrical Structure of Matter”.
[60] Rutherford E., 1933. “The Artificial Transmutation of the Elements”.
[61] Schrödinger E. 1926. "An Undulatory Theory of the Mechanics of Atoms and Molecules".
Phys. Rev. 28, 6, pp. 1049–1070. doi:10.1103/ Phys Rev. 28. pp. 1049.
[62] Schrödinger E. 1926. Annalen der Physik, (Leipzig), Main paper
[63] Schwarz P., 1998. “The Official String Theory Web Site”. Retrieved on December 16, 2005,
March, 2008.
[64] Singer C., 1941. “A Short History of Science to the Nineteenth Century, Clarendon Press, pp.
217.
[65] Soddy F, 1904. “Radioactivity: An Elementary Treatise from Standpoint of the Disintegration
Theory” (“The Electrician “Printing and Publishing, London),
[66] Slater J. C., 1960. “Quantum Theory of Atomic Structure", Volumes I & II McGraw-Hill, N.Y.
[67] Straede C. et al, 1987. Nucl. Phys. A. 462, pp. 85.
[68] Thiereus H. et al, 1981. Phys. Rev. C, 23, pp. 2104.
On a Heuristic Viewpoints Concerning the Mass, Energy and Light Concepts in Quantum Physics 601
[69] Troost J., 2002. “Beyond String Theory”. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Theoretical Physics
(TENA). Retrieved on December 16, 2005. – An ongoing project by a string physicist, working
for the French CNRS.
[70] The Life of Godfrey William von Leibnitz Full text of John M. Mackie's 1845 biography of
Leibniz from Google Books.
[71] Wilkins B. D et al, 1976. Phys. Rev. C. 14, pp.1832.
[72] Witten E., 1998. “Duality, Spacetime and Quantum Mechanics”, Kavli Institute for Theoretical
Physics. Retrieved on December 16, 2005.