Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Samantha Moussari
QI Project
In the intensive care unit setting, mobility is a struggle for the patient and caregiver.
Intensive care unit patients are often on ventilators or other critical equipment that puts them at
risk for bed rest leading to decreased mobility. According to the journal of Critical Care
Medicine, evidence demonstrates that after 48 hours of being on a ventilator, 39% of patients are
unable to walk & 34% need assistance with walking (Bailey & Miller, 2009). The short time
frame of 48 hours illuminates the severity of the results and indicates that there needs to be a
change in practice for the critically ill population. According to the journal of Cardiopulmonary
Physical Therapy, the lack of mobility leads to “severe weakness, deficits in self-care and
ambulation, poor quality of life, hospital readmission, and death have all been reported in
patients up to 5 years after discharge from the ICU ” (Alder & Malone, 2012, p. 5). Although it
is recognizable that there is a safety concern for mobilizing critical care patients, the devastating
outcomes occurring require the immediate attention of nurses and other staff members working
awareness in critical care, servant leaders need to understand and be cognizant of the four
domains of leading like Jesus. The four domains include: heart, head, hands, and habits. Servant
leaders, such as nursing managers, must be aware of their internal domains and external
domains. According to Blanchard and Hodges, internal domains are the “motivations of your
ICU Mobility Quality Improvement 3
heart and the leadership perspectives of your head” (2008, p. 31). Blanchard and Hodges explain
that the external domains are your “public leadership behavior, or hands, and your habits as
experienced by others,” which will determine your following (2008, p. 31). The five practices of
exemplary leadership include: model the way, inspire a shared vision, challenge the process,
enable others to act, and encourage the heart. It is essential for nursing managers to recognize
how they can implement this into their servant leadership style.
recognize that the success of this type of quality improvement stems from the motivation behind
it. The intent to succeed with this quality improvement project would be for the patients and not
for my personal self-satisfaction. A motto to be instilled in all unit members would be “life is
about what you give rather than what you get” (Blanchard & Hodges, 2008, p. 40). This motto
would be overly emphasized on the intensive care unit with the hope that nurses are constantly
reminded, especially during hard times, why they are serving the patient population that they are.
Additionally as a nurse manager I would assess the motivation of the team that will be working
towards early mobility. Establishing a common motivation will foster collaboration throughout
the unit. Ensuring that there is trust amongst coworkers, enable others to act because they are
assured that they are supported. I recognize that in order to enhance patient outcomes, there
The head domain for leading like Jesus examines beliefs and theories, which lead the
motivation for the objective (Blanchard & Hodges, 2008). In this instance, early mobility is the
objective and the motivation is guided by ones beliefs and supporting evidence. I as a servant
leader will inspire a shared vision. I would do this by creating a vision and plan for how patient
outcomes can be better achieved with early mobility. This act as nurse manager would be
recognized as a visionary role. Secondly, I would get engaged with the implementation role and I
hospital values so that employees recognize the importance of enhancing patient outcomes; such
as increasing mobility. As a nurse manager I can model the way by integrating these values and
beliefs into the quality improvement project. Every quality improvement project starts with a
Hands are the actions of the servant leader (Blanchard & Hodges, 2008). As a nurse
manager I would implement in the following ways. For starters, I would perform morning rounds
on the nurses and their patients about their plan for mobility. This would assess the nurse’s
willingness and their plan for the patient. Secondly, during patient rounds I would question the
mobility progress and initiative to further the next steps. This brings mobility awareness to all
interdisciplinary team members on a daily basis. Thirdly, I would go to education councils on the
hospital board and I would educate nurses about the current evidence that is out there. Having a
purpose and a plan will allow the goal to be better controlled and more likely attained.
Challenging the process is how change is brought about. All good change that comes about in
ICU Mobility Quality Improvement 5
hospitals is once challenged and therefore the staff and servant leader need to be persistent for
Habits are how a nurse manager renews the daily goal (Blanchard & Hodges, 2008). As a
nurse manager I would do this by repeating the mobility mission daily in rounds and when
meeting with nurses. The repetition will hopefully make the practice of mobilizing patients a
more standard part of practice. When new practices are brought about in a hospital, many people
are frightened and do not like change, but eventually the change occurs due to persistence. As a
servant leader I will encourage the heart by acknowledgement of staff work ethic towards the
goal. As a nurse manager I could encourage the heart effectively by being clear about the
expectations for early patient mobility. With daily positive reinforcement and constructive
Increasing patient mobility in the critical care units will enhance patient outcomes and
increase staff trust and collaboration. According to the journal of Cardiopulmonary Physical
therapy, functional mobility is enhanced through occupational therapy and physical therapy
(Alder & Malone, 2012). Nursing practice in critical care can be changed because instead of
allowing patients to be continually on bed rest, staff can take the initiative to assist the patients
towards a more progressive care. Trust and collaboration will be fostered because “successful
implementation of early mobilization requires a change in ICU culture” (Bailey & Miller, 2009,
p. 433). A change in culture takes an entire unit. In addition to the nurses implanting the change,
ICU Mobility Quality Improvement 6
that matches all members’ motives, transformation in the critical care population can be made in
professional practice.
Outcomes Evaluation
Although it is recognized in research that some patients cannot benefit from early
mobility, there are patients that benefit. On the intensive care unit at St. Mary’s hospital the
quality improvement project is in action and is being taken serious by the servant leader and
many of the staff members. The progress on the unit is small but recognizable. For example, one
patient that was vented with a tracheostomy was put into a recliner but could only withstand the
chair for 30 minutes. The following day the patient stayed in the chair longer and the day after
that the patient had no issues staying in the chair. For the patients that can withstand the change,
it is our job to provide our patients with the chance to progress. Furthermore, by servant leaders
following the four domains of leadership and utilizing exemplary leadership there is an increased
References
Adler, J., & Malone, D. (2012). Early Mobilization in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic
Bailey, P. P., Miller, R. R., & Clemmer, T. (2009). Culture of early mobility in mechanically
S435.
Blanchard, K., & Hodges, P. (2008). Lead like Jesus: Lessons for everyone from the greatest