Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Frank Stanish
Severn Trent Services, Inc.
Background on arsenic
Arsenic Toxicity
Sources of arsenic
Arsenic in Water
Arsenic Regulations
Arsenic Treatment Methods
Case Study Problem and Solution:
Hilltown Township Arsenic Removal Project
Frequently Asked Questions
Loma Linda, CA
Four 14’-Ø Adsorbers
3,000 gpm
35
30
25
A v erage In flu en t
Arsenic, ppb
20
W R T Z33
G FH
S o lm etex A sX n p
15
B ayo x id e E 3 3
10
0
0 1 0 ,0 0 0 2 0 ,0 0 0 3 0 ,0 0 0 4 0 ,0 0 0 5 0 ,0 0 0 6 0 ,0 0 0
B ed V o lu m es
Influent As
Concentration (μg/L)
30
20
10 As MCL
Treated
Water As As Breakthrough
0
0 25,000 50,000 75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000
Time (based on 75% Use Factor): 6 Mos 12 Mos 18 Mos
Severn Trent Services 13
Bed Volumes of Water Treated (BV’s)
On-site Pilot Test Program
Program Scope PG
P-01
Test Protocol
S-06
Vent
V-11
E33 Feed
Media P-01
S-08
Backwash
Simple Instruments
P-02
FI/FQI
P-02
Consistent Water Supply FQI FI P-03
PDI
Effluent/Media Backwash
E33
Weekly Sampling
P-09
GFO
Media
Pres Reg’r
Treated Water
Sample
/Drain
Coagulation / Filtration
Iron Removal
Removes Fe and Mn
Removal As/Fe/Mn
Needs high Iron level
Fe:As - 25:1 or better
As/Fe/Mn or Fe/Mn
Catalyze the Fe and Mn in
an oxidation/precipitation
process
Coagulation / Filtration of Fe
oxide & Mn oxide
Ferric chloride addition if
needed
As adsorbed by Fe oxide
Backwash
eductors
T: +1 215 859-3814
E: glohse@stservices.com
www.severntrentservices.com