Water Tank

UNIVERSITY OF BATANGAS
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN OF

ELEVATED WATER TANK
SUBMITTED BY:
CALANGI, VERONA G.
ORLINA, AVEGAIL V.
SANDOVAL, MARLON L.
SUBMITTED TO:
ENGR. JAKE MARAMOT
OCTOBER 16, 2015
Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Telephone Numbers: +63 43 723 1446 | 980 0041
Website: www.ub.edu.ph
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
Table of Contents
Perspective
Tank Elevation
Column - Intermediate – Gusset Plate Connection
Strut – Gusset Plate Connection
Base Plate and Anchor Bolt Detail
Properties of Structural Members
Water Tank Dimensions
Computation of Volume
Design Loadings
Load Analysis
Wind Load
Seismic Load
Portal Analysis
Design Analysis
Load Combinations
Column
Gusset – Plate
Strut
Base Plates
Anchor Bolts
Web Connection between Column and Gusset Plate
Web Connection between Gusset Plate and Strut

COMPUTATION FOR THE CAPACITY AND HEIGHT OF THE WATER TANK
Typical water consumption per month= 18m3

18m3
Water consumption per week = 30 days x 7days= 4.2m3 per week
Water consumption of 25 residence per week= 25x4.2m3= 105m3
Use total volume, Vt= 105m3
DEAD LOAD ANALYSIS

wWater=ɣwvw
wWater = (9.81)(37.5)
wWater = 367.875 kN
wTank= ɣsvs
ATotal=ACylinder+ PCylinder+ ASphere+ PSphere

ATotal =2πr(r+h)+ 2πrh+ 2πr
1
ATotal=2π(3)(1.8 + 4.7) +2(2)[ 2π(1.8)(1.65)+ 2π(1.8)]
ATotal= 152.493 m2
VT= ATt
VT=152.493(0.005) πd2
VT= 0.7625
wTank= ɣsvs
wTank =7780(9.81)(0.7625)
wTank = 58.192 kN
FOR THE PLATFORM (1m wide)
A36: t=12mm
d= 12mm
πd2 π(0.012)^2
AS= = =1.131x10-4m2 3m
3m
4 4
w=1.131x10-4(7780)(9.81)
w=0.008632 kN/m
P= 2πr
P= 2π(2.3)
P= 14.4513 m
wPlatform= 8Pw+ 8w(1)

wPlatform = 14.4513(0.008632)(8)+ 8(0.008632)(1)
wPlatform = 1.067 kN

RAILINGS
4m
P= 2πr
P= 17.5929 m
x
tan 30o=0.9m
x= 0.520m
h2=0.92+ 0.5202
h= 1.039m
wRailings= 0.008632(1.039+0.520)(25.133/0.520)
wRailings= 0.650 kN
WEIGHT OF COLUMN
Assume W 6 x 20
w= 235(9.81)
w= 2.305 kN/m
z 12.8 z2=12.82+ 2.62
2.6
wColumn= 4(13.061)(2.305)
wColumn= 120.424 kN

WEIGHT OF STRUT
6m
5 9.6 6+9.84
9.6 = LAve= 2
1 𝑥
x= 1.92 LAve= 7.92
X
2.6 6 2.6
Assume L 76 x 76 x 6
w= 2(15.93)(9.81)
w= 0.31255 kN/m
wStrut= 4(7.92)(0.31255)(4)
wStrut= 39.606 kN
wTotal= wWater+ wTank+ wPlatform+ wRailings+ wColumn+ wStrut

wTotal= 367.875+ 58.192+ 1.067+ 0.650+ 120.424+ 39.606
wTotal= 587.814 kN
AXIAL FORCE FOR COLUMN DUE TO DEAD LOAD P1
P1 𝑊𝑡
= 4(5)
√28
587.814(√28)
P1= 20
P1= 155.521 kN DLColumn
AXIAL FORCE FOR STRUT DUE TO DEAD LOAD

1
Pa Strut ϴ=tan-15
ϴ=11.3099o
Pa Strut
Pax= Pcolumnsinϴ
Pax= 155.521 sin(11.3099o)
Pax Pax= 30.500 kN
∑ Fv= 0
Ps= sin45(30.500)
Ps= 21.567 kN

LOAD ANALYSIS
WIND LOAD (Section 207)
F=qzGCfAf
Where:
qz= Velocity pressure
qz= 47.3x10-6KzKztKdV2Iw (207-15)
Kz= Velocity Pressure Coefficients (Table 207-4)
Kzt= (1+K1K2K3)2 (207-3)
NOTE:
When site conditions and locations of structures do not meet all the conditions specified
in Section 207.5.7.1, Kzt= 1.0. Under Sec. 207.5.7.1 condition 5: H is greater than or equal to
4.5m for exposures C and D and 18m for exposure B.
Since
H=18m > 18m (Exposure B), use Kzt= 1.0
Kd= wind directionality factor
= 0.95 (for round, Table 207-2. Wind directionality factor)
V= 200 Kph (zone 2) (Table 207-1. Wind zone for the different provinces of the
Philippines.)
Iw= Importance factor
= 1.15 (for essential facilities, Table 207-3. Importance factor)
NOTE:
The structure is considered an essential facility (I) based from Table 103-1. Occupancy
category
Cf= force coefficient for tanks

Af= projected area normal to wind

COMPUTATION FOR THE PROJECTED AREA NORMAL TO WIND
Af1 1.6
Af2
3.2
Af3
3.2
Af4
3.2
11.2
Af1: b1 = 6 m
b2 = 6.12(0.32) = 6.64 m
1 1
5 1.6 Af1 = 2(b1+b2)h = 2(6 + 6.64)(1.6)
1 Af1 = 10.112 m2
X
1.6 5
=
𝑥 1
x = 0.32 m
Af2: b1 = 6.64 m
b2 = 6.64 + 2(0.64) = 7.92 m
5 3.2
1
1
X Af2 = 2(6.64 + 7.92)(3.2) = 23.296 m2
3.2 5
=
𝑥 1
x = 0.64 m
1
Af3: Af3 = 2(7.92 + 9.2)(3.2)
b1 = 7.92 m Af3 = 27.392 m2
b2 = 7.92 + 2(0.64) = 9.2 m

b1=9.2m
b2= 9.2+ 2(0.64)= 10.48m
1
Af4= 2(9.2 + 10.48)(3.2)
Af4= 31.488 m2
GROSS AREA
Ag= Af1+ Af2+ Af3+ Af4
Ag= 10.112+ 23.296+ 27.392+ 31.488
Ag= 114.488 m2
WIND LOAD ANALYSIS
At H= 14.95 m
By Interpolation:
Z Kz
12 0.76
14.95 x
15 0.81
12−14.95 0.76−x
= 0.76−0.81
12−15
X= 0.809
qz= 47.3x10-6KzKztKdV2Iw
qz= 47.3x10-6(0.809)(1)(0.95)(2002)(1.15)
qz=1.673 kPa
Af= 6(3.7)=22.2m2
Cf= H/D= 14.95/6= 2.492
By interpolation:
H/D Cf
1 1.3
2.492 x
7 1.4
1−2.492 1.3−x
= 1.3−1.4
1−7
x= 1.325
F= 1.673(0.85)(1.325)(22.2)
F= 41.814 kN

At H= 13.1 m
By Interpolation:
Z Kz
12 0.76
13.1 x
15 0.81
12−13.1 0.76−x
= 0.76−0.81
12−15
X= 0.778
qz= 47.3x10-6(0.778)(1)(0.95)(2002)(1.15)
qz=1.609
Af= 10.112m2
Ag= 114.488 m2
𝐴𝑓 10.112
= = 0.088
𝐴𝑔 114.488
Cf= 4.0(0.088)2-5.9(0.088)+ 4.0

Cf= 3.510
F= 1.609(0.85)(3.510)(10.112)
F= 48.538 kN
At H=9.9 m
By Interpolation:
Z Kz
9 0.7
9.9 x
12 0.76
9−9.9 0.7−x
= 0.7−0.76
9−12
X= 0.718
qz= 47.3x10-6(0.718)(1)(0.95)(2002)(1.15)
qz=1.484 kPa
Af= 23.296m2
Ag= 114.488 m2
𝐴𝑓 23.296
= = 0.203
𝐴𝑔 114.488
Cf= 4.0(0.203)2-5.9(0.203)+ 4.0

Cf= 2.965
F= 1.484(0.85)(2.965)(23.296)
F= 87.137 kN

At H= 6.7 m
By Interpolation:
Z Kz
6 0.62
6.7 x
7.5 0.66
6−6.7 0.62−x
= 0.62−0.66
6−7.5
X= 0.639
qz= 47.3x10-6(0.639)(1)(0.95)(2002)(1.15)
qz=1.320 kPa
Af= 27.392m2
Ag= 114.488 m2
𝐴𝑓 27.392
= = 0.239
𝐴𝑔 114.488
Cf= 4.0(0.239)2-5.9(0.239)+ 4.0

Cf= 2.817
F= 1.320(0.85)(2.817)(27.392)
F= 86.577 kN
At H= 3.5m
By Interpolation:
Kz= 0.57
qz= 47.3x10-6(0.57)(1)(0.95)(2002)(1.15)
qz=1.178 kPa
Af= 10.112m2
Ag= 31.488 m2
𝐴𝑓 31.488
= = 0.275
𝐴𝑔 114.488
Cf= 4.0(0.275)2-5.9(0.275)+ 4.0

Cf= 2.7
F= 1.178(0.85)(2.7)(31.488)
F= 85.128 kN

87.352kN
3.2
87.137kN
3.2
86.577kN
3.2
85.128kN
3.2

SUMMARY OF PORTAL ANALYSIS DUE TO WIND LOAD

SEISMIC LOADS
OCCUPANCY CATEGORY I: ESSENTIAL FACILITIES
Assume:
Soil profile type (very dense soil and soft rock), Sc; zone 4(208-1)
Ca= 0.40Na; Na= 1
Ca=0.40
Rp= 3.0 (208-12)
Ap= 1.0 (208-12)
Ip= 1.50 (208-1)
ApCaIp 3hx
Fp= (1+ )Wp
Rp hr
1.0(0.4)(1.50) 3(1.31)
= (1+ )(1252.045)
3.0 18.3
Fp= 788.173 kN
Fp= 4CaIpWp
=4(0.4)(1.5)(1252.045)
Fp=3004.908 kN
Fp= 0.7CaIpWp
= 0.7(0.4)(1.5)(1252.045)
Fp=525.859 kN
Use Fp= 788.173 kN as the total design lateral seismic force

746.763kN A
373.3815N B
179.943kN 179.943kN
373.3815kN 373.3815kN
179.943kN 179.943kN
373.3815kN 373.3815kN
19.844kN
C D
9.922kN
276.650kN 276.650kN
303.3035kN
383.3035kN
456.593kN 456.593kN
303.3035kN 383.3035kN
13.978kN E F
6.989kN
205.551kN 205.551kN
390.2925kN
390.2925kN
662.144kN 662.144kN
390.2925kN 390.29125kN
7.588kN G
3.794kN H
158.632kN 158.632kN
394.0865kN 394.0865kN
820.776kN
820.776kN
394.0865kN 394.0865kN
I J

SUMMARY OF PORTAL ANALYSIS DUE TO SEISMIC LOAD

Load Combinations
For Column:
COLUMN LOAD COMBINATION
DL WL EL DL+WL D+E/1.4
Pa (kN) 319.210 155.441 881.363 474.651 948.755
Py (kN) 0 102.505 225.619 102.505 161.156
Mx (kN.m) 0 167.256 368.139 167.256 262.956
For Strut:
STRUT LOAD COMBINATION
Pa (kN) 44.266 43.676 373.382 87.942 310.377
Py (kN) 0 21.049 179.143 21.049 127.959
Mx (kN.m) 0 63.147 537.429 63.147 383.878
For Gusset Plate:

GUSSET PLATE LOAD COMBINATION
Pa (kN) 0 42.564 3.794 42.564 2.710
Py (kN) 0 74.432 158.632 74.432 158.632
Mx (kN.m) 0 366.2054 780.469 366.205 557.479

COLUMN AXIAL WITH BENDING ALONG X – AXIS
262.956 kN.m
262.956 kN.m
for pin connected and fix – ended, use theoretical Value : k = 0.7
Check:
kl 0.7(3263) kl 0.7(3263)
= 206.49 = 11.062 = 64.54 = 32.846
rx ry
Use kl/r = 32.846
2𝜋 2 E 2𝜋 2 (200,000)
Cc = √ =√ = 126.169
Fy 248
kl
< Cc Intermediate column
rx
kl kl
1r 2 Fy 5 3 1 kl/r 3
Fa = [1 − 2 ( Cc ) ] ; Fs = 8 + ( r )− ( )
Fs 8 Cc 8 Cc
5 3 32.846 1 32.846
=8+ ( )− ( )3
8 126.169 8 126.169
Fs = 1.762
1 32.846 248
Fa = [1 − 2 (126.169)2 ] 1.762
Fa = 135.980 Mpa
For Fbx:
Lb= 3263 mm
200 𝑏𝑓 200 (287)
𝐿1 = = = 3644.9044 mm = Lc
√𝐹𝑦 √248

13800𝐴𝑓 13800(287)(36.6)
𝐿2 = = = 11669.154 = 𝐿𝑢
𝐹𝑦𝑑 248(500.9)
Lb < Lc
<𝐿𝑢 ∴ Use Fb = 0.66 Fy
Fbx = 0.66 (248) = 163.68 Mpa
𝑀 262.965 (1000)2
fbx = 𝑆 =
𝑥 5086 ×103
fbx = 51.702 Mpa
𝑃 948.755 (1000)
fa = 𝐴 = 29871
fa = 31.762 MPa
𝑓𝑎 31.762
= 135.980 = 0.234 > 0.15
𝐹𝑎
𝑓𝑎 𝐶𝑚𝑥 𝑓𝑏𝑥 𝐶𝑚𝑦 𝑓𝑏𝑦
= 𝑓𝑎 (𝐹𝑏𝑥) + 𝑓𝑎 (𝐹𝑏𝑦) ≤ 1.0
𝐹𝑎 1−𝐹𝑒𝑥 1−
𝐹𝑒𝑦
𝑀 −262.956
Use: Cm = 0.6 – 0.4 (𝑀1 )= 0.6 – 0.4 ( 262.956 ) = 1.0
2
12𝜋 2 (200 000)
𝐹𝑒𝑥 = = 8416.196 MPa
23 (11.062)2
Magnification Factor:
𝐶𝑚𝑥 1
𝑓𝑎 = 31.762 = 1.0038
1− 1−
𝐹𝑒𝑥 8416.196
31.762 51.702
+ 1.0038 (163.68) ≤ 1.0
135.980
0.551 < 1.0 ∴ the section is adequate
Solving for Econimcal Section:
𝑓𝑎 𝐶𝑚𝑥 𝑓𝑏
+ 𝑓𝑎 (𝐹𝑏𝑥 ) ≤ 1.0
𝑃𝑎 1− 𝑥
𝐹𝑎
31.762 𝑥 𝑓𝑏
+ 1.0038 (163.68) = 1.0
135.980
𝑓𝑏𝑥 = 124.974 MPa
𝑀 𝑀
𝑓𝑏𝑥 = 𝑆𝑥 ; 𝑆𝑥 = 𝑓𝑏
𝑥
262.956 (10002 )
𝑆𝑥 = 124.974
𝑆𝑥 = 2104085.65 𝑚𝑚3
𝑆𝑥 min = 2104 × 103 𝑚𝑚3
∴ 𝑈𝑠𝑒 𝑊18 × 76 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛

𝑆𝑥 = 2394 × 103 𝑚𝑚3

DESIGN OF GUSSET PLATE
-P/A -Mc/I
t -P/A Mc/I
Assume 12 mm thick Plate
Use A572 Steel

Fy = 345 MPa
Fb for Plate
Fb= 0.6Fy
= 0.6 (345)
Fb=207 MPa
@ Member GH
𝑃 𝑀𝑐
Fb= - 𝐴 + 𝐼
ℎ
−2.71(1000) 557.479 ( )10002
2
207= - + 12(ℎ)3
12ℎ
12
h = 1159.872 mm
Assume 30mm thick Plate

ℎ
−2.71(1000) 557.479 ( )10002
2
207.0 = - + 12(ℎ)3
12ℎ
12
h = 733.694 mm
∴ Use t = 30 mm
h = 734 mm

DESIGN OF STRUT 30mm
90mm
90mm
x̅
𝑦̅ = yL = 26.59 mm
𝑡𝐺𝑃 30
𝑥̅ = xL + 2 = 26.59 + 2
𝑥̅ = 41.59 mm
Strut: 2L 90× 90 × 12
I𝑥̅ = 2 I𝑥̅ I𝑦̅ = 2 (𝐼𝑦 + 𝐴𝑑 2 )
= 2(1480 × 103 𝑚𝑚4 ) = 2 ( 1480.28× 103 + 2029 (41.592 )
I𝑥̅ = 2960560 𝑚𝑚4 = 9979796.63 𝑚𝑚4
A’= A
= 2(2029) 𝑚𝑚2
A’=4058 𝑚𝑚2
𝐼𝑥 2960560 𝐼𝑦 9979796.63
r𝑥̅ =√ =√ r𝑦̅=√ =√
𝐴′ 4058 𝐴′ 4058
r𝑥̅ =27.010 mm
r𝑦̅ = 49.591 mm
rmin= r𝑥̅ = 27.01𝑚𝑚

Assume both ends are fixed
K=0.5
𝐾𝐿 0.5(6000)
= =111.07
𝑟 27.01
2𝜋 2 𝐸 2𝜋 2 (200000)
Cc =√ =√ = 126.169
𝐹𝑦 248
𝐾𝐿
< Cc ∴ intermediate beam
𝑟
𝐾𝐿 2 𝐾𝐿 𝐾𝐿 3
1 𝑟 𝐹𝑦 5 3 𝑟 1 𝑟
Fa=[1 − 2 ( 𝐶𝑐 ) ] 𝐹𝑠 ; Fs=3 + 8 ( 𝐶𝑐 ) − 8 ( 𝐶𝑐 )
5 3 111.070 1 111.070 3
Fs= 3 + 8 (126.169) − 8 (126.169)
Fs= 1.192
1 111.070 2 248
Fa=[1 − 2 (126.169) ] 1.912
Fa= 79.447 Mpa
𝑃(𝐴𝐿𝐿𝑂𝑊𝐴𝐵𝐿𝐸) =A𝐹𝑎
= (4058)(79.447)
=322395.926 N
𝑃𝐴𝐶𝑇𝑈𝐴𝐿
𝑓𝑎 = 𝐴 ; 𝑃𝐴𝐶𝑇𝑈𝐴𝐿=310.377 𝑘𝑁
310.377 𝑘𝑁
= 40.58 𝑚𝑚2
𝑓𝑎 = 76.485 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑓𝑎 < 𝐹𝑎
𝑃𝐴𝐶𝑇𝑈𝐴𝐿 <𝑃(𝐴𝐿𝐿𝑂𝑊𝐴𝐵𝐿𝐸) ∴ 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑆𝐴𝐹𝐸
DESIGN ANALYSIS OF BASE PLATE
262.956 kN.m

PAY
948.775 kN W18x76
5
1
W18x76
Properties
A = 14387 mm2
M d = 462.5 mm
bf = 280.30mm
Ix = 553588x106 mm4
c Iy = 62267x106 mm4
tw = 10.80 mm
0.95d tf = 17.30 mm
rx = 196.16 mm
ry = 66.31 mm
m
n 0.8bf n
B
Assumed: C = 810 mm
0.95d + 2m = C
Using A36 Steel: Fy = 248 Mpa 0.95(462.50) + 2m = 810mm
5
PAY = 948.755( ) m = 185.313 mm
√26
PAY = 930.330 kN
M = PAY.e
262.956(1000) = 930.330e
e = 282.648 mm
Allowable Bearing Pressure: fp

fp ; f’c = 20.7 Mpa
fp = 0.35f’c = 0.35(20.7) = 7.245 Mpa
P fp
405mm 405mm
x
e+ = 405
3
x
282.648 + 3 = 405
x = 367.056 mm
xB 367.056B
P = 2 (fp) = 930.330 = (7.245)
2
B = 699.675 mm Use : 700 mm
Thickness of Plate
367.056 mm
185.33mm
h = 7.245
xhB y 7.242
P= = 930.330 = 367.056(h)(700) = 367.056 ; y = 3.656 mm
2 185.313
h = 7.242 < 7.245 ∴ Safe

CONSIDERING 1mm STRIP OF BASE PLATE
m 1 2
M = (h-y)( 2 )(1) + 2 2(m)(y)(1)(3) m
185.313 1 2
= (7.242-3.656)(1)( ) + (2) (185.313)(3.656)(1)(3) (185.313)
2
M = 42182.386 N.mm
P 185.313
3.586
7.242
3.656
6M
Fb = ; Fb = 0.75Fy ; Fy = 248 Mpa ; Fb = 0.75(248) = 186 Mpa
bt2
6(42182.386)
186 = 1t2
t = 36.888 mm
∴ Use t = 40 mm
185.313 mm
t
b = 1 mm

0.8bf 700
185.313
3.586 7.242
367.056
Checking the other side:

2n + 0.80bf = 700
2n + 0.80(280.30) = 700
n = 237.88 mm
Considering 1mm Strip of base Plate

n
M = (h-y)(n)(2)g 1mm Strip of base Plate
n
M = (h-y)(n)(2)
237.88
= (7.242-3.656)(237.88)( ) 237.88 mm
2
M = 101,460.302 N.mm
Fb = 0.75Fy ; Fy = 248
= 0.75(248)
Fb = 186 Mpa
6M
Fb = bt2
6(101460.302)
186 = (1)t2
t = 57.209 mm t
b=1mm 3.586
DIAMETER OF ANCHOR BOLTS
Using A36 steel; Fy = 248Mpa
Assume the anchor bolts will carry the full moment
P = 930.330N

M = 262.956 kN.m
590
110 T1 T2 110
810 mm
M = T(590mm)
262.956(1000) = (T1 ) (590)
T1 = 445688.136 N = T2
2T = AsFt ; Ft = 0.60Fy ; Ft = 0.60(248) = 148.8Mpa

2(445688.136) = As(148.8)
As = 2995.216 mm2
At = 2(2995.216) = 5990.432 mm2
Using 32 mm bolts
πd2 π(32)2
A32 = = = 804.248 mm2
4 4
At = A32 (n)
5990.432 = 804.248(n)
n = 7.449 ∴ Use 8 bolts
Use 4 bolts on each side with a diameter of 32 mm
Spacing of the bolts
700−2(110)−2(16)−4(32)
S= 4−1
S = 106.667 mm ; S = 107 mm

DESIGN ANALYSIS OF WELD CONNECTION BETWEEN COLUMN AND
GUSSET PLATE
134.75mm
fy
P/l C fx P/l B fx
y̅ x̅ fy
fx P/l A P
280.30mm
fy fy
134.75mm
D 190.565mm
P/l fx
30mm
Column : W18x76
bf−tf 280.0−10.80
x= 2 = 2
x = y = 134.75 mm
Computation for Center of Gravity z = √x 2 + y 2 = √134.752 + 134.752
Lx̅ = ∑ Lx
(734+367)(x̅) = 734(0)+367(190.565) z = 190.565 mm
x̅ = 63.522 mm
Ly̅ = ∑ Ly
(734+367)( y̅) = 734(367)+367(183.5)
y̅ = 305.833 mm
Moment due to force “P” (P=310.377)

M = P(367-y̅)
= 310.377(367-305.833)
M = 18984.830 kN.mm
Most Stressed Weld is at Point D

𝐿2
J=∑ 𝐿 [12 + 𝑥 2 + 𝑦 2 ]
7342 3672
= 734 [ + 63.5222 + (367 − 0305.833)2 ] + 367 [ + (190.565 − 63.0522)2 +
12 12
(305.833 − 183.5)2 ]
J= 54196699.12 𝑚𝑚3
My 18984.830(1000)(734−305.833)
fx= J = = 149.985 N/mm
54196699.12
Mx 18984.830(1000)(63.522)
fy= = = 22.521 N/mm
J 54196699.12
𝑃 310.377(1000)
= = 281.905 N/mm
𝐿 1101
Total force on D:
𝑃′ 2
T = √(𝑓𝑥 + ) + 𝑓𝑦 2 = √(149.985 + 281.905)2 + 22.2512
𝐿
T = 432.463 N/mm
For thickness of Weld

tmax = 33.5 mm – 1.5mm = 32 mm
tmax = 10 mm – 1.5mm = 8.5 mm
tmin = 8mm ( for over 20mm material thickness of thicker part joined)
Use 8mm size of fillet weld considering 1mm length of weld

T = 0.707tLFv
432.463 = 0.707 (8)(1)(Fv)
𝐹𝑣𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 76.461 MPa (actual)
Computing the allowable Fv using E60 electrodes: (Fu=415 MPa)

Fv= 0.3Fu
= 0.3(415MPa)
Fv= 124.5 MPa (allowable)
𝐹𝑣𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 < 𝐹𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒
∴ the design of Weld is safe
DESIGN ANALYSIS OF WELD CONNECTION BETWEEN THE GUSSET PLATE

AND STRUT

fx 200mm 2L 90x90x12
P/L B fx P/L A fx
90mm x̅ fy y = 26.59mm
fy P=
310.377kN
P/L fx
C
COMPUTATION OF FORCE CONNECTED BY ONE ANGLE BAR

P 310.377
= = 155.189 kN
2 2
COMPUTATION OF CENTER OF GRAVITY OF WELD
Lx̅ = ∑ Lx̅ Ly̅ = ∑ Ly̅

(90+200)(x̅) = 90(0)+200(90) (90+200)(y̅) = 90(45)+200(0)
x̅ = 62.069 mm y̅ = 13.966 mm
Moment due to force P
P 310.377
P’ = 2 = = 155.189 kN
2
M = P’(y-y̅)
= 155.189(26.59-13.966)
M = 1959.106 kN.mm

Most stressed at Point C
𝐿2
J=∑ 𝐿 [12 + 𝑥 2 + 𝑦 2 ]
902 2002
= 90 [ 12 + 62.0692 + (45 − 13.966)2 ] + 200 [ + (90 − 62.069)2 + (13.966)2 ]
12
J= 1355864.943 𝑚𝑚3
𝑀𝑦 1959.106(1000)(76.034)
fx= 𝐽 = = 109.862 N/mm
13355864.943
𝑀𝑥 1959.106(1000)(69.069)
fy= = = 89.864 N/mm
𝐽 13355864.93
𝑃 155.189(1000)
= = 535.134 N/mm
𝐿 290
Total force on C:
𝑃′ 2
T = √(𝑓𝑥 + ) + 𝑓𝑦 2 = √(109.862 + 535.134)4 + 89.6842
𝐿
T = 651.201 N/mm
For thickness of Weld

tmax = 10 mm – 1.5mm = 8.5 mm
tmax = 12 mm – 1.5mm = 10.5 mm
tmin = 5mm ( for over 6mm to 12mm material thickness of thicker part joined)
Use 8mm size of fillet weld considering 1mm length of weld

T = 0.707tLFv
651.201 = 0.707 (8)(1)(Fv)
𝐹𝑣𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 115.135 MPa
Computing the allowable Fv using E60 electrodes: (Fv=415 MPa)

Fv= 0.3Fv
= 0.3(415MPa)
Fv= 124.5 MPa
𝐹𝑣𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 < 𝐹𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒
∴ the design of Weld is safe

PROPERTIES OF STRUCTURAL STEEL MEMBERS
bf
tf
d tw
Properties of W 18x76
W = 113.17 kg/m Axis – x Axis - y
A = 14387 mm2 Ix = 553,588 x 106 mm4 Ix = 63.267 x 106 mm4
d = 462.50 mm Sx = 2,394 x 103 mm4 Sy = 451 x 103 mm4
tw = 10.80 mm rx = 196.16 mm ry = 66.31 mm
bf = 280.30 mm
tf = 17.30 mm
B
Properties of L90 x 90 x 12 Axis – x Axis- y

W = 15.93 kg/m Ix = 1480.28 x 106 mm4 Iy = 1480.28 x 106 mm4
A = 2,029 mm2 Sx = 23.34 x 106 mm3 Sy = 23.34 x 106 mm3
H = 90 mm rx = 27.01 mm ry = 27.01 mm
B = 90 mm y = 26.59 mm x = 26.59 mm
t = 12 mm

8-32 mm∅ Anchor Bolts
60 mm Thick Base Plate
810
700 mm
810 mm
BASE PLATE AND ANCHOR BOLTS DETAILS

6m
1.5 m
3.7 m
1.5 m
Water Tank Dimension

Diameter of Tank = 6 m
Height of Cylindrical part = 3.7m
Height of top or bottom Shell Plate = 1.5 m
Radius of Top or Bottom Shell Plate(r) = 3.75 m
Thickness of Shell Plate(t) = 5 mm

1.5
5.2 2.8
0.9
1.5
3.2
W18X76 WIDE
FLANGE
0.75
3.2 2-90X90X12mm ANGLE

BAR HORIZONTAL
STRUT
0.75
30mm THICK
GUSSET
3.2 PLATE
0.75
3.2
0.3
8-32mm dia. ANCHOR BOLT IN

60 mm BASE PLATE

W18 x 76 WIDE FLANGE
CROSS
BRACING
2pcs. 90x90x12
ANGLE BAR
10mm THICK GUSSET

PLATE
COLUMN INTERMEDIATE GUSSET PLATE CONNECTION

INTRODUCTION
Structures of the modern world cannot be enclosed on a specific designs and materials to
be used. Today, engineers develop new methods and techniques in designing structures from
complex bridges and roadways to the simplest structure like a chair. The analysis and design is in
need to understand more the behavior of the materials used and the structure as a whole.
In this structural analysis and design of a proposed multi-purpose function hall, the
designers used steel for trusses. The computations of the loads due to wind, live loads and due to
dead loads have been recorded to get its maximum loads that had been used in its ultimate strength.


Water Tank

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Water Tank

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

UNIVERSITY OF BATANGAS

STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN OF

OCTOBER 16, 2015

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Typical water consumption per month= 18m3

Use total volume, Vt= 105m3

DEAD LOAD ANALYSIS

ATotal=ACylinder+ PCylinder+ ASphere+ PSphere

FOR THE PLATFORM (1m wide)

wPlatform= 8Pw+ 8w(1)

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

z 12.8 z2=12.82+ 2.62

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

wTotal= wWater+ wTank+ wPlatform+ wRailings+ wColumn+ wStrut

AXIAL FORCE FOR COLUMN DUE TO DEAD LOAD P1

AXIAL FORCE FOR STRUT DUE TO DEAD LOAD

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

WIND LOAD (Section 207)

Cf= force coefficient for tanks

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

WIND LOAD ANALYSIS

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Cf= 4.0(0.088)2-5.9(0.088)+ 4.0

Cf= 4.0(0.203)2-5.9(0.203)+ 4.0

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Cf= 4.0(0.239)2-5.9(0.239)+ 4.0

Cf= 4.0(0.275)2-5.9(0.275)+ 4.0

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

OCCUPANCY CATEGORY I: ESSENTIAL FACILITIES

Use Fp= 788.173 kN as the total design lateral seismic force

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

For Gusset Plate:

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Solving for Econimcal Section:

∴ 𝑈𝑠𝑒 𝑊18 × 76 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Assume 12 mm thick Plate

Use A572 Steel

Assume 30mm thick Plate

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Fa= 79.447 Mpa

𝑃𝐴𝐶𝑇𝑈𝐴𝐿 <𝑃(𝐴𝐿𝐿𝑂𝑊𝐴𝐵𝐿𝐸) ∴ 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑆𝐴𝐹𝐸

DESIGN ANALYSIS OF BASE PLATE

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Allowable Bearing Pressure: fp

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

h = 7.242 < 7.245 ∴ Safe

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Checking the other side:

Considering 1mm Strip of base Plate

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

2T = AsFt ; Ft = 0.60Fy ; Ft = 0.60(248) = 148.8Mpa

Campuses: Hilltop | MH del Pilar | Pallocan East | Pallocan West | Lipa

Moment due to force “P” (P=310.377)

Most Stressed Weld is at Point D