Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
For
revised 2010
3
Table of Contents
revised 2010
4
PART I ⎯ UNIT PLANS
Teachers As Practitioners (TAP) DESIGN and IMPACT Project
revised 2010
5
A unit is developed by the teacher and serves as a long-range plan for delivery of long-
range goals. It contains multiple lessons that are related and that address the same
essential questions and help the students learn the same enduring understandings. A
unit is organized to emphasize a logical sequence of learning activities.
Teaching units adhere to five basic characteristics of standards-based education.
1. The focus is always on student learning.
2. The instructional unit plan explicitly identifies the learning standards and
benchmarks.
3. Assessment results are used to inform the teacher about the effectiveness of the
unit planning and instructional decisions.
4. Effectiveness of instructional practices is measured by student progress towards
meeting the learning standards and benchmarks.
5. Expectations for learning are maintained for all students, but there is a
recognition that different students may learn differently.
Some units are based upon a pre-selected theme. Other times, the standards identified
in a pacing guide, by a text, or by the teacher will inform the theme.
revised 2010
6
Regardless, the standards should be examined across content areas. Sometimes the
length of the unit will determine how many standards can be incorporated; other times,
the difficulty or integration of the selected standards will dictate how long the unit takes
to teach. There is no set number of lessons in or time span of a unit. In general, a unit
can be as short as two lessons or as long as six weeks.
revised 2010
7
Remember that integrated units (those that blend standards from a variety of subject
areas) tend to be the most authentic. Look closely at the standards seeking
commonalities, shared frames of reference, or thematic overlap. Then classify the
standards you identify into three categories:
standards essential to know at the end of the unit
standards important to know at the end of unit
standards nice to know at the end of the unit
logistics
This is the introductory portion of the unit plan and answers basic questions.
Who is designing the instruction and what are your qualifications?
What is the subject area(s) and grade level(s) for which the unit is designed?
What is the name/ title of this unit of instruction?
What is the approximate length of the unit (listed in number of hours, number
of lessons, or number of weeks)?
Generally, the logistics section is at the start of your unit plan in bullet-point or table
format.
revised 2010
9
The rationale for the unit seeks to attach meaning as to why you are doing this
particular instructional design. It is imperative that you know and can explain why you
have included what you have included in your unit (beyond the fact that it might be the
next topic in the pacing guide or teacher’s manual or that your cooperating teacher told
you to do so). First consider the goals specific to this unit of instruction. How does this
unit fit with year-long instructional goals? How does this unit fit within the school’s or
school district’s educational goals? How is this unit helpful to the authentic experiences
of students? It is important to identify and review this scope and sequence both before
and after you consider the NCSCOS. Next consider the developmental, functional, and
academic reasons for the unit. Because meaningful instruction establishes relevant and
authentic connections for learners, you should also consider real-world connections and
applications of your unit topic. Describe how the unit goals relate to the team/
department curricula, system/ state frameworks, and relevant world applications for
learning.
unit overview
The most important part of the unit overview is the plan for inter-disciplinary subject-
area integration. This is best achieved with a “mind map” or another form of graphic
organizer. The graphic organizer provides a broad plan for embedding higher-order
thinking skills and cross-curricular integration in your instructional plan. There are lots
of great mind-map resources online including Kidspiration, Inspiration, and a new
favorite, Bubbl. Do a good web search to see what is available to you for free or
almost-free. But do not discount a word processing program such as Microsoft Word,
Pages, or OpenOffice. These programs often have flow charts, relationship matrices, or
bubble maps built in that work pretty well. It is also entirely possible to use sticky notes,
index cards, chart paper, or a large white board to create your graphic organizer. As
long as you can take a digital photograph of it to submit electronically, any format is
really workable. Your mind map must indicate subject-area integrations and tie-ins
between content areas (organized around the central theme or topic). So as to reach all
kinds of learners, the graphic organizer should include considerations of fine and
practical arts, music, and kinesthetic movement.
This portion of the unit design must also contain a detailed bullet-point list of all pre-
requisite content knowledge required of the teacher in order to effectively present the
unit. This portion has as its impetus the NC Teacher Education Standard, 3b. Teachers
know the content they teach. This standard will be most specifically evidenced in the
TAS (Teachers As Scholars) Project that serves as state-mandated Electronic Evidence
2, but be aware that every unit has core content knowledge that is foundational to it. In
order to be able to display appropriate depth and rigor of content knowledge in the
revised 2010
10
subject area, the teacher must possess background knowledge and or conduct
research regarding:
key vocabulary for the unit
central ideas and concepts for the unit
personalities/ dates/ events for the unit
algorithms/ formulas/ foundational theories for the unit
Finally, list (by subject area) the NCSCOS goals and objectives connected to the unit.
revised 2010
11
the sage on the stage”), and how you will assess student progress (individual or group
tasks? Performance or traditional assessment?) throughout the unit.
Instructional planning is based on the LEARNING CYCLE.
Remember that you will need to collect evidence of students’ progress, including
examples of activities, assignments, and assessment. This documentation does not
always have to be formal tests (in fact, in many cases it should not be). Consider
anectodal notes, digital photos or sound files, logs or journals, interviews, projects,
videos, student self-evaluations, rubrics, etc.).
revised 2010
12
Although your time line can take any format, it is often easiest to use a basic table as a
planning tool. Be mindful of the fact that the unit timeline is NOT a collection of lesson
plans; rather, it is the brainstorming behind the creation and compilation of lesson plans
in the next stage of unit development.
suggested timeline table format:
DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5
specific expectations
(goals/objectives)
teaching and learning
strategies (in brief)
formative or
summative
assessment
type-strategy-tool
learner considerations
environmental
considerations
material resources
other resources
OR
(goals/objective
other resources
considerations
considerations
environmental
type-strategy-
teaching and
strategies (in
expectations
assessment
formative or
summative
resources
learning
material
specific
learner
brief)
tool
s)
DAY
1
DAY
2
DAY
3
DAY
4
lesson plans
revised 2010
13
The unit as a whole contains many topics that are united by a common thread and are
designed to involve instruction for days or weeks. Lesson plans subdivide the unit into
smaller more detailed chunks. Lesson plans are written by teachers for themselves so
as to structure the learning for themselves and for the students. Lesson plans are NOT
the same thing as “scripted curricula.” They are not meant to be an absolute guideline
for what to say or what to do. For specific guidelines regarding lesson plans and the
Salem College lesson plan template, see part II of the Instructional Design Resource
Guide.
Unit evaluation involves intentional consideration of and deep thinking about the
instruction you planned, the way in which it was delivered, the students’ engagement
with learning activities, and the learning outcomes the students attained. It is a
celebration of the successes and a plan for intervention for areas of challenge. It
involves re-thinking, re-visioning, re-tooling, and re-visiting. Ideally, the overall reflection
is composed at the conclusion of the unit, but reflective practitioners also keep
anecdotal notes and other ongoing records as the unit progresses. You will compose
daily reflections connected to each lesson, so this final piece is designed to synthesize
your ideas and experiences across the unit as a whole. For this reason, this portion of
the unit design is added after the unit has been created and taught.
revised 2010
14
After you have completed your TAP Design (including the unit plan, individual lesson
plans/ daily reflections, and the final reflection) as well as the TAP IMPACT (the plan for
and examples of daily formative assessments and a final summative assessment),
presented it to the students in your classroom, gathered evidences and artifacts, had
each component and the final compilation edited and okayed by your Salem Supervisor,
and readied both TAP Projects for final submission, you are likely to have two quite
sizeable files! In order for the state to be able to access the TAP DESIGN Project as
Electronic Evidence 3 and the TAP IMPACT as Electronic Evidence 4, both components
will be submitted to your Salem electronic portfolio on Foliotek. Foliotek accepts many
file formats, but there is a limit to file size and the amount of electronic storage you have
available (unless you want to purchase more space). For this reason, you are likely to
need to compress the file(s). If you are uncertain how to create a “zipped” or
“compressed” file, be sure to do a Google search for directions, seek out a YouTube
how-to video, or use the help feature of MS Word.
The following pages present a general template for instructional design. While you do
not have to use this exact format, it may prove to be helpful for you to do so.
revised 2010
15
LOGISTICS
Teacher
Grade(s) Level(s):
Title of Unit:
Length of Unit :
ESSENTIAL QUESTION(S)
UNIT OVERVIEW
plan for unit integration
(graphic organizer may be attached as separate document or inserted as digital image)
revised 2010
16
CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
physical space
temporal resources
learning materials
personnel resources
technological resources
type-strategy-tool
other resources
considerations
considerations
environmental
teaching and
strategies (in
expectations
assessment
formative or
summative
resources
learning
material
specific
learner
brief)
DAY
1
DAY
2
DAY
3
DAY
4
DAY
5
LESSON PLANS
Individual lesson plans should be inserted as separate subsequent
pages- insert page breaks between each lesson plan
Remember to include artifacts/ individual reflections for each lesson
revised 2010
17
OVERALL REFLECTION ABOUT THE UNIT (completed when you finish teaching the unit)
revised 2010
18
PART II ⎯ LESSON PLANS
Standards for student achievement have been at the center of K-12 educational reform
for more than 20 years. Standards follow the goal of providing a structured approach for
aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment with curriculum framework standards
and benchmarks. In creating the North Carolina Standard Course of Studies,
experienced practitioners across the state developed frameworks that describe what
learners should know and be able to do to be successful in achieving their goals.
Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment with the NCSCOS and benchmarks
can have many benefits. A program that has determined which North Carolina
standards and benchmarks are covered by each class and how transitions are handled
between classes has a basic curriculum in place—one that will provide new teachers
with direction, make decisions about class placement and advancement much easier,
and provide solid bases for each teacher's lesson planning.
LPs encourage the teacher to think more deeply on the specific needs of each
student in the class. Thus, the specific needs (which can change often) and
learning styles of each student can be considered in planning, as well as the
learning and teaching styles of the teacher.
LPs provide an excellent basis for discussion between peers, program director and
teacher, and teachers and students. For new teachers and veteran teachers
alike, lesson plans provide good bases for improving program design, planning
professional development, and sharing lesson goals with students and even
involving them in planning classes.
revised 2010
19
LPs help teachers be prepared, feel more confident, and deal better with surprises.
A good lesson plan can help a teacher feel grounded, more confident, and able
to foresee challenges and students' questions. By the same token, with this
grounding the teacher is better able to handle digressions and unforeseen
challenges and, ironically, be more flexible.
LPs deepen the teacher's own knowledge and skills. Thorough lesson planning
can push a teacher to make certain she knows the content, understands how to
apply the skills to be covered in the planned class or classes, and, after the
class(es) assesses how things actually went.
LPs can be shared. Written curriculum and lesson plans are forms of "captured
wisdom" that can be shared with other teachers or adapted to fit another class
level, so they don't have to start from scratch every class. They can also be given
to help teachers new to the program (or new to teaching) a sense of what
instruction is like in a specific program.
LPs provide a good record of what actually occurs in the classroom. Such records
can be kept on file to form the bases for future classes, or to help substitute
teachers cover classes effectively.
revised 2010
20
2. Background Knowledge/ Experiences:
Consider any prerequisite knowledge required in order for learners to make
sense of the new content.
Do learners need to have had any previous experiences in order to complete
lesson activities, participate in processes, or construct understandings?
Include background in terms of content, skills, procedures, and context
4. Teaching Strategies:
Determine the steps of the lesson and how long the lesson components will
take.
Create activities that are clear in focus, engaging and relate to learner
interests.
Include authentic and relevant 21st Century strategies and tasks. Refer to the
Framework for 21st Century Skills as needed.
Teaching strategies take three parts.
o Anticipatory or introductory strategies get students engaged in
the topic and connect to/ assess their prior experience, then use that
information to adjust the lesson if necessary.
o Developmental strategies present information, offer explanatory
or practice activities, and provide exploration of the content.
o Concluding strategies summarize content, offer wrap-up ideas
and activities, and provide closure to the lesson.
Manage "teacher talk" time so learners are active participants throughout the
learning process.
Differentiate as needed for students' varied learning styles, learning
issues/disabilities, or learners that may have greater knowledge/skill than
classmates.
Ensure that the teaching strategies and activities correlate to the stated
objective(s) from the NCSCOS.
Though brief, add enough detail so other teachers might be able to use the
lesson.
5. Assessment:
Can be created prior to consideration of teaching strategies or learning
activities to ensure teaching and assessment are correlated
Use to plan and adjust for what will be taught in following lessons (formative)
and to provide feedback to learners (formative)
Summative assessment used to evaluate/ capture learner progress Must
directly measure whether each learning objective was met, and/or how well
it was met.
Use a variety of assessment methods to capture learning, to allow students
with different learning styles to shine, and also to enable learners to monitor
their own progress.
revised 2010
21
Keep the following in mind when developing learning objectives for a class or series of
classes.
The content and skills expressed in the learning objectives should reflect your
students' interests, goals, and assessed needs (e.g., content such as "events
leading to the Civil War” or skills such as "learn to pronounce the French /r/".)
The content and skills should connect with one, possibly two, of the applicable
goals and objectives from the NCSCOS. Note which goals and objectives you
plan to address in your lesson plan, either here, in your activities section, or both.
revised 2010
22
Each class meeting should comprise 1-3 Learning objectives, 3 at maximum. Any
more than 3 will probably prove to be unrealistic in scope.
Start with the stem "Students will be able to..." as a handy stepping off point (e.g.,
"Students will be able to name and describe the three branches of the federal
government.") .
Wherever possible, a learning objective should be stated in terms of measurable
student outcomes (e.g., "Students will be able to name and describe the three
branches of the federal government with 100% accuracy", or "Students will be
able to identify at least two non-prescription products that reduce fever.") Think of
the objective in terms of a verb that will reflect what you wish students to be able
to do by the end of the lesson (e.g., demonstrate, identify, list, name, describe,
evaluate, etc.)
On the next page is a chart of "action verbs" that you can use in designing learning
outcomes so they will express the level of knowledge or skill, and even the specific kind
of skill, that you want your students to demonstrate. Note that the verbs are grouped
under headings that describe different kinds of learning outcomes.
revised 2010
23
TABLE OF "ACTION WORDS" FOR LEARNING OBJECTIVES
revised 2010
24
To emphasize what has been conveyed about learning objectives, consider these
examples of weak and strong learning objectives. Note that the strong learning
objectives contain both clearer and more meaningful action words and measurable
criteria for acceptable performance.
Regarding the weak learning objectives, note that the action verbs--"learn," "know," and
"become familiar with"--are vague in terms of what achievements are hoped for. And,
there is no indication of how achievement will be measured. In contrast, the strong
learning objectives state more clearly what is to be achieved and how achievement will
be measured. Well-conceived learning outcomes make envisioning the assessments of
a lesson a lot easier.
Teachers can use a variety of instructional strategies to activate and illustrate students’
prior knowledge and background experiences. Dialoging such as class discussions,
and visualizations like graphic organizers prompt students to make connections to their
prior understandings and encourage metacognition (students’ thinking about their own
thinking) This helps learners to transfer their thought processes to a conscious level and
connect new information with known.
By tapping their students' prior knowledge in all subject areas, teachers can plan
lessons that will: clarify incomplete or erroneous prior knowledge, determine the extent
of instruction necessary in a particular topic area, and discern necessary adjustments to
planned independent activities and assessment materials. Teachers also can use prior
knowledge to make instruction more meaningful. Many educational researchers also
emphasize the importance of incorporating parallels between a student's cultural
background and lesson design. As the world changes, students must learn to
revised 2010
25
understand and appreciate the experiences and contributions of people from different
backgrounds. Culturally responsive education links curriculum, instruction, and
assessment to experiences, language and culture-- in other words, instructional design
for diverse learners is absolutely dependent upon a teachers’ awareness of the prior
knowledge and background experiences of the students.
There are many strategies that may be used to activate background knowledge and/or
to give the teacher a sense of where his/her students are in relationship to lesson
content and objectives. Strategies include (but are not limited to):
Discussions: Teacher-to-student and whole-class discussions are great
ways to activate students’ prior knowledge by allowing them opportunities
to orally share their ideas and discuss their opinions. The art of discussion
is an important piece in the learning process. A common mistake many
teachers make is to present a question or idea and expect most of their
students to respond and discuss. It can be frustrating for both the teacher
and students to listen to a select few students have a discussion. To
conduct successful discussions, teachers need:
To be armed with the right types of questions and ready to respond to various
answers
To be able to use “teachable moments” to spark student interest and keep the
discussion lively
To use the discussion as a jumping off point for new content
To pose questions that directly relate to students and their prior knowledge
To allow the students to lead the discussion with teacher facilitation and probing
To accept all appropriate answers as correct and encourage additional
responses by others
To permit “think time” and use strategies such as think-pair-share before having
students respond.
Teachers should recognize that a quiet student can “hide” during a group
discussion, thus keeping the teacher from truly knowing what the individual
student does or does not know.
KWL Chart: The traditional KWL Chart can be used with any content area to
start students thinking about what they KNOW about a topic, what they
WANT TO KNOW about that topic, and what they have LEARNED at the
end of the unit. It can be adapted for research by adding a column between
the W and the L that requires students to think about HOW they will use
resources to find the answers to their questions. Students can create
individual KWL Charts, or the activity can be completed as a whole class. A
KWL Chart can be used as an pre-assessment for learning because a
teacher can quickly tell what students already know and understand about a
topic. Students can create individual KWL Charts, or the activity can be
completed as a whole class.
Picture Books: Picture books have been used in the primary grades for
decades, but they are an oft-neglected quick and convenient way to help
older students activate their prior knowledge as well! There is a new focus
on picture books that deliver difficult content in simple language. Picture
books are a great model for student writing, as they contain vivid language
and a variety of text structures. The beauty of using picture books in the
upper grades, including middle and high school, is that they can be read in
a few minutes and provide students with information connected to the
concept or skill being introduced.
THIEVES; The THIEVES strategy (Manz, 2002) will help students survey a
content textbook to activate their prior knowledge. The strategy prescribes
a certain previewing technique that follows the acronym. If students learn
this technique, they will be able to use it before they read a chapter and
also as they review for a test. Using the THIEVES strategy, students will
survey a content text in the following manner:
Title – Students sometimes skip the title, but it provides valuable
information by establishing the topic and the context of the chapter. If the
text is written in chronological order, the title may indicate where the
chapter would fit on a timeline. Some questions that the student may ask
while looking at the title include:
What do I already know about this topic?
How does it connect to the previous chapter?
How can I turn this title into a question to focus my reading?
Headings – Headings indicate the important sections of the
chapter. They help students identify the specific topics covered. Students
can turn the headings into questions to create a more focused look at
information covered in the chapter. Some questions that the student may
ask while looking at the headings include:
How does this heading let me know what I will be reading about?
What topic will be discussed in the paragraphs below this heading?
How can I turn this heading into a question that can be answered when I
read this section?
Introduction – The introduction provides an overview of the chapter.
It may come after the title and before the first heading. Sometimes the
goals and objectives of the chapter are stated in the introduction. Some
questions that students may ask when previewing the introduction include:
revised 2010
27
Is the introduction marked or do I have to locate it?
Does the first paragraph introduce the chapter?
What important information will I find in the introduction?
Do I already know anything about this?
Every first sentence in a paragraph – First sentences are often the
topic sentences of the paragraph, and by reading these a student can get
an idea of the information that will be contained in the chapter.
Visuals and Vocabulary – Students should look at all visuals
(pictures, charts, tables, maps and graphs) contained in the chapter. They
need to read the captions and labels on each. This enables students to
learn a little about the topic before they begin to read. Some questions
that students may ask about the visuals include:
How do these visuals relate to the content of this chapter?
What can I learn from them?
How do the captions help me understand the visual?
Vocabulary unlocks the meaning of the content. Students need to
understand vocabulary in order to comprehend the text. Vocabulary may
or may not be identified as key words. It might be highlighted or italicized
in the text. Some questions that students may ask about the vocabulary
include:
Is there a list of key words and are they defined In the glossary?
Are there important words in boldface or italics?
Do I know the important words?
Are there other words I don’t know?
End-of-Chapter Questions – These questions indicate important
points and concepts from the chapter. Just reading these questions will
help students target information that is important in the text and establish
a purpose for reading. Some questions that students may ask about the
end-of-chapter questions include:
What do these questions ask?
What information will be important in this chapter?
How do I locate this information in the text?
Summary – Many texts contain a summary at the end of the
chapter. Students can read the summary to activate prior knowledge and
give them an idea of the important concepts contained in the chapter.
revised 2010
28
3. MATERIALS AND RESOURCES
Listing the materials and resources that will be needed for a class, whether it be a
simple photocopy or a piece of equipment, will make lesson planning more efficient and
the class run more smoothly.
Use authentic materials suggested by your students' interests or pulled from a real-life
situation wherever possible. For example, using an actual check or deposit slip for math
work will be more meaningful for students that a mock checkbook in a workbook. By the
same token, authentic children’s literature, newspaper articles, public information
documents, newsletters, magazines, etc. will usually be more relevant, and motivating,
to students than materials assigned from, say, a commercially-produced reader.
CATEGORY RESOURCES
Printed Materials handouts
articles
pamphlets
books
Visual Aids overheads
document cameras
Smartboards
graphs
manipulatives
storyboards
charts & tables
posters
slides
chalk/whiteboards, newsprint
photographs
maps
diagrams
pictures
Audio-Visual videotapes & disks
audiotapes & CDs
Television
LCD projections
Computer-Based websites
email, listservs threaded
discussions, chat rooms,
bulletin boards
PowerPoint slideshows
computer conferencing
interactive learning sites
People guest (onsite)
social service reps (offsite)
other students
revised 2010
29
4. TEACHING STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES
The teaching strategies in a lesson plan are descriptions of planned instructional work.
Create learning outcomes aligned with the NCSCOS then "fill in" the activities that
would help students to gain the desired new knowledge and acquire the desired new
skills. Assessments should be devised to match the learning objectives; assessments
may be planned before or after learning strategies and activities are created.
For example, an ESL teacher might initially set out a learning objective for students to
be able to orally report important information on each of their family members (name,
age, gender, and so forth). However, after considering assessments, it might occur that
being able to write that information accurately would be highly important for, say, job
applications or health clinic questionnaires. The learning objective and assessment
would be updated and very probably new activities to support the added requirement for
writing skills would be added.
Please be mindful that your instructional planning reflects both constructivist practices
AND 21st Century teaching and learning ideals. The webpage for the Framework for
21st Century Skills may be a helpful tool.
revised 2010
31
5. ASSESSMENT
Assessments are tools such as presentations, quizzes, projects, check-ins,
observations or other instruments used to measure whether students have gained the
new knowledge or acquired the skills described in the learning objectives.
A strong learning objective will suggest its own activities and assessments. In fact,
some experts in the field believe that planning assessments before activities is a very
effective practice. Basically, the teacher considers how students will demonstrate that
they have gained the knowledge or achieved the skill described in a given learning
objective. For example, the learning objective "Students will be able to write the names
of the planets in our solar system with 80% accuracy" would suggest a simple quiz by
way of assessment. On the other hand, the learning objective "Students will be able to
orally differentiate between appropriate and inappropriate reasons for calling in sick and
give at least one example of each" would suggest a more complex assessment,
perhaps an oral report or presentation, or a culminating debate between students or
small groups.
If assessments are planned directly after learning objectives are laid out, planning
activities becomes a kind of "filling in" between the learning objective and the
assessment. In the second example above, if the teacher decides to require an oral
report, she might logically include brainstorming, note taking, speaking practice, and/or
creating a rubric among her activities for that class or series of classes.
Teachers should note that the NCSCOS are a great source of assessment (and
teaching strategy) ideas because they are written as indicators of acquired knowledge
and skills and provide specific examples in the form of activities. The table, Matching
Assessments To Objectives, Purpose, and Students, is designed to help you design
appropriate and effective assessments to determine if your students are meeting
revised 2010
32
learning objectives. The table will also provide you with a sense of the variety of forms
that assessments can take, for example:
selected response: Test takers select a response from a list, as in True/False or
multiple choice questions. There is "one right answer." Often quizzes and tests
are made up of selected response questions.
constructed response: Students create their own responses, such as providing
an answer to a math problem, writing an essay, or performing a task. There is
generally “one right answer” although the steps to obtain may vary.
authentic: Use of real-life materials and tasks.
project- or performance-based: Extended, multi-stage activities generally
involving real-world tasks or blending in- and out-of-school resources
revised 2010
33
MATCHING ASSESSMENTS TO OBJECTIVE, PURPOSE, AND STUDENTS
revised 2010
34
EXAMPLES OF "AUTHENTIC" TASKS & ASSESSMENTS
Making audio tapes to practice/check fluency
Anecdotal records of outside work
Book reports*
Drawings and diagrams
Favorite authors report
Field trip reports
Interviews
Inventories of workplace items
Investigations or research
Journals
Learning logs, reading logs
Lists of books read
Models with descriptions
Open-ended problems
Photographs and documentation
Problem-solving activities
Progress Reports
Project reports
Research papers
Developing rubrics
Self-evaluations
Simulations
Skits and role plays
Student-selected best work: Portfolios**
Teacher observations with rubric
Writing samples
Video tapes
Work samples
*This activity and most others can take many forms: personal responses; summaries of main ideas;
written or oral form; study circle or small group activity.
**This activity and similar ones can be in written form, collected in e-form, put on disk, or
expressed/reported using PowerPoint.
6. REFLFECTIONS
Wrap-up and Reflection activities have many important purposes in the overall lesson:
They are important ways to help students summarize what they have learned and
for teachers to determine what's been accomplished or not been accomplished.
Asking students to summarize what they have learned helps them to synthesize
and retain new knowledge.
The time devoted to wrap-up can encourage learners to consider ways they can
apply newly-learned skills to other areas of their lives.
These activities give students a sense that they are genuinely making progress,
which is continually mentioned among thinkers and researchers as a critical
element for promoting learner persistence and lifelong learning.
Building in regular time for summarizing and reflecting gives students practice in
important metacognitive critical thinking skills.
revised 2010
35
The teacher may discover if students are still unsure of something or especially
excited to know more about something, which will point the way for the next
class.
In addition to reviewing students’ responses to the lesson, the teacher must self-reflect.
What activities worked best? Was the time anticipated for each activity adequate? Did
the students actively engage in the lesson? Where there any unintended consequences
that occurred? Was the differentiation adequate? What changes to the lesson should
be made for the next time? What is the next logical lesson to build upon new
knowledge, remediate for any confusions, or extend students understandings?
There are many ideas and prompts to help with the design of useful Wrap-up/Reflection
activities. These are simply collections of ideas and techniques; no one should feel that
they have to “do them all.”
Curriculum/Content:
What topics unexpectedly emerged and how did you handle that?
What knowledge and skills did you assume students had in going into this
lesson?
Were your assumptions correct?
Lesson Design/Activities:
How did you incorporate the NCSCOS into the lesson?
Did the lesson allow enough practice/application to achieve the
standards/benchmarks?
Was the lesson sufficiently balanced in terms of giving students opportunities
to practice multiple skills? (speaking & listening, critical thinking, etc).
Did the activities engage learners in a focused topic of interest? Why/why
not?
Were activities chunked sufficiently to facilitate skills/knowledge acquisition?
Were activities sufficiently designed to support learning outcomes, especially
more sophisticated kinds of outcomes, such as supporting a personal
opinion?
How did you build in review into your lesson?
Who talked during the lesson and how much? Why or why not?
Did students actively participate in the lesson, why/why not?
How did you address students’ varied learning styles, learning
issues/disabilities, or learners that may have greater knowledge/skill than
classmates?
Assessment/Evidence of Learning/Next Steps
What tools did you use to capture learning, give feedback to learners and/or
inform your instruction?
In what areas did students improve per these tools?
How well did the activities work and why?
What does the assessment data tell you about the design of the next lesson?
How did you enable the students to capture the high points or summarize or
apply what they learned?
How were students engaged in evaluating the lesson and giving input for the
next lesson?
revised 2010
37
Salem Lesson Plan Format
teaching strategies
Differentiation strategies should be infused throughout. Differentiate for
content, product, and process.
developmental strategies
concluding strategies
revised 2010
38
III. TEACHERS AS PRACTITIONERS (TAP) DESIGN PROJECT
NORTH
CAROLINA
TEACHER
STANDARD
4. Uses positive management of student behavior, effective communication for defusing and deescalating
disruptive or dangerous behavior, and safe and appropriate seclusion and restraint.
3. Displays the ability to use appropriate data to identify areas of need that should be addressed in a school
improvement plan.
revised 2010
39
NORTH
CAROLINA
TEACHER
STANDARD
d. Teachers adapt their teaching for the benefit of students with special needs.
1. Cooperates with specialists and uses resources to support the special learning needs of all students.
2. Uses research-verified strategies to provide effective learning activities for students with special needs.
e. Teachers work collaboratively with the families and significant adults in the lives of their students.
1. Communicates and collaborates with the home and community for the benefit of students.
a. Teachers align their instruction with the North Carolina Standard Course of Study.
1. Develops and applies lessons based on the North Carolina Standard Course of Study.
2. Integrates effective literacy instruction throughout the curriculum and across content areas to enhance
students’ learning.
2. Encourages students to investigate the content area to expand their knowledge and satisfy their natural
curiosity.
a. Teachers know the ways in which learning takes place, and they know the appropriate levels of
intellectual, physical, social, and emotional development of their students.
1. Identifies developmental levels of individual students and plans instruction accordingly.
2. Assess and uses resources needed to address strengths and weaknesses of students.
revised 2010
40
NORTH
CAROLINA
TEACHER
STANDARD
2. Consistently encourages and supports students to articulate thoughts and ideas clearly and effectively.
h. Teachers use a variety of methods to assess what each student has learned.
1. Uses multiple indicators, both formative and summative, to monitor and evaluate students’ progress and
to inform instruction.
2. Provides evidence that students attain 21st century knowledge, skills and dispositions.
The Teachers As Practitioners (TAP) DESIGN Project was accepted by DPI to serve as
Electronic Evidence 3 (EE3) in the professional portfolio of Salem College Teacher
Candidates. The TAP DESIGN involves the creation of a full-integrated teaching unit
including all unit design components and daily lesson plans. (Although the assessment
will be created simultaneously, it will be pulled out of the unit and lesson design to be
submitted separately. Refer to the TAP IMPACT Project that follows.)
All candidates for initial licensure at the undergraduate level (i.e. undergraduate or MAT
phase 1) are required to create two draft versions of the TAP DESIGN Project. The first
version of a unit plan is created during EDUC330/530, Instructional Design. The
intermediate draft is compiled during a course particular to each candidate’s specialty
area, specifically:
art education candidates EDUC383/583, Teaching Art in the K-12 School
elementary education candidates EDUC356/556, Integrated Content
music education candidates EDUC 384/584, Teaching Music in the K-12 School
MS/ HS content area candidates EDUC385/585, Teaching Content in the MS/HS
second language candidates EDUC385/585, Teaching Content in the MS/HS
special education candidates EDUC356/556, Integrated content
The final version of the TAP DESIGN Project will be composed during EDUC399/599,
Teachers As Practitioners (student teaching), and submitted in final draft format
during EDUC394/594, Teachers As Practitioners Seminar.
As submitted to DPI in the Salem College Blueprints for Initial Licensure Program Re-
Visioning, Electronic Evidence 3 is as follows.
revised 2010
41
#3 Required
Pedagogical and Professional Knowledge Skills and Dispositions: Evidence that demonstrates effective design of
classroom instruction based on research-verified practice.
It is recommended this evidence address descriptors 1a.2, 2b.3, 2d.1, 3a.1, 3c.1, 3c.2, 3d.1, 4a.1, 4a.2, 4b.1, 4c.1, 4d.1, 4e.1,
4f.1, 5c.1.
This electronic evidence includes the instructional unit to be created, refined, and implemented during Block 4,
Teachers As Practitioners (student teaching). The final TAP DESIGN project will be submitted to and evaluated on Foliotek as
part of each candidate’s final portfolio. The rubric for this evaluation is correlated to descriptors from the McCREL rubric for
teacher candidate competence; candidates must attain a rating of “proficient” in each area of the matrix.
The TAP Design Project indicates candidates’ competence in the design, delivery, and assessment of meaningful
learning experiences for all students. Candidates will choose a two to three week unit of study from the Teachers As
Practitioners (TAP) experience in which and by means of which they demonstrate:
content knowledge and content pedagogy
abilities to plan for and assess student learning, including meaningful technology integration
knowledge of student development
ability to communicate effectively
use of technology to support instruction
ability to support unique learners’ needs, particularly exceptional learners and English Language
Learners
ability to foster a community that respects diversity and enhances cross-cultural interactions
Required Components
unit plan—the unit plan contains foundational elements for planning the instructional unit <1a2> <3a1> <4a1>
<4a2> <4b1>
purpose and rationale for teaching the unit
specific content knowledge of unit
content integration and curricular tie-ins across disciplines in the unit
NCSCOS goals and objectives to be included in the unit
special considerations - identification of special-needs students, language considerations, IEP
accommodations, resource personnel available, etc.
unit timeline-- this portion of the unit overviews the basic content and pacing for the unit including <1a2> <2b3>
<2d1> <3a1> <3c1>
day-by-day NCOS goals and objectives
overview of scope and sequence including a brief description of each lesson
brief description of the assessment(s) (formal or informal) associated with each lesson
lesson plans supporting the unit that must include <2b3> <2d1> <3a1> <3c1> <3c2> <3d1> <4c1> <4d1>
<4e1> <4f1>
necessary background knowledge/ prior experience
meaningful technology integration
a variety of developmentally appropriate methods and materials
integrated content areas
differentiation (not accommodation) strategies appropriate across content, process, and/or product for
the diversity of learners identified as being present in the classroom context, especially ELL and EC
“new literacies” including reading and writing across the curriculum and hypermedia
multi-cultural texts and strategies
21st century content and skills (see Framework for 21st Century Learning)
revised 2010
42
authenticity of activities relevance to students’ lives
evidence of collaborative student learning
samples of formative assessments for each lesson such as, checklists, rubrics, scoring guides,
performance assessments, collaborative learning opportunities, etc.
student artifacts (photos, formative assessments, audio recordings, video recordings, etc.) for each
lesson
NOTE THAT THE ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR THE UNIT WILL BE PRODUCED AS EVIDENCE 5, TAP
IMPACT
reflections about instructional practice in which candidates reflect on the design and implementation of each
lesson in the overall instructional design and delivery. <5c1>
use notes and reflective writings from mentor conferences held with Salem Supervisor and Cooperating
Teacher
incorporate notes and anecdotes from weekly conferences based upon the matrix of the Teacher
Candidate Evaluation Rubric
All required components for this evidence will be made available in the TAP IMPACT section of each candidate’s Foliotek
site. This will facilitate review by cooperating teachers, administrators, Salem Supervisors, Salem faculty, and DPI officials.
revised 2010
43
IV. TEACHERS AS PRACTITIONERS (TAP) IMPACT PROJECT
All candidates for initial licensure at the undergraduate level (i.e. undergraduate or MAT
phase 1) are required to create two draft versions of the TAP IMPACT Project. The first
version of an assessment plan is created during EDUC330/530, Instructional Design.
The intermediate draft is compiled during a course particular to each candidate’s
specialty area, specifically:
art education candidates EDUC383/583, Teaching Art in the K-12 School
elementary education candidates EDUC356/556, Integrated Content
music education candidates EDUC 384/584, Teaching Music in the K-12 School
MS/ HS content area candidates EDUC385/585, Teaching Content in the MS/HS
second language candidates EDUC385/585, Teaching Content in the MS/HS
special education candidates EDUC356/556, Integrated content
The final version of the TAP IMPACT Project will be composed during EDUC399/599,
Teachers As Practitioners (student teaching), and submitted in final draft format
during EDUC394/594, Teachers As Practitioners Seminar.
As submitted to DPI in the Salem College Blueprints for Initial Licensure Program Re-
Visioning, Electronic Evidence 5 is as follows.
revised 2010
44
#5 Required
Positive Impact on Student Learning: Evidence that demonstrates impact on student learning.
It is recommended this evidence address descriptors 1a.1, 4b.1, 4h.1, 4h.2, 5a.1.
The TAP IMPACT is a plan for assessment; candidates will develop and describe assessment tools and strategies to
be included as measures of student learning throughout the TAP DESIGN (electronic evidence 3). Elements of this evidence will
be developed to the emerging level of competency during Block 1 and Block 2 Professional Studies courses, will be refined
during program-specific courses, and will be presented at the proficient level during Block 4, Teachers As Practitioners (student
teaching). The TAP IMPACT demonstrates the candidate’s competence with:
planning for assessment
exhibiting attention to the variety of contexts, abilities, and cultures that influence student learning
differentiating for content, process, and product
showcasing performance-based products of learning that are relevant to student purpose and experiences
positively impacting students’ learning
This electronic evidence 5 of the Foliotek site will include:
learning outcomes - a context-specific definition of “desired student learning” and “desired learning outcomes” in
terms of the kinds of learners/ learning needs in the classroom, the unit content, appropriate NCSOS, desired
technology standards, and the integration of 21st century goals <1a1>
pre-assessment - a detailed description of pre-assessment strategies indicating an intentional evaluation or
measure of students’ prior knowledge and/or required background understanding (i.e. an anecdotal overview, a KWL
chart, student surveys, a pre-teaching activity, etc.). This evidence may NOT be a quantitative pre-test instrument.
<4b1>
the assessment plan - a detailed description of the assessment plan for the instructional unit including a
summative assessment designed to evaluate both learners’ understandings and candidate’s positive impact on student
learning. <4h1>
evidence must be performance-based
evidence must be authentic and relevant to students’ lives and experiences
evidence should utilize qualitative process-oriented goals rather than quantitative product-oriented goals
the evaluation plan - a description and supporting documentation for how the assessment(s) will be evaluated
(i.e. checklist, rubric), how results will be recorded and communicated to students, and how results will be used in
future lessons to improve students’ learning <5a1>
student samples - samples of assessments from three students (it is suggested that candidates select a high-
achieving, a mid-level, and a low-level student sample) that clearly demonstrate ways in which the candidate has had a
positive impact on student learning; samples may be videos, web links, journal entries, graphic organizers, audio
recordings, photos of students or projects, etc. <4h2>
revised 2010