Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 5

Stimulasi Sensori (Audio, Visual, dan Afektif) untuk Meningkatkan

Level Kesadaran pada Pasien Cedera Kepala


Sensory Stimulation (Audio,Visual, and Affective) to Enhance The Level of
Consciousness Among Brain Injury Patients

Carina Rega Utomo 1, Adelia Rochma2, Sanda Prima Dewi3, and Edy Purwanto4
1Department of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
2Department of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
3Department of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
4
Department of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
Carina.rega.utomo-2017@fkp.unair.ac.id, Adelia.rochma-2017@fkp.unair.ac.id, Sanda.prima.dewi-2017@fkp.unair.ac.id,
Edy.purwanto-2017@fkp.unair.ac.id.

Keywords: brain injury, sensory stimulation, and ICU.

Abstract: Background: Sensory stimulation (Auditory, visual and affective) is one of nursing intervention to enhance
the level of consciousness among comatose patient caused by brain injury in Intensive Care Unit (ICU).
However, little is known about the effect of sensory stimulation on brain injury patients. This study aims to
examine the effectiveness of sensory stimulation in level of consciousness among brain injury patients in ICU.
Method: source of the articles used are obtained from Scopus, Sage, PubMed, and Google scholar databases
from year 2007 up to 2017. Fifteen articles was measured by using PICOT and SORT methods. Results:
Sensory stimulation can be applied twice a day among brain injury patients to enhance the level of
consciousness. Given sensory stimulation, the consciousness level of all patients was increase by measuring
the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Conclusion: Sensory stimulation (Auditory, visual and affective) is known
to be more effective on enhancing level of consciousness when combined.

.
1 INTRODUCTION The explanation above describes the importance
of stimulation to increase client awareness with head
Head trauma is the most common cause of disability, trauma in ICU. Thus, it is important to know the
death and hospitalization in intensive care units (ICU) effects of sensory stimulation on head trauma.
throughout the world (Aghakhani et al., 2013).
Patients with head trauma usually have different types
levels of consciousness and cognitive function 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
(Borlongan et al., 2015). In addition, patients with
head injury usually takes a long time for the recovery The methods used in the preparation of systematic
process. If the patient does not get up from the coma review begins with the selection of the topic,
will be complications like cognitive impairment, keywords to search articles using the database
contractures, speech disorders, and brain death Scopus, sage, pumbed, and googlescholar which was
(Moattari, Shirazi, Sharifi, and Zareh, 2016). published in 2007 to 2017 with a combination of
In the United States, about 1.5 million people had keywords brain injury, injury, sensory, ICU, and
head trauma, and 52,000 died from head trauma. stimulation. All articles identified selected in
From 1.5 million people who suffered head trauma, according with research questions. Question of
90,000 people suffered severe head injuries that cause research on systematic review this is how evidence
disability in a long time (Ferdon, Dahlberg, and based (study of facts) about the effectiveness of
Kegler, 2013). Although the incidence of mild and sensory stimulation in patients with head injury
moderate head injuries decreased, the incidence of consciousness in the ICU? How much time is needed
severe head injuries does not decrease. Patients with to raise awareness of the patient? Inclusion criteria for
head trauma have neurological problems such as this study is the use of the English language and the
coma so that one of the main rehabilitation objectives sample population was patients with head injury with
is to awaken from the coma (Park, 2016). loss of consciousness. From all articles that match the
A wide variety of rehabilitation techniques can be theme and the inclusion criteria then analyse again
used for clients on head trauma (Abbate, Trimarchi, with Picot and methods scoring with SORT article.
Basile, Mazzucchi, and Devalle, 2014). Sensory
stimulation technique is non-invasive, low risk,
inexpensive, and easy to apply for comatose patients
3 RESULTS /REVIEW
after head trauma. The more sensors stimulation, the
patient may show changes in the level of
The initial search found 32 articles. Read the article
consciousness and awareness faster recovery (Kalani,
back if in accordance with the inclusion criteria.
Pourkermanian, & Alimohammadi, nd; Park, 2016).
Found 17 articles that match and 25 articles into the
Sensory stimulation techniques included in
exclusion criteria. 17 articles then go back and do a
rehabilitation techniques (Abbate et al., 2014).
review in accordance criteria inclusion. So
Several studies have described that this technique
determined appropriate article 15 (Figure 1).
effectively used for head trauma patients in intensive
15 study that aims to explain the effectiveness of
care units (Moattari et al., 2016). Research related to
sensory stimulation to the head trauma was found
sensory stimulation in patients with head trauma
(Johnstone et al., 2009; Kalani et al., Nd; Moattari et
known to have a good relationship between the
al., 2016; Park, 2016; Salmani et al., 2017). 5 The
stimulation of the healing process of patients with
study focuses on the sensory stimulus auditory parts,
head injury (Johnstone, Yoon, Rupright, & Reid-
one focusing on visual studies, and 9 other research is
Arndt, 2009).
a combination of multimodal sensory stimulus that is
Interventions using this sensory stimulation
affective. All articles are at level 1, 2, and 3
provide stimulus to the body. This intervention is
(Appendix 1).
usually divided into Kinestethic,
Auditory,Tactile,and Visual,thus providing multiple
functions simultaneously. Auditory and visual 3.1 Auditory Sensory stimulation
stimulation is known to activate the limbic system The auditory sensory stimulation can increase the
which will be interpreted in the cerebral cortex to awareness of patients with head injury (Kalani et al.,
increase awareness. So, hopefully with lots of Nd; Moattari et al., 2016; Park, 2016; Salmani et al.,
stimulus will be more efforts to activate the limbic 2017).
system (Salmani, Mohammadi, Rezvani, &
Kazemnezhad, 2017).
3.3 Affective Sensory stimulation of
Affective stimulation means the sensory stimulus is
given by people known to the patient. This
stimulation include multimodal stimulation on the
auditory, visual, and kinesthetik conducted by
relatives of known patients. Stimulus is known to
raise awareness of head trauma patients in ICU.
Increased awareness of unknown began to occur on
the seventh day.

3.4 Total Time Giving Stimulus


Stimulus length of time given by the researchers to
raise awareness of head trauma patients have a
different number of days, starting from 5 days, 7 days,
14 days, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks. The number of days
that is commonly used is 14 days. Despite all the
number of days to raise awareness of head trauma
patients, the number of days which is effective for
patients experienced a significant increase in
awareness is not yet known. Providing a stimulus to
do almost all researchers 2 times a day at the same
hour. Unknown stimulus effectively done for 15-30
minutes each meeting. Increased awareness of head
trauma patients who do sensory stimulus in the ICU
with measurement GlaslowComa Scale (GCS) on
average increased after day 7 to 14 days the amount
of stimulation (Moattari et al., 2016).
Figure 1: Flow diagram systematic review articles

4 DISCUSSION
Patients were more significantly enhanced awareness
when listening to recordings of voice or family or Providing stimulation is a challenge to nurses who
people they care compared to listening to the voice of provide care in the intensive care unit with a brain
a nurse or a stranger. Sensory stimulation to the injury patients. One of the serious problems in
auditory part also increased more significantly when patients with head injury is a comma on sensory
in stimulus directly, rather than indirectly. Examples deprivation (Moattari et al., 2016). This can cause an
stimulus Direct is a sound family visit and examples impact on the mental and perceptual problems and
of indirect stimulus is sound TV. life-threatening conditions. Provide necessary
stimulation given to the client even though the
3.2 Visual Sensory Stimulation conditions of loss of consciousness or coma
(Johnstone et al., 2009).
The visual sensory stimulation can also increase The first objective of this study was to compare
awareness. Visual sensory stimulation can be done the effectiveness of sensory stimulation auditory,
using a virtual reality (VR). Virtual reality will show visual and affective. Auditory sensory stimulation
both 2-dimensional images and three-dimensional. may alter cognitive function by increasing ventricular
Patients can be given a stimulus with photos or video fluid drainage without negative impact to the physical
without the sound of people loved. In addition, also such as increased ICP or cerebral perfusion pressure
using natural pictures such as forest or mountain can (Pape et al., 2015; Park, 2016). The other explanation
be given. However, the visual sensory stimulation is may be the stimulus auditory provided directly have
more effective when combined with auditory a level high interpersonal and content of the voice has
stimulation. an important meaning for the patient so as to activate
the central motoric system with this stimulation (Ali Nayeem, 2013). So, there is still need for further
& Gorji, 2014; Sullivan et al., 2017; Tavangar, research how many days are effective to provide a
Kalantary, Salimi, & Jarahzadeh, 2015). stimulus to an increase in awareness significantly.
Visual sensory stimulation increased awareness
by providing stimulating effects that facilitate the
dendrites to grow and connect with synaps. Another 4 IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING
possible explanation is the incorporation of auditory
and visual stimuli provide a soothing effect for PRACTICE
patients. So the recovery process can be maximum
(Gerber et al., 2017). It is also said that the possibility Providing caring is the main task of a nurse
of combining some of the stimulus is more effective (Abdullah, Idris, and Saparon, 2017). This role must
than a single stimulus. This is supported by studies on be adhered to by nurses, including nurse in the ICU
affective sensory stimulus. who have the challenge to stimulate the client's level
Affective sensory stimuli that are provided by the of consciousness as in the case of head trauma. Until
family or nurse may be activate the limbic system. more research is growing about the effectiveness of
After that, it will increase sympathetic activity and each of these stimuli, clinicians should use clinical
increase norepinephrine at the nerve terminal. It is recommendation today that have been proven, such
then interpreted by the cerebral cortex and ultimately as providing stimulus sensory in patients using
raise awareness and spirit. Additionally, when stimulus auditory in directly that have been proven to
families communicate, in which there is an element raise awareness, or using a combination of auditory
of visual stimulation, auditory and kinetic. In terms of and visual, as well as involve the family as affective
auditory family may give positive expectations, or stimuli. Nurses and family can provide this stimulus
create positive memories. This is consistent with the of about 15 minutes at a stimulus and performed
model psiconeuroimunological that positive thinking several times in one day. Given stimulus can improve
would be associated with better health status. patient recovery phase. Although, research related to
Moreover, it may also be due to each person will lean the effectiveness of each stimulus is limited.
on spiritual beliefs to help them reduce stress. So the
patient remain optimistic and reduced stress
(Johnstone et al., 2009; Salmani et al., 2017; Schmidt- 5 CONCLUSION
Wilcke et al., 2017).
Three explanations above show that more Sensory stimulation to the auditory, visual, and
stimulus is given to patients with head injury who affective known to be effective is used in patients
experienced loss of consciousness, will give a lot of with head injury with GCS at least 5 in the ICU. The
response from the body. However, when compared combination of multiple sensory stimuli such as
one by one between the effects of audio, visual, and auditory and visual known to be effective to increase
tactile, as well as affective until today still can not awareness. However, there is a shortage of evidence
explain exactly which one is more effective when based research on the effectiveness of each stimulus
using only one stimulus compared to using a lot of on head trauma in ICU. Clients are given a head
stimulus. Thus, the need for further research related trauma stimulation will begin to make a change after
to the effects of stimulus audio, visual, and tactile day 7. Intervention given a short time but often more
carried out by the use of the proper protocol by effective than one but in a long time. However, up to
nurses. now unknown number of days it takes to make it work
The second research objective was to answer the significantly stimulation. Thus, it is advisable to more
time required for the stimulation of consciousness. researchers studied the effects of long-term and short-
sensory stimulation and to compare each stimulus. So
Recovery in patients ranging from days 7 to 14 at the
that stimulation can know the effectiveness of sensory
client with the most common used GCS is 8. To date,
stimulus auditory, visual and kinetic.
there is no clarity researchers examined the number
of days studied and how many days are most effective
used. Stimulus performed usually twice by
investigators. Stimulus is done in a short time and REFERENCES
repeats more effective than done in the long term.
This is supported by research that the stimulus Abbate, C., Trimarchi, PD, Basile, I., Mazzucchi, A., &
Meghan five times within 15 minutes is more Devalle, G. (2014). Sensory stimulation for Patients
with disorders of consciousness: from stimulation to
effective than 1 time in 1 hour (Megha, Harpreet, and
rehabilitation. Frontiers in HumanNeuroscience,
8(August), 616. Moattari, M., Shirazi, FA, Sharifi, N., & Zareh, N. (2016).
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00616 Effects of a Sensory Stimulation by Nurses and
Families on Level of Cognitive Function, and Basic
Abdullah, E., Idris, A., & Saparon, A. (2017). PAPR Cognitive Sensory Recovery of comatose Patients
reduction technique using scs-slm in stfbc mimo- With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized
OFDM. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Control Trial, 21(4).
AppliedSciences, 12(10), 3218-3221. https://doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.23531.Research
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12426
Pape, TL, Rosenow, JM, Steiner, M., Parrish, T., Guernon,
Aghakhani, N., Azami, M., Jasemi, M., Khoshsima, M., A., Harton, B., ... Nemeth, AJ (2015) , Placebo-
Eghtedar, S., & Leader, N. (2013). Epidemiology of Controlled Trial of Familiar Auditory Sensory
traumatic brain injury in Urmia, Iran. Iranian Red Training for Acute Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A
Crescent MedicalJournal, 15(2), 173-4. Preliminary Report,
https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.2090 1.https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314554626

Ali, M., & Gorji, H. (2014). Effect of auditory stimulation Park, S. (2016). Effectiveness of direct and non-direct
on duration traumatic coma in the intensive care unit auditory stimulation on coma arousal after traumatic
of the Medical Sciences University of Mazandarn, brain injury, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12448
Iran, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-
354X.125940 Salmani, F., Mohammadi, E., Rezvani, M., &
Kazemnezhad, A. (2017). The effects of family-
Borlongan, C., Acosta, S., de la Pena, I., Tajiri, N., Kaneko, centered affective stimulation comatose on Brain-
Y., Lozano, D., & Gonzales- Portillo, G. (2015). Injured Patients' level of consciousness: A
Neuroinflammatory responses to traumatic brain randomized controlled trial. International Journal of
injury: etiology, clinical consequences, and NursingStudies, 74(January), 44-52.
therapeutic opportunities. Neuropsychiatric Disease https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.05.014
andTreatment,97.
https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S65815 Schmidt-Wilcke, T., Wulms, N., Heba, S., Pleger, B., Puts,
NA, Glaubitz, B., ... DINSE , HR (2017). Structural
Ferdon, C. David, Dahlberg, LL, & Kegler, SR (2013). changes in brain morphology induced by brief
Homicide rates among persons aged 10-24 years - periods of repetitive sensory stimulation.
United States, 1981-2010. MMWR. Morbidity and NeuroImage, 165(March 2017), 148-157.
Mortality WeeklyReport, 62(27), 545-8. Retrieved https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.016
from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23842443 Sullivan, EG, Guernon, A., Blabas, B., Herrold, AA, Pape,
L., Galassi, E., ... Herrold, AA ( 2017). Familiar
Gerber, BC, Jeitziner, M., Wyss, P., Chesham, A., Muri, auditory sensory training in chronic traumatic brain
RM, Jakob, SM, & Nef, T . (2017). Visuo-acoustic injury: a case study. Disability andRehabilitation,
stimulation that helps you to relax: A virtual reality 0(0), 000.
setup for Patients in the intensive care unit, (April), https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1277403
1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13153-1
Tavangar, H., Kalantary, MS, Salimi, T., & Jarahzadeh, M.
Johnstone, B., Yoon, DP, Rupright, J., & Reid-Arndt, S. (2015). Effect of family members' voice on the level
(2009). Relationships among spiritual beliefs, of consciousness of comatose Patients admitted to
religious Practices, congregational support and the intensive care unit: A single - blind randomized
health for individuals with traumatic brain injury. controlled trial. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-
BrainInjury, 23(5), 411-419. 9175.157806
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050902788501

Kalani, Z., Pourkermanian, P., & Alimohammadi, N. (nd).


The Effect of Family Guided Visits on the Level of
Consciousness in Traumatic Brain Injury.
https://doi.org/10.15412/J.JBTW.01050502

Megha, M., Harpreet, S., & Nayeem, Z. (2013). Effect of


frequency of multimodal coma stimulation on the
consciousness levels of traumatic brain injury
comatose Patients, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2013.767937

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi