Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
600 Water Street, SW, Washington, DC 20024, USA Tel: +1.202.484.7170/ Fax: +1.202.488.0754
www.msiworldwide.com
Disclaimer The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for
International Development or the United States Government
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface …………………………………………………………………………… i
Index …………………………………………………………………………….. 75
PREFACE
This booklet is not intended for the layman who has no basic knowledge of the
law and of court procedure. It is meant to be used by members of the Bench and Bar,
law professors and students, the legal community in general, and Non-Governmental
Organizations (NGOs) involved in improving the administration of justice, in
particular.
The booklet contains three checklists: The first is for Judges and Justices; the
second is for Prosecutors; and, the third is for defense lawyers. (Justices of the
Sandiganbayan are both trial and appellate court magistrates under Presidential
Decree 1606, as amended, creating the Anti-Graft Court) Each checklist contains
different headings stating certain qualities (like Integrity or Impartiality) under which
specific acts or norms of conduct are classified. These itemized acts are the standards
by which the conduct and performance of the magistrates, prosecutors and lawyers
being observed could more or less be evaluated. The standards are derived from the
following legal sources:
Established doctrines and recent jurisprudence on the subject have also been included.
Each point of conduct is supported by a specific citation. Being comprehensive, the
booklet is virtually a manual on judicial and legal ethics.
ii
With very few and unavoidable exceptions, acts constituting felonies and
violations of penal laws have intentionally been excluded for two reasons: first, they
involve elements too technical for observers to understand; and second, they would
entail criminal investigation or proceedings outside the scope of a court observation.
Limited copies of this booklet will be distributed to the Supreme Court, Office
of the Court Administrator, Judicial and Bar Council, Sandiganbayan, Department of
Justice, Office of the Ombudsman and the Special Prosecutor, other government
agencies, the Integrated Bar of the Philippines, some of the leading law schools in the
country, and some NGOs monitoring the progress of corruption cases.
First of all, familiarize yourself with the contents of this booklet. Note that it
contains three different checklists: one for Judges and Justices; another for
Prosecutors; and a third one for defense lawyers. Note further that each checklist has
different headings stating certain qualities (like “Integrity” or “Judicial Competence
and Performance”). Under each heading, the specific acts or norms of conduct to be
observed are classified (like “Does not solicit for charities” under the heading
“Integrity” in the Checklist for Judges and Justices). Once you know these acts or
norms of conduct or at least the heading and the checklist where they can be found, it
will be easy for you to turn to them during the court observation.
To the right of each point of conduct or act to be observed are two (2)
columns. The first column pertains to items that you have no knowledge of or had no
opportunity to observe during the court observation. You indicate your lack of
knowledge or lack of opportunity to observe by writing an “X” inside the box under
this column and opposite that particular point of conduct or act after the court
observation.
The second column is where you rate the conduct or performance of the
person being observed on a progressive scale of ten (10). The lowest score starts with
a dismal 1 and the highest score glows with a perfect 10. You indicate your rating by
simply checking inside the box under the numbered sub-column and opposite the
point of conduct you observed. You do the rating during the court observation or
immediately afterwards. For example, if you observed that the Prosecutor has
adequately prepared himself on the law and facts of his case and has presented his
evidence in proper order, turn to the Checklist for Prosecutors, look under the heading
“Professional Competence and Performance”, look for the point of conduct which
reads, “Does not appear for trial unless he has adequately prepared himself on the law
and the facts of his case, xxx” and check inside the box opposite that point under sub-
column 9 or 10, as you wish. Another example: Suppose you observed that the
counsel for the accused came late for trial and was even scolded for it by the Judge,
turn to the Checklist for Lawyers, look under the heading, “Professional Attitude,
Behavior and Demeanor”, look for the point of conduct which says, “Punctually
appears at Court hearings,” and check inside the box opposite that point under sub-
column 1 (lowest score).
Should you find some difficulty in locating specific points of conduct in the
checklists, use the subject index at the end of this booklet. To make it easy for you to
scan the page where the subject is found, the key words are written in bold letters. In
the index, you will notice that the page or pages where the subject may be found are
prefixed with the letters, “CJ”, “CP” or “CL”. These letters stand for “Checklist for
Judges and Justices”, “Checklist for Prosecutors” or “Checklist for Lawyers”,
respectively. Choose only the page or pages pertaining to the position of the person
being observed. To illustrate: Suppose you observed that the defense lawyer has
iv
been harassing the witness on cross-examination. Look for the subject “harassing a
witness” in the index and you will see that the subject can be found on pages CL-54
and CP-30. Choose page 54 because the person you observed harassing the witness is
the lawyer.
You are not expected to observe all the acts covered by the checklists, but try
to rate the person being observed on as many points of conduct as you can. (If you are
a law student, your own grade will depend on the number of points you were able to
observe because that will demonstrate your resourcefulness in getting at the facts, say,
by going over the records of the case or interviewing court personnel.)
After the court observation, count the number of items about which you had
no knowledge or had no opportunity to observe and write it on the space indicated
inside the box at the bottom of the page. Also count the number of items (not the
score) you were able to observe and write it on the space indicated inside the same
box. Now, add up the scores you gave under the second column and write the result
above the word “SCORE” inside the same box. Do this for every page.
At the end of every heading is a second box. Add up separately the number of
observed and unobserved items written inside the first box on each page and write the
results on the spaces indicated inside this second box. Also add up the scores on each
page and write the result on the space indicated inside this second box. This figure
represents the total score of the person observed on that particular heading or quality
only.
At the end of every checklist is a score sheet. Fill up this score sheet with the
corresponding figures or scores you wrote inside the second boxes. Finally, add them
up to arrive at the total figures (of observed and unobserved items) and total score of
the person observed. Whew, you made it!
Before submitting the booklet to your supervisor, see to it that the forms
provided on pages 1, 21 and 44 of the booklet have been filled up and signed by you.
Do not fill up the space for “Average Rating”. The supervisors will compute the
average rating. If you have any comments, write them under “Observer’s Remarks”
on page 92 of this booklet. Finally, submit the booklet to your supervisor.
The supervisors will afterwards collate and tally the results, using a fair
system of evaluation and computation that they will agree on. They will take into
account, among other things, the weight that should be given each quality or point of
conduct, and the number of points about which you had no knowledge or had no
opportunity to observe in proportion to the number of points you were able to
observe. The results will be summarized and brought to the attention of the proper
authorities for consideration and appropriate action.
Find inner satisfaction with the thought that your participation in the court
observation will contribute in someway, be it ever so small, towards improving the
administration of justice in our country.
1
No knowledge RATING
or (on a progressive scale of ten)
INTEGRITY No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
No knowledge (on a progressive scale of ten)
or
INTEGRITY No opportunity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
to observe
No knowledge RATING
or (on a progressive scale of ten)
IMPARTIALITY No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
or (on a progressive scale of ten)
IMPARTIALITY No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
or (on a progressive scale of ten)
INDEPENDENCE No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
JUDICIAL COMPETENCE or (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND PERFORMANCE No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
JUDICIAL COMPETENCE or (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND PERFORMANCE No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
JUDICIAL COMPETENCE or (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND PERFORMANCE No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
JUDICIAL COMPETENCE or (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND PERFORMANCE No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
JUDICIAL COMPETENCE or (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND PERFORMANCE No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
JUDICIAL COMPETENCE or (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND PERFORMANCE No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
JUDICIAL ATTITUDE, BEHAVIOR or (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND DEMEANOR No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
ADMINISTRATIVE ABILITY or (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND EFFICIENCY No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
ADMINISTRATIVE ABILITY or (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND EFFICIENCY No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
ADMINISTRATIVE ABILITY or (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND EFFICIENCY No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
or (on a progressive scale of ten)
EXTRAJUDICIAL CONDUCT No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
or (on a progressive scale of ten)
EXTRAJUDICIAL CONDUCT No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE or (on a progressive scale of ten)
LAW No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge RATING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE or (on a progressive scale of ten)
LAW No opportunity
to observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
INTEGRITY
IMPARTIALITY
INDEPENDENCE
EXTRAJUDICIAL CONDUCT
TOTAL SCORE
RATING
INTEGRITY No knowledge or (on a progressive
No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
INTEGRITY No knowledge or (on a progressive
No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
INTEGRITY No knowledge or (on a progressive
No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
INTEGRITY No knowledge or (on a progressive
No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge or RATING
IMPARTIALITY No opportunity to (on a progressive
observe scale of ten)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
IMPARTIALITY No knowledge or (on a progressive
No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge or RATING
INDEPENDENCE No opportunity to (on a progressive
observe scale of ten)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
_____________________
Total number of points you observed ____________ TOTAL SCORE FOR
INDEPENDENCE
28
RATING
PREOFESSIONAL COMPETENCE No knowledge or (on a progressive
AND PERFORMANCE No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE No knowledge or (on a progressive
AND PERFORMANCE No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE No knowledge or (on a progressive
AND PERFORMANCE No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE No knowledge or (on a progressive
AND PERFORMANCE No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
PROFESSIONAL ATTITUDE, No knowledge or (on a progressive
BEHAVIOR AND DEMEANOR No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
PROFESSIONAL ATTITUDE, No knowledge or (on a progressive
BEHAVIOR AND DEMEANOR No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
PROFESSIONAL ATTITUDE, No knowledge or (on a progressive
BEHAVIOR AND DEMEANOR No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
ADMINISTRATIVE ABILITY AND No knowledge or (on a progressive
EFFICIENCY No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
ADMINISTRATIVE ABILITY AND No knowledge or (on a progressive
EFFICIENCY No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
ADMINISTRATIVE ABILITY AND No knowledge or (on a progressive
EFFICIENCY No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
No knowledge or (on a progressive
EXTRAJUDICIAL CONDUCT No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
No knowledge or (on a progressive
EXTRAJUDICIAL CONDUCT No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
COMPLIANCE WITH No knowledge or (on a progressive
PROFESSIONAL DUTY No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
AND THE LAW
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
COMPLIANCE WITH No knowledge or (on a progressive
PROFESSIONAL DUTY No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
AND THE LAW
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RATING
COMPLIANCE WITH No knowledge or (on a progressive
PROFESSIONAL DUTY No opportunity to scale of ten)
observe
AND THE LAW
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
INTEGRITY
IMPARTIALITY
INDEPENDENCE
EXTRAJUDICIAL CONDUCT
TOTAL SCORE
No knowledge
or No RATING
INTEGRITY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
INTEGRITY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
INTEGRITY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
INTEGRITY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
INTEGRITY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
IMPARTIALITY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No
IMPARTIALITY opportunity to RATING
observe (on a progressive scale of ten)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
INDEPENDENCE opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND PERFORMANCE observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND PERFORMANCE observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND PERFORMANCE observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND PERFORMANCE observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND PERFORMANCE observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND PERFORMANCE observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND PERFORMANCE observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND PERFORMANCE observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
PROFESSIONAL ATTITUDE, opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
BEHAVIOR AND DEMEANOR observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
ADMINISTRATIVE ABILITY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND EFFICIENCY observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
ADMINISTRATIVE ABILITY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND EFFICIENCY observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
ADMINISTRATIVE ABILITY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND EFFICIENCY observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
ADMINISTRATIVE ABILITY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND EFFICIENCY observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
ADMINISTRATIVE ABILITY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND EFFICIENCY observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
EXTRAJUDICIAL CONDUCT opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
EXTRAJUDICIAL CONDUCT opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
or No RATING
EXTRAJUDICIAL CONDUCT opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
COMPLIANCE WITH or No RATING
PROFESSIONAL DUTY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND THE LAW observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
COMPLIANCE WITH or No RATING
PROFESSIONAL DUTY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND THE LAW observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
COMPLIANCE WITH or No RATING
PROFESSIONAL DUTY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND THE LAW observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
COMPLIANCE WITH or No RATING
PROFESSIONAL DUTY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND THE LAW observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
No knowledge
COMPLIANCE WITH or No RATING
PROFESSIONAL DUTY opportunity to (on a progressive scale of ten)
AND THE LAW observe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
INTEGRITY
IMPARTIALITY
INDEPENDENCE
EXTRAJUDICIAL CONDUCT
TOTAL SCORE
INDEX
ability to influence public official, tribunal or admission to the Bar, application for – CL-45
legislative body – CL-46
abusing a witness, avoids – CL-54 advice and assistance, gives proper – CL-49
abusive, offensive or improper language – CL-52; affairs of client, disclosure to associates about –
CP-32 CL-57
acting in another professional capacity – CL-46 appellate proceedings, does not waste time on –
CJ-12
acts contrary to law, refrains from doing – CP-38 application for admission to the Bar by an
unqualified person – CP-40
administration of justice, duty to assist in the speedy arraignment, complies with period of – CJ-8
and efficient - CP-29
administration of justice, supports efforts in the – assets, files statement statements of – CJ-20
CL-69
administrative functions, performance of – CJ-18 assets, liabilities and net worth; statement of – CP-41
administrator, serving as – CJ-2 attention, diligence, skill and competence; gives full
– CL-57
76
attire, appears in proper – CL-53; CP-32 business – prompt and effective dispatch of – CJ-15
attitude, courts are made for litigant –CJ-12 business advisor, serving as – CJ-16
attitude, detached from appealed case – CJ-12 business director, serving as –CJ-16
authorized signatories on papers and documents, not business employee, serving as – CJ-16
more than three – CP-36
Bar, application for admission to the– CP-22; CP-40 business officer, serving as – CJ-16
behavior, promotes court’s integrity and impartiality – candor, fairness and good faith to the Court – CL-60;
CJ-12 CP-32
behavior, scandalous – CL-60; CP-33 candor, fairness and loyalty to client – CL-72
bequest, refusal to accept –CJ-2 case status, keeps client informed of – CL-62
borrowing money from client, avoids – CL-61 case, decides with dispatch – CJ-9
browbeating a witness, avoids – CL-54; CP-30 case, failing to do anything about – CJ-9
cases, decides within required period – CJ-6 competence, gives full – CL-57
character of employment, fees determined by – CL-63 compliance with the law, impresses upon client –
CL-46
check drawn against insufficient funds – CL-47 conduct, above suspicion – CJ-16
citing as law repealed or amended provisions – CL-53 conduct, fitness to practice law – CL-60
classified information, does not divulge – CP-41 conduct, undermines fitness to practice law – CP-33
client’s affairs, indiscreet conversational about – conduct; unlawful, dishonest, immoral or deceitful –
CL-66 CL-44
client’s funds and property, delivers upon demand – conduct, unprofessional (of lawyers and court
CL-61 personnel) – CJ-13
client’s money and properties, holds in trust – CL-61 conduct, proper – CJ-16
client’s money and property, accounts for—CL-61 confidences and secrets of client, after relationship is
terminated – CL-73
client’s request for information, responds to – CL-62 confidences or secrets of client; exceptions –
disclosure of – CL-56
client’s rights – zeal in defense of – CL-60 confidences or secrets of client, prevents disclosure
of – CL-63
collaborating counsel, competent – CL-55 confidences or secrets of client, does not reveal –
CL-56; CL-73
compensation, controversies with client concerning – confidential or classified information, does not
CL-63 divulge – CP-41
competence and diligence, serves client with – CL-55 conflict of interest; due to his being a board member,
officer, stockholder or partner—CP-26
78
conflict of interest, informs prospective client about – court personnel, supervision of – CJ-15
CL-72
conflicting interests, does not represent – CL-72 court personnel, appointment of (based on merit and
qualifications) – CJ-14
Constitution, upholds the – CL-69; CP-41 Court processes, does not misuse – CL-54
consultation about a case, does not reveal– CL-67 Court, influencing the – CL-45
continuance, based on false statement – CP-31 courteous service to the public – CP-35
continuance, denies motions for – CJ-8 courtesy, fairness and candor to professional
colleagues – CL-52; CP-32
continuing legal programs, participates in – CL-70; courtesy, to lawyers, litigants and witnesses – CJ-9
CP-40
controversial tone in addressing counsel, litigants or creed, does not decline representation due to – CL-49
witnesses – CJ-10
controversies with client concerning compensation – criminal charges, does not present unfounded –
CL-63 CL-56
court personnel, restrained from making public deal, financial – CJ-2; CJ-16
comments – CJ-13
79
deceased partner, using name of – CL-67 devotion to the interest of his client – CL-60
deceitful conduct – drawing a check against diligence of a good father of a family, in the use of
insufficient funds is – CL-47 public funds and property – CP-37
defense, presents every possible – CL-57 diligence, in the dispatch of business – CJ-7
defenseless or oppressed, does not reject the cause of disappearance or abandonment due to threats to his
the – CL-69 life – CL-58
defenseless or oppressed, renders legal advice to the – disciplinary measures, against lawyers and personnel
CL-69 – CJ-13
delay a case, does not unduly – CL-54 discrimination, against the poor and underprivileged
– CP-25
delay, administers justice without – CJ-6 discrimination, due to party affiliation – CP-25
delay, filing motion solely for – CP-30 discrimination, due to preference – CP-25
delegation of professional tasks to unqualified person dispensers of undue patronage, public officials and
– CL-52 employees as – CP-33
democratic way of life and values, commits himself to display of learning, CJ-10
– CP-38
disqualification, immaterial – CJ-4 entrusting trial to another lawyer (if counsel testifies)
– CL-55
document to show assets, liabilities and net worth – example, for others – CJ-17
CP-41
document to show business and financial connections excellence, dedication and commitment to – CJ-14
– CP-41
documents, pores over all ( despite heavy caseload) – excellence, discharges duties with – CP-30
CJ-9
documents, ready with originals for comparison with execution of judgment, does not impede – CL-54
copies – CP-29
duties, performance of (subject to public scrutiny) – extension of time (to file pleadings, memoranda or
CP-31 briefs) – CP-29
employees, motivates his –CJ-14 extravagant display of wealth, does not indulge in –
CP-41
fact, not proven asserted as – CP-28 familiarity with Judges, cultivating – CL-45
facts, clearly stated in judgment – CJ-7 fee for legal services, does not divide – CL-70
fairness to the Court – CL-60; CP-32 fidelity to the cause of his client – CL-46
false statement, material to the granting of a firm name; use any false, misleading or assumed
continuance – CP-31 name– CL-67
falsehood, does not do or consent to – CL-44; CP-22 foreign intrusion, against Philippine sovereignty –
CP-27
falsification of commercial documents – CL-67 fraud perpetrated by client, calls client to rectify –
CL-56
82
free legal aid, does not decline IBP request for guardians, excessive compensation to – CJ-7
rendition of – CL-71
funds and property of client, delivered upon demand – gun, bringing out –CJ-10
CL-61
good customs, refrains from doing acts contrary to – hearings, openness of – CP-35
CP-38
good faith to the Court – CL-60; CP-32 honesty, no doubt on his – CJ-1
good morals, refrains from doing acts contrary to – honorable means, employs every – CL-57
CP-38
goods, resources and technology; locally produced – hospitality to the Judge – CL-45
CP-40
gratuity, soliciting or accepting – CP-24 IBP schedule of fees, fees determined by – CL-63
importance of the subject matter, fees determined by injunction, ex-parte hearing on applications for –CJ-7
– CL-62
improper language, use of –CL-52 insufficient funds, check drawn against - CL-47
impropriety, refrains from – CL-45 integrity of the legal profession – CL-45; CL-48;
CL-50
independence, integrity and effectiveness of the legal intelligence, discharges duties with –CP-30
profession – CL-51
information from his files, client’s consent needed for interference by another government branch or agency
disclosure of - CL-47 – CL-51; CP-27
information on office policies and procedures – CP-35 irresponsible and improper conduct – CL-48
infraction of the law, avoids the slightest – CJ-19 Judge, attributes motives to a – CL-53; CP-28
inhibition, for just and valid reasons—CJ-3 Judge, grievance against a – CP-40
inhibition, impartiality questioned –CJ-3 Judge, grievances against (submits them to proper
authorities only) – CL-70
84
Judges – cultivating familiarity with – CL-45 language, offensive and abusive – CL-59
Judges, administrative functions of other –CJ-13 Language; use of abusive, offensive or improper -
CL-52; CP-32
judgment, does not impede execution of – CP-30 law schools, supports high standards in – CP-38
judicial officers – respect due – CL-60; CP-32 law, facts and evidence of the case; prepared on –
CL-52
just administration of the law, zealous regard for – leader and manager, strives to be a good – CJ-14
CJ-11
just and inexpensive determination of every action, learning, skill and ability; exertion of - CL-60
assists parties to obtain –CL-58
justness and sincerity, acts with – CP-25 legal business, soliciting – CL-66
legal principles, conversant with – CJ-6 loyalty to country, above loyalty to persons or party –
CP-27
legal profession; independence, integrity and loyalty to the Filipino people, maintains – CP-40
effectiveness of – CL-50
legal profession, integrity and dignity of – CL-45; loyalty to the Republic, maintains – CP-40
CP-22
legal services, made available – CL-50 mail, adopts system to receive (during his absence) –
CL-64
legal system, lessening confidence in the – CL-45 mass media representatives, does not pay or give
anything of value to – CL-66
legislative body, ability to influence any – CL-46 material fact, suppression of (in application for
admission to the Bar) – CL-45
lending money to client, avoids – CL-62 material interest (in official transactions) – CP-23
liabilities, files statement of – CJ-19 merits and probable results of client’s case, gives
candid opinion on – CL-72
lien for attorney’s fees – CL-47 merits of his cause, relies on – CL-45; CP-33
loan, refusal to accept – CJ-2 misleading the Court, does not do or allow – CP-28
locally-produced goods, resources and technology – misquoting, (any decision, argument, language or
CP-40 paper) – CP-28
money and properties of client, holds in trust – CL-61 official papers and documents, not more than three
signatories on – CP-36
money and property of client, accounts for – CL-61; official papers and documents, processing and
CL-65 completion of – CP-36
motion, frivolous and without merit – CP-30 opinion of guilt, does not decline representation due
to – CL-49
multiple actions for same cause – CL-54 opinion, honest (about him) – CJ-17
net worth, files statement of – CJ-19 ostentatious display of wealth, does not indulge in –
CP-41
notice of lien, to satisfy fees and disbursements – papers and properties of client, turns over – CL-64
CL-61
offensive and abusive language, refrains from – CL-59 payments, does not demand excessive – CL-67
person unable to pay fees (lawyer observes same pretrial, considers all aspects of – CJ-7
standard as with paying clients) – CL-71
pleadings, prepares and files – CL-58 pride of country and people – CP-34
policy, rules and procedure (simplifying and primary duty (that justice is done) – CP-32
systemizing) – CP-35
political speeches, making of – CJ-18 Private enterprise; own, control or manage – CP-23
ponencia not yet promulgated, leaking of – CJ-18 private enterprise, recommending any person for
employment in - CP-23
poor and underprivileged, discrimination against – private interest, advancing his – CP-22
CP-25
position of any party – CJ-5 private interest (interferes with public duties) –
CP-22
practice of law – desists from – CJ-18 privileged communication, binds himself to the rule
on – CL-72
practice of law, does not assist in the unauthorized – probability of losing other employment, fees
CL-70 determined by – CL-62
practice of other profession (conflicts with judicial procedure of handling case, does not allow client to
functions) – CJ-18 dictate – CL-51
preparation on the law, facts and evidence of the case professional standing, fees determined by – CL-63
– CL-52; CP-29
preparation, does not handle any matter without professional tasks, delegation to unqualified person –
adequate – CL-55 CL-52
88
professionalism, discharges duties with – CP-30 public order, refrains from doing acts contrary to –
CP-38
prompt service to the public - CP-35 public policy, refrains from doing acts contrary to –
CP-38
proper attire, appears in – CL-53; CP-32 public safety, refrains from doing acts contrary to –
CP-38
property, borrowing (subject of case) – CJ-17 public scrutiny (on performance of duties) – CP-31
property, using (subject of case) – CJ-17 public service and fidelity, high standards of – CJ-13
public accountability, maintains principle of – CP-35 public statements regarding pending case, refrains
from making – CL-66; CP-38
public comments (on pending and impending cases) – public, service to the (courteous, prompt and
CJ-16 adequate) – CP-35
public documents, inspection of – CP-37 publicity to attract legal business, does not pay media
in return for – CL-66
public duties (interfered by his private interest) – publicity (for personal vainglory) – CJ-9
CP-22
public funds and property, diligence in the use of – punctually appears in Court – CL-53; CP-33
CP-37
public interest, over and above personal interest – qualifications or legal services, statements or claims
CP-23 about his – CL-67
public official, ability to influence any – CL-46 quasi-judicial functions, performance of – CJ-18
race, sex, creed or status of life (does not decline rules of procedure, observes – CL-53; CP-28
representation due to) – CL-50
rectitude, symbol of– CJ-1 sensitive on honest opinion about him – CJ-17
relatives in government, identification and disclosure services to the needy, does not refuse – CL-71
of – CP-42
repealed or amended law, citing as law – CP-28 settlement, encourages fair – CL-69
repealed or amended provisions, citing as law – CL-53 sex, does not decline representation due to – CL-49
respect due to the Court and judicial officers – CL-60; side remarks – CJ-10
CP-32
results of client’s case, gives honest opinion on signatories on papers and documents – CP-36
probable – CL-72
rights of parties, respect for – CJ-11 skill demanded, fees determined by – CL-62
90
soliciting legal business – CL-66 thin skinned, on honest opinion about him – CJ-17
sovereignty, Philippine – CP-27 threats to his life, disappears or abandons client due
to – CL-58
speedy and efficient administration of justice, assists time spent and extent of services, fees determined by
in the – CL-71 – CL-62
statement of assets, liabilities and net worth – CJ-19; trial, allows accused 15 days period to prepare for –
CP-41 CJ-8
status of case, keeps client informed of – CL-62 trial, complies with 30-day period to commence –
CJ-8
status of life, declines representation due to – CL-49 trial, complies with 180 day entire period of – CJ-8
supremacy of civilian authority over military, trial, punishes counsel or prosecutor who delays –
manifests by deeds – CP-40 CJ-9
trial, setting of (when witness is unavailable) – CP-30 witness, impersonating another, does not assist –
CL-54; CP-22
truth, ascertains the – CJ-6 zeal, represents his client with – CL-46
-U-
-W-
OBSERVER’S REMARKS
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
On the Prosecutor:
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
On the Lawyer:
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________