Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PROJECT REPORT
ON
1 INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION OF FII
SECONDARY DATA
LIMITATIONS
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
3 INDUSTRY PROFILE
COMPANY PROFILE
4 DATA TABULATION
5 CONCLUSION
INDEX
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
Chapter No.1
Introduction
FII (Foreign Institutional Investors)
‘FII’ include “Overseas pension funds, mutual funds, investment trust, asset
management company, nominee company, bank, institutional portfolio manager,
university funds, endowments, foundations, charitable trusts, charitable societies, a
trustee or power of attorney holder incorporated or established outside India proposing to
make proprietary investments or investments on behalf of a broad-based fund. FIIs can
invest their own funds as well as invest on behalf of their overseas clients registered as
such with SEBI. These client accounts that the FII manages are known as ‘sub-accounts’.
A domestic portfolio manager can also register itself as an FII to manage the funds of
sub-accounts.
In this project we will try to understand the concept of the Foreign Institutional
Investment (FII) and their role and effect on the exchange rate of Indian Rupee means the
fluctuation in FII investment affects the value of exchange rate or not.
In order to understand the role and effect of the FII on Indian Rupee we need to
know in brief about the Foreign Institutional Investment and Exchange Rate of Indian
National Rupee.
Foreign Direct Investment [FDI] involves in the direct production activity and
also of medium to long-term nature. But the Foreign Portfolio Investment[FPI] is a
short-term investment mostly in the financial markets and it consists of Foreign
Institutional Investment (FII). The FII, given its short-term nature, might have bi-
directional causation with the returns of other domestic financial markets like money
market, stock market, foreign exchange market etc. Hence, understanding the
determinants of FII is very important for any emerging economy as it would have larger
impact on the domestic financial markets in the short run and real impact in the long run.
The present study examines the determinants of foreign portfolio investment in the Indian
context as the country after experiencing the foreign exchange crisis opened up the
economy for foreign capital.
India, being a capital scarce country, has taken lot of measures to attract foreign
investment since the beginning of reforms in 1991. Till the end of January 2010 it could
attract a total foreign investment of around US$ 48 billions out of which US$ 23 billions
is in the form of FPI. FII consists of around US$ 12 billions in the total foreign
investments. This shows the importance of FII in the overall foreign investment
programme. As India is in the process of liberalizing the capital account, it would have
significant impact on the foreign investment and particularly on the FII, as this would
affect short-term stability in the financial markets. Hence, there is a need to determine the
push and pull factors behind any change in the FII, so that we can frame our policies to
influence the variables which drive-in foreign investment. Also FII has been subject of
intense discussion, as it is held responsible for intensifying currency crisis in 1990’s
elsewhere.
The present study would examine the determinants of FII in Indian context. Here
we make an attempt to analyze the effect of return, risk and inflation, which are traced to
be major determinants in the literature on FII. The proposed relation (discussed in detail
later) is that inflation and risk in domestic country and return in foreign country would
adversely affect the FII flowing to domestic country, where as inflation and risk in
foreign country and return in domestic country would have favorable affect on the same.
In the next section we would briefly discuss the existing studies. In section 3, we discuss
the theoretical model. Section 4 briefly discusses the trends in FII in India. Database and
methodology adopted in this study are discussed in Section 5. In section 6, we discuss the
estimated results and conclusions are drawn accordingly in the last section.
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
To analyze the impact of the investment made by FIIs on exchange rate of Indian
rupee.
To study the scope and trading mechanism of Foreign Institutional investors in India.
To find the relationship between the FIIs equity investment pattern and Exchange
rates.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
PROBLEM DEFINITION
RESEARCH DESIGN
In this project Causal Research Design has been used to analyze the cause and
effect relationship between the variables.
Causal research design is applied to find out the impact of independent variable
investment made by FII on various dependent variables related to Exchange rate of
Indian rupee.
These dependent variables include:
The Secondary sources have been used for the collection of the data used in the research.
Secondary Data:
Secondary data may be defined as the data that has been collected earlier for some
purpose other than the purpose of the present study. Any data that is available prior to the
commencement of the research project is secondary data, and therefore secondary data is
also called as the historical data.
Scope of the study is very broader and covers the impact of foreign institutional
investors on exchange rates. But, study is only going to cover Net foreign investments
and exchange rates in form of equity. The time period is taken from financial year
beginning to ending i.e. April 2010 to March 2017 as it will give exact impact in both the
bullish and bearish trend.
LIMITATIONS
1. The result obtained through the regression equation has not accurate. There is
probability of occurrence of error. The error is known as the Standard Error denoted by
the S.E. The standard error value is 2.62 in case of the regression equation of Net FII
investment on Exchange Rate, Y=0.576x-18992,which indicates that the estimated FII
investment for an expected Exchange Rate can be either more or loss by Rs.2.650 crore.
2. The relationship of FII investment and Exchange Rate denoted by the Coefficient of
Correlation has a probable error with it. The value of Coefficient of Correlation is 0.133
and the probable error is 0.672 it can be increase or decrease an exchange rate by Rs.
0.672.
3. The calculated values are taken up to 3 decimal places only. Actual value can be
changed if complete values are taken into account.
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Knill, A.M. (2004) in his paper examined the impact of foreign portfolio
investment on the financial constraints of smaller firms. The research utilized a panel of
firms from around the world which included a number in excess of 1, 87,000 firmyear
observations from 53 countries. The research results supported the contention that foreign
portfolio investment does help to bridge the ‘financing gap’, the need of external capital,
through the capital markets. There is no evidence supporting an indirect path of foreign
portfolio investment reaching smaller firms through bank lending.
Banerjee and Sarkar (2006) have attempted to forecast stock return volatility
using intra-day data of NSE from June 2000 through January 2004 by employing the
GARCH model. The findings revealed that participation of FIIs in the Indian stock
market does not result in significant increase in market volatility.
Upadhyay, Saroj (2006) found in their study that FII flows supplements domestic
investment without increasing the foreign debt of our country. It was noticed that when
FIIs purchase and sell the stocks there is a high degree of volatility in the stock market.
The researchers argue that the volatility is due to the fact that the FIIs manipulate the
situation of boom in such a manner that they wait till the index rises up to a certain height
and exit at an appropriate time.
Kumar, SSS (2006) examined the role of institutional investors in Indian stock
market from 1993 to 2005. After applying unit root test, OLS regressions were employed
and results indicated that institutional activity has an influence on stock market. Granger
causality test showed that for any market rise or fall the FIIs follow the suit.
Entry Option for FII’S
A foreign company planning to set up business operations in India has the following
options:
1. Incorporated Entity
• Joint Ventures; or
Sub-account :
Designated Bank:
Designated Bank means any bank in India which has been authorized by the
Reserve Bank of India to act as a banker to FII.
Domestic Custodian:
Domestic Custodian means any entity registered with SEBI to carry on the activity
of providing custodial services in respect of securities.
Broad Based Fund means a fund established or incorporated outside India, which
has at least twenty investors with no single individual investor holding more than 17%
shares or units of the fund. Provided that if the fund has institutional investor(s) it shall
not be necessary for the fund to have twenty investors.
If the fund has an institutional investor holding more than 17% of shares or units in the
fund, then the institutional investor must itself be broad based fund.
3. Unincorporated Entity
• Pension Funds
• Mutual Funds
• Investment Trust
• Investment Trusts
• Banks
• Endowments
• University Funds
• Foundations
Further, following entities proposing to invest on behalf of broad based funds, are also
eligible to be registered as FIIs:
• Trustees
• The applicant is required to have the permission under the provisions of the
Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 from the Reserve Bank of India.
• The applicant has to appoint a local custodian and enter into an agreement with
the custodian. Besides it also has to appoint a designated bank to route its transactions.
• Certified copy of the relevant clauses or articles of the Memorandum and Articles
of Association or the agreement authorizing the applicant to invest on behalf of its clients
• Audited financial statements and annual reports for the last one year , provided
that the period covered shall not be less than twelve months.
• A declaration by the applicant that it has entered into a custodian agreement with
a domestic custodian together with particulatrs of the domestic custodian.
The fee for registration as FII is US $ 5,000. The mode of payment is Demand Draft in
favour of "Securities and Exchange Board of India" payable at New York”.
India.
SUB-ACCOUNT REGISTRATION
Foreign Corporates
Foreign Individuals.
The FII should apply on the behalf of the Sub-account. Both the FII and the Sub-
account are required to sign the Sub-account application form.
"Annexure B" to "Form A" (FII application form) needs to be filled when
applying for sub-account registration. No document is needed to be sent with annexure B.
The fee for sub-account registration is US$ 1,000. The fee is to be submitted at the time
of submitting the application. The mode of payment is Demand Draft in the name of
"Securities and Exchange Board of India" payable at New York. SEBI generally takes
three working days in granting FII registration. However, in cases where the information
furnished by the applicants is incomplete, three days shall be counted from the days when
all necessary information sought, reaches SEBI. The validity of sub-account registration
is co-terminus with the FII registration under which it is registered. The process of
renewal of sub-account is same as initial registration. Renewal fee in this case is US $
1,000. OCBs / NRIs are not permitted to get registered as FII/sub-account.
POST-REGISTRATION PROCESSES:
FIIs, under the Portfolio Investment Scheme, are permitted to make both primary
and secondary investments in the Indian capital markets. Unlike an investor which relies
solely on FDI regulations, a foreign investor which registers as a FII would be allowed to
buy and sell securities over Indian stock exchanges. In addition, FIIs are entitled to effect
transactions in a broader category of securities than an investor relying on FDI
regulations alone. FIIs are permitted to purchase equity securities (both listed and
unlisted), units of schemes floated by the Unit Trust of India and other domestic
municipal funds, warrants, debentures, bonds, governmental securities and derivative
instruments which are traded on a recognized stock exchange. There is no limit on the
amount that FIIs may invest in the Indian market, and no lock-up periods apply to
investments made by FIIs.
Exchange Controls
FIIs are required to open up one or more bank accounts with certain designated
banks and must also appoint a domestic custodian for custody of investment made by the
FII. Through the designated accounts, FIIs are authorized to freely transfer funds from
foreign currency accounts to Rupee accounts and vice versa; make Rupee denominated
investments in Indian companies; freely transfer after-tax proceeds from Rupee accounts
to foreign currency accounts, and repatriate capital, capital gain, dividends interest
income and other gains, subject to deduction for applicable withholding taxes. So long as
FIIs execute purchases and sales on a recognized Indian stock exchange, they are not
required to obtain transaction specific approval from the Reserve Bank. FIIs are also
entitled to effect transactions using their own proprietary funds, or the funds of their sub
accounts.
Investment Restrictions.
Certain limitations apply to investments by FIIs into India. First, FIIs’ and their
sub- accounts’ investment in an Indian company can not exceed ten percent (17%) of the
total issued share capital of the Indian company (five percent if the subaccount is a
foreign corporation or individual). In addition, the aggregate investment of all FIIs in an
Indian company may not exceed twenty four percent (24%) of its total issued share
capital, without the express approval of its board of directors and shareholders. Even with
board of director and shareholder approval, the same sectoral limits which apply to
foreign direct investment would continue to apply. FIIs may register with SEBI as a debt
fund or an equity fund. FIIs which are registered as equity funds, are required to invest at
least seventy percent (70%) of their funds in equity and equity-related securities. A FII
registered as a debt fund, on the other hand, must invest one hundred percent (170%) of
its funds in debt instruments. Foreign corporations and individuals are not eligible
subaccounts of a FII that is registered as a debt fund. FIIs are not permitted to engage in
short selling, other than in respect of derivative securities traded over a recognized
exchange, and must effect transactions through a registered stock broker. Sector
investment prohibitions and caps which apply to foreign direct investment also apply to
investments by FIIs, and FII investments must also comply with the pricing requirements
applicable to foreign direct investment. In addition, FIIs are not permitted to invest
in print media.
• In 2011, FII investments crossed $9 billion, the highest in the history of Indian
capital markets.
• The total net investment for the year up to December 29 stood at US$9,142
million while foreign investors pumped in about US$2,113 million in December.
• Korea and Taiwan have always been the biggest recipients of FII money. It was
only in 2011 that India managed to receive the second highest FII inflow at over $8.5bn.
• On 9th March 2016, India's exceptional growth story and its booming economy
have made the country a favourite destination with foreign institutional investors (FIIs). It
has continued to attract investment despite the Satyam non-governance issue and the
global economic contagion impact on Indian markets.
• According to Mr Gautam Chand, CEO of Instanex, said FIIs are the largest
institutional investors in India with holdings valued at over US$ 751.14 billion as on
December 31, 2015.
• They are also the most successful portfolio investors in India with 172 per cent
appreciation since September 30, 2010.
• As per SEBI, number of registered FIIs stood at 1626 and number of registered
sub-accounts stood at 4972 as on March 17, 2016.
Future Prospects of Foreign Institutional Investments:
• Simplifying procedures and relaxing entry barriers for business activities and
Providing investor friendly laws and tax system.
• Checking the growth of population; India is the second highest populated country
in the world after China. However in terms of density India exceeds China, as India's land
area is almost half of China's total land. Due to a high population growth, GNI per capita
remains very poor. It was only $ 2880 in 2010 (World Bank figures).
• Expanding industry fast, by at least 17% per year to integrate not only the surplus
labour in agriculture but also the unprecedented number of women and teenagers joining
the labour force every year.
• Effecting fiscal consolidation and eliminating the revenue deficit through revenue
enhancement and expenditure management.
• Global corporations are responsible for global warming, the depletion of natural
resources, and the production of harmful chemicals and the destruction of organic
agriculture.
The government should reduce its budget deficit through proper pricing
mechanisms and better direction of subsidies. It should develop infrastructure with what
Finance Minister P Chidambaram International Research Journal of Finance and
Economics - Issue 5 (2013) 171 of India called “ruthless efficiency” and reduce
bureaucracy by streamlining government procedures to make them more transparent and
effective.
Empowering the population through universal education and health care, India
must maximize the benefits of its youthful demographics and turn itself into the
knowledge hub of the world through the application of information and communications
technology (ICT) in all aspects of Indian life although, the government is committed to
furthering economic reforms and developing basic infrastructure to improve lives of the
rural poor and boost economic performance. Government had reduced its controls on
foreign trade and investment in some areas and has indicated more liberalization in civil
aviation, telecom and insurance sector in the future.
There is a long list of entities that are eligible to get registered as FIIs such as
pension funds, mutual funds, insurance companies, investment trusts, banks, university
funds, endowments, foundations, sovereign wealth funds, hedge funds and charitable
trusts. In fact, asset management companies, investment managers, advisors or
institutional portfolio managers set up and/or owned by NRIs are also eligible to be
registered as FIIs.
The nodal point for FII registrations is SEBI and hence all FIIs must register
themselves with SEBI and should also comply with the exchange control regulation of
the central bank. Apart from being allowed to invest in securities in primary and
secondary markets FIIs can also invest in mutual funds. Dated government securities,
derivatives traded on a recognized stock exchange and commercial papers.
The ceiling for overall investment for FIIs is 24% of the paid up capital of the
Indian company and 17% for NRIs/PSOs. The limit is 20% of the paid up capital in the
case of public sector banks, including the State Bank of India.
The ceiling of 24% for FII investment can be raised up to sectoral cap/statutory
ceiling, subject to the approval of the board and the general body for the company
passing a special resolution to that effect. And the ceiling of 17% for NRIs/PIOs can be
raised to 24% subject to the approval of the general body of the company passing a
resolution to that effect.
The ceiling for FIIs is independent of the ceiling of 17/24 percent of NRIs/PIOs.
The equity shares and convertible debentures of the companies with in the prescribed
ceilings are available for purchase under PIS subject to:
The investment made on repatriation basis by any single NRI/PIO in the equity
shares and convertible debentures not exceeding five percent of the paid up equity capital
of the company of five percent of the total paid up value of each series of convertible
debentures issued by the company.
Companies where NRI investment has already reached 17% and no further
purchases can be allowed
4. SPL Ltd
Companies where NRI investment has reached 8% and further purchases are allowed
only with prior approval RBI
9 BPL Ltd
16 CRISIL
1. Aptech Ltd.
2. CRISIL
7. NIIT Ltd.
Companies in which NRI/FII Investment is allowed upto 49% of their paid up capital
Companies in which FII Investment is allowed upto sectoral cap/statutory ceiling of their
paid up capital
Companies where 22% FII investment limit has been reached and further purchases are
allowed with prior approval of RBI
1. ACC Ltd.
FIIs are among the major sources of liquidity for the Indian markets. If FIIs are
investing huge amounts in the Indian stock exchanges then it reflects their high
confidence and a healthy investor sentiment for our markets. But with the current global
financial turmoil and a liquidity and credit freeze in the international markets, FIIs have
become net sellers (on a day to day basis). The entry or FIIs in India has brought mixed
consequences for our markets, on one hand they have improved the breadth and depth of
Indian markets and on the other hand they have also become the major sources of
speculation in testing times like these.
India opened its stock market to foreign investors in September 1992 and has,
since 1993, received portfolio investment from foreigners in the from of foreign
institutional investment in equities. This has become one of the main channels of FII in
India for foreigners. In order to trade in Indian equity market foreign corporations need to
register with SEBI as Foreign Institutional Investor (FII). India allows only authorized
foreign investors who are referred to as FII’s which include pension funds, investment
trusts, asset management companies, university funds, endowments, foundation,
charitable interests and charitable societies that have a track record of five years and
which are registered with a statutory authority in their own country of incorporation or
settlement. It is possible for foreigners to trade in Indian securities without registering as
an FII but such cases require approval from the RBI or the Foreign Investment Promotion
Board. FIIs generally concentrate in secondary market. The total amount of foreign
institutional investment in India has accumulated to formidable sum of over US $
11464.64 Million by the end of November 2002.
To test the hypothesis entailed in the last section, we require data for returns, risk
and inflation in domestic and foreign economy, and data on FII flowing into domestic
economy (India). US is chosen as the foreign country to model FII inflow in India,
because US is our trade partner and accounts for the largest proportion of FII following
to India. (42 percent)3. Hence US could safely be used as proxy for rest of the world, to
Study prices, (Return = logPt-logPt12). Composite BSE Sensex is used for Indian stock
prices and S& P 500 is used for US stock prices. This study uses Standard & Poor’s 500
Index because it is usually considered as the benchmark for U.S equity performance. It
represents 70% of all U.S. publicly traded companies. Part of the index’s popularity is
due to its close association with the largest mutual fund in the world, the Vanguard 500
Index Fund, and Spiders, the first exchange traded fund. The listed companies are highly
diverse, spanning every relevant portion of the U.S. economy. The S&P 500 index also
tends to be the default when people discuss “index funds,” since index funds based on
other indexes were not widely available until recently.
To capture risk, monthly standard deviations are computed from daily returns on
composite BSE Sensex and S&P 500. We Would use ex ante risk rather than realized risk,
because realized risk represents a combination of ex ante risk and unexpected risk. While
FII may exhibit a negative relationship with predicted risk, its relationship with
unanticipated standard deviation could be positive. Since the relative importance of ex
ante risk and unexpected risk could vary overtime, one may get obscure relationship
between FII and realized risk. Wholesale Price Index is used to calculate year-on-year
inflation in India and Producer Price index is used to calculated inflation in US.
Monthly data has been used from January 1994 to November 2002. First year (1993) is
considered as learning period for foreign investors and hence an outlier, so it is not
included in the estimate.
In 1975, the Rupee’s ties to the Pound Sterling were disengaged. India established
a float exchange regime, with the Rupee’s effective rate placed on a controlled, floating
basis and linked to a ‘’basket of currencies” of India’s major trading partners. More
recently, the Indian Rupee has been depreciating in step formation, but roughly in line
with the fall in its Purchasing Power Parity since the early 1980s. While the PPP was 15
around 1982, the actual exchange rate was 9.30 per US dollar. After the devaluation, the
Rupee underwent the change from a controlled regime to a “Managed” or “Dirty” float
regime, where the market supposedly determines the exchange rate. In mid 2012, the
actual rate was near 43.60.
Latest Symbol of Indian National Rupee
D. Udaya Kumar
Research Scholar of Indian Rupee symbol
IIT Bombay
Political Structure
Prominent Figures
Unique Characteristics
The INR is being pushed by India’s strong growth rate and speculation that there
may be an imminent adjustment to China’s FX regime. In addition, India’s trade deficit
has experienced record highs in 2012 and 2013.
Throughout 2012, the Reserve Bank of India’s has seemed to be apathetic to the
overvaluation of the Rupee. This apathy is letting devices work toward their ends, as an
overvalued Rupee is helping to maintain a balance between inflation and growth. An
overvalued currency in an environment of high imported prices, can moderate
inflationary pressures. Once the inflation rate returns to more tolerable levels, the
overvaluation concerns will once again get back into focus.
The Central Statistical Office of India recently started using data reporting
standards of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), reporting the GDP in early quarters
of the late 1990s. The GDP measures the total production and consumption of goods and
services in India. It is necessary to look at changes in real GDP growth in India’s primary
industries, which include agriculture, manufacturing, trade, hotels, transport and
communication.
Industrial Production :
A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
The evolution of India’s foreign exchange market may be viewed in line with the
shifts in India’s exchange rate policies over the last few decades from a par value system
to a basket-peg and further to a managed float exchange rate system. During the period
from 1947 to 1971, India followed the per value system of exchange rate. Initially the
rupee’s external per value was fixed at 4.15 grains of fine gold. The Reserve Bank
maintained the per value of the rupee within the permitted margin of =1 percent using
pound sterling as the intervention currency. Since the sterling dollar exchange rate was
kept stable by the US monetary authority, the exchange rates of rupee in terms of gold as
well as the dollar and other currencies were indirectly kept stable. The devaluation of
rupee in September 1949 and June 1966 in terms of gold resulted in the reduction of the
per value or rupee in terms of gold to 2.88 and 1.83 grains of fine gold, respectively. The
exchange rate of the rupee remained unchanged between 1966 and 1971.
Given the fixed exchanged regime during this period, the foreign exchange
market for all practical purpose was defunct. Bank were required to undertake only cover
operations and maintain a ‘square’ or ‘near square’ position at all times. The objective of
exchange controls was primarily to regulate the demand for foreign exchange for various
purposes, within the limit set by the available supply. The Foreign Exchange Regulation
Act initially enacted in 1947 was placed on a permanent basis in 1957. In terms of the
provisions of the Act, the Reserve Bank, and in certain cases, the central Government
controlled and regulated the dealings in foreign exchange payments outside India, export
and import of currency notes and bullion, transfers of securities between residents and
non-residents, acquisition of foreign securities, etc.
With the breakdown of the Bretton Woods System in 1971 and the floatation of
major currencies, the conduct of exchange rate policy posed a serious challenge to all
central banks world wide as currency fluctuations opened up tremendous opportunities
for market players to trade in currencies in a borderless market. In December 1971, the
rupee was linked with pound sterling. Since sterling was fixed in terms of US dollar
under the Smithsonian Agreement of 1971, the rupee also remained stable against dollar.
In order to overcome the weaknesses associated with a single currency peg and to ensure
stability of the exchange rate, the rupee, with effect from September 1975, was pegged to
a basket of currencies. The currency selection and weights assigned were left to the
discretion of the Reserve Bank. The currencies included in the basket as well as their
relative weights were kept confidential in order to discourage speculation. It was around
this time that banks in India became interested in trading in foreign exchange.
The impetus to trading in the foreign exchange market in India came in 1978
when banks in India were allowed by the Reserve Bank to undertake intra-day trading in
foreign exchange and were required to comply with the stipulation of maintaining
‘square’ or ‘near square’ position only at the close of business hours each day. The extent
of position which could be left uncovered overnight (the open position) as well as the
limits up to which dealers could trade during the day were to be decided by the
management of banks. The exchange rate of the rupee during this period was officially
determined by the Reserve Bank of its buying and selling rates to the Authorized Dealers
(Ads) for undertaking merchant transactions. The spread between the buying and the
selling rates was 0.5 percent and the market began to trade actively within this range. Ads
were also permitted to trade in cross currencies (one convertible foreign currency versus
another). However, no ‘position’ in this regard could originate in overseas markets.
By the late 1980s and the early 1990s, it was recognized that both macroeconomic
policy and structural factors had contributed to balance of payments difficulties.
Devaluation by India’s competitors had aggravated the situation. Although exports had
recorded a higher growth during the second half of the 1980s (from about 4.3 percent of
GDP in 1987-88 to about 5.8 percent of GDP in 1990-91), trade imbalances persisted at
around 3 percent of GDP. This combined with a precipitous fall in invisible receipt in the
form of private remittances, travel and tourism earnings in the year 1990-91 led to further
widening of current account deficit. The weaknesses in the external sector were
accentuated by the Gulf crisis of 1990-91. As a result, the current account deficit widened
to 3.2 percent of GDP 1990-91 and the capital flows also dried up necessitating the
adoption of exceptional corrective steps. It was against this backdrop that India embarked
on stabilization and structural reforms in the early 1990s.
This phase was marked by wide ranging reform measures aimed at widening and
deepening the foreign exchange market and liberalization of exchange control regimes. A
credible macroeconomic, structural and stabilization programme encompassing trade,
industry, foreign investment, exchange rate, public finance and the financial sector was
put in place creating an environment conducive for the expansion of trade and
investment. It was recognized that trade policies, exchange rate policies and industrial
policies should from part of an integrated policy framework to improve the overall
productivity, competitiveness and efficiency of the economic system, in general and the
external sector, in particular.
The dual exchange rate system was replaced by a unified exchange rate system in
March 1993, whereby all foreign exchange receipts could be converted at market
determined exchange rates. On unification of the exchange rates, the nominal exchange
rate of the rupee against both the US dollar as also against a basket of currencies got
adjusted lower, which almost nullified the impact of the previous inflation differential.
The restrictions on a number of other current account transactions were relaxed. The
unification of the exchange rate of the Indian rupee was an important step towards current
account convertibility, which was finally achieved in August 1994, when India accepted
obligations under Article VIII of the Articles of Agreement of the IMF
With the rupee becoming fully convertible on all current account transactions, the
risk-bearing capacity of banks increased and foreign exchange trading volumes started
rising. This was supplemented by wide-ranging reforms undertaken by the Reserve Bank
in conjunction with the Government to remove market distortions and deepen the foreign
exchange market. The process has been marked by ‘gradualism’ with measures being
undertaken after extensive consultations with experts and market participants. The reform
phase began with the Sodhani Committee (1994) which in its report submitted in 1995
made several recommendations to relax the regulations with a view to vitalizing the
foreign exchange market.
The Expert Group on Foreign Exchange Markets in India (Chairman : Shri O.P.
Sodhani), which submitted its Report in 1995, identified various regulations inhibiting
the growth of the market. The Group recommended that the corporate may be
recommended that banks should be permitted to fix their own exchange position limits
such as intra-day and overnight limits, subject to ensuring that the capital is provided
marked to the extent of 5 percent of this limit based on internationally accepted
guidelines. The Group also favored fixation of Aggregate Gap Limit (AGL), which would
also include rupee transactions, by the managements of the banks based on capital risk
taking capacity, etc. It recommended that banks be allowed to initiate cross currency
positions abroad and to lend or borrow short-term funds up to six months, subject to a
specified ceiling. Another important suggestion related to allowing exporters to retain 170
percent of their export earnings in any foreign currency with an Authorized Dealer (AD)
in India, subject to liquidation of outstanding advances against export bills. The Group
was also in favor of permitting ADs to determined the interest rates and maturity period
in respect of FCNR (B) deposits. It recommended selective intervention by the Reserve
Bank in the market so as to ensure greater orderliness in the market.
As part of long-term measures, the Group suggested that the Reserve Bank should
invite detailed proposals from banks for offering rupee-based derivatives, should refocus
exchange control regulation and guidelines on risks rather than on products and frame a
fresh set of guidelines for foreign exchange and derivatives risk management.
As regards accounting and disclosure standards, the main recommendations included
reviewing of policy procedures and transactions on an on-going basis by a risk control
team independent of dealing and settlement functions, ensuring fo uniform
documentation and market practices by the Foreign Exchange Dealers’ Association of
India (FEDAI) or any other body and development of accounting disclosure standard.
Most of the recommendations of the Sodhani Committee relating to the
development of the foreign exchange market were implemented during the latter half of
the 1990s.
Along with these specific measures aimed at developing the foreign exchange
market, measures towards liberalizing the capital account were also implemented during
the last decade, guided to a large extent since 1997 by the Report of the Committee on
Capital Account Convertibility (Chairman : Shri S.S. Tarapore). Various reform measures
since the early 1990s have had a profound effect on the market structure, depth, liquidity
and efficiency of the Indian foreign exchange market as detailed in the following section.
The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA),1973 was replaced by the market
friendly Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999. The Reserve Bank delegated
powers to authorized dealers (ADs) to release foreign exchange for a variety of purposes.
For example, a lower volatility stock may have an expected (average) return of 7%,
with annual volatility of 5%. This would indicate returns from approximately -3% to 17%
most of the time (19 times out of 20, or 95%). A higher volatility stock, with the same
expected return of 7% but with annual volatility of 20%, would indicate returns from
approximately -33% to 47% most of the time (19 time
CHAPTER – III
INDUSTRY PROFILE
COMCPANY PROFILE
Industry Profile
Depository can in many ways be compared to a bank. Just as a Bank holds cash in
your account and provides all services related to transaction of cash, a depository holds
securities in electronic form and provides all services related to transaction of shares
/debt instruments. A depository interacts with clients through a Depository participant
(DP) with whom the client has to maintain a Demat Account. Several people consider the
Depository to be another custodian. But the depository has an advantage over the
custodian- the depository can transfer the Beneficial Ownership of the Securities legally,
which a custodian cannot do.
BENIFICIARY
OWNER
Fig No. 1
Depository System
Depository Participant
A Depository Participant is an agent that provides depository services. There are
over 200 DPs in the country. The depository interfaces with the investors and clearing
members through its agents called “Depository Participants”. INDIA BULLS is
depository Participant.
Company Profile
Indiabulls is India’s leading Financial, Real Estate and Power Company with a
wide presence throughout India. They ensure convenience and reliability in all their
products and services. Indiabulls has over 640 branches all over India. The customers of
Indiabulls are more than 4,50,000 which covers from a wide range of financial services
and products from securities, derivatives trading, depositary services, research &
advisory services, consumer secured & unsecured credit, loan against shares and
mortgage & housing finance. The company employs around 4000 Relationship managers
who help the clients to satisfy their customized financial goals. Indiabulls entered the
Real Estate business in the year 2005 with its group of companies. Large scale projects
worth several hundred million dollars are evaluated by them.
Indiabulls Financial Services Ltd is listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE),
Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and Luxembourg Stock Exchange. The market
VISION
MISSION
Brand Values
Indiabulls is amongst the largest non-banking financial services companies in
India and enjoys strong brand recognition and customer acceptance. The company
attributes its dominant position in the brokerage industry to the preferential status it
enjoys with investors Coupled with its forays into various segments; the Group believes
that the bulk of its brand story is yet to be written. Indeed, when a case study on India’s
youngest brands which have had a profound impact on the economy is crafted, Indiabulls
will feature prominently in it
INDIABULLS GROUP
Milestones Achieved
KOTAK SECURITIES
SHAREKHAN
SWOT ANALYSIS
India bulls has presence in the Real Estate, Infrastructure, Financial Services,
Securities, Retail, Multiplex and Power sectors
Weaknesses
It should have its own mutual funds as it provides advises on mutual funds
It does not provide indices on major world markets, ADR Prices of Indian Scripts.
Opportunities
High client base will help for cross sales of its products.
Threats
Companies like Share khan, ICICI Direct, Kotak Securities and Private brokers
are major threats.
Table 1 : Table containing the Net FII Inflow. It has been taken as the net position of the Net
Inflow of FII at the end of each month. All amounts are Rs. In Crore.
Table 2 : Table containing the data of Exchange Rate of Indian rupee. All the amounts in
rupees (All the values have been taken as the position at the end of each month).
Table 4.1 : Net FII Investment (Monthly Position of Net FII Investment,
From 1st April 2010 to 31st March 2017 total 84 data point)
1 Apr-10 572.38
2 May-10 1232.95
3 Jun-10 2592.95
4 Jul-10 2495.89
5 Aug-10 2128.14
6 Sep-10 4117.69
7 Oct-10 6939.72
8 Nov-10 3282.39
9 Dec-10 6290.59
17 Jan-11 2492.86
11 Feb-11 3182.74
12 Mar-11 8811.80
13 Apr-11 4214.86
14 May-11 -3151.29
15 June-11 511.00
16 July-11 1292.83
17 Aug-11 2850.25
18 Sep-11 2815.61
19 Oct-11 3952.11
20 Nov-11 6344.57
21 Dec-11 5890.00
22 Jan-12 1324.24
23 Feb-12 7493.76
24 Mar-12 7885.58
25 Apr-12 -946.29
26 May-12 -586.82
27 Jun-12 5699.40
28 Jul-12 7390.55
29 Aug-12 4154.87
30 Sep-12 3258.00
31 Oct-12 -3815.31
32 Nov-12 4559.14
33 Dec-12 9615.32
34 Jan-13 5177.18
35 Feb-13 7859.26
36 Mar-13 6347.74
37 Apr-13 722.14
38 May-13 -8930.32
39 Jun-13 1781.87
40 Jul-13 1773.16
41 Aug-13 3998.12
42 Sep-13 4624.13
43 Oct-13 5812.01
44 Nov-13 7028.59
45 Dec-13 -1869.49
46 Jan-14 3184.86
47 Feb-14 4279.14
48 Mar-14 2127.12
49 Apr-14 4257.88
50 May-14 3242.17
51 Jun-14 7217.02
52 Jul-14 19515.29
53 Aug-14 -6476.32
54 Sep-14 19823.40
55 Oct-14 16375.64
56 Nov-14 -3122.11
57 Dec-14 5124.92
58 Jan-15 -13000.98
59 Feb-15 7784.26
60 Mar-15 1354.39
61 Apr-15 1475.95
62 May-15 -3378.41
63 June-15 -17429.39
64 July-15 -1653.81
65 Aug-15 -2815.24
66 Sep-15 -7548.91
67 Oct-15 -13461.39
68 Nov-15 -2614.45
69 Dec-15 2214.88
70 Jan-16 -3897.01
71 Feb-16 -1758.84
72 Mar-16 521.87
73 Apr-16 8122.99
74 May-16 21114.76
75 June-16 4331.55
76 July-16 11987.48
77 Aug-16 3847.28
78 Sep-16 21034.61
79 Oct-16 8558.21
80 Nov-16 5728.01
81 Dec-16 17600.75
82 Jan-17 -2435.27
83 Feb-17 2734.14
84 Mar-17 19976.61
Graph 4.1.1 : Net FII Investment (Closing Investment of
FII at the end of every month 30th April 2010 to 30th Mar
2011 )
Graph 4.1.2 : Net FII Investment (Closing Investment of FII at
the end of every month 30th April 2011 to 30th Mar 2012 )
Graph 4.1.3 : Net FII Investment (Closing Investment of FII at
the end of every month 30th April 2012 to 30th Mar 2013 )
Graph 4.1.4 : Net FII Investment (Closing Investment of FII at
the end of every month 30th April 2013 to 30th Mar 2014 )
Graph 4.1.5: Net FII Investment (Closing Investment of FII at
the end of every month 30th April 2014 to 30th Mar 2015 )
Graph 4.1.6: Net FII Investment (Closing Investment of FII at
the end of every month 30th April 2015 to 30th Mar 2016 )
Graph 4.1.7: Net FII Investment (Closing Investment of FII at
the end of every month 30th April 2016 to 30st Mar 2017 )
Table 4.2: Exchange Rate (Monthly Position of Exchange Rate at the end
of every month, from 1st April 2010 to 31st March 2017)
1 Apr-10 47.3758
2 May-10 47.1516
3 Jun-10 46.7168
4 Jul-10 46.2300
5 Aug-10 45.9330
6 Sep-10 45.8471
7 Oct-10 45.3873
8 Nov-10 45.5221
9 Dec-10 45.5880
17 Jan-11 45.4557
11 Feb-11 45.2710
12 Mar-11 45.0179
13 Apr-11 43.9311
14 May-11 45.2515
15 June-11 45.5138
16 July-11 46.1116
17 Aug-11 46.3417
18 Sep-11 46.1650
19 Oct-11 45.7826
20 Nov-11 45.1251
21 Dec-11 43.9796
22 Jan-12 43.7545
23 Feb-12 43.6798
24 Mar-12 43.6912
25 Apr-12 43.7412
26 May-12 43.4889
27 Jun-12 43.5836
28 Jul-12 43.5361
29 Aug-12 43.6245
30 Sep-12 43.9150
31 Oct-12 44.8180
32 Nov-12 45.7265
33 Dec-12 45.6411
34 Jan-13 44.3970
35 Feb-13 44.3289
36 Mar-13 44.4817
37 Apr-13 44.9491
38 May-13 45.4143
39 Jun-13 46.1261
40 Jul-13 46.4562
41 Aug-13 46.5370
42 Sep-13 46.1181
43 Oct-13 45.4676
44 Nov-13 44.8514
45 Dec-13 44.6351
46 Jan-14 44.3325
47 Feb-14 44.1583
48 Mar-14 44.0260
49 Apr-14 42.1482
50 May-14 40.7814
51 Jun-14 40.7736
52 Jul-14 40.4139
53 Aug-14 40.8212
54 Sep-14 40.3400
55 Oct-14 39.5114
56 Nov-14 39.4364
57 Dec-14 39.4395
58 Jan-15 39.3737
59 Feb-15 39.7326
60 Mar-15 40.3561
61 Apr-15 40.0224
62 May-15 42.1250
63 June-15 42.8202
64 July-15 42.8315
65 Aug-15 42.9374
66 Sep-15 45.5635
67 Oct-15 48.6555
68 Nov-15 48.9994
69 Dec-15 48.6345
70 Jan-16 48.8338
71 Feb-16 49.2611
72 Mar-16 51.2287
73 Apr-16 50.1319
74 May-16 48.5330
75 June-16 47.7714
76 July-16 48.4783
77 Aug-16 48.3350
78 Sep-16 48.4389
79 Oct-16 46.7211
80 Nov-16 46.5673
81 Dec-16 46.6288
82 Jan-17 45.9598
83 Feb-17 46.3279
84 Mar-17 45.4965
Graph 4.2.1 : Exchange Rate (Exchange Rate at the end of every month
from 30th April 2010 to 31st Mar 2011)
Graph 4.2.2 : Exchange Rate (Exchange Rate at the end of every month
from 30th April 2011 to 31st Mar 2012)
Graph 4.2.3 : Exchange Rate (Exchange Rate at the end of every month
from 30th April 2012 to 31st Mar 2013)
Graph 4.2.4 : Exchange Rate (Exchange Rate at the end of every month
from 30th April 2013 to 31st Mar 2014)
Graph4.2.5 : Exchange Rate (Exchange Rate at the end of every month
from 30th April 2014 to 31st Mar 2015)
Graph4.2.6 : Exchange Rate (Exchange Rate at the end of every month
from 30th April 2015 to 31st Mar 2016)
Graph 4.2.7 : Exchange Rate (Exchange Rate at the end of every month
from 30th April 2016 to 31st Mar 2017)
DATA INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS
Impact of FII Investment on the Indian Exchange rate can be observed by change in
the FII Investment then it can be affect the Exchange Rate. This impact can be statistically
represented through a regression line indicating the effect of net investment of FII on the
growth of the market capitalization
In this regression equation the net investment by FII is a dependent variable and the
Exchange Rate is an independent variable
Y= a + b*X
To solve the above equation we need two more equation, given by:
∑ XY= a ∑X + b∑ X2
In the above equation, Y is exchange rate (Dependent Variable), X is Net FII Investment
(Independent Variable) and ‘a’ & ‘b’ are two constants which are known to be the
“intercept” and “slope” respectively.
With the help of the tabulated values we can construct a regression equation of Exchange
Rate on Net FII investment.
Y=0.576x-18992
By calculating the “Coefficient of Correlation” We can define the relationship of the two
variables Exchange Rate and Net inflow of FII.
The value of r2 = 0.011 or 0.40% that indicated the effect of the FII inflow has about 0.40%
effect on Exchange Rate.
The Graphical representation of the regression equation is given below:-
Hypothesis: 1
The hypothesis says that the net inflow of FII has appreciates the rupee value and
depreciates the Exchange Rate dollar Vs INR. The Appreciation of rupee can be measure by
calculating the regression line and coefficient of correlation of Net FII Inflow and the
Exchange Rate.
By calculating the “Coefficient of Correlation” we can define the relationship of the two
variables Exchange Rate and Net inflow of FII.
The value of r2 = 0.011 or 0.40% that indicate the effect of the FII inflow has about 0.40%
effect on Exchange Rate.
Hypothesis: 2
The hypothesis says that the inception of the investment of FII has increased the volatility of
the Exchange Rate. The volatility can be measured by calculating the Standard Deviations
(σ) of the Exchange Rate before the investment allowed to FIIs and after the investment
done by the same
For calculating the standard deviation of the Exchange Rate when there was no investment
made by the FIIs, we have taken the time period of April 1990 to March 1992, total of 24
month’s observations, FIIs were allowed to invest in the Indian capital market since the
financial year 1992-93 onwards.
The mean index value of the Exchange Rate was calculated to be at 27.9170 By using the
formula for calculating Standard Deviation (σ) we get the value to be 1.186 The mean index
value of Exchange Rate Since April 2010 to March 2017 is 44.872 and Standard deviation
(σ) is 2.650.
The difference of the standard deviations of Exchange Rate before FII started investment in
India and after FII started the investment in India is degree of effect on exchange rate.
Investment of FII is not the only indicator of the volatility of the Exchange Rate.
A country’s exchange rate is typically affected by the supply and demand for that country’s
currency in international exchange markets and this supply and demand affected by
following reasons.
1. Rate of Interest
2. Rate of Inflation
3. Exchange rates are susceptible to political instability and anticipations about the new
government.
8. Balance of Trade
17. Any rumor in the markets also leads to fluctuation in the Exchange Rate.
If we consider the volatility of the Exchange Rate has increased due to the above
mentioned reasons to be 17%, still the new standard deviation is more than 27.9417+ 17%
i.e..about 30.7351
Thus is quite obvious that the volatility of the Exchange Rate has increased since the
inception of FII investment
Therefore the hypothesis we constructed that the Net investment by FII has increased the
volatility of the Exchange Rate holds true, hence proved.
We can calculate the difference of the volatility of the Exchange rate (when FII
investment was not done and when FII investment are made), through t-Test by applying
suitable formula with the help of the two samples, their mean values and the standard
deviations.
Chapter No.5
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
The study of FII net inflow has shown the positive correlation with the exchange rate.
That means when the FII net inflow done then appreciates the Rupee Value and the
exchange rate increase and vice versa.
The Net FII Inflow/Outflow has increases the volatility of exchange rate. It proves
that Standard deviation of exchange rate before and after FII Inflow/Outflow. In this
Analysis standard deviation more after the FII investment started in India.
Volatility of the exchange rate denotes to the ups & down in the exchange rate due to
fluctuation of the FIIs.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Book References:-
Official Websites:-
www.google.com
www.wikipedia.com