Submission procedure

The Plant Pathology online submission site is located at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/pp.

The submission process can be saved at each stage. There are instructions online to guide you,
or you can contact the Editorial Office (plantpath@bspp.org.uk) in case of difficulties.

Authors are requested to submit their manuscript text, figures and tables as individual
files.

• Accepted text file types: Word (.DOC or .DOCX), Rich Text Format (.RTF) or Postscript
(.PS) only.

• Accepted figure file types: .TIF, .EPS or .PDF (see below)

• Times New Roman font, 12-point size

• Lines double-spaced

• Pages and lines numbered (continuous by preference)

• Maximum file size 60 Mb

Research article format

Title page

• Title informative and not more than 30 words

• Authors listed with first names as initials only (preceding the name)

• Addresses at which the work was carried out follow the names

• Author for correspondence indicated by an asterisk with an e-mail address provided (one
author only)

• Running head – a short title of no more than 40 characters (including spaces)

• Key words – provide up to 6

Abstract

• Indicate why and how the work was done, the result and conclusions

• 250 words or less

• Abstracts should not be unnecessarily descriptive and must, where appropriate, contain
quantitative data.

Introduction
• Describe, succinctly, the current state of work in the relevant field

• Describe the reasons for carrying out the experiments

• Give a clear statement of the objectives and hypotheses being tested

Materials and methods

• Sufficient information must be given in this section to allow the reader to understand the
experimental design and statistical methods used in the data analysis. All experiments should
have adequate replication and, where relevant, should have been repeated for confirmation.

• Système International (SI) units are preferred. Others should be related to SI units at the
first mention.

• Commercial equipment and products used in experiments should name the product and
company, but addresses should be omitted.

• State the methods used e.g. analysis of variance (ANOVA) and ensure that the analysis
method chosen is appropriate for the data. Data tables presenting, for example, mean values
should include the appropriate standard errors (SE) and degrees of freedom (DF) relevant to
the SE. Where comparisons are made between data values care should be taken to ensure that
the SE values quoted are suitable for the comparisons. Indiscriminate use of multiple range
tests should be avoided.

• Molecular marker data need to be properly replicated using appropriate positive and
negative controls and provide an assessment of error rates based on independent DNA
extractions.

Results

• Results should be presented in an orderly fashion

• Make use of tables and figures where necessary and without duplication

Discussion

• Discussion normally should be presented separately from the Results

• Focus on the work presented and its relationship with other relevant published work

• It should not digress widely into general discussion of a research area, or into excessive
speculation, and should not normally exceed 5 pages in length

Acknowledgements

• Sources of funding should be listed

• All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed (e.g. technical
help, data analysis, writing assistance or general support)
References

• Only papers accepted for publication or published may be cited

• Not normally > 35 in total

• In the text, cite by author and date in chronological order. Use & between names of 2
authors; use et al. for 3 or more authors

• At the end of the paper, give full details as per the examples below

• Personal communications in the text should be cited as: initials, name, brief address,
personal communication. Authors must have permission from colleagues to include their
work as a personal communication.

• Papers “in press” which are cited but not yet available as a DOI or in print should be
submitted (as a .PDF file) as “Supporting Information not for publication”

• Use of a tool such as EndNote (www.endnote.com) or Reference Manager

(www.refman.com) is recommended

Journal (article) Elmer PAG, Reglinski T, 2006. Biosuppression of Botrytis cinerea in

grapes. Plant Pathology 55, 155–77.

Journal (online) Gibbs MJ, Ziegler A, Robinson DJ, Waterhouse PM, Cooper JI, 1996.
Carrot mottle mimic virus (CMoMV): a second umbravirus associated with carrot motley
dwarf disease recognized by nucleic acid hybridization. Molecular Plant Pathology Online
[http://www.bspp.org.uk/mppol] 1996/1111gibbs.

Book Sutton BC, 1980. The Coelomycetes. Kew, UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute.

Book (edited) Palti J, Kranz J, eds, 1980. Comparative Epidemiology. A Tool for Better
Disease Management. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and
Documentation.

Book (chapter) Jones CS, Smith N, Brown RS, 1979. Biology of diseases caused by Botrytis
spp. In: Smith N, Brown RS, eds. Diseases of Vegetables. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific
Publications, 40–9.

Conference proceedings (published) McIntosh RA, 1992. Catalogues of gene symbols for
wheat. In: Miller TE, Koebner RM, eds. Proceedings of the Seventh International Wheat
Genetics Symposium, 1987.Cambridge, UK: IPSR, 1225–323.

Agency publication Harvey JM, Pentzer WT, 1960. Market Diseases of Grapes and Other
Small Fruits. Washington, USA: United States Department of Agriculture: USDA publication
no. 189. (Agriculture Handbook Series.)

Dissertation or thesis Lenné JM, 1978. Studies of the Biology and Taxonomy of
Colletotrichum Species. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne, PhD thesis.
Online material Lu HJ, Kottke R, Martin J, Bai G, Haley S, Rudd J, 2011. Identification and
validation of molecular markers for marker assisted selection of Wsm2 in wheat. In: Plant and
Animal Genomes XIX Conference, abstract W433. [http://www.intl-
pag.org/19/abstracts/W68_PAGXIX_433.html]. Accessed 20 April 2012.

Tables

• Self-explanatory with an appropriate legend without abbreviations

• Number with arabic numerals, e.g. Table 2

• Refer to tables in the sequence in which they are presented

• Use lower-case letters, e.g. a, b and c, for footnotes

• Individual file for each table

• Save file in an editable format, e.g. .DOC or .DOCX

• Not embedded as an image

• If the table is very large, make it a Supporting Information file.

Figures

• Number in a separate series from the tables

• Use arabic numerals in the text, e.g. Figure 2

• Subdivisions within figures should be labelled with lower-case letters, e.g. a, b and c

• Photographs as .TIF format, at least 300 dpi at final size

• Graphs, charts and line art as .EPS or .PDF format (pdf v1.5 or earlier)

• Combinations of photos and text labels as .EPS or .PDF with the photo image at least 300
dpi, or in .TIF format at 600 dpi

• Individual file for each figure

• Not embedded in another document type (e.g. .DOCX or .PPTX)

• No figures in the main text

• Magnification in photographic figures should be shown by a scale or bar

• Avoid using tints if possible; if shading is essential to the understanding of the figure, try to
make it coarse
• Colour figures should be used when details cannot be adequately observed on black and
white photographs

• Authors pay the full cost for the reproduction of their colour artwork in the print issue

• Figures that are black-and-white in the print issue but colour in the online version are free of
charge

• Legends should be included at the end of the main document, self-explanatory and without
abbreviations

• First 100 characters of the legend should describe key aspects of the figure, for the
abbreviated links used in the online version

• For detailed information on our digital illustration standards, please go to

http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/illustration.asp

Supporting Information for online publication

• Supporting Information gives the opportunity to present data in different formats than
traditional print media, e.g. video

• Useful format for large datasets

• Electronic files for online publication must be submitted for the review process, uploaded as
separate files and given the file designation "Supporting Information for online publication
only"

• Please try to restrict individual files sizes to 5 Mb maximum (zipped or unzipped)

• Provide a brief title for each item intended for online publication at the end of the main
manuscript

• For more information on preparing Supporting Information, please see

http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/suppmat.asp

Supporting Information not for publication

• Articles cited as “in press” but not yet available for public access should be uploaded
as .PDF files for the reviewers

Pre-submission English-language editing

Authors for whom English is a second language may choose to have their manuscript
professionally edited before submission. A list of independent suppliers of editing services
can be found at http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/english_language.asp. All services
are arranged and paid for by the author. Use of one of these services does not guarantee
acceptance or preference for publication.

Review process
Plant Pathology uses single-blind peer review.

Submissions that are out of scope may be rejected without external peer review.

The Senior Editor will appoint a member of the Editorial Board to manage each new
submission. The Editor will generally appoint two anonymous reviewers to report on
the suitability for publication. Authors may suggest the names of potential reviewers -
these should not be recent collaborators. If there are people that authors would
prefer not to be used as reviewers, please provide your (confidential) reasons in the
cover letter to the Senior Editor.

The Senior Editor will make a final decision based upon their own judgement and the
recommendations of the reviewers and Editor. The process from submission to first
decision currently takes 32 days on average.

Following acceptance

Online Open

OnlineOpen is available to authors of primary research articles who wish to make their article
available to non-subscribers on publication, or whose funding agency requires grantees to
archive the final version of their article. With OnlineOpen the author, the author's funding
agency, or the author's institution pays a fee to ensure that the article is made available to
non-subscribers upon publication via Wiley Online Library, as well as deposited in the
funding agency's preferred archive. For the full list of terms and conditions, see
http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/onlineopen#OnlineOpen_Terms.

If you want your article to be open access please choose the appropriate licence agreement
when you log in to Wiley’s Author Services system. Click on ‘Make my article OnlineOpen’
and choose the appropriate license by clicking on ‘Sign license agreement now’ when you log
in to Wiley’s Author Services system.

RCUK/WT Funder mandate authors only

If your paper is accepted, the author identified as the formal corresponding author for the
paper will receive an email prompting them to login into Author Services; where via the
Wiley Author Licensing Service (WALS) they will be able to complete the license agreement
on behalf of all authors on the paper.

For authors signing the copyright transfer agreement

If the OnlineOpen option is not selected the corresponding author will be presented with the
copyright transfer agreement (CTA) to sign. The terms and conditions of the CTA can be
previewed in the samples associated with the Copyright FAQs below:

CTA Terms and Conditions http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/faqs_copyright.asp

For authors choosing OnlineOpen

If the OnlineOpen option is selected the corresponding author will have a choice of the
following Creative Commons License Open Access Agreements (OAA):

Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License OAA

Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial -NoDerivs License OAA

To preview the terms and conditions of these open access agreements please visit the
Copyright FAQs hosted on Wiley Author Services
http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/faqs_copyright.asp and visit
http://www.wileyopenaccess.com/details/content/12f25db4c87/Copyright--License.html.

If you select the OnlineOpen option and your research is funded by The Wellcome Trust and
members of the Research Councils UK (RCUK) you will be given the opportunity to publish
your article under a CC-BY license supporting you in complying with Wellcome Trust and
Research Councils UK requirements. For more information on this policy and the Journal’s
compliant selfarchiving policy please visit: http://www.wiley.com/go/funderstatement.

For RCUK and Wellcome Trust authors click on the link below to preview the terms
and conditions of this license:

Creative Commons Attribution License OAA

To preview the terms and conditions of these open access agreements please visit the
Copyright FAQs hosted on Wiley Author Services
http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/faqs_copyright.asp and visit
http://www.wileyopenaccess.com/details/content/12f25db4c87/Copyright--License.html.

Colour Work

If there are colour figures in your manuscript, we require you to complete and return a colour
work agreement (CWA) form before your paper can be published. This form allows authors
to state whether to publish in colour online only or in both the print and online versions of the
journal. Payment options are also given. The CWA will be sent to authors on acceptance of
their paper, and is also available to download from here.

Please return the signed CWA to the Editorial Office by e-mail to plantpath@bspp.org.uk

In addition, for authors paying for colour figures, please post the original signed hard copies
to:

Customer Services (OPI)

John Wiley & Sons Ltd, European Distribution Centre
New Era Estate
Oldlands Way
Bognor Regis
West Sussex
PO22 9NQ
This extra requirement is needed to comply with UK Payment Card Industry Data Security
Standard (PCI DSS) legal requirements.

Cover image

High quality images, suitable for the cover of Plant Pathology, are welcomed by the Senior
Editor. Any prospective front cover images should be sent to the Plant Pathology Editorial
Office (plantpath@bspp.org.uk) following acceptance of the manuscript.

Online production tracking

Author Services enables authors to track their article through the production process to
publication online and in print. Authors can choose to receive automated e-mails at key
stages of production. The corresponding author will receive an e-mail with a unique link
inviting them to register for Author Services. Visit http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/
for more details.

Proofs

Authors will be notified by e-mail when the proofs are ready to download as a .PDF. Authors
should correct their proofs promptly (preferably within 3 days), and return them by e-mail to
the Editorial Office (plantpath@bspp.org.uk). Major alterations to the text will be charged to
the author and may delay publication.

Publication

Early View

Plant Pathology is covered by Wiley-Blackwell's EarlyView service. EarlyView articles are

complete full-text articles published online as soon as they are ready, not waiting for the next
print issue. EarlyView articles are in final form; no changes can be made after publication.
EarlyView articles are “published” and are citable immediately using a Digital Object
Identifier (DOI). After print publication, the DOI remains valid and can continue to be used
to cite and access the article. More information about DOIs can be found at
http://www.doi.org/faq.html.

Offprints

To receive a free PDF offprint, the author must sign up to Author Services. Visit
http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/ for further information.

Additional printed offprints may be ordered online at http://offprint.cosprinters.com. Printed

offprints are posted to the correspondence address given for the paper unless a different
address is specified when ordered. Note that it is not uncommon for the printed offprints to
take up to 8 weeks.