Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Punjab - 2014
Title design
Ali Iqbal
Printed by
December, 2014
Punjab Curriculum and Textbook Board
21-E/II, Gulberg III, Lahore, Pakistan
T +92 -42-99230672-6
F +92 -42-99230679
www.ptb.gop.pk
Curriculum Implementation Framework
Punjab - 2014
1. Introduction 1
2. Rationale for a Curriculum Implementation Framework 3
3. Curriculum Design 4
3.1 Process of Curriculum Revision 4
3.2 Approach of the Curriculum 5
4. Proposed Curriculum Implementation Framework for Punjab 8
4.1 Dissemination 10
4.2 Development of Textual Material 11
4.3 Teacher Training 13
4.3.1 Pre-service 14
4.3.2 In-service 14
4.4 Examination/Assessment and Evaluation 15
4.5 Feedback and Evaluation 16
4.5.1 Principles of Curriculum Monitoring 16
Outcomes for
Curriculum Implementation
1. Introduction
Curriculum must change in order to prepare young students to cope with the challenges of economic demands and
technological changes. Nations keep on revising the school curricula with a view to meet the global market trends and
technological advancements of 21st century. In 2006, Pakistan also started a major revision process to bring its
national curricula in line with a competency-based model rather than an objectives-based model. Curricula for 23 core
compulsory subjects were notified as first batch in 2006-07 with implementation to start in 2008. Between 2006 and
2010 curricula of 61 core/compulsory and elective subjects were revised. At the same time in 2007 new ‘Textbook and
Learning Material Policy and Plan of Action’ was introduced to produce quality textbooks through a competitive
process between private sector publishers. Due to a number of factors including uncertainties within Provincial
Textbook Boards about their future role, the textbooks for the new curriculum could not be introduced till April, 2010.
Apart from delays related to understanding new roles and responsibilities as laid down in the Textbook Policy, the
absence of a comprehensive, holistic Curriculum Implementation Framework was considered as one of the main
reasons for non implementation of the new National Curricula. A curriculum implementation framework does not
necessarily mean a set of instructions or rules to be followed but rather presents a set of shared guidelines about
roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders - mainly the textbook boards, publishers of textbooks and learning
materials, teachers and teacher trainers, experts and bodies for examination and assessment and curriculum
developers and the government departments for education who have the sole responsibility for providing quality
education to the masses they serve.
Teachers, professionals and curriculum developers need to work together to decide how the curriculum will be used
with students and the milestones that will be met at different points in the implementation process. Over time, teachers
need to be given different kinds of support, tailored to their changing needs. Teachers need to share insights with one
another as they implement the new curriculum.
It is crucial that curriculum implementers understand that implementing a curriculum takes time, resources, and a
commitment to reform. In addition, the change needs to be institutionalized by ensuring the continued use of the
curriculum after the initial phases. Plans must be established for its nationwide holistic implementation through
textbook development and ongoing professional development for all existing teachers and curriculum oriented
induction of new teachers.
Briefly, the Curriculum Implementation Framework is a broad policy guideline regarding development of learning
materials, professional development of teachers/ instructional delivery system, assessment and testing of students'
achievements/learning outcomes and feedback for changes required for effective future revision of curriculum.
Writing
Written
Learning Outcomes:
peace, gender,
higher order thinking
Curriculum
ht
Classroom Teaching
e ste
T
In-service Support
& Supervision
The recent decision by the Government of Pakistan to devolve the Federal Ministry of Education to the provincial level
has had its implications on the process of implementing the national curriculum. It has empowered the provincial
ministries of education and their related departments to improvise and innovate, whilst opening up new avenues for
them especially in the area of implementing the curriculum. However, the devolution has simultaneously created a
gap, at least temporarily, as the support and coordination mechanism that was in place at the federal level is no more
available for the provinces. This has also created the need to look into the current capacities of the different provincial
departments and its related institutions on whether they are prepared enough to take the process forward in their
respective provinces with respect to:
Alignment of in-service teacher training with the standards, benchmarks and learning outcomes of the new
curriculum in consultation with the provincial stakeholders. Development of guidelines/standards for in-
service training for successful implementation of new curricula.
Alignment of the pre-service curriculum to the requirements and objectives of the curricula.
Alignment of examination level (school assessment – internal and external) to assess the achievement of
standards and student learning outcomes.
The Curriculum Implementation Framework is designed (i) keeping in view all these recent developments and (ii) as a
flexible guideline for implementation that can be adapted to each province’s needs in order for the provinces to
continue this reform process in the absence of the Federal Ministry. The idea is to propose a curriculum
implementation strategy document which outlines the philosophy and objectives of the new curriculum, its underlying
methodologies, the standards and benchmarks and detailed outlines of implementation strategies vis-a-vis textbook
development, preservice/inservice teacher training and assessment strategies in order to ensure the delivery of the
new curriculum in its true spirit down to the level of the teacher and the child.
The approach of the revised curriculum is in line with the international standards and has been made comprehensive
by incorporating content strands/competencies, standards, benchmarks and students' learning outcomes.
Development of attitudes and values towards various subjects is also included and not just transfer of knowledge.
The curriculum provides a comprehensive outline for the teaching of each subject and developing teaching learning
resources (textbook, teachers' guide, and workbook) and encourages the use of related educational technologies.
Students' assessment and evaluation strategies are also outlined in the curriculum which go beyond rote-
memorization and allow students to demonstrate proficiency in a variety of ways. The curriculum provides detailed
guidelines for quality assessments, which would:
Stress application of what students know and are able to do in new or different situations.
The revised curriculum intends to make learners creative, constructive, communicative and reflective individuals who
are disciplined, productive, moderate and enlightened citizens capable of effectively participating in the highly
competitive globalized, knowledge-based economy.
The revised curriculum lays a strong emphasis on values for peaceful co-existence, unity in diversity, and
development of positive attitudes towards fellow human beings through respect and tolerance.
The curriculum is activity based and essentially focuses on activities through cooperative learning where children in
schools are encouraged to work together in groups and pairs to solve problems and carry out activities to foster
learning and sharing.
The existing national curriculum was reviewed, updated and revised with a view to:
Providing triggers within curricula for inquiry and analytical thinking as well as inculcating life skills and
values.
Discouraging passive learning to infuse in students the habit of learning by doing and with understanding.
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) are essentially the essence of the revised curriculum 2006.It is based on a
globally accepted and effective format, which consists of standards, benchmarks and SLOs. For each subject
document, horizontal and vertical articulation has been maintained. Vertical overlapping within the discipline and
horizontal overlapping with other disciplines (subjects) has been avoided to make room to include emerging trends,
new developments and such applications and concepts that are useful in real life situations for making the subject
learning more relevant, meaningful and stimulating. Inquiry approaches and interaction with peers as well as with
teachers are emphasized. Science, technology and society connections have been earmarked. Instructions and
guidelines are given to develop assessments based on understanding, thinking abilities and process skills.
In order to specify the syllabus as precisely as possible and also to emphasize the importance of higher order abilities
and Investigative skills/library/field work other than recall, learning outcomes have been used throughout.
Standards: they define the competencies by descriptive statements specifying broadly, the knowledge,
skills and attitudes that students will acquire in each subject, know and be able to do in a particular key area during
the course of study. These are qualitative in nature and set out the learning targets.
Benchmarks: they elaborate the standards indicating that the students will accomplish at the end of each
development level. They are also subject specific.
SLOs: they are detailed statements describing what students are supposed to learn and be able to do at each
grade level for each subject to achieve the specified benchmarks. They are activity specific and generally
observable and measurable.
The intended level and scope of treatment of content is defined by the stated learning
outcomes within easily recognizable domain of
(i) Remembering
(ii) Understanding
(iii) Applying
(iv) Analyzing
(v) Evaluating
(vi) Creating
The standards and the accompanying benchmarks assist in the understanding of syllabus, foster diversity in
establishing high quality learning outcomes, and provide an accountability tool to individuals involved in the
evaluation process. These provide a common denominator to determine how well students are performing. They will
ensure that all students are measured on the same knowledge and skills using the same method of assessment.
Learning in a standards based approach is considered as the active construction of knowledge by learning through an
engagement of the learner in a social or personal experience and not as the transfer of knowledge from teacher to
learner.
Curriculum implementation is a complex process which requires coordinated efforts of various organizations with
multiple jurisdictions. Curriculum implementation is primarily the job of the Provincial Education Departments (PED).
Through their networks of provincial and district level educational institutes/departments, the PEDs provide textual
material, teacher training and guidelines and where necessary upgrade existing teaching facilities. For example,
many a time, changes in science curricula require new equipment and modifications to be carried out in the
laboratories.
Learning materials are one of the most important components of the educational process. Results of most of the
educational analysis provide evidence about the importance of learning materials in the process of building up
educational quality through improving the quality of textbooks. In spite of the fact that revolutionary changes have
occurred in instructional technology, textbooks still occupy the central place in the delivery of curriculum in schools.
Teacher quality is also recognized as the greatest determinant of educational success. Quality teaching has a
measurable impact on student outcomes. Successful teaching requires a deep understanding of the subject matter,
use of appropriate instructional methods, and application of various classroom assessment strategies. For this
purpose fundamental changes are required both in pre-service and in-service teacher education curricula and
training systems.
In Pakistan most teachers - specifically those in public service - depend only on textbooks. They just prepare the
students for success in the examination and not success in life. Teachers who are good at subject knowledge and
take interest in learning research-based instructional skills surely play a key role in student development and
achievement of learning outcomes. For successful implementation of any curriculum it is pertinent to bring attitudinal
changes in the teachers on one hand and to equip them with new classroom delivery techniques with maximum
participation of the students on the other. Activity and programme - based learning need to be encouraged keeping in
view the developmental level of the learners.
Student assessment is another important component of the overall educational process. Good assessment involves
evaluating student progress and measuring the degree to which a student has achieved desired educational
outcomes. Methods for assessment must also be developed to guide students throughout the instructional process
and to determine how well each student achieves the desired outcomes. Examination systems need to align their
methods to the requirements of the new curriculum. The examination system in Pakistan tends to reinforce the
system of rote memorization through its continued trend in asking textbook based questions that students can simply
reproduce if they have successfully memorized their books. Very little emphasis is given to testing understanding,
application and higher order thinking. Since the entire education system is heavily geared towards success in
examinations as teachers inevitably start following teaching techniques that foster memorization. A major overhaul is
required in this field in order to ensure that student learning outcomes, as laid down in the curriculum, are achieved
and tested as desired.
After detailed consultations in several national workshops representing all stakeholders the following steps are
proposed to facilitate implementation of curriculum:
Dissemination
Development of Textual Material
Teacher Training
Examination/Assessment and Evaluation
Feedback
A series of actions is set into motion with formal adoption of the curriculum. The foremost task is communication of
the change to provincial/area government who bear the responsibility for bringing the change at the level of schools
and examination boards. The education authorities develop plans to bring about the change in the schools under
their supervision. This may involve changes in timetable, instructions to teachers to rearrange course schedules
and provision of new books.
Dissemination needs to move beyond the traditional approach of posting the curriculum documents to relevant
institutions and hoping for change. It needs to focus more on building understanding of the new approaches and
informing the public at large on the importance and relevance of the proposed change. The process of
dissemination should encompass creation of ownership and support for the reform by spreading the message to as
large a group of stakeholders as is necessary.
Following are the proposed sub-steps to disseminate the new / revised curriculum to the concerned stakeholders
for implementation:
For the detail of stakeholders responsible for certain actions and the suggested time span for various activities
please see Part II – CIF Monitoring Framework.
Other details about the above is given in Part II – CIF Monitoring Framework.
New textual material requires additional effort from teachers in learning the new concepts and adopting them in their
teaching. The change affects right down to the individual lesson plans developed by the teachers. In most cases as
witnessed in the past curriculum reviews, a change in the curriculum is confined to introduction of new textbooks
while training of teachers in adoption of new teaching methodologies is ignored. Implementation requires
simultaneous change in both textbooks and teaching methodologies. Therefore more efforts are required on part of
the teachers training institutes to ensure that the required change is communicated to the teachers accordingly and
in time.
The importance of effective communication with teachers, explaining the purpose of the change and the potential
for improving learning outcomes should be emphasized. Teachers must be treated as the most important factor in
curriculum implementation. Their points of view and conditions should not be ignored. It should be kept in view that
the best possible results for implementation may not be achieved by just passing out instructions for the change, but
rather by taking teachers on board and convincing them about the need for the change. A ‘Continuing Professional
Development’ (CPD) system is needed which provides continuous ongoing professional support to teachers at
school level and also fosters the participation of teachers in their own professional development through reflective
practices and peer learning.
Pre-service education of teachers normally focuses on equipping the teachers with necessary pedagogical skills to
deliver a variety of contents at different age groups of children. The National Education Policy, 2009 has the
following provision for pre-service teacher education in Pakistan;
Teacher education curriculum shall be adjusted to the needs of the school curriculum and scheme of
studies. The curriculum shall include training for student-centred teaching, cross- curricular competencies,
and an on-site component.
Under the provisions of NEP, 2009 the existing system of teacher education will be replaced with Associate Degree
and Bachelor Degree of Education in future. This means that Higher Education Commission has to take over the
responsibility of preparing teachers for the whole system of school education. Therefore, the liaison between HEC
and Punjab Curriculum and Textbook Board (PCTB) is required to implement any new curriculum effectively.
The sub-steps to be taken to improve the quality of teacher education are proposed as under. For details please see
Part II – CIF Monitoring Framework.
4.3.2 In-service
Agree upon framework for training all teachers in new curricula
Prepare training schedule
Develop training materials
Carry out training of teachers in new curriculum according to framework/plan
Develop and implement mechanisms for supervision, mentoring and feedback to sustain the required
teaching practices
Teachers must be trained both in summative and formative assessment. Summative assessment to measure the
degree of student achievement at the end of an instructional process and formative assessment used to facilitate
student' improvement by identifying areas of weakness. Its results should be fairly shared with the students as well as
the parents. As a part of educational process we need to recognize the importance of assessment in achieving overall
goals of education.
Steps to be taken for curriculum-based assessment are suggested below. For details please see Part II – CIF
Monitoring Framework.
In other words, the instruments of feedback and evaluation may have a short term use: they generate data, which is
then used to carry out any revisions that may be necessary in the curriculum even prior to the next phase of new
curriculum construction and implementation. This is an ongoing use. No major changes are ordinarily contemplated
during curriculum implementation phase. Feedback and evaluation is initiated in the form of studies and reviews.
Data generated from the feedback and evaluation mechanisms generates reports. These reports also inform the
work of curriculum construction that is undertaken at the beginning of the next phase of curriculum development. This
review is different from the one that may be carried out periodically and results in minor revisions.
1. Data collection should be from a representative sample to be able to draw credible conclusions;
2. Baseline situation should be sketched out to assess the impact of curriculum implementation;
3. Sufficient number of observations at different time intervals should be taken to formulate an assessment on
Implementation.
4. Communication and administrative systems in which curriculum implementation is taking place should be
studied;
5. Data that is already available should be used where possible. For instance, examination data on student
achievements contains information that is relevant to effectiveness of the curriculum;
6. In-depth analyses should include detailed interviews with teachers, students, district education managers
and other stakeholders.
CIF Monitoring
Framework
5. Scope of the Monitoring Framework
This Monitoring framework is based on the ideas and content presented in the Curriculum Implementation
Framework, which had been developed prior to the development of the monitoring framework.
All outcomes, related completion indicators, and monitoring activities mentioned in this document are therefore
based on the steps identified during the development of the CIF, and have been taken as they appear in the CIF
document. However, the participants carried out a thorough discussion and review of these outcomes and indicators
during the workshop sessions. The discussion on review criteria revolved around key considerations such as
Baseline values,
A strategy for collection,
Means of verification.
Some of the proposed indicators were re-written in light of the discussion held with stakeholders, in which they were
finalized and made part of the monitoring framework.
Outcomes
Goals
Major Activities
Sub Activities
Indicators (OVI - MOV)
Data Sources Responsibility of stakeholders
Timeframe
1. Outcome: Timely distribution of the curriculum in a way that it reaches all the stakeholders as per
defined implementation framework in a simple and understandable form.
1.1. # of documents produced to translate the new curriculum in an easy to understand and implementable form in each province/area.
1.2. # of “face to face” activities (e.g. Seminars/conferences/meetings etc.) that are organized to disseminate the information on the
new curriculum to the beneficiaries.
1.3. Development, preparation, printing and distribution of posters and summaries to all stakeholder
1.4. # of “awareness raising” media (campaigns) appearing at the local, provincial and national levels to highlight the implementation
of the new curriculum
i. Prepara on of OVI
no fica on schedule by # of copies of
competent authority implementa on
ii. Dispatch informa on schedule schedule received by
to all beneficiaries , all the beneficiaries
Prepara on and
stakeholders and media # of leading
no fica on of newspapers in which
1 X PCTB
Implementa on iii. Iden fica on of the
the no fica on
schedule websites where the
appears
informa on is to be
displayed MOV
Copy of the
iv. Development of no fica on
content for the website
2. Outcome: Development of effective learning materials for use of teachers and students to
achieve the learning outcomes specified in the curricula.
2.1 % increase in the number of textbooks published based on the new curricula in every phase / year of the implementation
2.2 # of textbooks published according to the procedures and quality standards set in the implementation framework.
OVI
# of relevant
stakeholders
receiving the
no fica ons
MOV
Copies of the PCTB
approval /
no fica on
available in the
files at the
stakeholders
office
OVI
# of interna onal
i. Review/study best(prac ces)/ models reviewed/
models at interna onal studied
levels (Documentary
proof available ‐
Linked with the
next point)
Eligibility Criteria for MOV
Copy of eligibility X PCTB
2 selec on of
publishers ii. Determining of criteria
minimum standard vis a vis OVI
infrastructure for Pakistan # of adapta ons
/ modifica ons
HR, Experiences financial made as per
resources requirements
MOV
Standards and
other documents
OVI
# of resource
persons that
conduct the
orienta on /
training list of
resource persons PCTB
Orienta on/
ii. Selec on of resource X
3 training of MOV
person
Publishers/ Authors List of resource
person(s) Onsite
a endance of
Departmental
Representa ves
or Officials at the
event
OVI
# of copies of
the schedule
iii. Schedule no fica on received by the
X
invitees
MOV
Copy of schedule
OVI
i. Bidding documents New bidding X
prepara on documents used
during the process
Prepara on MOV
/Adapta on Copies of bidding
4 PCTB
of Standard bidding documents
document OVI
# of
ii. Study of previous prac ces adver sements X
appearing in leading
newspapers
MOV
Copies of bidding
documents
OVI
# of mee ngs held
iii. Consulta on with publishers with publishers X
MOV
Minutes of the
mee ng
PCTB
OVI
# of
adver sements
appearing in leading
iv. Adver sement newspapers X
MOV
Copies of published
adver sement
OVI
Copy of criteria
available for scru ny
i. Scru ny of papers X
of papers
MOV
Copy of criteria
OVI
Copies of all
Short lis ng of documentary
successful bidders proofs available in
5 PCTB
and placement of the concerned
ini al orders department/ offices
MOV
Visit report (of
ii. Physical verifica on, Short list random visits)
verifica on, Placing order for of the monitoring X
models chapters, (subject) team to the
specifica on publishers sites.
Copies of
purchase
orders
Copies of various
correspondence
held with regard
to subject
specifica ons.
OVI
Copy of criteria
available for local
i. IR criteria X
review
MOV
Copy of criteria
document
OVI
# of mee ngs
organized at the
Internal / Local
7 local level
Review ii. mee ng/ minutes/report X PCTB
MOV
Minutes of the
mee ng Copies
of reports
OVI
Invita on le ers to
experts / members
of IR Commi ee
iii Iden fica on of experts MOV
List of experts X
Copies of their
invita on le ers
OVI
Acknowledgment
from publishers
that they have
iv. Sharing report with received the report
publishers X
MOV
Minutes of the
mee ng Receipts
of courier service/
peon book
PCTB
OVI
Commi ee
members finalized
MOV
v. Final checking before sending Copies of any
to PRC final comments by X
IR Commi ee,
Copies of final
approval le er
from IR Commi ee
OVI
Copy of criteria
i. Review Criteria available for review X
MOV
Copy of criteria
OVI PCTB
Invita on le ers to
experts / members
of PRC
ii. Iden fica on of experts MOV X
List of experts,
Copies of their
8 Provincial Review invita on le ers,
Copies of TORs
OVI
PRC mee ng held
iii. Review Report MOV X
Report and
Minutes of
mee ng
PCTB
OVI
Comments from
iv. Ac on on basis of PRC desk reviewers
Review MOV X
Desk review
documents
OVI
# of changes made
in the manuscript
(if any)
MOV
i. Select Commi ee X
Documents PCTB
Approval of the highligh ng the
Manuscript and suggested
10 ac on from the
NOC
issuance approving
authority
OVI
Copy of NOC/
approval received
for on ward
ii. NOC/Approval processing X
MOV
Copies of NOC/
Approval
OVI
Physical
verifica on of
books received
MOV
i. Storing Visit report (of X
random visits) of
the monitoring
team to the stores
Copies of stock
registers
OVI
Demands
12 Distribu on
verifica on
ii. Demands/ verifica on available PMIU SED/PMIU
distribu on list X /PCTB
MOV
Copy of verifica on
le er
OVI
Copies of books
received by the
DEO, Dy‐DEO's
iii. Dispatch to DEO, Dy. DEO offices
X
MOV
Copies of
dispatch le ers
Copies of
receipt le ers
OVI
Random
check at different
levels
iv. AEO/ Schools
MOV X
Copies of stock SED/PMIU
registers
OVI
Monitoring tools
developed
i. Monitoring tools MOV X
Copies of
monitoring tools
Coordina on and
13 Monitoring PCTB/PMIU
Mechanism
OVI
Smooth supply of
materials without
ii. Coordina on with actors/ complaints from
departmental
departmental offices etc. offices X
MOV
Copies of
task comple on
reports
OVI
Field visit reports
MOV
Visit report (of
iii. Field Monitoring random visits)
X
of the monitoring
team to the stores
Field notes of other
departmental
representa ves
PCTB/PMIU
OVI
Documentary
proof available
including reports
iv. Feedback: analysis/
repor ng. MOV X
Copies of stock
registers Copies of
monitoring and
other relevant
report
3. Outcome: All teachers (pre- and in-service) at all the institutions are trained in using the new
curricula.
3.1 # of trainers/teacher educators at all in-service and pre-service training institutions trained in designing and delivering training
programs as per new curricula.
3.2 % increase in the number of teachers trained according to the new curricula.
3.3 # of teacher guides published for each subject curricula, and disseminated at both in-service and pre-service teacher training programs
3.5 # of revised training programs and syllabi in all subjects as per new curricula
OVI
i. Situa on analysis,surveys,
TNA Report
workshops for TNA.
MOV X
Development of TNA tools
Teachers
Implementa on of TNA interviews / survey
Teaching Needs
1 Assessment (TNA)
OVI
Documents
containing
standards and
ii. Se ng up minimum outline as per new
standards, and outline for curriculum needs.
MOV X SED/DSD
the resource/manual design
Copies of minimum
standard document
Copy of the outline
of resource manual
design
OVI
Completed
reviewed manuals/
resources
i. Review of the exis ng
Prepara on of MOV
resources by DSD X
2 resource and Review
training manuals documents and
other resources
A endance list of
par cipants
OVI
# of people that
ii. Workshops for developing
reviewed the
the final versions of the
document X
resources and manuals
MOV
List of resource
person(s)
OVI
DSD
Manuals and
resources finally
iii. Review workshops for redesigned and
finaliza on of the developed ready to use
manuals MOV
X
Onsite a endance
of Departmental
Representa ves or
Officials at the
event
OVI
Venue evalua on
survey
Registra on X DSD
A endance
MOV
Copies of survey
OVI
Evalua on tools X
i. Designing online/hard copy
developed
evalua on tools
MOV
Departmental X
ii. Training professionals to Representa ves or
administer evalua on tools officials at the
event
Monitoring of X
iii. Administering the training OVI
6 Training and DSD
evalua on Monitoring tools
follow ups designed as per
training objec ve
iv. Follow up by DEAs and DTEs X
MOV
Copies of
v. Data analysis monitoring tools
(including X
evalua on forms)
OVI
100% comple on
of evalua on
forms
MOV
75% ques ons
responded from
the tool DSD
OVI
Evalua on X
report completed
and submi ed
MOV
Copies of
evalua on reports
OVI
Documents with
syllabus break up
available for use in
i. Planning syllabus (Academic classrooms X
calendar) MOV
Copies of
documents with
syllabus break‐up
OVI
ii. Synchronizing training Classroom
observa ons
material with learning X
MOV
material or textbooks Classroom
observa on sheets
Opera onalizing OVI
SED/PCTB
7 the New Teacher feedback
iii. Classroom teaching and /BISEs
Curriculum MOV X
learning Teacher feedback
forms
OVI
Assessment
iv. Forma ve and Summa ve reports
MOV X
assessments
Assessment
reports
OVI
Teachers guides
covering SLOs
v. Extension to elementary men oned in the
respec ve curricula X
and secondary level
MOV
Teachers guides
1 Orienta on on OVI
“Curricula Documents with
i. Developing objec ves/
2006” and outline /
source outline
scheme of studies objec ves X
in pre‐service MOV
Teacher Course content
curriculum
OVI
ii. Approval from HEC/ More emphasis
Affiliated Degree Awarding on curriculum
2 Coordina on with Ins tu ons. related concept/
HEC Development Integra on of “new ac vity sheets
X
of lessons as per Curriculum component” MOV HEC
new curricula into regular scheme of Teacher's guides
studies as reference
material
OVI
HEC approval
3 Introducing cer ficate
course /paper MOV
Scheme of studies iii. internship Copies of X
of textbook New Na onal
Curriculum 2006
development
of different
subjects.
OVI
i. Training metable,
New inducted
designed, finalized and teachers oriented
approved. on Na onal
Curriculum 2006 X
MOV
No. of new
inducted teachers
oriented on
Na onal
Orienta on of Curriculum 2006
“newly inducted ii. Commencement of
4 Teachers guide
Teachers on training developed on
Na onal SLOs X DSD
Curriculum 2006
4. Outcome: Assessment and examinations are conducted using the new curricula.
4.1 # of examination boards/authorities at various levels conducting examinations to assess student learning outcomes
specified in the new curricula.
4.2 # of teachers trained for improving the assessment practices and examination as per the new curricula.
4.3 % increase regarding data analysis practices of examination results as per outcomes specified in the new curriculum.
OVI
Capacity gap and i. Survey and workshop for Specimen of X
need assessment for TNA material developed
introduc on of # of items
curriculum based developed
assessment and
orienta on of SLO ii. Material Development MOV
1 Based assessment workshop (Paper se er, Copies of items X
for BISEs/PEAS/ and Head examiners) developed
PEC/PED (including
teachers) OVI
NOTE: grade V and iii. Seminars/Mee ngs with # of seminars / X
VIII level exams are head, Teachers mee ngs held SED/BISEs/PCTB
conducted by PEC Development
MOV Partners
A endance list of
iv. Training of item writers par cipants,
registra on forms X
OVI
Orienta on on use Tools for assessment
of tools for i. Workshop/seminars of SLOs developed
2 Material development X
assessment of MOV
SLOs Workshop report
OVI
1. Development of i. Material Development Manuals
Material (assessment manual) developed # of
items developed
MOV
X
Copies of
assessment
manuals
a endance list of
par cipants
OVI
# of workshops
3 held and list of
par cipants # of SED/BISE/PCTB
paper se ers/test DSD
i. Orienta on/ Training item developers
2. Orienta on and
Workshops/ for teachers/ and reviewers
training of Paper
paper‐se ers of assessment trained
se ers/Test item
developers/ organiza ons and the MOV
X
teachers selected subject teachers List of resource
persons
Onsite
a endance of
Departmental
Representa ves
or Officials at the
even List of
trained people
OVI
i. Framework for curriculum # of items
based tests X
developed for the
item pool
MOV
Copies of
ii. Rubrics model papers X
OVI
# of rubrics
developed
Development of iii. Item Pool
4 X
Model papers MOV
Representa ves SED/BISEs/
or Officials at PCTB/DSD
iv. Pilot tes ng the event
OVI X
# of examinees
a ending the pilot
v. Review and finaliza on test
MOV X
# of model papers
developed
vi. Dissemina on of Model
Ques on Papers
X
OVI
i. Selec on of SLOs for test SLOs selected X
development
MOV
List of items X
ii. Formula on of test writers
specifica on OVI
Specifica ons X
developed
iii. Selec on of item writers
MOV
Items pool X
Curriculum based
5 assessment/ iv. Development of items and
OVI
examina on rubrics
Item writers SED/BISEs/
X PCTB/DSD
MOV
v. Revision of items Tests for pilo ng
OVI X
vi. Test assembling No. of items
developed
MOV X
vii. Pilot tes ng Copies of coding/
marking schemes
viii. Analysis of pilot tested items OVI X
Revised items list
MOV
ix. Revision of items and rubrics Copies of the
X
gaze e
OVI
i. Feedback tool Different reports
development produced X
MOV
Copies of the
reports
ii. Test analysis (overall / SLOs) OVI
X
Dissemina on
tools prepared
MOV
6 Feedback/Research
iii. Development of General Use of
SED/PEC/
and Technical reports for informa on and X PCTB/DSD/
feedback to system and material
BISEs/PMIU
improving learning generated
Students
performance
reports
X
iv. Data collec on
v. Analysis of data X
OVI
i. TNA conducted Selec on criteria
for human X
resource
MOV
ii. Selec on of relevant human Ac vity Reports
resources OVI
X
Training material
developed
Strengthening/ MOV
capacity iii. Training of HR in assessment A endance sheets
7 development of psychometrics area SED/PEC/
OVI PCTB/DSD/
R&D cell in all X
BISEs, PEC Data analysis BISEs/PMIU
manuals / materials
MOV
iv. Training for assessment data Manuals / capacity
analysis development
materials / manuals X
distributed
5. Outcome:
Systems and mechanisms are in place to obtain feedback from different stakeholders on the
effectiveness and use of the new curricula, and are fed back into the system for revision purposes.
5.1 Number of Standard Operating Procedures developed to monitor the progress of the curriculum implementation process
5.2 Percentage of schools that provide feedback on the use and effectiveness of the new curricula
5.3 Number of valid feedback propositions/queries received from various implementing organizations that are incorporated
in future implementation plans.
OVI
# of seminars
organized
MOV
i. Seminars / workshops Onsite X
a endance
of Departmental
Representa ves
or Officials at the
event
OVI
# of orienta on SED/
materials PEC/PCTB/DSD/
Orienta on on produced X BISEs/PMIU
1 importance of ii. Material for Orienta on
MOV
feedback
Copies of the
orienta on
materials
OVI
# of ar cles /
le ers wri en
iii. Ar cles/Le ers MOV
X
Copies of the
ar cles / le ers
OVI
# of discussions
held
MOV
iv. Discussion Forums Outcomes
X
of brainstorming
discussions
SED/PEC/
PCTB/DSD/
BISEs/PMIU
OVI
# of media
adver sement
v. Media campaign
MOV
Copies of X
adver sements
OVI
Short list of
i. Selec on of a consultant consultant X
MOV
Adver sement
OVI
No. of le ers
wri en
MOV
ii. Iden fica on of experts Onsite a endance X
of Departmental
Representa ves or
Officials at the SED/PEC/
Development of event
3 PCTB/DSD/
tools for feedback
OVI BISEs/PMIU
No. of experts
par cipated
iii. Review of research studies X
MOV
A endance list of
par cipants
OVI
iv. Workshops No. of research
Construc on of tools studies collected
(Ques onnaires, checklist, and reviewed
MOV X
interviews). Assessment
Manual List of resource
persons
i. Findings X
OVI
ii. Conclusion Copy of the final X
report produced
(Technical/
Repor ng / Thema c/
8
Feedback Result reports)
MOV
iii. Recommenda ons X
Final report / SED/PEC/
recommenda ons PCTB/DSD/
BISEs/PMIU
iv. Dissemina on X
OVI
Ac on plan
developed by
i. Experts opinion/ experts
9 Way forward X
development of ac on plan
MOV
Copy of ac on plan
The following figure represents the level and number of stakeholders involved in the implementation
and monitoring process.
The stakeholders
Community
PCTB
DSD
PMIU
HEC BISEs