On Stream Inspection in Lieu of Internal Inspections Form {Document No}

Criteria from API 510 Version :{XXX} {MM/DD/YYYY}

Approved By:{XXXXXXXXXXX}

Equipment ID: PTX-700.XX-XX-XXXX

Equipment Description: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Criteria Yes/No Acceptance Justification

Notes
1) Does the vessel size or configuration make it physcially impossible for Yes {Fill in nozzle sizes
vessel entry for internal inspection? – { If they would like to specify a or not accessible
minimum nozzle size criteria they want to add for more clarity that would etc}
be a good starting point}
2) When vessel entry is physically possible all of the following criteria
should be met

a) Is the general corrosion rate of the vessel known to be less than Yes {Define corrosion
0.005 in. per year? rate here; if
possible attach
calculations for
corrosions rates
below}
b) Does the vessel have a remaining life greater than 10 years? Yes {Fill remaining life
number; show
calculations}
c) Has the corrosive character of the contents , including the effects Yes {Describe service
of trace components been established by at least 5 years of the history; notes from
same or similar service? Previous
inspection}
d) Have any questionable conditions been discovered during the No {Describe
external inspection? inspection history;
notes from
Previous
inspection}
 On Stream Inspection in Lieu of Internal Inspections Form {Document No}

Criteria from API 510 Version :{XXX} {MM/DD/YYYY}

Approved By:{XXXXXXXXXXX}

e) Does the operating temperature of the steel vessel shell exceed the No {Define the
lower temperature limits for the creep rupture range of the vessel operating
material referenced in API 579-1/ASME FFS, Part 4, Table 4.1- temperature of the
Attached in reference below vessel; add
reference source}
f) Has the vessel been subjected to environmental cracking or No
hydrogen damage from the fluid being handled?
g) Does the vessel have a non-integrally bonded liner such as strip lining No
or plate lining?
3) Has an RBI assessment been performed on the vessel that determined If assessment {Attach
that the risk associated with the veesel is acceptable low and the has been done assessment as
effectiveness of the external NDE technique(s) is adequate for the bullet 2 does reference}
expected damage mechanism? not need to be
satisfied for
acceptance.
4) When an Internal inspection has been conducted on a vessel with similar {Enter Equipment
or same service with the following criteria ID and description
of Vessel}
a) Does this vessel operate in the same service and conditions as the Yes {Define operating
vessel already inspected internally? conditions of both
vessels; attach
reference source}
b) Are the two vessels installed in series operating at the same Yes {Define operating
conditions and no potentially corrosive contaminants are introduced at conditions of both
an intermediate point in the train or otherwise become in such a way vessels; attach
that it affects the integrity of the vessel? reference source/
P&ID to show
details}
 On Stream Inspection in Lieu of Internal Inspections Form {Document No}

Criteria from API 510 Version :{XXX} {MM/DD/YYYY}

Approved By:{XXXXXXXXXXX}

PRINT NAME SIGNATURE DATE

EQUIPMENT INSPECTOR
On Stream Inspection in Lieu of Internal Inspections Form {Document No}

Criteria from API 510 Version :{XXX} {MM/DD/YYYY}

Approved By:{XXXXXXXXXXX}