7 ICHAEL K. Jk AKES, CLERK od Muihbeiag * WILLIAM G MONTGOMERY D.MERKLING, FILED MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY UOT DEC ~6 PH Ae 21 Michael Minicozzi Deputy County Attorney Bar ID #024743, 301 W. Jefferson, Sth Floor Phoenix, AZ 85003 Telephone: (602) 506-8556 meaosvd@meao.maricopa.gov MCAO Firm # 00032000 Attorney for Plaintiff DR 05000015801 - Maricopa County Attorney's Office ‘DR 05000015801 - Maricopa County Attorney's Office 1688386 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA ‘THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Plant, vs. MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO, ©R2017-155098-001 aka Michael Joseph Paladino aka Michael Joseph Smith Defendant. INDICTMENT 710 GJ 466 COUNT 4: SEXUAL ASSAULT, A CLASS 2 FELONY (MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO) COUNT 2: SEXUAL ASSAULT, A CLASS 2 FELONY (MIGHAEL JOSEPH PALADIN) COUNT 3: SEXUAL ASSAULT, A CLASS 2 FELONY (MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO) ‘COUNT 4: SEXUAL ASSAULT, A CLASS 2 FELONY (MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO) GOUNT 5: SEXUAL ASSAULT, A CLASS 2 FELONY (MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO) COUNT 6: SEXUAL ASSAULT, ACLASS 2 FELONY (MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO) ‘The Grand Jurors of Maricopa County, Arizona, accuse MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO, on December 6, 2017, charging that in Maricopa County, Arizona:COUNT 1 MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO, on or between May 1, 2003 and May 31, 2003, intentionally or knowingly, did engage in sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with VICTIM A, without the consent of VICTIM A, in violation of ARS. §§ 13-1408, 13-1401, 13-3821, 19-610, 13-701, 13-702, 19-702.01, and 13-801 ‘COUNT 2: MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO, on or about November 2, 2005, intentionally or knowingly, did engage in sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with VICTIM B, without the consent of VICTIM B, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1406, 12-1401, 13-3821, 13-610, 13-701, 13-702, 13-702.01, and 13-801, ‘COUNT 3: MICHAEL. JOSEPH PALADINO, on or about November 17,2006, jteiinaly know without the conseft of VICTIM engage in sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with VICTIM violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1406, 12-1401, 13-3821, 13-610, 13-701, 13-702, 13-702.01, and 13-801 ‘COUNT 4: MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO, on or about January 15, 2006, intentionally or knowingly, did engage in sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with VICTIM D, without the consent of VICTIM D, Violaion of ARS. §§ 13-1406, 13-1401, 13-3821, 13-610, 13-701, 13-702, 13-702.01, end 13-801 COUNT 5; MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO, on or about February 5, 2006, intentionally or knowingly, did engage in sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with VICTIM E, without the consent of VICTIM E, in Violation of ARS. §§ 19-1406, 13-1401, 13-8821, 13-610, 19-701, 13-702, 13-702.01, and 13-801 ‘COUNT: MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO, on or between May 1, 2005 and August 31, 2005, intentionally cor knowingly, did engage In sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with VICTIM F, without the consent of VICTIME, in violation of AR.S. §§ 13-1406, 19-1401, 13-624, 13-610, 13-701, 13.702, 13.70207, ‘and 13-804WILLIAM G MONTGOMERY MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY -s ‘el Minicozzi feputy County Attorney as True Bi) Date: December & 2017 FOREPEASON QF THE GRAND JURYIMPORTANT NOTICE | RDOC PURSUANT TO RULE 2.3(b) OF THE ARIZONA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, THE DEFENDANT IS CHARGED WITH ANY OFFENSE LISTED IN A.R.S TITLE 13, CHAPTERS 14, 32, 35 OR 35.1 OR IN WHICH THE VICTIM WAS A JUVENILE AT THE TIME OF THE OFFENSE, THIS CASE IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SUPREME COURT RULE 123(G)(1)(C)(ii)(H)IN THE HIGHLAND JUSTICE COURT STATE OF ARIZONA, fee FINALE HH COUNTY OF MARICOPA Michael K Teanes, Clerk of Court “= Plectronically Filed *** T. Alameda, Deputy 12/4/2017 3:46:00 PM. Filing ID 8898209 coURT [RELEASE QUESTIONNAIRE Notice: Unless specific Form 1V is sealed or ordered redacted by the Court, Court or Clerk a the time they are provid to the Court and will he veleased DEFENDANT'S NAME MICHAEL, JOSEPH PALADENO ALIAS(ES) A, GENERAL INFORMATION Charges Pursuant to AR.S. §41-1750 fen-print fingerprints were taken ofthe arrasted person? Yes C1 No Ityes, PON —__ Pursuant fo ARS, §19-610 one or more of the above. ‘charges requires the arresting agency to secure a DNA ‘sample ffom the arrested person? J Yes C1 No Ifyes, does the defendent have a val DNA sample on fllewith AZOPS? B@ Yes C] No Ino, Arresting Agoncy hss token required sample? C] Yes B No Offense Location: aruaRRn, xz (Offense Date: 2005-11-17 Arrest Location: xc. Av5/ Date: 2017-11-29 Time: 19:56 B, PROBABLE CAUSE STATEMENT “1 Please summarize and include the facts which establish probable cause for the arrest, BL GILBERT Form 1Vs are public reeords ofthe in entirety upon request DOB 1939-04-07 BOOKING NO. 2427016 CASE NO, #F202715503: G, OTHER INFORMATION (Check if applicable) 1.1] Defendant is presenti on probation, parole or any ciner farm of release involving other charges of convictions: Explain 2, Listany prior ‘Arrests? see Radendun Convictions? nis, CRIMINAL DAMAGE, PHOSt EST A9? ous ‘3, Isthore any indication the defendant is: TD AnAlcohoitc?| 1 An Adalct? 1D Mentally disturbec? BR Physically ul? 4, Defendant is currerty employed {With whom apo HVAC How long: 0 yess 1 menene 5, Where does the defendant currently reside? 2478 wns DEGERT GORING WAY QUEEN CREEK, 22 With whom azei.azmK, STEP-cHI1D, CHILD How long: 2__years. © _months_o 6. What face indicate tne defendant wil fee feleased? Explain 7. What fgets doas the state have to oppose an unsecured release? Explainaarcke oP OFPaxsus, WoLITeLE vrermn D, CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE OFFENSE(Check if applicable) 4. C1 Firearm or other weapon was used Type" 1 Someone was injured by the defendant CO Medical attention was necessary Natur of injuries: 117. 2. CJ Someone was threatened by the defendant Nature and extent of threats; 3. Did the offense involve a child victim? Yes. 69 No I¥yes, was DCS notiled?] Yes B No 4. Ifproperty offense, value of property taken or damaged 1 Property was recovered 5, Name(s) of co-defendants):DEFENDANT'S NAMEMIcHAsI. JogsPa PALADINO DOB 1989-04-07 BOOKING NO.T41702¢ CASE NO. 2201715803600 Page 2 of 2 3,0] Evidence ofthe offense was found in the defendant's E. CRIMES OF VIOLENCE possession 1 Relationship of defendant to victim: Explain 1 Vieti«n(s) and defendant reside together 2._ How was the situation brought to the attention ofthe police? A Vetim Di Thire Party C] Offcer observed 4. Was the defendant uncer the influence of aleahel or drugs atthe time ofthe ofenso Yes" CI No 8% Unk | H. DRUG OFFENSES: 1. Ifthe defendantis considered to be a drug dealer, plesse state the supporting facts 3._ 01 There are previous incidents involving these same parties Explain 4._ Is defendant currenty the subject of | 1 Anorderof protection 11 Any other court order Injunction against harassment Explain 2. What quanties and types of ilegal rugs are rectly . involved in the offense? F. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ISSUES (Check If applicable) Defendants actions 1 Drug field test completed CH Threats of horicice/suictteroodly harm 1 Defendant admission of crus ype ontroVoumershipfealousy issues ime occurs in public ‘Approximate monetary valve: § eer ae sd 5! Was any money seized? Pl in G Prior history of OV Cl Kidnapping eve taa 1 Frequencyfintensity of DV increasing Depression Amount: ¢ 1D Access to or use of weapons 1D Staking behavier |. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1 Violence against childrenvanimals ae ee ; ; Has the defendant served inthe military services ofthe Di Mutipe violations of court orders Canaaoees eves No. Tl Cassown G. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ARREST (Chock if applicable) ft yes ne Oe On eee ae 1._ Did the defendant aterpt to Branches Served In {he ha Powe A fr C& Cone aa EW Com Ci Avoid arrest) Resistarrest 1) Self Surender Mic hana ae 21s the defendant nomaless? nin C1YesB3 No Unknown 3, Do you need the court to provide an interpreter to help ‘communicate and to understand what is being said? 2. © Defendant was armed when rested Cl Yes bd No 7 ua Iso, whet language Fa fugive amet, « For IVA must ais be comleted* Ee ~~ Teertity that the information presented is true to the best of my knowledge. romienca/667 : 829071100/602-291.-¢082 2ory-11n28 ‘ARRESTING OFFICER/SERIAL NUMBER “ARREST AGENCYIDUTY PHONE NUWBER TE: sooco1seox /azocs100 _ ‘ 4 _ DEPARTMENTAL REPORT NO. ‘DEPARTMENTAL REPORT NO DEPARTMENTAL REPORT NO,Pretrial Services-Court Report [State of Arizona vs MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO Reviewed By: Chery! None Clark Superior Coutct Azone et 7-50 AMon 1YG02017 Booking: TAYTONS IA Type ‘Superior Court New Case Dos: 04/07/1989 Interview Type: Ful Gender Hele stats ofResidence: _rizona Etiniciy: Anglo County OF Reaitence: Unted Stator rest Date: 111202017 Chargeter atte: Diseription Clase Felony: 75408 SEXUAL ASSLT 2 | 13-1406 ‘SEXUAL ASSAULT F2 13-1406, SEXUAL ASSAULT F2 1.1408 SEXUAL ASSAULT ee 13-406 SEXUAL ASSAULT "2 13-1406 SEXUAL ASSAULT F2 Nohtervew ational Recommendations:PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY FINANCIAL INFORMATION Defendant's Name: MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO Booking #: 7417016 ‘The Judicial Officer needs to know about your financial situation in determining whether to require you to post bond and, if se, the amount of bond. The Judicial Officer must also determine if you are entitled to have a lawyer appointed to represent you. Number of Dependents: 2 Employment/Student/Carcgiver Status; Employed/Full Time Employment Verified: No Occupation HANDYMAN Employment Status: Current ‘Length of Employment: 10 Years Employer Name: SELF EMPLOYED Income (Month Expense (Monthly Pay Amount $3,000.00 Rent / Home Payment: $1,000.00 Payrall Deductions for Savings, Stocks, ete Utilities $100.00 Spouse Income: Food: $300.00 Public Assistance/Foos Stamps Gas $250.00 Disability Benefits Call Phone: $150.00 ‘Veteran Benefits Cable: 30.00 Social Security Benefits ‘Charge Account Payments $0.00 ‘Accident Benefits: Loan Payments: $0.00 Retirement Benefits ‘Cor Loan Payments $535.00 ‘Allotment Checks(Tribal): Car Tnsurence: $200.00 Interest Child Support: $0.00 Dividends Medical Care: 80.00 Child Support Received: Court Fines and Fees: $0.00 Alimony Or Maintenance Received Alimony: 30.00 Unemployment Benefits Child Care: 30.00 Other income: Union Dues: 30.00 Net Income: ‘$3,000.00 Other Expense: FAMILY $500.00 Delinquent Expense: ‘Total Expenses: s3.235,00 Asset, ‘Asset (Continued) ‘Cas Asset: $0.00 Stereos: Checking Amount: 50.00 Totevisions: Savings Amount $0.00 Musical instruments: Cash Owed To This Person: Stock In Trade: Cash Value OF Stock Or Bonds: Tools: Value: $0,00 Owed: $0.00 Net: $0000 Jewelry Real Estate Location: Jail Property $0.00 Value: $0.00 Owed: $0.00 Net $0.00 Other Assets: Automobile I ‘Total Assests: soon Value: $0.00 Owed: $0.00 Net: 30.00 Automobile 2: Value: $0.00 Owed: $0.00 Net 90.00 ‘Taller: Value: $0,00 Owed $0.00 Net: $0.00 Boat: Value: $0.00 Owed: $0.00 Net $0.00PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY FINANCIAL INFORMATION Defendant's Name: MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINO Booking #: T417016 ‘The Judicial Officer needs to know about your financial situation in determining whether to require you to post bond and, if s0, the amount of bond. The Judicial Officer must also determine if you are entitled to have a lawyer appointed to represent you ‘Number of Dependents: 2 Pmployment/StudenvCaregiver Status: Employed/Full Time Employment Verified: No Gccupation HANDYMAN Employment Status: Current Length of Employment : 10 Years Employer Name: SELF EMPLOYED Aclinoned ‘GATWUSDER PENALTY OF PERJURY: [have trethflly given he information, which appearsin his statement. Lhave not coneated, arin any way tisrepresentd my manda eseures Tam wae that Team be Held in contempt of court or prseeated for perjury if made any fae statements. I the Pubic Defender ors court appointed nforney accepts my css Iwill ify them of any cages Onancal resoures, employment, income or rearrest. "uo give permision for the Pretrial Services gency st to contact avon named above ot amy agency br husness concerning tei vestigation nthe ‘intent Ime I hereby make these statements ender ath An 9 MICHAEL JOSEPH PALADINOpest Michael Paladino DOB 04/07/1989 Gilbert Police Department 05-000015801. | During April, 2027, the Gilbert Police Department received a CODIS hit related to 2 sexual assault case ‘that was reported in 2005 (GPD OR 05-15803). The DNA identified in the case matched to SP Michael ‘Smith (aka Paladino}, and during subsequent follow-up by the Gilbert Police Department, multiple other sexual assault and/or sexually motivated crimes involving SP Smith were found. Documented in Chandler PD DR 03-068110 Onan undetermined day during May, 2003, the 13 year-old female victim {V2) snuck out of her residence and joined SP Mike Smith (14 year-old) and one of his friends in SP Smith’s mother’s vehicle that he was driving without her knowledge ar permission. SP Smith dropped off his friend at an apartment complex, then drove the victim to an alley (within the city of Chandler} and parked. While parked, SP Smith told the victim that he wanted to have sex with her. ‘The victim told him she would not have sex with him, SP Smith eventually told the victim that he was going to have sex with her, and that, he would “rape” har ifshe did not get into the back seat af the vehicle. Fearing for her safety, the victin ‘moved to the rear seat ofthe vehicle where SP Smith inserted his penis nto her vagina without consent, After the sexual assault, SP Smith went back and picked up his fiend {who he had dropped off at the apartment), and then drove to a park where he hung out with his fiend while the victim remained in the vehicle, The victim was eventually driven back to her residence and dropped off. The victim did not report the Incident until 07/14/2003, and a sexual assault kit was subsequently not performed, The victim did not want to cooperate witha confrontation call atthe time of the original investigation, and the case was not further investigated. SP Smith was not contacted or interviewed at the time of the original investigation. Documented In Gilbert PD DR 05-000015859 (On 12/2/2005, the 17 year-old femiale victim {V2} went willingly to SP Mike Smith's (26 years-okd} residence (285 E. Sherri Drive, Gilbert, AZ) where she ultimately found herself alone with SP Mike in his bedroom, After locking the bedroom door, SP Smith “playfully” told V2 that he was going to rape her. V2 told SP Smith that she would not have sex with him, SP Smith again told V2 that he was going to have sex with her, and V2 again told him she would not have sex with him. SP Smith became “ageressive,” and started to pull down V2's pants while she physically resisted. V2 told SP Smith, “I don’t want this to happen” V2 began to cry and $P Smith became apparently sympathetic and told her everything would be ok. when V2 did not stop crying, SP Smith became angry, ralsed his fst above her in a threatening manner and stated, “Fucking stop crying!” SP Smith then removed V2's pants and inserted his penis vagina without consent. After the sexual assault, V2 did not immediately tell anybody about what occurred. into her gy PH: T417016 NN UU TILA PALADINO, MICHAEL JOSEPH BkDi 117292017 4989 Sex:V2 reported the incident to Gilbert PD on 11/18/2005. A forensic nurse examination of V2 was not performed. V2 cooperated with a pretext call to SP Smith, and during the call SP Smith admitted to having sex with her but that it was consensual. SP Smith was subsequently interviewed by a Gilbert police detective and sald that he had sex with V2, but that it was consensual. ocumented in Gilbert PD DR 05-000035801 (On 11/17/2005, the 20 year-old female victim (V3) went to SP Mike Smith’s residence (285 . Sherr Drive, Gilbert, AZ) where she expected to hang out with him. While there, they went into SP Smith’s bedroom and engaged in consensual king. SP Smith asked V3 fora "biow jo!” orl penile | penetration], but V3 refused. SP Smith put his hand down the front of V3's pants and penetrated her vagina with his fingers. V3 told j SP Smith that it hurt and for him to stop. SP Smith stopped as requested, They continued to Kiss, and SP | Smith removed V3's pants. He told V3 that he wanted to have sex with her, and V3 totd him she would | rat have sex with him. SP Smith then pushed V3's underwear to the side and inserted his penis into her vagina, while wearing a condom, without consent. V3 told SP Smith, “No,” and physically pushed him off of her while telling him that she had already tald him she would not have sex with him. V3 then gat up, put on her pants, and left SP Smith's residence. As she was walking out, SP Smith asked V3 what was wrong, and if she was going to “tel everybody that he raped her.” Once she returned home, V3 told her mother what had occurred, and was taken to the hospital where | police were called on 11/18/2008. A forensic nurse examination was performed on V3, and potential DNA evidence was obtained, During a follow-up interview with a police detective, V3 decided she did not want to cooperate with a pretext call to SP Smith and the case was inactivated. During 2016, the sexual assault kit (SAKi collected from V3 was submitted to a crime fab and DNA evidence was identified from swabs of V3's neck, In 2017, the DNA identified from V3's neck swabs hit in CODIS to SP Michact Smith (aka Paladino). Documented in Gilbert PD DR 06-000001192 (On 01/15/2006, the 14 year-old female victim (Va) met with $P Smith at her residence, and agreed to go ‘with him to a nearby park, SP Smith instead took her to his residence (285 €. Sherri Drive, Gilbert, AZ) ‘were they went inside and to his bedroom. While in his bedroom, SP Smith attempted to kiss VA, but she pushed him away. SP Smith asked her what was wrong, and VA told him that she did not feel right, ‘about it because she had not known him very long. SP Smith then held V4 down and pulled down her pants. VA asked him what he was doing, and SP Smith pulled her underwear to the side and inserted his penis into her vagina without consent, During the sexual assault, V4 told SP Smith that she was scared ‘and wanted him to stop. SP Smith did not stop, but continued to sexually assault V4 before removing his penis from V4's vagina and ejaculating on his bedAfter SP Smith ejaculated, V4 got dressed and SP Smith walked her back to her residence. During the ‘walk back to V8's residence, SP Smith told V4, “not to tell anyone that he raped her because he did not rape her” During 2 comprehensive interview with the initially assigned detective, V4 disclosed that SP Smith had | forced her to perform oral sex (pentle/oral penetration) without consent on 2 previous occasion. She said that the prior incident occurred at SP Smith’s residence approximately one month prior to this reported incident, and that she never reported it becouse, “I dd not think it was 8 big deal.” ‘On 01/21/2006, V4 reported what had occurred to her mother, and police were subsequently called, V4 said that her reason for delayed reporting was because she was afrald her parents would “freak” and “think of her less.” A forensic nurse examination was not performed on V4. Va cooperated with a pretext call to SP Smith, and during the call SP Smith told V4 that she never told him “no” (to sex). He questioned whether police were monitoring the call, and eventually hung up the | phone. SP Smith did nat admit during the pretext callf) that he engaged in non-consensual sex with V4. SP Smith agreed to be interviewed by police, and admitted to having sex with V4, but claimed it was consensval. Documented in Mesa PD DR 2006-0360605 (0n 02/05/2006, VS was home alone doing homework when she heard a knock at the residence’ s front door. When she opened the door, she recognized! that it was SP Mike Smith. VS knew SP Smith as an Individual who had been attempting to get her to go out with him unsuceessfully, and who she was actively trying to avoid. | VS told SP Smith that nobody else was home, and that she would not allow him into her residence. She attempted to shut the door, and SP Smith forced his way into the residence. V5 said that SP Smith smelled strongly of atcohol, (Once in the residence, SP Smith pushed VS down onto a couch and forcefully held her down while V5 screamed, cried, and physically resisted. 5° Smith pulled V5's pants down, and put his hand onto V5's vagina. During V5's comprehensive interview following the incident, she described SP Smith as “aggressively rubbing” her vagina and thet his fingers did not penetrate. During a recent interview (11/3/2017), V5 recalled that $P Smith's fingers did penetrate her vagina, and that it had caused her injury. She also said that SP Smits “agaressive rubbing” was an apparent attempt to turn her on, and that she would consider it to have been masturbatory contact. No forensic nutse examination was performed, and VS stated she does not know of medical documentation that documented any genital injuries.‘While touching and/or penetrating V5's vagina with his hand, SP Smith exposed his penis, and VS thought he was going to insert It into her vagina without consent, Before he could insert his penis into her vagina, her house phone rang. The distraction of the phone ringing allowed V5 to get away from SP Smith, She answered the phone, and it was VS's brother's friend calling. V5 was crying and sald that a person was attempting to rape her. SP Smith talked briefly to the witness caller, and was told to leave, After the phone call concluded, SP Smith left the residence. | During a comprehensive Interview, V5 told the detective that she knew of two other potential victims that SP Smith sexually assaulted. One of the potential victims was unable to be located at the time of the initial investigation, and during more recent follow-up did not cooperate with being interviewed. ‘The original investigating detective was able to identify and contact one ofthe two potential victims (V6) | that V5 told her about. V6 (16 year-old female at the time of offense) disclosed that on an undermined date during the summer ‘of 2005, $P Mike Smith (friend of V5's) contacted her by telephone at approximately 2200 hours and equested she meet with him at hs residence (285 E, Sherri Drive, Gibert, AZ). He told her that the reason he wanted to see her before he was going to jal. SP Smith did not tell V6 why he was supposedly going to jal, and she later found out that he had been lying about it V6 snuck out of her residence, and $P Smith picked her up in a vehicle and drove her to his house, ‘When V6 first arrived at SP Smith's residence, she vratched television with SP Smith, SP Smith's sister and her boyfriend. After approximately an hour or watching television, Vi and SP Smith went to his bedroom where they used his computer. At some point, V6 realized the bedroam door was locked, yet she did not know how it got to be that ‘way. SP Smith told V6 that he wanted to have sex with her, and she told him that she would not. SP threatened that he would not drive her home if she did not have sex with him, V6 told him that she did ot want to walk home, but maintained that she would not have sex with him, V6 did engage in consensual kissing with SP Smith, and eventually SP attempted to remove her clothes. V6 told SP Smith that she did not want to remove her clothing, and SP then pushed her onto a couch and held her down by her shoulders. Due to V6 being afraid that SP Smith would physically harm her, she ld not further resist once he held her down on the couch. SP Smith then inserted his penis into V6's vagina without conseat. After the sexual assauit, V6 got dressed and she was driven home approximately twenty minutes later by SP Smith’ sister's boyfriend. V6 told the initial investigator that she never reported the sexual assault because she did not feel as though SP Smith had “raped” her. The detective asked V6 Tori what she believes to be rape (sexual assault), and she told her, “It means when a person gets beat up or hes to fight Alllof the above listed victims have been recently contacted and are willing to ald with prosecution,Between 7/8/2011 and 12/12/2011, SP Michael Joseph Smith legally changed his name to Michael Joseph Paladino (Per MVD records). Gn 11/29/2027 at approximately 1200 hours, SP Michael Paladino was arrested following a traffie stop for driving on a suspended license, and was subsequently interviewed regarding the above listed | Incidents. He recalted some details regarding what occurred with V4 and V5, but sald that he has has never “raped” anyone. He said that V4 would have made the allegation against him because she was a virgin, and that he does not remember why V5 became mad with him after he touched her breasts and ‘masturbated her vagina with his hand. He remembered V's brother (or brother's friend) coming to the residence and that an argument ensued. He did not remember what caused the argument. SP Michael Paladino said that he did not remember having sex with V4, V2, or V3, bt that itis possible | because he hes iad sex with over 200 girls. Regarding V6's allegation, he said that he had consensual ‘sex with her while they were dating. 5® Paladino said that none of the reporting victims knew each other, and that they had all ved in ifferent cities. He said that he is “aggressive” during sex, but does not know why the above listed victims reported that he sexually assaulted them, He sald, “That’s what girls do,” | asked him if he knows of other friends who multiple girls have alleged sexual assault against, end he told me he does not. Based on the above listed booked on the following: formation, SP Michael Joseph Paladino (aka Smith]{D0B 04/07/1989) was 6 counts of Sexual Assault ARS 13-1406OPriC# OF THE.CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT- REQUEST YOR ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS TMPORTANT!!! IF REVIEWING PAPER CASE FILES, DO NOT REMOVE ANY SE FYLE. “FIEASE COMPLETE The ENTIRE FORMORR SUPREME COURT ROTE I ER SUPREME: COUR RULD 125, ~COMMERCLL PLRPONE” MEANS TRE USE OF 4 PCBLIC RECORD FOR THE PURPOSE OF SALE OR REBALE OR FOR THIF, PURPOSE OF FRONUCING A DOCUMENT CONTAINING ALL OR PART OF THE CORY, PRINTOUT OR PHOTOGRAPH FOR SALE OK THE OEAISING OF NAMES AND ADDRIXSES FROM SUCH PLBLIC RECORDS FOR THE FURPOSE OF SOLICIYATION OR THE SAL OF SUCK NAMES, [AND ADPRESSES TO ANOTHER FOR THE PURPOSE OF SOLICITATION OR FOR ANY PURVOSH TN WICH THE PURCHASER CAN REASONABLY ANTICIPATE. THE RECHIPL OF MONLTARY GAIN BROM DIRECT OR SNDIEECT [SE OF SUCH PUBLIC RECORD. COMMERCIAE PURPOSE: ROE NOY NEAN TH USI OF A PUBLIC RECORD AS EVIDENCE OR AS RESEARCH FOR EVIDENCE IN AN ACTION IN A JUDICIAE. O8 QUASISUDICIAL BODY OF THIS STATE OR A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE, i MARRIAGE LICENSE INFORMATION NINE GHRAL PORTICO AGENCYCONMERCIRD UNCERTIFIED COPY $90.50 PL LICENSE {YOUR NAME (GRNFRAT PORLICIGOVT AGENCYICONMERCIALY ene one Se eee ABSTRACT $28.00 PER ASIRACT (CV FR REPRESENTED (ATTORNEWIGOVT AGENCYTCOM ‘TO MARRIAGE Cit 8017-e/IAQ |e COUNTY AND STATE MARRIED - eet at _ BOOK AND PAGE OR ViCENSE NUMBER ee vous sas Soa ( )COPY OF MARRIGE LICENSE CERTIFIED ( }YES ( )NO (CJ COPY OF AFSIDAVIT CERTINED ( ) YES “() NO. copy Fexs: {00.30 PER PAGE COPED DOCKET PRINTOUT $00.50 BER PAGE COPIED NUMBER OF COPIES ML AFFDAVE__ CERTIF.CATION (1 SEAL) $28.00 PER DOCUMENT ~ EXEMPLIMICATION (SEAN) 556,00 PER DOCUMENT AUIDENTICATION SEAL) $84.00 PER DOCUMENT i = PLEASE LIST NAMES O# ALL REQUESTED DOCUMENTS BELOW | [ FOF [FILE] CERTIACATE [# OF COPIES OF PLEASE PAPCR CLAP ALL REQUESTED DOCUMENTS, paces | DATE SEAL | RACH poctIMENY WING FIEM, PLEASE: INCLUDE FRAME # TOR EACH PAGE REQUESTED PROCESSED BY _ AMOUNT PAID pate AMOUNT DUE eos 40F COMFS__ G : AMOUNT WAIVED _ ae 4 OF CERTIFICATIONS. RECHT EE FILM OR FTE Sb IMAGE OR PRINT [REQUEST RBCKIVED BYMICHAEL M. JEANES, CLERK \ BY la SeP WILLIAM G MONTGOMERY Cree MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY WIT FEB 13. PM bi bs Michael Minicozzi Mt Deputy County Attorney Bar {D #: 024743 301 W. Jefferson, Sth Floor Phoenix, AZ 85003 ‘Telephone: (602) 506-8556 | meaosvd@mcao.maricopa.gov MCAO Firm #: 00032000 Attorney for Piainttt DR 02020087 - Tempe Police Department i 1641081 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA I IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA ‘THE STATE OF ARIZONA, | Plait, vs. ~ ae EVODIO MARTINEZ, CReo7 00117 4-001 aka Evodio Retana-Martinez Defendant. INDICTMENT 687 Gu 432 COUNT 1: SEXUAL ASSAULT, A CLASS 2 FELONY (EVODIO MARTINEZ) COUNT 2: KIDNAPPING, A CLASS 2 FELONY (EVODIO MARTINEZ) COUNT 3: AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, A CLASS. 3 FELONY (EVODIO MARTINEZ) ‘The Grand Jurors of Maricopa County, Arizona, accuse EVODIO MARTINEZ, on February 13, 2017, charging that in Maricopa County, Arizona ‘COUNT 1: EVODIO MARTINEZ, on or about February 4, 2002, intentionally or knowingly, did engage in sexual intercourse or ral sexual contact with Victim A, without the consent of Victim A, in violation of ARS. §§ 13-1406, 19-1401, 13-3821, 31-281, 13-701, 13-702, 13-702.01, and 13-801COUNT 2: EVODIO MARTINEZ, on or between February 3, 2002 and February 4, 2002, knowingly did restrain Victim A with the intent to infict death, physical injury, or a sexual offense on her or to otherwise i aid in the commission of a felony, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1304, 13-301, 13-701, 13-702, 12-702.01, and 13-601 COUNT 3; EVODIO MARTINEZ, on or between February 3, 2002 and February 4, 2002, intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly did cause physical injury to Victim A, knowing or having reason to know that Victim A was a prosecutor, by any means of force, which caused a temporary but substantial 13801 cisfigurement, to Vietim A, in vioation of AR.S, §§ 13-1203, 13-1204, 43-701, 13-702, 13-702,01, and CATrve Bil?) Dale: Feary 13,2017 (Ctr FOREPERSON OF THE GRAND JURYIMPORTANT NOTICE RDOC onze 00117 4-001 PURSUANT TO RULE 2.3(b) OF THE ARIZONA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, THE DEFENDANT !S CHARGED WITH ANY OFFENSE LISTED IN A.R.S TITLE 13, CHAPTERS 14, 32, 35 OR 35.1 OR IN WHICH THE VICTIM WAS A JUVENILE AT THE TIME OF THE OFFENSE: THIS CASE IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SUPREME COURT RULE 123(G)(1)(C)(ii)(H)Michael K Jeanes, Clerk of Court “Electronically Filed °°" IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COURT ——M:Mattin, Deputy 7/28/2017 11:22:00 AM. STATE OF ARIZONA, COUNTY OF MARICOPA "Minty assign 5 see FINALS A RELEASE QUESTIONNAIRE Notice: Unless specific Form IV i sealed or ordered redacted by the Court, all Form TVs are public records ofthe ‘Court or Clerk atthe time they are provided to the Court and will be release in their entirety upon request DEFENDANT'S NAME SvoDI0 MARTINEZ __DOB 2983-12-29 BOOKING NO. 1385436 ALIAS(ES) _ z ie CASE NO,_c#20170011 74002 A, GENERAL INFORMATION ©. OTHER INFORMATION (Check if applicable) Charges 1. C1 Defendant is presently on probation, parole or any Tce, 22-1606A SEXORL ASSAULT #2 ‘ther form of release Involving other charges or convictions: 04K AGG ASLT-OLAPIGUREMENT F3 Explain 2._ List any prior ‘Arresis? TLLBGKL. RE-aN7RY Pursuant io ARS. §41-1760 ton print fngerprins were taken of the arested person?) Yes” No Convictions? lFyes, PCr FTA‘? Pursuant to ARS. §13-610 ane or more of the above charges require the arresting agency to secure a DNA. sample ftom the arrested person? ®@ Yes C] No 3._ Is there any indication the defendant is: 1D An Alcoholic? Do An Addict? Ifyes, does the defendant have a valid DNA sample on Mental dotubed? Gives ie filewth AZDPS?- C] Yes) No ; 4. 1 Defendant is currently employed lino, Arresting Agency has taken required saan sample? Yes No How ng fee Loeaon doe te dtendantauonty oie? ws OSs Bae aa-os 8. iere deste deena’ cent ei ca een et asec aerate rma So eee 8. PROBABLE CAUSE STATEMENT Har eg st aus Each eames cinmarce toi th fc ich eaoblsh otra naeat te eionant i fe Freebie caso fr ares Som a roe Gir or/27/2017 RvODrO NAETENEE WAS RELEASED PROM U.S, Gr HARSRE KEVIN ERLSH AND TE DuTECEIVE JAE release? Explain'sce Si urs SHLP ADMISSION. D. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE OFFENSE(Check if applicable) 1. Firearm or other weapon was used Type: 7. What facts daes the state have to oppose an unsecured Ee Gl Someone was injured by the defendant 1 Medical attention was necessary Nature of injuries: /a 2. 1) Someone was threatened by the defendant Nature and extent of threats: 3. Did the offense involve a child victim? Yes. B No Ityes, was DCS notified? Yes. No 4, Ifproperty offense, value of propery taken or damaged 1 Property was recoveredDEFENDANT'S NAMEBvooTO waRrae2 =25 BOOKING NO.7285436 CASE NO, 2201700117400 Page 2 of 3 5, Name(6) of co-detendant(s:DEFENDANT'S NAMEEVODro MARTINEZ . CRIMES OF VIOLENCE 1, Relationship of defendant to victim: 1 Vietin(s) and defendant reside together 2,_ How was the situation brought tothe attention ofthe police? (D VietimC) Third Parly C1 Offoer observes 3._ 0] There are previous incidents involving these same partes Explain: 4._ Ie defendant currenty the subject of Di Anorderof protection Cy Any other court order Injunction against harassment Explain F, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ISSUES (Check if applicabio) Defendant's actions Di Tweats of homicide/suicierbodlly harm 1 Controvownershipfealousy issues] Crime occurs in public 1 Prior history of OV G Kidnapping CG Frequeneyintensity of DVinereasing [Depression (1 Access to or use of weapons 1 Stalking behavior 1D Violence against childrenvanimals, 1 Mutiple violations of court orders G. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ARREST (Check if applicable) 1. Did the defendant attempt to: CH Avoid arrest C1 Resist arest (Self Surrender Explain 2] Defendant was armed when arrested Type: DOB 1923-11-29 BOOKING NO.T385436 CASE NO, cx201700127400: Page 3 of 3 3. C1 Evidence of the offense was found in the defendants possession Explain 4, Was the defendant under the influence of alechol or | DOCUMENTS, AFTER VIEWING HIM, PLEASE INCLUDE ERAME# FOR EACH PAGE REQUESTED. or | FICE | CERUIBCATE [# OF CoMENOF paces | part ISEAL | RACH DOCUMENT 25EAL SSEAL }-—- - as z t PROCESSED BY AMOUNE RAID. a par AMOUNT DUE - - wor cops AMOUNT WAIVED. wor crenmications_! PHL OR FL = IMAGE OR PRINT Q [REQUEST RECHIVED RY RECHT YMICHAEL K. JEAWES. CLERK BY cee WILLIAM G MONTGOMERY Cana MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY os ee ‘QUT HAR 27 PH 4: 27 Deputy County Attorney Bar ID #: 028754 301 W. Jefferson, Sth Floor Phoenix, AZ 85003 Telephone: (602) 506-8556 meaosvd@mcao.maricopa.gov MCAO Firm #: 00032000 Attorney for Plaintiff DR 2002121602 - Tempe Police Department 1634291 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA ‘THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Plaintiff, vs. RAUL LUJAN, aka Kaki Lujan ‘aka Kaki Lujau ‘aka Roul Raul-Lopez aka Roul Lujan aka Raul K Lujan OR AIT -001564-001 Defendant INDICTMENT 691 GJ371 COUNT 1: SEXUAL ASSAULT, A CLASS 2. FELONY (RAUL LUJAN) COUNT 2: SEXUAL ASSAULT, A CLASS 2 FELONY (RAUL LUJAN) ‘COUNT 3: SEXUAL ASSAULT, A CLASS 2 FELONY (RAUL LUJAN) COUNT 4: SEXUAL ASSAULT, A CLASS 2 FELONY (RAUL LUJAN) COUNT 5: SEXUAL ABUSE, A CLASS 5. FELONY (RAUL LUJAN) GOUNT 6: SEXUAL ABUSE, A CLASS 5 FELONY (RAUL LUJAN)COUNT 7: KIDNAPPING, A CLASS 2 FELONY (RAUL LUJAN) COUNT 8: ARMED ROBBERY, A CLASS 2 FELONY (RAUL LUJAN) ‘The Grand Jurors of Maricopa County, Arizona, accuse RAUL LUJAN, on March 27, 2017, charging that in Maricopa County, Arizona: COUNT 1: RAUL LUJAN, on or about July 28, 2002, intentionally or knowingly, did engage in ‘sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with Victim A, without the consent of Victim A (to wit: penis in vagina), in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1406, 13-1401, 13-3821, 31-281, 13-701, 13-702, 13-702.01, and 13-801. COUNT 2: RAUL LUJAN, on or about July 28, 2002, intentionally or knowingly, did engage in sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with Vietim A, without the consent of Victim A (to wit: oral sexual contact 1st time), in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1408, 13-1401, 13-3821, 31-281, 13- 701, 13-702, 13-702.01, and 13-801 COUNT 3: RAUL LUJAN, on or about July 28, 2002, intentionally or knowingly, did engage in sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with Victim A, without the consent of Vietim A (to wit: oral sexval contact 2nd time), in violation of AR.S. §§ 13-1406, 13-1401, 13-3821, 31-261, 13- 701, 13-702, 13-702.01, and 13-801. COUNT 4: RAUL LUJAN, on or about July 28, 2002, intentionally or knowingly, did engage in sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with Vietim A, without the consent of Victim A, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1406, 13-1404, 13-3821, 31-281, 13-701, 13-702, 13-702.01, and 13- 801COUNT 5: RAUL LUJAN, on or about July 28, 2002, intentionally or knowingly did engage in sexual contact with Victim A, a person of fifteen ot more years of age, without the consent of Victim A (to wit: grabbing breasts), in violation of AR.S. §§ 13-1404, 13-1401, 13-3821, 31-281, 13-701, 19-702, 13-702.01, and 13-801 COUNT 6: RAUL LUJAN, on or about July 28, 2002, intentionally or knowingly did engage in sexual contact with Victim A, a person of fiteen or more years of age, without the consent of Victim A (to wit; mouth on breasts), in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1404, 13-1401, 13-3821, 31-281, 13-701, 43-702, 13-702.01, and 13-601, COUNT 7: RAUL LUJAN, on of about July 28, 2002, knowingly did restrain Victim A with the intent to inflict death, physical injury, or @ sexual offense on her or to otherwise aid in the commission of folony, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1304, 19-1301, 19-701, 13-702, 13-702.01, and 13-801 COUNT 8: RAUL LUJAN, on or about July 28, 2002, did in the course of taking property of another from Victim A's person or immediate presence and agalhst her wil, used threats or force against Victim A, with the intent to coerce surrender of the property or to prevent resistance to RAUL LUJAN's taking or retaining the property while RAUL LUJAN or an accomplice used or threatened to use a deadly weapon, dangerous instrument or a simulated deadly weapon, against Victim A, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1904, 13-1901, 13-1902, 13-701, 13-702, 13- 702.01, and 13-801(A True Bil") WILLIAM G MONTGOMERY RICOPA GOUNTY ATTORNEY Date: March 27, 2017 Obie Ovo. cat | Elisa Ramunno Fe PERSON OF THE GRAND JURY Deputy County Attorney pbIMPORTANT NOTICE RDOC CR 27 -00156%-001 PURSUANT TO RULE 2.3(b) OF THE ARIZONA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, THE DEFENDANT IS. CHARGED WITH ANY OFFENSE LISTED IN A.R.S TITLE 13, CHAPTERS 14, 32, 35 OR 35.1 OR IN WHICH THE VICTIM WAS A JUVENILE AT THE TIME OF THE OFFENSE. THIS CASE IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SUPREME COURT RULE 123(G)(1)(C)(ii)(H)‘Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court Sms SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA sun gg 207 SOA MARICOPA COUNTY CR2017-001564-001 DT 06/27/2017 CLERK OF THE COURT i HONORABLE ALFRED M. FENZEL A. Chee 1 Deputy i STATE OF ARIZONA MICHAEL ANTHONY MINICOZZi t 5 RAUL LUJAN (001) KATIE KREJCI DOB: 11/29/1977 AZDOC DISPOSITION CLERK-CSC MCSO-ATTN RECORDS MANAGER, RFR SENTENCE OF IMPRISONMENT 8:56 a.m, Courtroom CCB 1103 State's Attomey: As slated as above Defendant's Attorney: ‘As stated as above Defendant: Present ‘Court Reporter, Vanessa Gartner, is present, ‘A record of the proceedinigs is also made digitally. Count(s) 1: WAIVER OF TRIAL: The Defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived all pertinent constitutional and appellate rights and entered a plea of guilty. IT IS THE JUDGMENT of the Court Defendant is guilty of the following: Docket Code 193 Form R193 Page |SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY | CR2017-001564-001 DT. 06/27/2017 AL ASSAULT OFFENSE: Count 1 (AMENDED) ATTEMPT TO COMMIT SI Class 3 FELONY ARS. § 13-1406, 1401, 1001, 3821, 610, 701, 702, 704, 801 Date of Offense: July 28, 2002 j Dangerous pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-704 - Non Repetitive | [AS PUNISHMENT, IT IS ORDERED Defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment and is committed to the Arizona Department of Corrections as follows: | Count 1; 15.00 year(s) from 6/27/2017, Presentence Incarceration Credit: 76 day(s) | Sentence is concurrent with CR2005108070 AND CR2005033024. IT IS ORDERED the Defendant shall pay through the Clerk of the Superior Court: SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION FEE: Count 1 - $250.00. ASSESSMENTS; ADDRESS CONFIDENTIALITY PROGRAM: Count 1 - $50.00. ‘Count 1: $500.00 for Dangerous Crimes Against Children or Sexual Assault, ‘The Arizona Department of Corrections shall notify the Clerk of the Court of Maricopa County of Defendants release from custody via e-mail cforesponse@mail.maricopa.gov.. The Clerk of the Court, upon said notification, shall furnish financial information for a Criminal Restitution Order for Judicial signature for any unpaid monies to date. Community Supervision: Count 1 - Imposed pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-603(D). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant must submit to DNA testing for law ‘enforcement identification purposes in accordance with A.R.S. §13-610. TT 1S ORDERED granting the Motion to Dismiss the following: Counts 2-8; Dangerous allegations are dismissed except as alleged for Count 1; All other sentencing allegations are, dismissed except they may be used as aggravating factors pursuant to A.RS. 13-701(D). IT.IS ORDERED authorizing the Sheriff of Maricopa County to deliver the Defendant to the Arizona Department of Corrections to earry out the term of imprisonment set forth herein. Docket Code 193 Form R193 Page 2SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA. MARICOPA COUNTY CR2017-001564-001 DT. 06/27/2017 IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant register as a sex offender pursuant to A.R.S. §13- 902. IT 1S ORDERED the Clerk of the Superior Court remit to the Arizona Department of Cortections a copy of this Order or the Order of Confinement together with all presentence reports, probation violation reports, and medical and psychological reports that are not sealed in this cause relating to the Defendant. Pursuant to A.R.S, § 13-3821 (K), notification is made to the Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona. 9,00 a.m. Matter concludes. IT IS ORDERED that defense counsel shall preserve defendant's file for post-convict relief purposes. If defense counsel receives notice that defendant is seeking post-conviction relief, counsel shall prepare the file for delivery to PCR counsel and shall make timely arrangements for the exchange thereof when notified. Further, upon exchange of the file, defense counsel shall file with the court a Notice of Compliance that shall, at a minimum, include date of compliance. recipient of the file, and an itemization of contents of the file. A. copy of the Notice shall be provided to PCR counsel, the State and the PCR Unit. Docket Code 193 Form R193 Page 3SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY HONORABLE ALFRED M. FENZEL Date: WORT ae oS CLERK OF THE COURT A. Chee CR __CR2017-001564-001 Deputy. STATE v, LUJAN Let the record reflect that the Defendant’s right index fingerprint is permanently affixed to this sentencing order in open court. (vight index fingerprint) Page lMichael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Coust “sts Filed "** ' | SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA JUN 3.8 2017 Boot MARICOPA COUNTY | R2017-001564-001 DT 06/27/2017 CLERK OF THE COURT | HONORABLE ALFRED M. FENZEL A. Chee Deputy STATE OF ARIZONA MICHAEL ANTHONY MINICOZZI v. RAUL LUJAN (001) KATIE KREICI | DOB; 11/29/1977 AZDOC DISPOSITION CLERK-CSC MCSO-ATTN RECORDS MANAGER RFR SENTENCE OF IMPRISONMENT 8:56am, Courtroom CCB 1103. State's Attorney: ‘As stated as above Defendant's Attomey: As stated as above ‘Defendant: Present Court Reporter, Vanessa Gartner, is present, A recont of the proceedings is also made digitally. Count(s) 1: WAIVER OF TRIAL: The Defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived all pertinent constitutional and appellate rights and entered a plea of guilty. IP IS THE JUDGMENT of the Court Defendant is guilty of the following: Docket Code 193 Form R193 Page |SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA. MARICOPA COUNTY. | CR2017-001964-001 DT 06/27/2017 OFFENSE: Count | (AMENDED) ATTEMPT TO COMMIT SEXUAL ASSAULT Class 3 FELONY. i AR.S, § 13-1406, 1401, 1001, 3821, 610, 701, 702, 704, 801 ‘Date of Offense: July 28, 2002 Dangerous pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-704 - Non Repetitive AS PUNISHMENT, IT 1S ORDERED Defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment and is committed to the Arizona Department of Corrections as follows: Count 1: 15.00 year(s) from 6/27/2017, Presentence Incarceration Credit: 76 day(s) Sentence is concurrent with CR2005108070 AND CR2005033024. ITS ORDERED the Defendant shall pay through the Clerk of the Superior Court: SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION FEE: Count 1 - $250.00, ASSESSMENTS: ADDRESS CONFIDENTIALITY PROGRAM: Count 1 - $50.00. Count 1: $500.00 for Dangerous Crimes Against Children or Sexual Assault ‘The Arizona Department of Corrections shall notify the Clerk of the Court of Maricopa County of Defendants release from custody via e-mail eforesponse@mail.maricopa.gov. The Clerk of the Court, upon said notification, shall furnish financial information for a Criminal Restitution Order for Judicial signature for any unpaid monies to date, Community Supervision: Count 1 - Imposed pursuant to ARS. § 13-603(D. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant must submit to DNA testing for law enforcement identification purposes in accordance with A.R.S, §13-610. IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion to Dismiss the following: Counts 2-8; Dangerous allegations are dismissed except as alleged for Count 1; All other sentencing allegations are dismissed except they may be used as aggravating factors pursuant to A.RS, 13-701(D). IT IS ORDERED authorizing the Sheriff of Maricopa County to deliver the Defendant to the Arizona Department of Corrections to carry out the term of imprisonment set forth herein. Docket Code 193 Form R193 Page 2SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY ‘CR2017-001564-001 DT. 06/27/2017 IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant register as a sex offender pursuant to A.R.S. §13- 902, IT IS ORDERED the Clerk of the Superior Court remit to the Arizona Department of Corrections a copy of this Order or the Order of Confinement together with all presentence reports, probation violation reports, and medical and psychological reports that are not sealed in this cause relating lo the Defendant | Pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-3821(K), notification is made to the Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, | :00 a.m. Matter concludes, IT IS ORDERED that defense counsel shall preserve defendant's file for post-conviction relief purposes. If defense counsel receives notice that defendant is seeking post-conviction relief, counsel shall prepare the file for delivery to PCR counsel and shall make timely arrangements for the exchange thereof when notified. Further, upon exchange of the file, defense counsel shall file with the court a Notice of Compliance that shall, at a minimum, include date of compliance, recipient of the file, and an itemization of contents of the file, A copy of the Notice shall be provided to PCR counsel, the State and the PCR Unit. Docket Code 193 Form R193 Page3SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY HONORABLE ALFRED M. FENZEL Date: WaT oe CLERK OF THE COURT A. Chee CR __CR2017-001564-001 Deputy STATE v. LUJAN Lt the record reflect that the Defendant's right index fingerprint is permanently | affixed to this sentencing order in open court (right index fingerprint) h tel Uf JUBGE/SE THE SUPERIOR COURT Page | yMichael K Jeanes, Clerk of Court 24 Elecronieelly Filed *** MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Eerearonona ane SENTENCING/DISPOSITION SHEET Filing 1D 844874 DEFENDANT: RAUL LUJAN AGE/DOB: 39/11-29-1977 SENTENCING DATE: JUNE 27, 2017 JUDGE/DIVISION: — ALFRED FENZEL/CRIO9 CASE NOS €R2017001564-001 APO: DENISE PEREZ COUNT 001 AS AMENDED, §13-1406 ATTEMPT TO COMMIT SEXUAL ASSAULT, FELONY 3 ARS. § 13-1001, 13-1401, 13-1406, 13-3821, 13-610, 13-701, 13-702, 13-704, 13-801 DATE OF OFFENSE: 7/28/2002 DANGEROUS - NON REPETITIVE | PRIOR CONVICTIONS/CONFINEMENTS/PROBA TIONS: FELONY: PRISON: PROBATION:__ MISDEMEANOR: SAIL: JUVENILE: DOIC: PROBATION: PLEA AGREEMENT: fa REST/REIMBURSE:, FINE: COMMUNITY SERVICE:, | RECOMMENDATIONS DEFENSE — PROSECUTION, APO. ‘VICTIM | SENTENCE/DISPOSI N: AGGRAVATION 13-7021 MITIGATION 13-702 (D) (COMMENTS | DAYSINIAIL: ___DISMISS COUNTS: sveneeeh ENDOFCOVERSHEET “e000“The Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County ‘Adult Probation Department Chief Probation Officer Barbara A. Broderick PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION State of Arizona v. Raul Larjan, CR2017001564-001 Superior Court Criminal Division CRJO9 Sentencing Date:June 27, 2017 ‘Sentencing Judge: Alfred Fenzel Prosecutor: Michael Minicozzi PSI Office Denise Perez Defense Counsel: Katie Krejei €R2017001564-001 | | Present Offense | The following information was summarized from the Tempe Police Departmental Report | #2002121602: On July 28, 2002 at approximately 12:30 a.m,, Vietim A returned home to her apartment. As she | was unlocking the door, the defendant approached her and asked her if she had any money and | indicated he had a gun in his pocket. He then placed her hand on hiis pocket and she felt a hare | object. Victim A gave him an unknown amount of money and the defendant placed it in his pocket, ‘The defendant then placed his hand on the back of her neck and led her into the apartment. The defendant opened every bedroom door checking if anybody else was in the residence while still | having a grip on her neck. The defendant told Victim A to lay on the couch. Victim A sat on the couch and the defendant sat next to her and grabbed her breasts. He told her he was not going to hurt her and then began to suek on her breasts. The defendant placed a hand down her pants and told her to take off her underwear. Vietim A took off her underwear and the defendant pulled his pants down to his knees. The defendant placed his penis in Victim A's vagina, After about one minute of penetrating her vagina with his penis, the defendant stuck his penis in Vietim A's mouth. The defendant started to masturbate and he placed her hand on his penis to help him masturbate. He then ejaculated inside her mouth, The defendant had a hand on her face that was firm but gentle as he masturbated and ejaculated in her mouth, He also had a hold of her hair at the back of her neck, Vietina A swallowed the semen because she was afraid he would hurt her or beat her up if she did not. The defendant then asked Victim A for a cigarette and, after she gave him a cigarette, he left. Prior to leaving, the defendant stated, "if I see any police outside your door, I'm going to come back with my A.K." ‘A SANE nurse exam was completed on the day of the incident, A DNA match was found and the defendant was arrested. Statutory Offer irem Probation is not available. The defendant is required to register as a sex offender. The defendant was determined to be a level 3 sex offender for community notification via the Arizona Sex Offender Assessment completed by APD staff (the level is subject to change when the same assessment is completed by local law enforcement post sentencing). Related Offenses (On November 23, 2005, the defendant was found guilty by jury of Count 1: Sexual Assault, a class 2 felony, Count 2: Sexual Abuse, a class 5 felony, Count 3; Kidnapping, a class 2 felony, and Count 4: Armed Robbery, a class 2 felony (CR2005-033024-001), On January 9, 2006, he was Page 1 of 8‘The Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County Adult Probation Department Chief Probation Officer Barbara A. Broderick State of Arizona y. Raul Lujan, CR2017001564-001 sentenced to the Department of Corrections for twenty-eight years in count 1, seven and a half years in count 2 (consecutive to count 1), thirty-five years in count 3 (concurrent with eounts | and | 2), and thirty-five years in count 4 (consecutive to counts 1, 2, and 3). | ‘On November 23, 2005, the defendant was found guilty by jury of Count 1: Armed Robbery, a class 2 felony, Count 2: Kidnapping, a class 2 felony Count 3: Sexual Assault, a class 2 felony, Count 4; Sexual Abuse, a class 5 felony, and Count 5: Resisting Arrest, a class 6 felony (CR2005 | =108070-001), On January 9, 2006, he was sentenced to the Department of Corrections for thirty five ycars in count 1 (consecutive to CR2005-033024-001), thirty-five years in count 2 | (consecutive to count 1), twenty-eight years in count 3 (consecutive to count 2), seven and a half | ‘years in count 4 (consecutive to count | and concurrent with count 2), and three years nine months in count 5 (consecutive to count 4). It should be noted, according to the plea agreement, the defendant evows to no more than nine prior felony convictions; however, according to his criminal history he has twelve known prior felony convictions stemming from four separate cases. It should be noted, the plea agreement in CR2002-097313-001 and CR2005-10807 from prison in CR2002-097313 and he R2005-108070-001 cates the term of imprisonment shall run concurrent with 001; however, the defendant has already been released currently incarcerated in CR2005-033024-001 and Victim Statement(s) ‘Victim A indicated she is not making a statement. She further indicated she received no medical attention, incurred no financial loss, and is not requesting restitution, Defendant Statement On the advice of counsel, the follow-up interview was waived. The defendant provided the following information to the presentence sereener: On the advice of counsel, the defendant declined to iscuss the present offense, Risk/Necds Assessment ‘The Field Reassessment Offender Screening Tool (FROST) or Offender Screening Tool (OST) uses 1 detailed interview and scoring system to determine an offender's risk to re-offend and identifies the risk factors (domains) of their life that would benefit from intervention. There are nine domains grouped by their impact on the offender’s overall risk level. Scores of 60% or higher (50% for ‘mental health domain) in each individual domain contribute the most to the offender's total risk lovel, whereas lower scores may contribute moderately or not at all, The identified risk factors provide the Court and other agencies information to match supervision and treatment interventions that will address an offender's greatest risk factors, potentially reducing their risk to re-offend. The FROST or OST has been validated for statewide use on Arizona’s adult population and has been approved by the Administrative Office of the Courts. Page 2 of 8‘The Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County Adult Probation Department Chief Probation Officer Barbara A. Broderick State of Arizona v. Raul Lujan, CR2017001564-001 OVERALL RISK/NEEDS LEVEL, (Male Risk/Needs Range) | 19 Low (0-3) | Medium-Low (6-10) Medium-High (11-17) High (18-42) DOMAINS THAT DO NOT CONTRIBUTE TO OVERALL RISK/NEED LEVEL i DOMAIN SUMMARY | Education Did not attend high school Eamed GED 03 0% Would like to go back to schoo! in the future but has been denied Reading ability above the sixth grade level Residence cen incarcerated in the Department of Corrections since 2005 02 % Plans to live with his mother upon release Attitude | Believes convietion was fair 07 % Expressed motivation to changefimprove life Page3 of 8‘The Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County ‘Adult Probation Department Chief Probation Officer Barbara A. Broderick State of Arizona v. Raul Layjan, CR2017001564-001 DOMAINS THAT MAY CONTRIBUTE TO OVERALL RISK/NEED LEVEL DOMAIN SUMMARY IRamily and Social Relationships 218 25% Raised by his biological mother and stepfather Mother and stepfather were verbally abusive towards each other His stepfather was physically abusive towards the defendant Reports he was sexually abused by a friend from ages twelve to seventeen (he received treatment) Reports relationship with family is positive Currently single Four adult children identified his ex-girlfriend (Elizabeth Archuleta) as a positive rol Imodel in his life DOMAINS THAT SIGNIFICANTLY CONTRIBUTE TO OVERALL RISK/NEED LEVEL, DOMAIN SUMMARY ‘ocational/Financial 60% [Unemployed \Job skills include landscaping, roofing, cook, and janitorial {Alcohol First consumed alcohol at age twelve Last consumed aleahol approximately twelve years ago JReports he was drinking alcohol a lot to the point of intoxication 67% | about an 18 pack of beer per day) before the present offense because of his abuse as a child [Attended alcohol treatment once in 2000 Does not believe he is in need of additional aleohol treatment Page 4 of 8The Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County Chief Probation Officer Barbar Adult Probation Department ‘A. Broderick State of Arizona y. Raul Lujan, CR2017001564-001 rug Abuse 28 67% {First used marijuana at the age of eleven and used the drug daily lwith his last use being about fifteen years ago First used cocaine at the age of thirteen and used the drug daily with his last use being about twenty-one years ago IFirst used methamphetamine at the age of nineteen and used the ldcug daily with his last use being about twelve years azo [Reports he has been sober fiom drugs since 2005 Started using drugs due to abuse he endured as a child and people! Ihe was associating with [Never been involved in drug treatment Believes he can benefit from drug treatment criminal Behavior 8/9 89% Several juvenile referrals ‘Several prior felony and misdemeanor convictions |Current offense is a felony |Current offense is violent |Prior violent convictions Prior probation grants revoked ental Health 22 100% [See confidential section of report Page 5 of 8The Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County Adult Probation Department Chief Probation Officer Barbara A, Broderick State of Arizona v. Raul Lujan, CR2017001564-001 Additional Assessment and Screenings Addendums for Meets 7 Program Recommended Additional Screening Comments rograms Progra itera Drug Court No No Probation not available DUI Court No No ‘Nature of offense/Probation not available bv No No Probation not available Ips No No Probation not available i sTOP No No Age of the defendant/Probation not available i Probation not evailablc/Sce confidential section of Mental Health No No oe Sex Offender No No Probation not available Veterans Court No No Nota Veteran/Probation not available Page 6 of 8The Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County Adult Probation Department Chief Probation Officer Barbara A. Broderick State of Arizona v. Raul Lujan, CR2017001564-001 Kinancial Assessments ‘The defendant reports no ineome, assets, or liabilities as he has been incarcerated in the Department of Corrections for a separate offense since 2005 and is not likely to be released. The victim is not requesting restitution. Per statute, the defendant is responsible for a $500.00 sexual assault assessment, a $50.00 address confidentiality assessment, and a $250.00 sex offender registration fee. In addition, if released, the defendant will have a $150.00 pet month GPS ‘monitoring fee, Reimbursement for attorney costs is not recommended as the Court has found the defendant to be indigent. Jentification Status Due to being incarcerated, the defendant did not have access to documents that could verify his identity, Discussion and Evaluation ‘The defendant is currently before the Court for bis third case involving a sex offense. During the present offense, the defendant contacted the victim as she was entering her apartment and threatened her with a gun, He forced her into her apartment where he had sexval intercourse with her and foreed her to give him oral sex, ultimately ejaculating in her mouth, The defendant's two sex offense convictions involve similar circumstances. He has a lengthy criminal history that includes twelve felony convietions, three misdemeanor convictions, and twenty-five referrals to the Juvenile Courts, He is currently serving a prison sentence in CR2005-108070-001 and CR2005 -033024-001 and is not likely to be released during his lifetime, A sentence to the Department of Corrections is mandatory for the present offense. ‘The Offender Screening Tool assessment indicates the defendant is a high risk to re-offend. Due to the violent nature of the offense, the defendant's lengthy criminal history, and his prior convietions, for similar offenses, a term greater then the presumptive appears warranted. In addition, it is ‘recommended the prison term in the present offense run consecutive to the prison terms he is already serving in CR2005-108070-001 and CR2005-033024-001. Recommendations CR2017001564-001, Count 1: Itis respectfully recommended that the defendant be committed to the Department of Corrections/Arizona State Prison for the term greater than presumptive, Presentence Incarceration (CR2017001564.001 Count 1: Page 7 of 8The Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County ‘Adult Probation Department Chief Probation Officer Barbara A, Broderick State of Arizona v. Raul Lujan, CR2017001564-001 Incarcerated To Reason Days 04/132017 6/27/2017 _Presentence 76 Total Days: 16 | Respectfully submitted by: Denise Perez, Adult Probation Officer Cell: (602) 859-7449 June 22, 2017 0: 3@apd.maricopa.sov Jill Gondek, Supervisor Phone: (602) 619-2964 Page 8 of 8OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT ~ REQUEST FOR ACCHSS TO COURT RECORDS IMPORTANTIH!! If REVIEWING PAPER CASE FILES, DO NOT REMOVE ANY DOCUMENTS oe THE. CASE FELE_ PEN SUPRENIF COURT RULE 523," COMMERCIAL, PURPOSE” MEANS THE USE OF 4 PUBLIC RECORD FOR THE HOR THE PURPOSE. OW PRODIICING 4 ROCOMENT CONTAINING ALL OR PART OF THE OWTAINING OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES FROM SUCH PUBLIC RECORDS FOR THE PO ‘ND ADDRESSES TO ANOTHER FOR tit PURPOSE OF SOLICITATION OR FOR ANY PURPOSE. TN WHICH THE PURCHASER CAN REASONABLY LSVICIPATE. THE RECEIPT OF MONETARY GAIN £ROM DIRECT OR INDIRECT LSE OF SUCH PUBLIC RECORD. COMMERCIAL PURPOSE DOES [NOW MESH THI USE OF A PURLIC RECORD AS FVIDBNCE OR AS RESEANCL FOR EVIDENCE IN AN ACTION JN A JUDICIAL, OR QUASISUDICIAL 800V OF THUS STATE OR A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF TIS STATE. PURPOSE OF SALE OR RESALE OR ‘OPV, PRINTOUT OR PHOTOGRAPH FOR SALE OR THE. "OSE OF SOLICITATION OF THE SALE OF SUCH NAMS, TA RREAGETICENSE INFORMATION [ROUNCY FIRM REPRESENTED (ATTORNFYIGOVT AGENCYICOMM) PLUASE WRITE BOTH NAMES OF COUPLE PRIOR TO MARRIAGE oo ee _ a APPLICANT ( “APPLICANT 2 conwnee OTLOOIG - 0659 UF aT fa COUNTY AND STATF MARRIED a ae BOOK AND PAGE OR LICENSE NUMBER. FOr | TR] GERURCATE | # OF COPIES OF LEASE INCLUDE PRAME # FOR EACH PAGE REQUESTED: SEAL. 7 ee ‘ SEAL i i eae AMOUNT DUE cov ST isons : RECHT, nM OR FIER IMAGEOR PRINT. REQUEST RECEIVED BYWILLIAM G MONTGOMERY MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY Ryan Powell Deputy County Attorney Bar ID #: 025695, 01 W. Jefferson, th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85003 ‘Telephone: (602) 506-8556 meaosvd@mcao.maricopa.gov MCAO Firm #: 00032000 Attomey for Plaintitt DR 11115956 - Tempe Police Department 4871562 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF.ARIZONA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA. ‘THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Plaintiff, ws. ANTONIO RAY SULLIVAN, aka ANTONIO SULLIVAN aka AKA TONY RAY SULLIVAN GR 2016 -000947~001 aka TONY RAY SULLIVAN Defendant. INDICTMENT 656 GJ 530 ‘COUNT 1: BURGLARY IN THE SECOND DEGREE, A CLASS 3 FELONY (ANTONIO RAY SULLIVAN) COUNT 2: ATTEMPT TO COMMIT SEXUAL ASSAULT, A GLASS 3 FELONY (ANTONIO RAY SULLIVAN) ‘COUNT 3: SEXUAL ABUSE, A CLASS 5 FELONY (ANTONIO RAY SULLIVAN) ‘COUNT 4: THEFT, A CLASS 1 MISDEMEANOR (ANTONIO RAY SULLIVAN) |‘The Grand Jurors of Maricopa County, Arizona, accuse ANTONIO RAY SULLIVAN, on January 13, 2016, charging that in Maricopa County, Arizona: COUNT 1: : ANTONIO RAY SULLIVAN, on or about July 9, 2014, with the intent to commit a theft or fa felony therein, did enter or remain unlawfully in or on the residential structure of Victim A, located in Tempe Arizona, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1507, 13-1501, 13-701, 13-702, and 13- 801. COUNT 2: ANTONIO RAY SULLIVAN, on or about July 9, 2041, intentionally or knowingly, did attempt to engage in sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with Victim A, without the consent | of Victim A, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1004,13-1406, 13-1401, 13-3621, 13-610, 13-701, 13- 702, and 13-804 COUNT 3: ANTONIO RAY SULLIVAN, on or about July 9, 2011, intentionally or knowingly did engage in sexual contact with Victim A, a person of fifteen or more years of age, without the consent of Victim A, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1404, 13-1401, 13-3821, 13-610, 13-701, 13- | 702, and 13-804 COUNT 4: ANTONIO RAY SULLIVAN, on or about July 9, 2011, without lawful authority, knowingly did control Vietim A's debit card, driver's license, and cash; of a value less than $1,000, with the intent to deprive Victim A of such property, in vioiation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1801, 13-1802, 13-707, and 13-802.IMPORTANT NOTICE RDOC PURSUANT TO RULE 2.3(b) OF THE ARIZONA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, THE DEFENDANT IS CHARGED WITH ANY OFFENSE LISTED IN A.R.S TITLE 13, CHAPTERS 14, 32, 35 OR 35.1 OR IN WHICH THE VICTIM WAS A JUVENILE AT THE TIME OF THE OFFENSE. THIS CASE IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SUPREME COURT RULE 123(G)(1)(C)(ii)(H)HONORABLE MARK H, ANTONIO RAY SULLIVAN (001) DOB: 05/06/1971 = DISPOSITION CLERK-CSC =osAI2016 prison, release ae incarceration, or residential treatment and conti Keep APD advised of progress toward ease plan goals and com, the APD to enforce compliance with the conditions of probation. Provide DNA test ‘required by law. ee Conciion 8 Request and tian ‘written permission a prior to leaving the state. "Condition 9: May apply for Interstate Compact supervision in the sae celine: ant ‘will not proceed to that state until reporting inst are received and the APD) issues 4 ‘written travel permit, Condition 15: Restitution, Fines and Fee PROBATION SERVICE FEE: Count 2 - $65.00 per month, SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION FBE: Count 2 $250.00. PROBATION ASSESSMENT. Count? = $20.00. : Count 2. Time payment fee pursuant to ARS. § 12-116 in the wnounl 0f 820.00. INTERSTATE COMPACT APPLICATION FEE: Count 2 - $300,00, i ae in full at ‘the time of submission ofthe application. Pome bo ue od ee le and is due on the same day ‘of each month thereafter until paid in full. County of Defendant's aes Oreo ‘the Court, upot id notification, shall€R2016-000947-001 DT ee - = 08/17/2016 Condition 16; ‘Not consume or possess an: substances containing alcohol. 2 : a ____Candition 19. Not have ony contact ‘with the victim() in any form, unless approved in waiting by the APD. Condition 21- Thies epee ocho cao — octet wacker the Uniform oe ‘of Supervised ee as folloy Sex ender ‘Computer Usage: Ownership and ‘Monitoring — Other - Computer Usage Pursuit iD ARS. § 1538210). ‘otifetion js made io the Sheri of Maricopa County, “Arizona Condition 22: Other: Defendant shall pay restitution raleoae Joss 0 all vietims. ‘Defendant shall register asa sex offender, Do not rum to the scene of the crime, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED thet Defendant shall submit to fingerprint identi fiestion processing by the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office if diteoted to do so by the Adult Probation Department. The Adult Probation Department shall direct any Defendant placed on probation ‘who has not already bad a State [dentification Number (S{D) established to submnit to Fingerprint processing. Defandant is advised pursuant to A.R.S, § 13-805 tht failure to mainlain contact with the _ Probation Department may resul inthe issuance of: © 1, A criminal restitution order in favor of the state for the unpaid balance, ifany, ‘of any fines, oe Incarceration costs, fees, surcharges or assessments imposed. 2, A criminal restiution order'n favor of each the: us ‘balance of: any vestitutic ait 18 ORDERED er seg oe Mi ition = allegation ef por felony convietons for©R2016-000947-001 DT Counl(s) 1: IIS ORDERED authorizin — County Sheriff to deliver Defendant io the Arizona Department of Corte IT IS ORDERED the Clerk ofthe Superior Court remit to the Arizoné Department of ‘Corrections a copy of this Order or the Order of Confinement together with all presentence reports, probation violation reports, and medical and psychological reports that are not sealed in this cause relating tothe Defendant. : 2 Count(s) 2: a 5 FURTHER ORDERED Defendant be lead fom. volint ous = = 10 DNA testing flew “1E1S FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant must su RS 613610 enforcement identification purposes jn accordance with oltem Mavter concludes. IT 1S ORDERED that defense counsel shal preserve defendants Mle br post-conviction _ relief purposes. Ifdefense counsel receives aotice that defendant is seeking post-conviction relief, counsel shall prepare the fle for delivery 16 POR counsel and shall make timely. atrangements for the exchange thereof when notified. Further, upon exchange of the file, ‘defense counse! shall file with the court a Notice of Compbiance that shall, at a minimum, include date of complianes, recipient ofthe fle, and an itemization of contents ofthe Sle, A copy ofthe Notice shall be provided to PCR counsel, he Sta and dhe PCR Unit“Michael K Teanes, Clerk of Court *+#* Electronically Filed #** RuMontoya, Depa MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT aiifatte 1022-00 AM ‘SENTENCING/DISPOSITION SHEET Filing ID 7652087 DEFENDANT: ANTONIO RAY SULLIVAN —AGEY/DOB: 45/05-06-71 (TENCING DATE: AUGUST 17, 2016 CITIZENSHIP: UNITED STATES JUDGE/DIVISION: — MARK BRAIN/CRJOS APO: MARTHA ROMERO CR2016-000947-001-DT COUNT I: BURGLARY IN THE SECOND DEGREE, A CLASS 3 FELONY OFFENSE DATE: JULY 9, 0211 CHARGE: COUNT 2: ATTEMPTED SEXUAL ASSAULT, A CLASS 3 FELONY | OFFENSE DATE: JULY 9, 2011 PRIOR CONVICTIONS/CONFINEMENTS/PROB. | FELONY: __ PRISON: PROBATION: MISDEMEANOR: JAIL: Bia JUVENILE: DOIC: PROBATION: ECE PLEA AGREFMENT: i REST/REIMBURSE: EINE: COMMUNITY SERVICE: RECOMMENDATIONS: DEFENSE, PROSECUTION APO VICTIM SENTENCE/DISPOSITION: AGGRAVATION 13-702(C) MITIGATION 13-702 (D) DAYS IN JAIL DISMISS:‘The Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County — Adult Prob Chief Probation Officer Barbara A, Broderick mm Department PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION State of Arizona v, Antonio Ray Sullivan, CR2016-000947-001-DT Superior Court Criminal Division CRJOS Sentencing Date: August 17, 2016 Sentencing Judge: Mark Brain Prosecute Ryan Powell, DCA PSI Officer: ‘Martha Romero Defense Counsel: Laurel Workman, DPD. Present Offense: ‘The following information is summarized from Tempe Police Departmental Report #L1115956: On July 9, 2011, between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 3:30 a.m., an unknown suspect, later identified as the defendant, entered the residence of Dustyn Mitchell while she was asleep on the couch. She awoke to the defendant climbing on top of her and noticed that her shorts and underwear had been pulled down. She was able to push him off of her and fled the area to the bathroom where she locked herself inside. While she was locked inside the bathroom, she heard the defendant jiggling the doorknob in an attempt to enter. After approximately thirty minutes and onee she thought the intruder had left, the vietim ran out of the bathroom, straight across the hall, locking her door behind her. She attempted to climb out the window but it was stuck shut. ‘The vietim then put on some shoes and grabbed a bottle of nail polish remover thinking she would throw it at the defendant if he was still inside, She ran to the living room to try and find her cell phone but if was missing, so she grabbed her wallet and ran to a nearby convenience store. Once at the store, the victim realized the defendant had stolen her driver's license, her debit card, some cash and her cell phone. The victim told police she was unsure if the defendant had any other physical contact with her while she was asleep. Statutory Offense Requirements: ‘The defendant was determined to be a level | sex offender for community notification via the Arizona Sex Offender Assessment completed by APD staff (the level is subject to change when the same assessment is completed by local law enforcement post sentencing). Based on this assessment score GPS monitoring is not mandatory pursuant to A.R.S. 13-902 (G). Victim Statements: Attempts were made to contact Dustyn Mitchell. However, these attempts were unsuccessful. Should contact be made with the vietim prior to sentencing, a supplemental report will be submitted to the Court. Defendant's Statement: ‘The defendant declined to make a statement regarding the present offenses or sentencing. PAGE 1The Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County — Adult Probation Department Chief Probation Officer Barbara A, Broderick State of Arizona v. Antonio Ray Sullivan, CR2016-000947-001-DT Risk/Needs Assessment The defendant chose not to participate in the assessment process. The following information was obtained from a prior assessment conducted on December 20, 2011. The defendant was raised by his mother and grandmother in a supportive household. His parents divorced when he was two years old, He dropped out of high school after completing the tenth grade because he had to move between family members, as he and his stepfather were not getting along. While in school, he was suspended three times for truancy issues. He experimented with marijuana at age fourteen and cocaine at eighteen and denied any other drug use since that time. His criminal history indicates he is currently serving a prison sentence related to a prior conviction consisting of four felony counts committed around the same time as the present offense, Additional Assessments and Screenings: The defendant was not screened for participation in any programs as he declined to participate in the presentence assessment process. Financial Assessment: The defendant is unemployed as he has been imprisoned since 2012 for his prior convictions. It appears his earning capability is reduced to entry level positions that typically pay minimum wage, As this officer has been unable to contact the victim in this ease, restitution remains undetermined. A blank ledger will be provided to the Court in the event that restitution is determined at the time of sentencing. Although the defendant is facing a stipulated prison term in this case, he should be held accountable for any Court ordered fees imposed. A monthly probation service fee of $65.00 will be recommended along with a $250.00 sex offender registration fee, a $20.00 probation surcharge, and a $20.00 time payment fee. Attorney reimbursement fees will not be recommended, as the defendant has been found by the Court to be indigent. ion and Evaluation: ‘The defendant is before the Court pending sentencing of his fourth felony conviction following his arrest for burglary and sexual assault. ‘The present offenses involve the defendant breaking into the victim’s residence in the middle of the night and sexually assaulting her while she slept. He declined to make @ statement regarding the present offenses or sentencing; therefore, his thougbts are unknown. The defendan’s particular needs are also unidentified at this time. ‘The plea agreement stipulates he serve a term of imprisonment in count 1, to be followed by placement on probation in count 2, Based on the nature of the present offenses which involved a sexual assault on a vietim, the presumptive term in the Department of Corrections in count | to be followed by placement on probation in count 2 appears appropriate, PAGE 2‘The Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County — Adult Probi Chief Probation Officer Barbara A. Broderick n Department State of Arizona v. Antonio Ray Sullivan, CR2016-000947-001 Given the nature of the offense in count 2, this officer respectfully recommends the Court impose a sentence of lifetime probation including sex offender terms and to register as a sex offender. Ident \n Status: ica Due to his incarceration, the defendant does not have access to documents to verify his identity. Recommendati Count 1 It is respectfully recommended that the defendant be committed to the Department of Corrections for the presumptive term. It is respectfully recommended that the defendant be granted lifetime supervised probation to begin upon absolute discharge from prison in count 1. Abide by the following additional conditions Condition #15 I will be financially responsible by paying all restitution, fines, and fees in my case as imposed by the Court. I understand, if T do not pay restitution in full, the Court may extend my probation, 15b,Probation Service Fee of $65.00 per month. 150.Sex Offender Registration Fee of $250.00. 15r, Probation Assessment of $20.00. 15s. Time Payment Fee of $20.00. Condition #16 I will not consume or possess any substances containing alcohol, Condition #19 I will not have any contact with the victim(s) in any form, unless approved in writing by the APD. Condition #21 I will abide by the attached special conditions of probation: Sex Offender ‘Computer Usage abide by the following additional condition(s) Do not return to the scene of the crime. Condition #22 PAGE3‘The Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County — Adult Probation Department Chief Probation Officer Barbara A. Broderick State of Arizona v. Antonio Ray Sullivan, CR2016-000947-001-DT. Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by: Judge: Martha Romero, Adult Probation Officer Date: Cell: 602 619-5464 | August 15, 2016 ‘Mailto:romerom005@apd maricopa.gov Don Warrington, Supervisor Phone: 602 526-4201 PAGE 1OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THK SUPERIOR COURT- REQUEST FOR ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS IMPORTANT!!! If REVIEWING PAPER CASE FILES, DO NOT REMOVE ANY DOCUMENTS FROM THE CASE FILE PLEASE COMPLETE THE ENTIRE FORM PER SUPREME COURT RULE 123 lor SUPREME: COURT RULE 323, “COMNIFICIAT PURPOSE” MEANS'TIE, USB O8 4 PUBLIC RECORD FOR THE PURPOSE OF SALU OR RESALE OR FOR FIR PURPOSE OF PRODUCING & DOCUMENT CONTAINING ALOR PARI OF THE COPY, PRINTOUT 08 PHOTOGRAPU FOR SALE O8 THE DOBTATNING OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES FROM SUCH PUBLIC RECORDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF SOLICITATION OR Tile SALE OF SUCH NAMES AND ADDIESSES TO ANOTHER FOR THE PURPOSE OF SOLICEFSTION OF FOR ANY PUREOSE. IN WIHICH THE PURCHASER CAN REASONABLY ANTICIPATE THK RECEIPT OF MONETARY GAIN PROM DIRECT OR INDIRECT USE OF SUCH PUBLIC RECORD. COMMENCLAL PURPOSE DOES OT MEAN STE USE OF A PUBLIC RECOW? AS EVIDENCK OR AS RESFANCH FOR EVIDENCE IN AN ACTION FX A JUDICTAL OR QUAST-SUDICIA, PODY OF THIS STAY. OF & POLEFICAE SUBDIVISION OF THKS STATE. aR TIRE FORMATION UNCERTIFIED COPY 300 50 PER LICENSE! CERTIMED COPY $28.50 PER LICENSE ABSIRACT 5200 PER ABSTRACT PLEASE WRITE BOTH NAMES OF COUPLE PRIOR TO MARRIAGE ‘FOUR NAME GENERAL PURTICIGOVE AGERCVICONDERCIAD) — FERNEY sv REPOSTED ATTORNEY GOVE AGENCYICONA) baTE_ PRONE NUMER coy esr CL QOIF-OOQLOS _ PARTIES NAME. RICANS INT AND STATE MARRIED PaRirhis NAME BOOK AND PAGHOR LICLNSE NOMGER PARTIES NA) YP OF REQUES! ROLLOF EAT DATE OF MARRIAGE (View or casieescoro: ( )BOckHT peMTOUT REELE Tre rf ( )COPrFS (COMPLETE BELOW) Copy res: FRAME S00 SOR PAO (|View FILM ONLY { )GOPY OF MARRIGE LICEN: (COM OF APIDAVIT CERTIFIED ( ) YER“) NO exer ED{ )¥ES (NO. SSOcKT MUNTOUT Sinn PER PAGH COPIED [NUMBER OF COMES Mt areavir_ CHICA HON (SEAL) $2800 188 DOCLENT FEXENMPLICATION © SIA) $5500 PER DOCUMENT _AUTHENTIEATION (SEAL) 52400 CLR DOCUMENT ee PLEASE LIST NAMES OF ALL REQUESTED DOCUMENTS BELOW | #0F FILE] CERTIFICATE: [¥ OF COPIFS OF PLEASE PAPER CLAP ALL REOUEST®D DOCUMENTS racis | pain | askai. | EACH DOCUMENT EFTER VIEWING FILM, CLEASE INCLUDE FRAME FOR KACH PAGE REQUESTED EAL PROCESSED BY AMOUNT PAID i bate AMOUNT DUR __ “OPES _ 3 #00 CRRTIFICATIONS sor PIMOR FILE IMAGHEON PRMITQ RLQUEST RECEIVED BY — AMOUNT WAIVED, RECEIPTSWILLIAM G MONTGOMERY MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY Michael Minicozz1 Deputy County Attorney Bar ID # 024743, 301 W Jefferson, Sth Floor Phoenix, AZ 85003 Telephone (602) 506-8556 ‘meaosvd@meao mancopa gov MCAO Firm # 00032000 Attorney for Plant rte ANE uses BF yey FILED ATAUB-1 PH HE 29 | DR 02096261 - Tempe Poice Department “605133 | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA ‘THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Paint, vs NUR ALI MUKTAR, ‘aka Moe Muktar ka Benjamin Fatola ‘aka Randy Sachnez ‘ka Nur Muktar ‘aka Mur Ali Muktar Defendant F | cR 207 002603~004 INDICTMENT Gu 172 fT 4: SEXUAL ASSAULT, A CLASS 2 Kear. (NUR AL! MUKTAR) ‘COUNT 2: KIDNAPPING, A CLASS 2 FELONY (NUR ALI MUKTAR), COUNT 3: ATTEMPT TO COMMIT SEXUAL ASSAULT, ACLASS 3 FELONY (NUR ALL MUKTAR) COUNT 4: SEXUAL ABUSE, A CLASS 5 FELONY (NUR AL! MUKTAR}) ‘The Grand Jurors of Maricopa County, Arizona, accuse NUR ALI MUKTAR, on August 1, 2017, charging that in Mancapa County, AnzonaCOUNT 4 NUR ALI MUKTAR, on or about June 14, 2002, intentionally or knowingly, did engage in sexval intercourse of oral sexual contact with VICTIM A, wathout the consent of VICTIM A, (To Wit orallvaginal contact), n volation of A RS §§ 13-1406, 13-1401, 13-3821, 21-261, 12-701, 19-702, 13-702 01, and 13-801 counr2 NUR ALI MUKTAR, on or about June 14, 2002, knowingly did restrain VICTIM A withthe intent to inflict death, physical iyury, or @ sexual offense on her or lo otherwise aid in the commission ofa felony, in volaton of ARS §§ 13-1304, 19-1301, 13-701, 13-702, 13-702 01, and 13-801 count 3 NUR ALI MUKTAR, on oF about June 14, 2002; intentionally or knowingly, did attempt to engage sn sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact vath VICTIM A, without the consent of VICTIM A, (To Wit Attempted penile/vaginel mntercourse), n violation of AR S §§ 13-1001,13-1406, 13-1401, 13-3821, 31-281, 13-701, 18-702, 13-702 01, and 13-801 COUNT 4 NUR ALI MUKTAR, on of about June 14, 2002, intentionally or knowingly did engage in sexual contact with VICTIM A, a person of fifteen or more years of age, wthout the consent of VICTIM A, (To Wit Defendant touched the vietim's breasts), in violation of AR S §§ 19-1404, 13-1401, 13-3821, 31- A True Bull CA Troe Bir) 281, 13-701, 13-702, 13-702 01, and 13-801 WILLIAM G MONTGOMERY MARICOPA COUNTY A’ Date August 1, 2017 REPERSON OF THE GRAND JURY nsIMPORTANT NOTICE RDOC PURSUANT TO RULE 2.3(b) OF THE ARIZONA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, THE DEFENDANT IS CHARGED WITH ANY OFFENSE LISTED IN A.R.S TITLE 13, CHAPTERS 14, 32, 35 OR 35.1 OR IN WHICH THE VICTIM WAS A JUVENILE AT THE TIME OF THE OFFENSE. THIS CASE IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SUPREME COURT RULE 123(G)(1)(C)(ii)(H)OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT - REQUEST FOR ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS IMPORTANT!!! IF REVIEWING PAPER CASE FILES, DO NOT REMOVE ANY DOCUMENTS FROM THE CASE FILE TEASE COMPLETE ir ENTIRS FORM Pan SUPREME COURT ROLES | ‘PER SUPREME COURT RULE 123, “COMMERCIAL PURPOSE” MEANS THE USE OF A PUBLIC RECORD FOR TIE PURPOSE OF SALE OR RESALE OR FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRODUCING A DOCUMENT CONTAINING ALL OR PART OF THE COPY; PRINTOUT OR PHOTOGRAPH FOR SALE OR THE OBTAINING OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES EROM SUCH PURLIC RECORDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF SOLICITATION OR THE SALE OF SUCH NAMES AND ADDRESSES TO ANOTHER POR THE PURPOSE OF SOLICITATION OR FOR ANY PURPOSE IN WILCH THE PURCHASER CAN REASONABLY. ANTICIPATE, THE RECEIPT OF MONETARY GAIN FROM DIRECT OR INDIRECT USE OF SUCH PUBLIC RECORD. COMMERCIAL PURPOSE DOES NOT MEAN THE US OF A PUBLIC RECORD AS EVIDENCE OR AS RESEARCH FOR EVIDENCE IN AN ACTION IN A JUDICIAL OR QUASL-JUDICIAL BODY OF THIS STATE OR A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE, ‘YOUR NAME (GENERAL PUBLICIGOVT AGENCYICONIMERCIAD—— NARRISGE LICENSE INFORMATION UUNCERTIRIED COPY $00 $0 PER LICENSE ee Sac Sic uniay FP ie TR sane eee te LEASE WHITE BOTH RATS OF COUPLE ESIOR i sabia canvanner CRQO1 3. - COST YP soning - eae | arrrxnens——— | PARTIES NAME Hee aoe | BOOK AND PAGE OR LICENSE NUMBER aa sweorneousr ROLLOF FILM : | oe ~ DATE OF MARRIAGE here cael thea Nem rs aoa (jeoemstComrieTé nrLow) RAMEE | Cleormseomnetaaion mint ——— Iw nsecas TERA Soma «cory Srp cen cree ectnmot EE Le ae Geiranowinewy,, BUCHER Dona oe | PLEASE LIST NAMES OF ALL REQUESTED DOCUMENTS BELOW 4 OF FILE CERTIFICATE | # OF COPIES OF AFTER VIEWING FILM, PLEASE INCLUDE FRAME # FOR EACH PAGE REQUESTED eae co ae 8 OF CERTIFICATIONS, #1 OF E-CERTIFICATIONS, FILM OR BLE IMAGE OR PRINT REQUEST RECEIVED BY. RECEPTS WwfMICHAEL K. JLANES, CLERK ‘BY ‘OEP ol Mersiteing WILLIAM G MONTGOMERY O MERKLING, FILED MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY 2M OCT 13 PH 3: 38 Michael Minicozzi Deputy County Attorney Bar 1D # 024743 301 W Jefferson, 5th Floor Phoenx, AZ 85003 Telephone (602) 506-8656 meaosvd@meao maricopa gov MCAO Firm # 00032000 Attorney for Piaintft DR 02096604 - Tempe Police Department DR 0296604 - Tempe Police Department DR 200296604 - Tempe Police Department oa7e1et IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA ‘THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Plait ROGER DALE SIMS, CR 2017-005747-001 aka Roger Sims re aka Roger D Sims Detendant | INDICTMENT 703 6438 ‘COUNT 4: SEXUAL ASSAULT, A CLASS 2 FELONY (ROGER DALE SIMS) The Grand Jurors of Mancopa Counly, Anzona, accuse ROGER DALE SIMS, on October 13, 2017, charging that in Mancopa County, Anzona COUNT 4 ROGER DALE SIMS, on or between June 14, 2002, and June 15, 2002, intentionally or knowingly, did engage in sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with VICTIM A, without the consent of VICTIM A, in violation of A RS §§ 13-1408, 13-1401, 13-3821, 31-281, 19-701, 19-702, 13-702 07, and 43-801CAT Iue Bary WILLIAM G MONTGOMER MARICOPA COUNTY ATI Lp iiicKGel Mime Deputy County Attorney Date October 13, 2017 fbb 4 ‘THE GRAND JURY nsIMPORTANT NOTICE RDOC PURSUANT TO RULE 2.3(b) OF THE ARIZONA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, THE DEFENDANT IS CHARGED WITH ANY OFFENSE LISTED IN A.R.S TITLE 13, CHAPTERS 14, 32, 35 OR 35.1 OR IN WHICH THE VICTIM WAS A JUVENILE AT THE TIME OF THE OFFENSE. THIS CASE IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SUPREME COURT RULE 123(G)(1)(C)(ii)(H)IN THE +e ee PINAL EER SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF ARIZONA, COUNTY OF MARICOPA Michael K Jeanes, Clerk of Court 4 Electronically Filed *** K.Curtner, Deputy 10/28/2017 8:17:00 AM Filing ID 8792612 | os » _ COURT [RELEASE QUESTIONNAIRE Notice: Unless a specific Form TV is sealed or ordered re ‘Court or Clerk atthe time they ave provided tothe Cour DEFENDANT'S NAME xogzr DA ALIAS(ES) Rock SMe + Ross A, GENERAL INFORMATION Charges Pursuant to AR.S. 641-1750 ten-print fingerprints were taken ofthe arrested person? C1 Yes BQ No yes, PCN = Pursuant to A.R.S. §13-5109 one or mors of tho above charges requires the arresting agency to secure a DNA sample from the arrested person? Bd Yes] No Ifyes, does the defendant have a valid DNA sample on file with AZOPS? [Yes No If n9, Arresting Agency has taken required sample? [1 Yes BQ No Offense Location Offense Date: 2002-06-15, Arrest Location: DEER VALLEY AIRPORT Date: 2027-39-27 Time: 08:00 B, PROBABLE CAUSE STATEMENT 1. Ploase summarize and include the facts which establish probable cause forthe arrest 20/27/27 Af ABOUT. HOURS RoORR S208 WAS nooxn Hemmaoerep Frow coLiin covey, MOREMY 1 ted by the Court all Form IVs are will be velesed ia their entirety upon request ie record ofthe DOB 1980-03-22 BOOKING NO. "408847 ‘CASE NO__ca017005747002, C, OTHER INFORMATION (Chock if applicable) 1. [1 Defendant is presently on probation, parole or any cher form of reteasa involving other charges or convictions: Explain 2_List any prior | Arrests? Convictions? TAs? | ‘3, Is there any indication the defendant i: 1 An Alcoholic? An Addict? 1 Mentally disturbed? D1 Physicaly 117 4. 0 Defendant is currenty employed wath whom How long: 5, Where does the defendant currently reside? 1110 crace: With whom How long: years months days 6, What facts indicate the defendant wil lee if released? Explain 7. What facts does the state have to oppose an unsecured release? Expiain D. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE OFFENSE(Check if applicable) 4. Firearm or other weapon was used Type! 1D Someone was injured by the defendant C1 Medical attontion was necessary Nature of injuries: 17 2. Someone was threatoned by the defendant Nature and extent of threats 3, Did the offense involve @ child victim? Z] Yes. No I"yes, was DCS nosed? Yes 52 No 4, Ifproperty offense, value of property taken or damaged: 1 Property was recovered 5. Name(s) of co-defendants):DEFENDANT'S NAMEROGER DALE E. CRIMES OF VIOLENCE 1. Relationship of defendant to victim: I Vietim(s) and defendant reside together 2._ How was the situstion brought tothe attention ofthe police? 1 Vieim” Gi Third Party C) Officer observed 3._O] There are previous incidents involving these same parties Explain 4._ Is defendant currently the subject of: Cl Ancrcerof protection C1 Any other court order 1 Injunction against harassment Explain F, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ISSUES (Check if applicable) Defendants actions 1) Threats of homicide/suicideibosty ham I Controvownershipifeaiousy issues) Crime occurs in pubic D Kidnapping Intensity of BV increasing Depression 1 Stalking behavior Cy Por history of DV 1 Frequeney' 1 Access to or use cf weapons 1 Violence against childrervanimals 1 Mutiole olations of court orders G. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ARREST (Check if applicable) 4, Did the defendant altemp! to: Gl Avodarest Resist arrest C] Self Surender Explain 2, 0) Defendant was armed when arrestod Type | ceri that the “ARRESTING OFFICERISERIAL NUMBER “ARE | DEPARTMENTAL REPORT NO DOB 1990-05-12 BOOKING NO.1#08947 CASENO.cezeu700s747008 3,1 Evicence of tne cfense was found inte defencent's possession eon Page 2 of 2 4, Was the defendant under the influence of lcotol or crugs at the time ofthe offenso7 Yes" No] Unk H. DRUG OFFENSES 1. Ifthe defendant Is considered to be a drug dealer, please sate the supporting Fats 2. What quantities and types ofilegal drugs are directly Involved inthe offense? C1 Drug field test completed 1D Defendant admission of drug type ‘Approximate monetary value: ¢ 3. Was any money seized? Yes No Amount: |. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1. Mikary Service: Has the defendant served in the military services ofthe Untea States?) Yes. CI.No &@ Unknown yes, currenty on active duty? Yes] No Branchos Served in a (R-tree AR vn) OB Coss Gia MG-Heene Cox Marchant eres NG Natens Guard WV>Navy 2, isthe defendant homeless? (Yes C1 No.l Unknown 3. Do you need the court to provide an interpreter to help ‘communicate and to understand what is being ssid? CO Yes No Iso, what language: Form IVA must alee be complied” ate fk ‘ “DEPARTMENTAL REPORTNO DEPARTMENTAL REPORT NO,Pretrial Services-Court Report [State of Arizona vs ROGER DALE SIMS Reviewed By: Julian Velasquez ‘Superior Court of Arizona, at 1:58 AM on 10/28/2017 Booking #: 1408947 1A Type: ‘Superior Court Grand Jury DOB: o3r12/1980 Warrant Interview Type: Financial interview Gender: Mate [State of Residence: Texas. Ethnicity: African American [Country OF Residence: United Siates Arrest Date: 10/27/2017 [charge(s): Statute: Discription: Glass Felony: 13-1406A, ‘SEXUAL ASSAULT FZ New Violent Criminal Activity Flag: No Failure to Appear Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 New Criminal Activity Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 Public Safety Assessment-Court Risk Factors Responses 1. Age at Arrest 23 or older 2. Current Violent Offense 1, Current Violent Offense and Under 21 Pending Charge at the Time of the Offense Prior Misdemeanor Conviction Prior Felony Conviction Prior Violent Conviction Prior Failure to Appear pre-trial in Past Two Years Prior Failure to Appear pre trial Older than Two Years, oP Naane Prior Sentence to Incarceration PSA - Court Assessment Recommendation [Final Recommendatior |Special Conditions: ‘Supervision Level: Prt Series Report Release Onde ID: 616225 Page 1062Pretrial Services-Court Report ‘Additional Recommendations: Contact You are not to initiate contact with the arresting olficers Prohibitions You are not to possess any drugs without a valid prescription You are not to drive # motor vehicle without a valid driver's license Requirements ‘You must continue to provide the court with proof of your local address ‘You must submit to DNA testing at the arresting police department You must submit to 10-Print fingerprint atthe arresting police department Preis Servis Repent Relese Order ID: 646226 Satay, Qetober28, 2017PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY FINANCIAL INFORMATION Defendant's Name: ROGER DALE SIMS Booking #: 408947 The Judicial Officer needs to know about your financial situation in determining whether to require you to post bond and, ifs0, the amount of bond, The Judicial Officer must also determine if you are entitled to have a lawyer appointed to represent you. ‘Number of Dependents Employment!Student(Caregiver Status Employed Full Time Employment Verified No Occupation ‘Owner he Coaching and ‘consulting Employment Status: Current Length of Employment : 7 Years Employer Name: Self employed - Billboardz wellness 360 Income (Monthly): Expense (Monthly): Pay Amount Rent / Home Payment: $1,100.00 Payroll Deductions for Savings, Stocks, ete, $0.00 Utltes $500.00 Spouse Income $2,000.00 Food: $400.00 Public Assistance/Food Stamps $0.00 Gas: $300.00 Disability Benefits $0.00 Cell Phone: $200.00 Veteran Benefits: $0.00 Cable: $0.00 Social Security Benefits $0.00 Charge Account Payments: $100.00 Accident Benefits, $0.00 Loan Payments: 50.00 Retirement Benefits: $0.00 Car Loan Payments: $3300.00 Allotment Checks(Tribal): $0.00 Car Insurance: $100.00 Interest, $0.00 Child Support: $0.00 Dividends: $0.00 Medical Care: 30.00 Child Support Received: $0.00 Court Fines and Fees: 30.00 Alimony Or Maintenance Received: $0.00 Alimony: $0.00 Unemployment Benefits: 30.00 Child Care: $0.00 Other Income: $0.00 Union Dues: $0.00 ‘Net Income: $3500.00 Other Expense: general business $150.00 expense Delinguent Expense: $0.00 $3150.00 Asset Asset (Continued) Cash Asset: $0.00 Stereos: $0.00 ‘Checking Amount $500.00 Televisions: $0.00 Savings Amount: $100.00 Musical Instruments: $0.00 Cash Owed To This Person: $0.00 Stock In Trade: 30.00 Cash Value OF Stock Or Bonds: Tools: $0.00 ‘Value: $0.00 Owed: $0.00 Net: $0.00 Jewelry: $30.00 Real Estate Location: House Jail Property 30.00 ‘Value: $140,000.00 Owed: $90,000.00 Net: $50,000.00 Other Asset $0.00 Automobile 1: 2014 ultima ‘Total Assests: 555,600.00 ‘Value: $15,000.00 Owed: $13,000.00 Net: $2,000.00 Automobile 2: 2003 dodge ram ‘Value: $3,000.00 Owed: $0.00 Net: $83,000.00 Trailer: ‘Value: $0.00 Owed: $0.00 Net $0.00 Boat ‘Value: $0.00 Owed: $0.00 Net: $0.00PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY FINANCIAL INFORMATION Defendant's Name: ROGER DALE SIMS Booking #: 7408947 ‘The Judicial Officer needs to know about your financial situation in determining whether to require you to post bond and, if so, ‘the amount of bond. The Judicial Officer must also determine if you are entitled to have a lawyer appointed to represent you. ‘Number of Dependents: 2 _EmploymentStudentCaresive Employed/Full Time Employment Verified No Occupation (Owner he Coaching and consulting Employment Status: Current Length of Employment : 7 Years Employer Name: Self employed - Billboardz wellness 360 ‘Schnundedsement iy Defendant ‘OATH UNDER PENALTY OF PLRIURY: Ihave rohflly give the information, whic appear In thi statement. have nt concealed, oi any way twisepresnted my Hancil resources, Lam aware that I canbe heldin cterpt of court or proscaced for perjury, Laude ay fave tatcnent 1 The Fable Defender ora court appolntedattrmey accepts my ease, ill ty thems any changes fe Gina resources, employment income or re-aerest also give permisson forthe Pretrial Services Ageny stl te contact anyone tated above ar an agency or business concern their Investigation nt he Statement T made-T hereby make these tatements under ath ew ROGER DALE SINS